Bucs Dugout: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Worst GM Poll: Bill Bavasi vs. Brian Sabean

UPDATE: This poll is now closed.

Today's contest features the Mariners' Bill Bavasi (4) against Brian Sabean (1) of the Giants. 

This is the moment we've all been waiting for, folks -- Sabean had a bye in the first round and then got a free pass through the second round after Wayne Krivsky was fired. But now, the legend has finally entered the ring. 

If you want to appreciate Sabean's work, you should check out this hilarious article , which is supposed to be a defense of Sabean. The article has already been skewered pretty nicely by Fire Joe Morgan, but if you don't mind, I'd like to take that skewer and put it on the barbecue.

My kid and I write a blog together. In our latest offering, we argued who's a better general manager, Brian Sabean or Billy Beane, and I chose Sabean, although Beane is very good...

Sabean made the daring, unpopular trade of Matt Williams for Jeff Kent, which set up the Giants for years. Beane never makes trades like that. One reader pointed to Beane's Mark Mulder for Dan Haren, Daric Barton and Kiko Calero trade as proof Beane can deal like Sabean. Please. Haren already is gone. All Beane's good young guys already are gone -- Tim Hudson, Nick Swisher, Miguel Tejada. I could go on.

What difference does it make if Haren is already gone? If Beane held on to Haren rather than dealing him, wouldn't that make him popular and un-"daring"? Aren't "daring" trades pretty much Beane's entire M.O.? When's the last time Sabean made a "daring" trade? Forget it. Let's move on.

The A's aren't a baseball team. They're a baseball clearing house. In and out. In and out.

That sounds hot.

As far as Daric Barton goes, well, in the first place, who the heck is Daric Barton? He is someone who may be, could be, perhaps, will be good. And if he becomes a standout player, it's, "Hey, Daric, you're out of here" -- perhaps to Kansas City for four no-name players Beane will trade down the line if they achieve anything worthwhile.

Yes, just like Haren never achieved anything worthwhile for the A's. And... Kansas City? Seriously? The A's got Jermaine Dye and Johnny Damon from Kansas City! Anyway, sorry, this is supposed to be about Sabean.

That's how I feel. But, I can't ignore reality -- no one defends Sabean, his reputation is in the dumper. It's in the dumper even though he was under orders from up above, I believe, to patch together a team around the grumpy power-hitting left fielder because while the grumpy power-hitting left fielder was here, fans would not accept young players and rebuilding.

Wait, sorry, ladies and gentlemen, we've gotten it wrong. Stop the presses! We need a new headline! SMALL-TIME COLUMNIST "BELIEVES" SABEAN UNDER ORDERS TO ASSEMBLE RIDICULOUSLY CRAPPY TEAM. There, that's better.

By the way, what the hell is a "dumper"?

And that's what Sabean did. He patched. You can question his guts -- interesting because his persona is Mr. Tough Guy. He could have fought back or even quit -- people do quit. He didn't show mondo guts allowing the Barry Bonds cronies and that one drug dealer to lurk in the clubhouse. Those are strikes against him.

Keep in mind, again, that this is supposed to be a defense of Sabean.

Sabean has other strikes against him, lots of crummy free-agent signings -- Armando Benitez, Edgardo Alfonzo, Ray Durham, and yes, Barry Zito. He is notorious for one stinker of a lousy trade -- Joe Nathan, a terrific closer, and two other players for -- hold your nose -- A.J. Pierzynski.

And the other two players were Francisco Liriano and Boof Bonser. And the Zito contract was the biggest one ever given to a pitcher. Nice work, Sabean.

After Dusty Baker left, Sabean hired Felipe Alou, who was too old, a guy the players couldn't stand. And now he has Bruce Bochy, who's shown no aptitude to rebuild a team that desperately needs rebuilding.

Looks like everything's under control here. I'm going to go take a nap. Call me if you need me...

The Giants' farm system has been a joke, nothing like the A's -- this is a positive Billy point here. The only productive player the Giants' farm system produced in the current century was Pedro Feliz, and he wasn't all that productive.

To be fair, there's also Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain. But yeah, the guy's got a point. When's the last time Sabean drafted and developed a good hitter?

So, what can he do? Well, he needs to peel away the veterans like layers of an onion. Any team that depends heavily on Durham, Dave Roberts, Rich Aurilia and even Omar Vizquel is a team going nowhere. He needs to find out if his young guys can play. Amend that. He'd better pray his young guys can play -- Eugenio Velez, Dan Ortmeier, Brian Bocock, Fred Lewis and Rajai Davis. Aside from Velez, I don't feel confident about any of those guys. Do you?

I'll go a step further -- I don't even feel confident about Velez! Davis, by the way, has already been designated for assignment.

Now that he is free -- finally free -- to make a real team, Sabean has to show he has a vision for his club and knows how to bring that vision to life -- not this year, but certainly in 2009 and after.

Got that? The current composition of the team must not be Sabean's fault. I'm sure he was under orders to trade three good players for A.J. Pierzynski and to intentionally give away his first-round draft picks and to jerry-rig his farm system so as to not develop a good hitter in an entire decade. Not his fault! Now he's really in charge.

I have defended Sabean, but now it's up to him. He has to defend himself.

"I give up."

Make sure to check out my writeup about Bavasi before you vote.

Poll
Which GM is WORSE?
Bill Bavasi (Mariners)
449 votes
Brian Sabean (Giants)
811 votes

1260 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Bucs Dugout

Mariners Fire Bill Bavasi

Jun 2008 by Charlie - 21 comments

We Have A Champion!

May 2008 by Charlie - 15 comments

Worst GM Poll: The Championship!

May 2008 by Charlie - 10 comments

Comments

Display:

If you write an column in defense of Sabean

and don’t even mention Cain and Lincecum, you might be a worse columnist than Sabean is a GM.

...

Well, probably not.

by scoreboard on Apr 28, 2008 9:06 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that FJM article his hilarious

by scoreboard on Apr 28, 2008 9:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just visiting for your Worst GM poll

This is a tough matchup. Bavasi is pretty awful himself. He just resigned his 32 year old catcher (Johjima) to a three year deal while it appears that he is alredy in decline (.504 OPS, OPS+43). This despite the fact that their best prospect is a catcher (Clement). Furthermore, Bavasi regularly employs Brad Wilkerson (OPS+ 61) as RF, Richie Sexson (OPS+ 106 not great for a 1B), and Jose Vidro as a DH! (OPS+ 53). Yet they are trying to win now!

Ultimately though I had to vote for Sabean. I really have nothing to add to the wonderfully funny article you linked in the main post. Sabean must have some very incriminating stuff on Giants owner Peter McGowan to keep his job because he obviously has no idea how to build a baseball team.

As an aside, Littlefield would have been right up there with Sabean had he still been employed by your team. That Matt Morris trade in which he got hoodwinked by Sabean has got to be one of the worst trades of all time just for its sheer stupidity. Being a Cardinal fan I have very fond memories of Matty Mo but I knew he was done when he left us. Littlefield did not notice it a year and a half of crappy pitching later.

by indakind on Apr 28, 2008 12:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Another blog did a Worst GM poll a couple years ago, and Littlefield won in a landslide. At the time, though, Sabean didn’t seem nearly so bad.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bill Bavasi has never won a trade in his life

(or it seems like he never has)

He’s bad at identifying FA talent, but he has had good go with the draft.

As much pain as Bavasi has brought me, I have a hard time identifying who is worse.

by JI on Apr 28, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bavasi has made one geniunely good trade

and it turned out really badly. His trade of Freddy Garcia for Miguel Olivo, Jeremy Reed, and Mike Morse was a tramendous deal. Of course, Olivo played his worst baseball ever in Seattle, Reed’s power never arrived, and Morse have been caught using steroids three times, but at the time it was a good deal.

Aside from that, Bavasi’s trades are appalling.

by Llewdor on Apr 28, 2008 2:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll give him that.

We all really liked that deal at the time.

by JI on Apr 28, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As an Angels fan, I'm going to point out

that your Bavasi write-up only covers the second half of Bavasi’s career as a GM. He spent the first half doing the same thing to the Angels (GM 1994-1999) that he is doing to the M’s now. Horrible contracts during this time include Ken Hill, Mo Vaughn, and Gary DiSarcina. Bad trades include Chili Davis for Mike Bovee and Mark Gubicza.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Apr 28, 2008 3:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You’re right. I didn’t write about that because I wanted this to be mostly about these GMs in their current jobs, but I did write about Ed Wade’s tenure in Philadelphia, so that’s not really fair. If Bavasi wins this one, I’ll write about his work in Anaheim.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you do, be sure to point out that in 1994, Bavasi was literally handed

the best young hitting class the Angels have ever had (Tim Salmon, Jim Edmonds, Garret Anderson, JT Snow) plus a veteran slugger in Chili Davis, and quality pitching in Chuck Finley and Mark Langston plus a top relief prospect in Troy Percival. All he had to do was build a team around those guys. Admittedly, he was up against some pretty crazy teams (Johnson-Griffey-A-Rod-Buhner-Martinez Mariners, plus the Greer-Pudge-Gonzalez Rangers) but come on. It couldn’t have been that hard.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Apr 28, 2008 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will do. The history of the mid-90s Angels isn’t something I’ve ever written about before, so researching this would be pretty interesting.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As someone who watched it go down, I'll warn you that it's not pretty.

He had a few decent picks, (Erstad, Glaus, Washburn, Lackey) and got lucky a few times (Scot Shields in the 38th round, won the bidding on Francisco Rodriguez) but overall the man couldn’t GM his way out of a paper bag. Thank god for Bill Stoneman is all I can say.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Apr 28, 2008 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If it wasn't for Barry Bonds

Brian Sabean would’ve been fired a long time ago. He’s Littlefield-level useless.

by Gomez on Apr 28, 2008 3:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's amazing how horrible those teams would have been

if Snow, Burks, and Aurilia hadn’t had years completely disproportionate to their true abilities.

by JI on Apr 28, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How the hell...

...is Bavasi winning this one?

by Vlad on Apr 28, 2008 3:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Some tomfoolery by Bavasi-hating Mariner fans, I’m afraid. There was recently a thread posted about this at the Giants blog McCovey Chronicles, so the imbalance may or may not resolve itself soon.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're going to have to block Corco and start over if you want a genuine result

pre-Corco Bavasi was getting his ass handed to him 15-85

Sorry Corco.

by JI on Apr 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The trouble is, I don’t even think he’s registered here. I know exactly what you’re talking about, but I’m not sure what I can do about it.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he

Or she.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He

definately a he

by JI on Apr 28, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What is he doing? Spamming the poll?

If so: asshole.

If he’s merely suggesting that LL members add their views, then I think that’s fair. And even though I’m an M’s fan, I think Bavasi still wins this one honestly. Really, I think he’s just about the worst GM in the majors. Sabean is his only realy competition now that Littlefield and Baird are gone.

by esoteric on Apr 28, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How does Bavasi's Angel tenure do anything but make him look worse?

He got handed the core of a perenial contender and spent the next five seasons wasting it. He had a few decent draft picks, but Sabean’s done at least as well in that department as Bavasi has.

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Apr 28, 2008 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait.

I may have been misreading your post. Do you mean higher as in worse, or higher as in better?

~Till the Halo burns out...

by Zu Long on Apr 28, 2008 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You were misreading.

I meant higher as in worse. As in screwing up two teams, not just one. But that’s okay, I was unclear in the first place. And honestly, I’ve begun thinking about it and maybe Sabean really IS worse. Jeff Sullivan just wrote a great post over on LL talking about how Zito’s K may be the worst in baseball history. That’s gotta qualify a GM for top spot honors.

by esoteric on Apr 29, 2008 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Corco's a freaking genius at gaming online polls.

I’m amazed some political campaign hasn’t hired him yet.

Sabean needs to win this, though I wish these guys had met in the final. Once you take Bavasi’s work in Anaheim into account they’re awfully close.

by Llewdor on Apr 28, 2008 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That sucks.

Yeah, Bavasi is a terrible GM, but they still ought to try and be objective about things.

by Vlad on Apr 28, 2008 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Just like we always were about Littlefield.

by WTM on Apr 28, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, he really WAS the worst.

We stuffed it for him, but he earned it on merit.

by Vlad on Apr 28, 2008 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s be fair here – and I’m not calling you out, Vlad, because I’ve used the word “stuffed,” too. We didn’t stuff the box, we just sent our readers over to the site and encouraged them to vote. That’s perfectly legitimate, I think.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

....And Sabean’s back in the lead.

by Charlie on Apr 28, 2008 5:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That was a terrible article
That’s how I feel. But, I can’t ignore reality—no one defends Sabean, his reputation is in the dumper. It’s in the dumper even though he was under orders from up above, I believe, to patch together a team around the grumpy power-hitting left fielder because while the grumpy power-hitting left fielder was here, fans would not accept young players and rebuilding.

For the past 3 to 4 years, Giants fans have been calling for rebuilding…. It has been the the qoute following the “FIRE SABEAN” chant they have all come to know and love. The writer of the article has to be either of two men, Sabean himself or a Dodger writer/fan/GM.

by silentearth36 on Apr 28, 2008 6:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

To be fair, there’s also Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain. But yeah, the guy’s got a point. When’s the last time Sabean drafted and developed a good hitter?
-Charlie

As for claiming that Cain and Lincecum were developed in the Giants system, nope. Both of them barely spent any time in the minors to even truly develop.
Bill Mueller was the last developed hitter. But the last “good hitter” was Matt Williams

by silentearth36 on Apr 28, 2008 6:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

messed up on the block qoute, oops!

by silentearth36 on Apr 28, 2008 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Too Close to Call

Both of these guys are just awful and both deserve to walk away with the title. In times like these, I like to remind myself that just because one of these men won’t win, that doesn’t mean he’s still not an awful general manager. The other 28 teams, no matter their GM, should be glad they don’t have Brian Sabean or Bill Bavasi at the helm.

by Sky Kalkman on Apr 28, 2008 7:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

At the very least, I think Bavasi should be 2 rather than 4

He’s really, really really bad.

...and now I'm here

by Librocrat on Apr 28, 2008 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zito.

That Zito contract alone might be enough to let Sabean win this.

Then again, Sabean’s only competition for Zito’s “services” was Bavasi…

by Llewdor on Apr 29, 2008 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A mere 836 votes as I write this!

For the record, I voted for Sabean. The man seemingly goes out of his way to create teams where most players are a decade past their peak! He then hires Felipe Alou to manage these creations!

Steve Z

by steve_z on Apr 28, 2008 10:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

visiting to vote for Bavasi...

Sabean is an idiot, mind you, but Bavasi takes the cake. He destroyed the Angels in the 90’s, and he’s bungling a perfectly serviceable club in Seattle as we speak.

Then again, the Pirates have had some real dummies in the last decade or so, right.

Good thing my Athletics have a smart one!

"You have to have a catcher or you'll have all passed balls."- Casey Stengel

by Gaijin_Suketto on Apr 29, 2008 2:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just wanted to say...

...that’s a quality username, right there.

by Vlad on Apr 29, 2008 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sabean

I’m guessing the only reason he still has a job is because most of the really stupid ideas, like the Zito contract, are ownerships ideas. You can’t really fire a guy when, what he told you was a terrible idea turns out to be a terrible idea.

In the end though, the Giants were strong contenders for seven years. And if the GM is to be blamed for everything bad, no matter how unforseen, that happens on his watch then he must also be lauded for everything that happens on his watch whether or not he is responsible.

For that reason, despite all the f*()ups, I’ll have to vote for Bavasi—his team has yet to make the playoffs despite a ton of cash.

by Change Up on Apr 29, 2008 11:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m guessing the only reason he [Sabean] still has a job is because most of the really stupid ideas, like the Zito contract, are ownerships ideas. You can’t really fire a guy when, what he told you was a terrible idea turns out to be a terrible idea.

You seem to believe life if fair….

Steve Z

by steve_z on Apr 29, 2008 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would argue...

...that even with a few playoff appearances, Sabean’s performance is still worse. I mean, the man had 14 seasons of one of the very best hitters in baseball history… and he won the division exactly three times? Having a juiced-up Barry Bonds at the heart of your lineup is a huge, huge boost, and he still couldn’t close the deal.

by Vlad on Apr 29, 2008 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sabean has had a long tenure in his current position

to look horrible, but he does have that one world series appearance which was foiled by last minute heroics by the Halos.

What does Bavasi have to show for his “work”?

Someone say something witty.

by Omerta on Apr 29, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nothin', but...

...if he’d inherited a roster with Barry Bonds on it, it’s hard to believe that he wouldn’t have stumbled into a few good seasons.

Having a prime-era Bonds was like starting every game up 2-0, and while Sabean deserves some credit for signing him in the first place, that was back in the Stone Age and he’s done absolutely nothing to capitalize on it since.

by Vlad on Apr 29, 2008 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Devil's Advocate For Sabean

Here are the Giants win totals from 1997 through 2004: 90, 89, 86, 97, 90, 95, 100, 91—that’s pretty solid, even with Bonds and a high payroll. Of course, there’s 1995-96 (67, 68) and 2005-07 (75, 76, 71). It deserves a closer look, but maybe Sabean’s strategy of eeking out the last years of veteran’s careers stopped working recently as other teams are doing a better job of separating the wheat from the chaf. Or maybe I’ll stick to my original opinion that he got damn lucky by signing Bonds and having him turn into Babe Ruth for a decade.

by Sky Kalkman on Apr 29, 2008 6:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sabean and veterans

Given the subsequent revelations of the BALCO scandal and the Mitchell report, I’m not sure how much credit Sabean deserves for getting an unusual level of production out of veterans. Guys like Benito Santiago and Armando Rios and Matt Williams weren’t playing well because Sabean was a shrewd evaluator of talent – they were playing well because they were on the juice. He could’ve signed anybody, and they would’ve derived the same benefit.

by Vlad on Apr 29, 2008 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

owners and sabean

Sabean didn’t sign Bonds. Bonds signed with SF prior to the 1993 season, when the Magowan group bought the Giants from Bob Lurie, “saving” the team for the city because Lurie had threatened to sell to Tampa Bay interests. Bob Quinn was the GM at the time. Remember, they played at Candlestick Park, and Lurie had tried several times to get a new park built somewhere, was always shot down, and got huffy. The new owners signed Bonds - and Dusty Baker as manager - and immediately commenced compaigning for a new park. The team won 103 games on the back of Bonds’ career year (.336/.458/.677). The team also had Matt Williams and Will Clark. Ultimately, of course, the owners got their little jewel—you have to know SF politics to understand what a miracle that was, and while plenty of arm twisting and bundles of money moved around, Bonds was what put it over. But 1994 was the strike year, and the next two years were miserable too, with only Bonds and Williams producing. So Quinn was fired and Sabean came in. He traded Williams, essentially, for Jeff Kent and cash to pick up JT Snow, a good glove sabermetric horror of a 1B. The Giants won the division, tied for the wild card, then shut down Candlestick at second in the division. The Giants made playoffs in 2000, Bonds hit 73 HRs in 2001, they went to the Series in 2002 and won 100 in 2003. Why? To oversimplify, effective bats around Bonds (among them Kent, Burks, Aurilia, Santiago, Galarraga, Grissom, Cruz), OK pitching, and a closer (Nen 2000-2002, Worrel 2003). Then Sabean’s luck on veteran supporting cast and closers ran out, Bonds was hobbled in multiple ways, and all the chickens of his ridiculous surrounding moves came home to roost. Wordy post, I know. Short version: Sabean inherited the best baseball player of the era in Bonds, gambled yearly to stack up veteran bats around him, has lost those gambles since 2003, has lost every bullpen gamble since then too, and his farm system stands naked from neglect giving him nowhere to go. And then he signs Zito. Sabean was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and now he is a deadbeat dad and bum.

by hilarie on Apr 30, 2008 12:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

on the juice

Vlad is not wrong about Sabean’s utterly random judgment, but he is wrong about Sabean being able to “sign anybody” because “the juice” made whoever he signed good. There’s no evidence that any form of any juice has ever made any marginal ball player into a good ball player. And there’s no reason to think Sabean’s reputation as GM benefited more from “the juice” than any other GM’s did. Beane. Cashman. John Hart and Jon Daniels. Bavasi. Hendry. And so on. Come on. Although this does remind me that Sabean signed and kept on the 25 man roster Marvin Benard, an amazingly lousy steroid using player whose career was kept alive not by “the juice” but by Sabean’s decisions.

by hilarie on Apr 30, 2008 1:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

There are a few

major-leaguers who would disagree with this statement:

There’s no evidence that any form of any juice has ever made any marginal ball player into a good ball player.

by DITO on Apr 30, 2008 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

right

vlad’s usually spot-on but i also thought that was a dubious statement. i don’t want to start a steroid argument in this thread, but if steroids without talent made you good at baseball jay gibbons would win the mvp.

by johnnycuff on Apr 30, 2008 10:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Steroids and SF

One of the big talking points in SF for years was the team’s ability to get good production out of old vets. In the early ‘00s, Baker and Sabean received a lot of credit for adding old guys, and then having those guys remain productive past the age where that would normally be the case.

I wasn’t trying to say that the steroids made SF’s players more productive (although that was probably the case, too – a roided-up Gibbons is still less bad than a deflated one). I was saying that the steroids enabled SF’s old players to remain productive for longer, thus camouflaging the main weakness in Sabean’s “sign all the old guys” strategy. One of the main benefits of steroids is a decrease in muscular recovery time, effectively giving a gimpy ol’ vet “fresh legs”.

Every GM has probably employed users at some point or other, but SF was BALCO central, with dealers wandering freely though the dugout and players swapping syringes. It is, of course, an open question, whether Sabean was conscious of the dealers and enablers in the clubhouse (and thus shrewdly exploiting the situation), or whether he was largely ignorant of the situation (and thus grossly overestimating the value of veterans). Neither prospect helps his reputation.

by Vlad on Apr 30, 2008 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

With this being just speculation and not being a meant for blood letting.

Just to be clear I voted Sabean. Though I wish Bavasi and Sabean had met later on. I don’t see who wins this can be bounced by any of the others remaining.

So how do you account for the A’s and the personal that have been accused or proven of this since the mid 80‘s? In those cases they were "home grown" talent not free agent of trade acquired. Did those player just do that stuff once they left Oakland?

The point being this stuff was rampant, and probably still is. To think only one or 2 franchise was driving it is only insuring the issue is swept under the rug.

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on May 1, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sabean is a special case

No other GM got called out so expressly in the Mitchell Report. According to that document, Stan Conte told Sabean right up front that Greg Anderson was selling steroids to Giants players in 2002, and Sabean did absolutely nothing with the information. There were other GMs mentioned in the report, but they were discussed as trying not to acquire steroid users or trying to get rid of the steroid users they had discovered on their roster. Things like that aren’t exactly noble, but they’re much better than sitting on your hands and doing nothing once you’ve been told there’s a problem.

by Vlad on May 1, 2008 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The relevant bit...

...starts on page 122, if you want to check my work.

by Vlad on May 1, 2008 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am not defending Sabean or any upper management type in this era. I also see the Mitchell report as some nice facts but contains a lot of white wash and C.Y.A. for the commissioners office. That is my opinion.

As for using P.E.D. abuse as a criteria for judging GM’s in the last couple decades is why I was asking you see the A’s? A franchise that does get as much press on this topic ( thus not as much emotional baggage) but has had some serious ties to some very key players that came up through their system.

" Their still Shitty" - Major Leagues the movie.
I am a Giants fan. Thus I enjoy my pain. Currently enjoying it more then usual.

by daveinexile on May 1, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My dad

would like to thank Brian Sabean for taking Bruce Bochy off of the Padres’ hands.

Not that Bud Black is any better, but still…I can’t believe Brian Sabean wanted Bruce Bochy.

"I got my pregnant wife (the Yankee fan) with me. Hoping my kid learns to kick her everytime the Mets score." -Schifftis-

by future on May 1, 2008 6:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.
Start posting about the Pirates »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pittsburgh Proud
Small
Pirates rotation next year
Small
Rich Harden
20090612mf_fleury_cup_500hp_small
JJ Hardy traded to the Twins!
101_0170_small
Lot of Pent Up News from World Series No Fly Zone
3dacrssi_small
Let's say we didn't trade Freddy...
18470r_small
Ex-Pirate Enrique Wilson is apparently a real sleazeball
Remer_small
What you can expect from Aki
Pitt20_small
Akinori Iwamura is Officially A Pirate
20090612mf_fleury_cup_500hp_small
Iwamura on his way to the Pirates?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

VV, Hacker, Lerud Off 40 Man
Kevin Polcovich honored
My Thoughts on the Iwamura Trade
Rich Hill Is A Free Agent
Anyone for Brian Buscher
Atlanta's Offseason Needs May included Trading for Matt Capps
Shortstop – Jack Wilson, Pittsburgh and Seattle Wilson won’t win a Gold Gl...
Freddy Sanchez re-ups with Giants
Pirates name Carlos Garcia 1B coach/Infield Instructor
Pirates Claim Justin Thomas off Waivers from M's

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SPONSORS


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie