Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: My First Fight: Diego Sanchez

Giants Sign Zito

Surely you're all aware of this by now, but Barry Zito has signed an enormous 7 year, $126 million contract with the Giants that parallels the extension Vernon Wells recently signed with the Jays. The trouble with this is that this is just deck chairs on the Titanic for the Giants. They won just 76 games last year with a geriatric roster, and they already lost Jason Schmidt, who's just as good as (if not better than) Zito, and a very productive outfielder in Moises Alou. 2006 draftee Tim Lincecum aside, there isn't too much coming through their farm system in the near future, either. Meanwhile, the Dodgers, Diamondbacks and, to a lesser extent, the Rockies, all have up-and-coming young teams, and the Padres are still in decent shape. Even with this signing, the Giants aren't too likely to contend next year, let alone three years from now, when they could be horrible. They really need to trade some of their older players and rebuild, but that doesn't sound like something GM Brian Sabean would be interested in doing.

In the only other move in the past few days that even made a dent in the headlines, the Marlins signed Aaron Boone to a cheap contract. Boone's only marginally useful now and, with Dan Uggla, Hanley Ramirez and Miguel Cabrera manning second, short and third, the Marlins don't need him to start. No one will really notice Boone this year, unless the Marlins and Red Sox make the World Series, in which case there'll be about eighty-two annoying articles written about him every day.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

boone
I think the plan is to have him play first against left-handers. As for the Giants, I wouldn't pick them to win the west, but it's possible given the weakness of that division. The Dodgers and Padres could struggle to score, and the D-Backs might be a year or two away from contention. I liked the long-term impact of the Jennings deal for the Rockies, but my guess is that it sets them back this season.

by bolton on Dec 30, 2006 6:09 PM EST reply actions  

new rule changes
 Interesting diary at athletics nation:

http://www.athleticsnation.com/story/2006/12/28/125051/75

Because the giants had one of the 15 worst records in baseball last year, they keep their #1 pick.   The A's only get a sandwich + the giants 2nd round pick, at least that seems to be the case.  This is an interesting rule change, and hopefully the Pirates have noticed, since it's likely that they will be among the fifteen worst teams for at least the next couple of hot stove sessions, if not perpetually.

by Brian in 317 on Dec 31, 2006 8:26 PM EST reply actions  

I could be wrong, but...
I don't think that's a new rule, so it probably won't change the Pirates' perspective one way or the other. Even if it were new, I don't think they'd take advantage of it, since they're not in the habit of signing Type A free agents who are offered arbitration by their teams.

It's interesting how many draft picks the A's are getting, by the way. That's another benefit of being good year after year - when your good players leave, you get rewarded with more chances to develop good players. I can't remember the last time the Pirates got a compensatory pick.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Jan 1, 2007 2:40 AM EST up reply actions  

No rule change
Draft picks in the upper half of the draft have always been protected, but how compensatory picks are awarded has changed.

The Pirates under Dave Littlefield have never been awarded a compensatory draft pick. They have never offered arbitration to a free agent under Littlefield.

by Greg Schuler on Jan 2, 2007 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Authors

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas