Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: New York Giants Super Bowl XLVI Ring Unveiled

Jack Wilson Struggling

Dejan Kovacevic's new notebook mentions Jack Wilson's recent troubles at the plate. I've been meaning to write about this for a while.

Wilson hit extremely well in April but contributed almost nothing since then. He had a .292 batting average in May, but had just two walks and five extra base hits (all doubles) the entire month, resulting in a .653 OPS. As Kovacevic says, Wilson was even worse in June, hitting .190 with only four extra base hits.

His current season line:

.258/.296/.373

To put that into perspective, Baseball Prospectus' VORP stat says that Wilson has been just one and a half runs better with the bat than the typical backup or Class AAA callup. Essentially, this means that the Pirates would lose almost nothing on offense if they just dumped Wilson and replaced him with, say, Yurendell DeCaster. Obviously, Wilson is far better with the glove than DeCaster or just about anyone else, but it's very hard to be even an average player overall if you're only replacement level with the bat. If anyone can do it, it's probably Wilson, but it doesn't seem likely, especially since fielding stats like zone rating and range factor suggest that he hasn't been quite as effective with the glove as he was last year. (He certainly still looks good out there, of course.) I can't say exactly how much Wilson's defense has been worth this year, but it'd have to be beyond extraordinary to make Wilson's year a good one overall.

We might be tempted to dismiss Wilson's poor offense since the end of April as the mother of all slumps, but, first, I can't think of any obvious reason (like an injury) to do that, and, second, his hitting for the year is pretty much as it always has been.

YEAR OPS
2006 669
2005 662
2004 794
2003 656
2002 638

Which one of these is not like the others?

I don't have anything especially insightful to say here, because the conclusion should be pretty clear: Wilson just isn't much of a hitter. That doesn't mean he isn't valuable, but it does mean that we should view his contract extension with fear. Wilson is 28, and his play is not likely to get better. He already isn't worth the $6 or $7 million a year he'll be getting over the course of his contract, and he's probably likely to get worse by the time it's over.

Comment 1 comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It won't be that bad
Unless the current ownership decides to take the payroll down to to Marlins range.

Given what players like Cabrera and Renteria were given (albeit as free agents) Jack Wilson's contract is probably a market contract. To me, it won't be the contract that prevents the Pirates from trading him (which I doubt they ever do - Jack is for better or worse the face of the franchise along with Bay and probably Duke after this season) but that the Pirates won't get anything for him because of his play. Fewer teams will get sucked into believing his defense is game changing.

by Greg Schuler on Jul 5, 2006 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Bloody_mary_small
Bucs / Gnats o'flow
Small
5 tool players
Espn_avatar_small
Pirates' Struggling Offense: OBP and Runs Scored
Small
Quick Fixes for the Offense
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 38: Pirates @ Nationals
Small
How much longer do we fans have to keep looking at this offense and it's lack of production!!
Small
Bucco Lineup - 5/16/2012
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 37: Pirates @ Nationals
Small
The Huntington Conundrum
Small
Oh, it's all so simple

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas