Bucs Dugout: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Stop Me If You've Heard This One Before

Jayson Stark:

The Pirates are this year's winners of the Team Most Grumbled About Before the Deadline award. You name a contender. They've all made a run at somebody in the Pirates' display case (Jason Bay, Xavier Nady, Damaso MarteJohn GrabowJack Wilson). And all those clubs have come away complaining that the price tags are way out of line. For instance:

Bay: The Pirates are asking for four players back -- two sure-thing young players, one good prospect and a fourth prospect with upside.

Nady: A similar package, except they want three players instead of four -- one sure thing, one good prospect and a third, more iffy, prospect.

Marte: The Pirates seem confident he'll be a Type A free agent, so they're telling teams they need to do better than the first-round pick and sandwich pick they'd get if he walks.

Grabow: Because Grabow can't be a free agent until after next season, the Pirates are looking for a similar package on him as they're asking on Marte.

Wilson: One rumor -- heavily denied -- is that they asked the Dodgers for Matt Kemp and/or Chad Billingsley for Wilson. But everyone agrees they want two or three players, depending on who they are, all of whom have to be big-league ready.

Just because people are telling Jayson Stark this stuff doesn't make it true, of course, but if it is, junk like this is straight out of the Dave Littlefield playbook, particularly the stuff about players being "big-league ready." I'm all for the Pirates trying to get Kemp for Wilson because the Dodgers are desperate and dumb, and I agree with their approach to trading Marte. (And the bit about Marte later in the article, in which Stark quotes a club official wondering if everyone will pass on Marte if he's a Type A free agent, is pretty silly, since teams have willingly given up picks for players like Justin Speier, Danys Baez, Roberto Hernandez, Frank Catalanotto, and Scott Linebrink in the past two years.) But in general, the Pirates asking for too much, if Stark's sources are telling the truth. And we all know what that means: we're going to be waiting with bated breath until an hour before the deadline, at which point the Pirates' prices will drop dramatically and we'll wind up with the 2008 equivalent of Matt Peterson.

I understand that it's certainly possible that Stark's sources aren't telling the truth. (And I'm pretty suspicious of reports that say things like "the Pirates are asking for four players back--two sure-thing young players...", since I highly doubt the Bucs are taking that sort of hard-line approach with every team they talk to. It's possible the Pirates asked for four players from one team and then that got translated by that team's GM into a sort of general principle.)

But Stark is far from the first person to report something like this, and it'd be easier to believe his sources were lying if Neal Huntington had made a single big trade since becoming GM, but he hasn't. Meanwhile, other teams, like the A's, continue to collect youngsters and build for the future. 

I'm sure everyone has noticed already, but I'm getting impatient. And I don't think I'm wrong to do so. Most of the Pirates' good draft picks remain unsigned, the minor league system is still a complete mess, and the Pirates' veterans aren't getting any younger. I understand that Rome wasn't built in a day (and that Huntington was probably wise to avoid trading Bay or Nady last offseason), but it clearly wasn't built by doing nothing, either. 

UPDATE: Long4willie wrote a FanPost about this while I was writing.

0 recs | Comment 25 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Game 48: Sox love the WPs

May 2009 from Over the Monster - 2 comments

Sox looking for a new DH?

May 2009 from Over the Monster - 36 comments

Comments

Display:

Screw Em All

Why do I never see a report saying that Billy Beanne is asking too much for his players?

Why does everyone assume that the Pirates are some sort of AAA team who’s job is to develop a few good players to send “up” to the real teams fighting for post-season play, but not to weaken those teams long-term competitiveness?

All these reporters are just taking their marching orders from “sources” at these good teams that have gotten used to getting something for nothing from the Pirates. I say good for PBC management, and that the days of Aramis Ramirez for Bobby “There’s Something Wrong WIth That Boy” Hill are over.

Unless management gets what it wants, the PBC is better off if Marte goes free agent. Wilson is signed for a reasonable price, and there is no replacement for him anywhere in the system—why give him away? Bay is worth more a year from now, when he’s one more year removed from his inury prone 2007. Nady may well be worth more in trade this winter, when teams have more flexibility.

Pearce and Cutch are definitely not pushing for starting jobs in Pittsburgh—why start a fire sale of corner outfielders? There’s no depth at relief pitching, so why give away Grabow?

The only guys I would absolutely trade from the 40 man roster are Nyjer Morgan and good ol’ Chris Duffy. They are blocked by Cutch, Michaels (re-sign him) and McLouth. They are taking AB’s away from others in the organization. I’d take anything that looks like an Evan Meek (hard throwing minor league relief pitcher) for either. Somebody has got to be stupid enough to fall for their speed and defensive prowess—where are Littlefield and Tracy now?

by WstCstBucco on Jul 24, 2008 5:54 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What Is The Market For Morgan and Duffy?

Would someone like to tell me what we can get for a novelty act and a reclamation project? Please humor me!

by thegunner on Jul 24, 2008 6:01 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll take anything

When I say PBC should absolutely trade them, I mean absolutely. A bag o’ balls each is fine with me. The only reason to keep them is if they are not takin any AB’s away from anyone else (and not risking anyone leaving via Rule 5 if they are still on roster at year’s end), and I’m pretty sure Morgan, at least, is keeping Pearce at 1B more than the big brass would want.

by WstCstBucco on Jul 24, 2008 6:29 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe something similar to the Rajai Davis net?

aka… a veteran with a huge salary… with the Pirates taking on the whole salary.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 24, 2008 7:36 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

An empty roster spot.

Plus the waiver price, maybe.

by Vlad on Jul 24, 2008 8:55 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No pressure

The only person on the list who’s “too expensive” that isn’t signed for 2009 is Marte. Yes, it would be nice for the Pirates to make a deal, but this isn’t a situation where there’s any need to deal anybody before the deadline.

If WstCst is correct (and there’s some reason to believe he is) it might be a good idea to demand more than these guys are worth, sit tight, and then if the trade deadline passes, no big deal. It would demonstrate to GMs who think “this is the Pirates, I can just wait ‘em out and steal their good players for Matt Peterson” that the new ownership/GM team will not, in fact, be playing that game.

But I agree about not having the top picks signed yet. I’m not terribly worried yet – its not like we, as Pirate fans, have a lot of experience in the pace of Scott Boras negotiations – but it would be nice if everybody was under contract. Still, I expect a deal to get signed about 7 minutes before the deadline – at that point the potential harm to both sides is great enough that they’ll come together very quickly.

by DJAnyReason on Jul 24, 2008 6:12 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The longer the Pirates wait to trade a player, the less valuable he’ll be. That’s the reason they feel entitled to ask so much for Nady and Bay in the first place—that they’re under contract for 2009. If they wait until after the season, the offers would not (I don’t think) be any better then, particularly if either of them slump at all in the next two months. Sure, the Pirates don’t need to deal any particular person, but if they’re taking the idea of rebuilding seriously, they’ll at least make a trade or two. Huntington has been at this almost a year and he hasn’t made a big trade yet.

by Charlie on Jul 24, 2008 6:17 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes and No

The less years a player has on contract the less he’s worth, true.

But with Bay, reports say GMs are nervous because of his poor stats from 2007. A year from now, he’ll still have time on his contract (won’t scare any of the big boys) and (hopefully) have another full year of good stats to water down 2007.

Nady’s contract is up after 2009, so he’ll be worth less in July 2009. But trading him over the winter only loses his new team Aug & Sept. 2008—not too material.

by WstCstBucco on Jul 24, 2008 6:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bay is actually under contract through 2009.

by Charlie on Jul 24, 2008 6:41 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also, I’d say that the difference between a team getting Bay for a year and a team getting him for a year plus two high-impact months is material.

by Charlie on Jul 24, 2008 6:44 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Is it real or is it Memorex

Maybe it is all just a show. Ask high and nothing happens but it looks like you are trying to do the right thing. Maybe ownership doesn’t want to get better, just make it look like they are trying to make deals and sign high draft picks, but no one will cooperate with the poor Pirates, who have no money to spend to get better. It just isn’t fair…...

by long4willie on Jul 24, 2008 6:22 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think

Huntington knows that whatever he does, it is going to be compared to Littlefield. He is gun shy. He does not want to make a mistake. He knows that if he makes a deal with any of these guys and it doesn’t pan out for us (or just sound good off the bat), Pirates’ fans will give an outcry on how nothing has changed and we are still the same losing team just managed by different bad decision makers

by northsidenotch on Jul 24, 2008 6:51 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Huntington to be a star

If he is compared to Littlefield, then he doesn’t have to make too many good trades, just one. Anyway, I think that the Pirates should do nothing as they are a competitive team against the bad teams and as this and other blogs show, they demand, just as they are, lots of attention. Ownership must be very happy.

by long4willie on Jul 24, 2008 6:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm impressed that you know Huntington so well

To get such an insight into his motives, do you speak to him every day, or just once a week?

by Vlad on Jul 24, 2008 8:56 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He's going to hear the same complaints

even if no deal is made.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 24, 2008 9:05 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Skepticism

I doubt anybody is exactly “lying” about the Pirates’ demands, but trade negotiations are always pretty fluid, I’m sure, and things can probably be characterized differently depending on which day’s discussion is being leaked to reporters like Stark. Remember Kevin Towers and the Giles negotiations? He “announced” in the media that he wasn’t going to make a trade until after the season, no doubt in an effort to panic the Pirates. Then he went ahead and did the deal shortly afterward.

Right now you’ve got a bunch of teams in the hunt with glaring holes. (When was the last time so many contending teams needed a hitter?) Their GMs no doubt will face heavy criticism if they don’t make a move. Articles like Stark’s may be aimed as much at fans in NY or LA or Tampa as anything else.

The other factor that keeps getting ignored is that these guys are all under control for another year, including Marte who has an option for 2009. Plus, the Pirates are not dumping salary. Stark writes as if the Pirates HAVE to get rid of these guys. Not true. They can just ride it out, hope to end the losing streak this year or next, and take draft picks.

I don’t see that big a deal about their requests, either. Beane got the Phillies’ #2 and #4 prospects for an improved version of Josh Fogg who has a career ERA around 4.60 away from the extreme pitcher’s park in Oakland. Bay is worth way more than Blanton and, given the high demand for and low supply of hitting, I think Nady is worth about as much as Blanton.

by WTM on Jul 24, 2008 7:10 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, but we need to find GMs

that agree.
And that are willing to bear the “humiliation” that will undoubtedly come from the media in paying such a huge price to the Pirates.

Of course, coming and complaining to the media (which all other GMs seem to be doing) is highly stupid. I mean… NH is asking for what’s fair. Beane (not trying to start this all again) does the same thing… and comes away with every prospect in the system plus the GM’s first-born every time.

You ask for what you think they’re worth, the other team offers what they think is fair… and either they agree in between or one side has to bend a bit more. Normally, the Pirates have been doing the bending. This year NH is trying to do that, and other teams are crying to the media. Kinda pathetic.

If you don’t like the prices, move on. We (the Pirates, other teams’ fans, whatever) really don’t care if you don’t make the post-season (or if you make it and are out quick) because you don’t have the bat/arm you needed because you didn’t want to give up “too much” (all relative, no?) for them. You have to give up something to get something.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 24, 2008 7:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thank you

for bringing up the fact these guys are all signed for another year. Wasn’t the plan to build a team that could make a move in 2009? “Make a move” is certainly an elastic concept with this team, but I don’t understand the pressure to deal all these guys now. The pressure to deal Nady now is based on the belief that he’s a mirage. It’s almost August. He’s not a mirage. He’s not Albert Pujols, but he’s not a mirage. And he’s not 37. The fact that it’s just about McCutchen Time means we ought to take a good deal if it’s on the table, but we could also make McC earn a spot next year.

The 4-guys-for-Bay could reflect more that the Pirates think he’s part of the future than what they actually think he’s going to fetch in trade. NH should listen to all offers, but if you’re going to take my best player, you ought to make it worthwhile to put that huge hole in the lineup.

All of which assumes that Stark is hearing the truth. Go check his archives from last year to see if there was any “fluidity” in the rumor mill. I’m betting there was.

by KPatrick on Jul 24, 2008 9:06 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So

you think he is a .330, 30 home run guy?

by DITO on Jul 25, 2008 1:46 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Like I've been stating in other posts

people call the Pirates and the only thing in the mind is “I’m gonna rip them off”. It comes from the DL days… maybe before.

And nobody wants to be the first one to pay too much to the Pirates, because otherwise that avenue (getting players on the cheap) is gone from yet another team.

And in NH wilts now, it’ll just be the same thing next year. He needs to hold strong… even if it means nothing happens. Let the other guys know you’re serious.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 24, 2008 7:18 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What he said

Time for management to put on the big-boy pants.

by WstCstBucco on Jul 24, 2008 9:10 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What are the Pirates going to do with major-league ready talent?

Have a team that’s half ready next year and another half that won’t be ready for 10?
I like the idea of sticking to your price… but is NH’s price too high?
Maybe. But how does he lower it without seemingly getting ripped off and continuing right in the DL line?

Oh, and have the Pirates scouted anyone that they wouldn’t consider “big-league ready”? I mean… Jack Wilson probably won’t net you 2 big-league ready prospects. That’s what the rest of the minors are for… guys making the way up towards the majors. I understand the Pirates are lacking here so the concept might be new to them, but still…

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 24, 2008 7:38 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

who's junk is Stark's stroking...

to get a list of what the Bucs want for the aforementioned players? C’mon, if GM’s are going to give Gagne and Cordova the cash this past off-season, who in their right minds doesn’t think Marte won’t get his cash? Just because some ‘source’ says he might not get signed in the off season doesn’t mean jack. The ‘source’ is probably pissed because he can’t get Marte for a sack of nuts and a resin bag. The last time I looked at the standings, the PBC was listed right there with Oakland, Tampa, Philly and every other GD team in the MLB. Aim high, settle for what you want, Neal. The days of DL and the sub-human Bucs are over!

by ElliottBayBucco on Jul 24, 2008 9:14 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Interesting post on CBS Sportsline.com

http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/10908026

Don’t know what too think of this but if Coonely is intent on breaking the losing streak it would explain why know deals have been made. I’ve been a little nervous the FC was holding NH back. Maybe true, maybe not. Interesting none the less.

by Slick1 on Jul 24, 2008 9:32 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.
Start posting about the Pirates »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nyjer_small
Brian Giles Got Traded! SCREW THE PIRATES!

Recent FanPosts

Dscf0211_small
Losing Pirate Triumverate?
3dacrssi_small
If We Trade with the Twins...
Explorepahistory-a0a0g4-a_349_small
Pirates in trade talks with Twins
Dscf0211_small
Is Pedro Alvarez on the Move?
Small
Rudy Owens.
Small
Willie Stargell Mustache Night
Small
Ross Ohlendorf Interview
Bloody_mary_small
Game Thread
Bloody_mary_small
Ian Snell Describes Personal Struggles
Small
Some Roster Observations

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports