Why Is It That...
...whenever a mainstream sportswriter evaluates teams' offseason activity, he or she always thinks it's a good idea when a team signs a big free agent, or trades prospects for veterans, or does something stupid rather than just doing nothing?
Can anyone explain to me how the White Sox had a better offseason than the A's? If there's a coherent argument to be made there, I'd love to hear it. The A's won four more games than the Sox last year and play in a weaker division, and Chicago finished 24 games out of first last year. And yet the A's wound up with Chicago's entire farm system. How does that benefit the White Sox? Can someone explain this, please? And how did the Nationals, who won one of the most lopsided trades in recent memory, do worse than the White Sox? I'm mystified. To this guy's credit, he does skewer a few veteran acquisitions, but only a few, and a couple of them are just gratuitous slaps at guys who've been implicated in the steroid scandal.
By the way, this writer ranks the Pirates' offseason 28th in baseball. It's about 99.9% certain that if the Pirates had signed Luis Vizcaino and Johnny Estrada, they'd be in this guy's top 20.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm clairvoyant
cbhds
Cabrera drastically improves the IF defense and increases the team OBP and situational hitting while lessening Ks.
Swisher improves the whole lineup with his high OBP, intangibles, and the possibility of hitting 35+ HR in US Cellular, he's also under control for 5 more years for extremely cheap.
The Linebrink and Dotel signings improve which was one of the worst bullpens in baseball for the 2nd straight year outside of Jenks. While the signings were overpriced they were necessary to get the ball to Jenks. Rather than see countless 3 run leads blown in the 7th and 8th innings, thanks to the likes of Ryan Bukvich, Nick Masset, Brett Prinz, and Mike MacDougal.
The acquisition of Carlos Quentin drastically improves the OBP and gives them a potential high upside player in vital categories that is still very young.
The signing of Alexei Ramirez is another very low risk/high upside move, super utility player that could turn out to be something great. If Cabrera leaves after 08 Ramirez could slide in and become the starting shortstop.
by sockin on Feb 16, 2008 6:09 PM EST reply actions
Sox
I get this. My point, and I don't understand why mainstream writers so often seem indifferent to this point, is that short-term improvement alone is not the only consideration one should have in approaching the offseason. The White Sox improved themselves in the short term, but to what end? Quentin's a good young player and could distinguish himself, but until then, they didn't obviously win that trade. And trading two very good arms for Swisher might be a great move for the right team, but why is that a good move for the White Sox? They won 72 games last year and don't have the young talent necessary to put together a good core in the next few years. Similarly, the bullpen may be improved, but to what end?
by Charlie Wilmoth on Feb 16, 2008 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
Because...
by Slick @ Bucs Dugout on Feb 16, 2008 8:02 PM EST reply actions
The Pirates Have No Choice
Therefore, in a small market like Pittsburgh, the Pirates can only do one thing --- and that is REBUILD. Maybe the Pirates can be competitive by 2010 if they start drafting and developing better than in the past, and start making better deals with their tradeable veterans to obtain AA players that have a chance to become impact major leaguers.
And they need to strike when the iron is hot, for example, when other teams lose an everyday player to injury and need a replacement, like a Bay, Sanchez, or Wilson. I'm not ready to part with LaRoche and we won't get much for Nady.
We could part with at least one of the young starters. Some team is also going to need Marte well before July 31.
The Pirates were ranked 28th for their off-season activity for a reason. They did nothing of significance to improve the club. They claim that they could not get fair value because Pirate players had sub-par years.
Well, "doing nothing" with the roster and hoping that the team will be better this year is the decison that the Pirates made. And "doing nothing" is always one alternative when contemplating the future and considering alternatives..
But we better see a "culture" change of some magnitude soon or see better evaluating, scouting, development and trades, or I'm afraid that we are going to be looking at a minimum of 17 consecutive losing seasons.
As for the Pirate fan base, fans will put up with anything as long as they believe that there is a plan and that management knows what it is doing.
Now we are going to find out if the C & H boys can "walk the talk".
Why is it that....
......whenever a mainstream sportswriter evaluates teams' offseason activity, he or she always thinks it's a good idea when a team signs a big free agent, or trades prospects for veterans, or does something stupid rather than just doing nothing?
It's due to the fact that mainstream writers are paid to write, not think.
I could not agree with you more
by Dino65 on Feb 17, 2008 3:19 PM EST reply actions

by 













