Bucs Dugout: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Pirates Trade Xavier Nady, Damaso Marte to Yankees

Scroll down for the latest updates. It's Nady and Marte for minor leaguers Jose Tabata, George Kontos, Russ Ohlendorf and Phil Coke.

Paul Meyer doesn't have the details yet, but thinks they're going to the Yankees.

Here's the report from the AP. Nady was pulled from the Pirates' lineup tonight.

I actually suggested trading Nady to the Yankees a couple weeks ago. It'll be interesting to see who the Pirates get. 

I'm all over this one. More details as I find them.

Thanks to Carnival Matleuse.

UPDATE 8:32 PM: KDKA thinks Ian Kennedy or Phil Hughes could be involved, although Hughes is on the major-league DL, which I think means he can't be traded, except perhaps as a PTBNL.

UPDATE 8:35 PM: A Yankees Class AA pitcher named Phil Coke was pulled from his start tonight, the Post-Gazette reports. Jose Tabata, Ross Ohlendorf, and George Kontos might be three other players who are involved. Coke and Ohlendorf don't do much for me--they're both fairly old, and would be useful mostly in that they could pitch right away or almost right away--but Tabata and Kontos are real prospects.

Tabata has had a rough year at AA, but he's still 19 for another month. He has hit well in the past and has all kinds of time to make himself into a good big-league outfielder. Kontos looks like a bona fide starting pitching prospect, with a good fastball, a passable change, an excellent slider and a pitcher's build. He turned 23 last month.

If Tabata and Kontos come the Pirates' way, they'd immediately become the second and third-best prospects in the system, behind Andrew McCutchen. Pedro Alvarez, if/when he signs, would obviously bump them down a notch, too.

UPDATE 8:46 PM: Maybe I'm selling Ohlendorf short a bit. He can start, and he has a good strikeout rate this year. He could probably join the Pirates' rotation right away.

UPDATE 8:48 PM: Ken Rosenthal hears the same things the Pirates are hearing: he says it's Tabata, Ohlendorf, Kontos and Coke.

UPDATE 8:50 PM: If this is the trade, then I like it. Fans may be upset about losing Nady in particular, but they'll calm down if Ohlendorf and/or Coke join the team and immediately outperform the string of no-count pitchers who've occupied the back end of the rotation and the middle relief innings. 

Tabata and Kontos are the most important parts of the deal. Tabata is still so young that you can imagine just about anything's possible for him. He's far from a sure thing--his power hasn't developed, and with the troubles he's had with his hand and wrist, it's fair to wonder how much it will--but he showed real skills as an 18-year-old in Class A+, and that's something not many players can say. There's a very good chance Tabata completely flames out, but also a decent chance he becomes a star. I'll take that gamble--the Pirates need stars.

This is a pretty good return for Nady and Marte. It's not a steal by any means, but Tabata and Kontos both have upside and are exactly the sort of players the PIrates should be getting in these trades. I approve, if the trade is as it's been reported.

UPDATE 8:59 PM: Buster Olney confirms the players involved with no equivocation, except to say that the trade is pending physicals.

UPDATE 9:09 PM: Tabata is currently on the DL with a "fairly severe" hamstring problem. You may get the impression from the Post-Gazette's blog that it's a hand issue, but that's not the case, which is probably good.

UPDATE 9:19 PM: People are discussing this in the game thread, and they're not happy, but I think some perspective is in order. Marte's a good reliever and he's going to bring back a pair of draft picks. Nady has been a really good hitter this year, relative to his position, for the first time in his career. He probably isn't going to bring back picks, because he probably isn't going to stay healthy for the next year and a half. He's not a great player, and now was the perfect time to trade him. Neither Nady nor Marte are stars. Tabata could be. And I think all the commentary I've seen from Pirates fans so far underrates Kontos. 

UPDATE 9:35 PM: The Post-Gazette found this footage of Tabata:

Keep in mind that Hughes, who's pitching, is both older and more advanced than Tabata, who's only 17 in this footage. That's why Tabata looks a bit overwhelmed at times.

UPDATE 10:43 PM: It's somewhat strange to now be the person who defends the Pirates' trades, but I just can't understand some of the withering reactions I'm seeing. Other than McCutchen at the tail end of the 2006 season--when he was with Altoona mostly so he could keep playing after both single-A teams had shut down for the year--when's the last time the Pirates have had a teenager in Class AA? I can't think, offhand, of anyone else this decade who has done it. Chad Hermansen did it a decade ago. (And let's please not start comparing Tabata to Hermansen; Tabata has some idea of the strike zone, and he'll probably have decent coaching. Hermansen had neither.)

Tabata is a unique player, and anyone who would write him off this early is crazy. If the deal had been Bay and Marte, then I'd be upset too, but let's keep in mind that Nady is not that good, and that if Tabata can recover from his injuries with no ill effects, he has plenty of time to become a very good player. 

0 recs  |  Comment 143 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

ross ohlendorf
phil coke
jose tabata
george kontos

according to espn.com

by mak_DC on Jul 25, 2008 8:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A package deal?

DK will be flabbergasted. No soup for him!

by bucdaddy on Jul 25, 2008 9:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can't say I like this deal

First, the Pirates got too many pitchers and not enough hitters. Second, the pitching they got isn’t that good. It looks to me like a waste of trade assets, a waste because the Yankees got the two best players.

Steve Z

by steve_z on Jul 25, 2008 9:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been a regular reader of this blog for a long time now, but have never really been motivated to post comments, until now. Looking at everyone’s reaction in the game thread has been ridiculous. First of all, everyone’s expectations were WAY too high for both Nady and Marte. Marte, who is very good, is only one of many left-handed relievers out on the trade market (including Sherrill, Fuentes, and Mahay), meaning the Pirates were not going to receive any mind-blowing offers for him, with so much comparable talent. Nady has been fantastic this year, there is no doubt, but he was playing above his head:

‘08 Avg: .330 ‘08 OBP: .383 ‘08 SLG: .535
Career: .281 Career: .337 Career: .456

It’s also worth mentioning that he is frequently injured (130 games in ‘06 are his career-high), and that his defense is shaky, at best. Yes, he has a good arm, but he misplays balls in right regularly, and if the Yankees really use him as their everyday left-fielder, with Yankee stadium’s cavernous left-field, his defensive shortcomings will come to a national light. All of which is to say that he is a good but not great player (so expectations on what he brings the pirates in a trade should be appropriately tempered), who the pirates have done well to sell while his value is at its highest.

Given all that, I think NH and co. did pretty well in this trade. Tabata is a legitimate, elite prospect who has the potential to far exceed anything Nady could hope to do at the big league level. Kontos is another legit prospect, which is exactly what this pitching-starved organization needs. And the other two players, Ohlendorf and Coke, should not be dismissed so quickly. Like Charlie said, they both have the potential to step in and contribute quickly, both have good K rates, and both should be an improvement on the pitching we have been subjected to over the past few months. It seems like people were expecting Jackson, Hughes and Kennedy for Nady/Marte if it was a Yankees deal. And that’s just ridiculous, and was never going to happen.

by jcassara on Jul 25, 2008 9:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Here, here.

I would’ve LOVED to have Jackson, though.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen.

I have been reading so many ridiculous trade proposals by Pirate fans that I knew there was no way most people were going to be happy with this trade. We have severly overvalued X and Marte. I like them both but let’s be realistic. I didn’t expect to get any elite prospects for either of them. NH was able to bring back Tabata and I’m absolutely thrilled about that and although I don’t know that much about Kontos from what I’m reading he is a legit prospect as you have mentioned. Yes we need pitching but if any Pirates fans thought that Nady would bring back a Kershaw, Davis, or Hellickson type picther it was truly a pipe dream. Hell the best the Indians could do for Sabbathia was was one elite prospect, what did Sanatanna get the Twins. Granted Nady is under control next year and Marte will bring us draft picks but everything I read about next year;s draft is that it isn’t deep. There are more top pitching prospects than position players yes but overall the talent level is down. The draft is a crapshoot anyway. We got some good arms and a couple of players with high upside. If Tabata develops like I think he will, an outfield featruring him and McCutchen will make us forget all about this years dream outfield (this wasn’t sarcasm I loved the way our OF has played this season). I also heard on another blog that Grossman signed. Can anyone confirm this?

by Slick1 on Jul 25, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Grossman

The Grossman signing is still a rumor at this point, as far as I have heard. Rocco Demaro reported it on the postgame show last night, citing good sources. He didn’t expect anything to become official until closer to the August 15 deadline.

Pittsburgh Lumber Co.

by MBandi on Jul 25, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Substantially above slot draftee player signings...

are, per recent reports, said to be the subject of a moratorium imposed by MLB. They don’t want them announced until the last minute so as not to drive up the cost of other unsigned players.

FWIW, I also heard Demaro report on last night’s post-game show that we were very close to signing Grossman.

by Uncle Nate on Jul 25, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen, Charlie and jcassara.

Except that I still think Coke is organizational filler.

by matskralc on Jul 25, 2008 9:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, you may be right about that. I assume the Pirates will try to push him up a level to be sure, though.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What’s got me thinking that is that the Yankees are a fairly smart organization, at least with developing players. And they’ve had Coke in high-A at 23 and 24 and AA at 25. He may be one of those guys where something isn’t showing up on his baseball-reference page. Maybe he’s only got one pitch or is a junkballer getting the kids to chase. I don’t know yet.

by matskralc on Jul 25, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His fastball isn’t so great, from what I’ve read.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Coke

= NOT the Real Thing?

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- HST

by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 25, 2008 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fans will be fans...

NH knows (hopefully) what he’s doing.
I guess this was the best offer out there, whether he dealt X-Man& Marte separately or in a package.

My question is, if NH had waited longer… is there any chance he might’ve been able to pry Kennedy or Jackson or what-not from the Yankees (they get desperate, etc.) or another “big-name” prospect from someone else? Or would the return have decreased? I mean, I know it changes by team/GM & situation and all that… I’m just curious.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 25, 2008 9:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I guess we’ll never know. It’s always possible to second-guess the timing of things.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably not

Marte isn’t as valuable as everyone insists because there are other serviceable lefties on the market (Fuentes, Sherrill, somebodyelseIforget). And as long as Adam Dunn and maybe Matt Holiday and even Jason Bay were still floating around as “available”, Nady (clearly inferior to those three) wasn’t going to get much more valuable.

by matskralc on Jul 25, 2008 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chances are...

they would have made another deal snatching up one of the other available lefties and then maybe gone after an Ibanez, Blake or possibly Dunn.

by Slick1 on Jul 25, 2008 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing…right now it seems like Yankee fans are REALLY excited about this deal and Pirates fans are REALLY underwhelmed/frustrated. It’ll be interesting to see how that changes over the next few months (if at all). I just have a bad feeling about Nady going over to the Yanks. He’s a very streaky hitter who has been hot for awhile now, and we all know what he looks like when he’s in a funk. And like I mentioned in the above post, I could easily see his defense in left getting roundly booed in Yankee stadium….Marte will probably be excellent, but you never know. And if Ohlendorf comes up and pitches decently, Kontos continues his good year, and Tabata returns from the DL and flashes his potential to Pittsburgh writers/fans…we all might have a very different perspective soon enough. We shall see.

by jcassara on Jul 25, 2008 9:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't expect...

Tabata to flash much this season. He has a bad hamstring injury and the Yanks were planning on bringing him along slowly. I think the Bucs would be wise to do the same. I’m truly excited about the potential of younsgerts coming through the system if we get Alvarez signed. It does seem to me that NH believes in a powerhouse offense and power arms. Now we just need to get Jack sent to the Dodgers for that rumored McDonald-Hu package and I would consider this deadline to be a success.

by Slick1 on Jul 25, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does this

free up the money to bump up the offer for Alvarez? We’ll be saving around a million on Marte, roughly the same for Nady?

by bucdaddy on Jul 25, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is a spot open

There is a spot open now on the 40 man. Ohlendorf is the only guy on the 40 man coming over here. That would mean that we would need an outfielder to come to Pittsburgh. Could McCutchen be getting on a plane tomorrow?

http://hyzduhq.blogspot.com

by hyzduhq on Jul 25, 2008 10:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That would be great. Some playing time in Pittsburgh may be just the kick in the pants he needs.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that's the expectation.

The fear is that it’s Nyjertime.

by matskralc on Jul 25, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bet on Pearce

He didn’t play in Indy tonight, while McC did (went 2 for 5, if I remember right)

by KPatrick on Jul 25, 2008 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pearce...

might immediately come up. but I would have to think that there are thoughts of what to do with mccutchen.

Lord help us if it is Nyjertime.

http://hyzduhq.blogspot.com

by hyzduhq on Jul 25, 2008 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Huntington and co. are smarter than that, and it doesn’t hurt that Morgan has been awful at Indianapolis.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure, but

I just read that Tabata is out for the year.
Can anyone confirm that?

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 25, 2008 10:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I haven’t read that specifically, but when I read about the hamstring issue, I assumed that would be the case. Either way, at his age, I wouldn’t worry about it.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

and

he is healing from a wrist injury i do believe (which causes bad hitting numbers)

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

who I am going to root for this post season. I hate the Yankees but I’d really really like to see X and Marte do well.

by WestCoastBuc on Jul 25, 2008 10:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Same here.

Sorry to X-Man and Marte, but I can’t root for you anymore (at least not until you change teams again).
Thanks for everything you gave us (not that you’ll ever read this, but whatever).

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 25, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The smell test...

has been passed as far as I am concerned. Nady is being traded at his peak value, which is far above his regular career value. Marte’s career isn’t spiking as dramatically, but his value is still high. I think they perhaps could have gotten more for Marte. That said, without studying the trade yet or being particularly familiar with the Yankees system, our return includes 2 prospects that I have heard good things about.

Past management was unwilling to take risks (read drafting a No. 3 ceiling SP number 1 overall). Tabata has huge upside as I understand it. Olendorff was a top prospect with Arizona not too long ago and pitchers sometimes take a while to come of age. Kontos seems to have upside. This seems like a nice move, but I’ll reserve final judgment.

By the way, I’m a regular reader but infrequent poster. I last posted before the season to chime in with minority that was in favor of not giving away Nady just to promote Pearce. For the record, although the theory proved correct in this instance, I never imagined that Nady would turn in this kind of year at this point.

Good day.

by Uncle Nate on Jul 25, 2008 10:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry about the Nady mirage

If you say “he’s going to turn into a pumpkin” every day for the rest of your life, sooner or later you’ll be right.

by KPatrick on Jul 25, 2008 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Turn into” a pumpkin? Until this April, he was a pumpkin.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cheap shot

Let’s not revise history.

by azibuck on Jul 25, 2008 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How’s that a cheap shot? Nady wasn’t a good player before this year. I said so then, and so did lots of other people, so it’s hardly revisionist history.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really? A pumpkin?
cheap shot
NOUN:
An unfair or unsporting verbal attack on a vulnerable target.
cheap
  1. Achieved with little effort: a cheap victory; cheap laughs.
  2. Of or considered of small value: in wartime, when life was cheap.
  3. Of poor quality; inferior: a cheap toy.
  4. Worthy of no respect; vulgar or contemptible: a cheap gangster.
  5. Stingy; miserly.

I think the question is, how was he a pumpkin?

Look, I’m not mad or anything, I wasn’t a big fan of his, but he wasn’t horrible. He came courtesy of a DL fetish (not his fault) and the trade looked bad for a while, and may still be called bad I think, but not because of him, and that’s also not his fault.

Tike Redman was a pumpkin. He turned into a handsome coach for 56 games, then turned back into a pumpkin. Nady may be a handsome coach right now, but he wasn’t a pumpkin before this April. It was cheap because there was no point, or truth, in saying it right then.

by azibuck on Jul 25, 2008 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look, I’m not mad or anything, I wasn’t a big fan of his, but he wasn’t horrible.

Well, pumpkins aren’t horrible. They are perfectly useful for eating, displaying, and smashing into annoying neighbors’ houses. They just aren’t beautiful stagecoaches.

I think you think I am saying something that I’m not saying.

by Charlie on Jul 26, 2008 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you're saying something

I’m sorry for hijacking the thread. I think if you meant something else you shouldn’t have said pumpkin.

In the vernacular, the pumpkin is nothing, an ugly gourd. Mice/horses, rat/coachman, Cinderella’s rags into a beautiful gown, the metaphors are all the same. If Cinderella was wearing a smart outfit from Walmart and the fairy godmother turned that into a beautiful gown, or if the FG turned a mule into a stallion, or a farm wagon into the coach, it would be more appropriate.

pumpkin – coach – pumpkin
bad – great – bad
ugly – beautiful – ugly

There’s no average in any of those.

by azibuck on Jul 26, 2008 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

is his OPS+ still 142? I mean, yeah, he’s not likely to do that for the next 5 years. Not a lot of guys are, age 25 or age 29. It just seems to me that 4 months into that kind of season, we have to think this may be at least approaching the real thing. I’m well aware that it’s a statistical outlier. But I also know that it’s actually happening. If somebody finds a prescription for fairy dust in his locker, I’ll stand down, but it seems to me to be almost an ideological point to keep focusing on his “failures” of having around a 100 OPS+ before this, in years where he was hurt or was a part-time-player, rather that conceding that it’s possible that he’ll perform at an above-average level for a couple of years.

by KPatrick on Jul 25, 2008 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, sure, I’ll concede that it’s possible.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok take a moment and breathe and then see

Ryan Ludwick, or Brady Anderson (dont tell me 1996 was the only year he ever took roids), Carlos Pena last year, Melvin Mora in 2003 and 2004, etc.

Its called a career year, and selling high. Chances are he will regress to an OPS of around 800 which is close to his career average. So getting players who have a chance at being impact players when the pirates are in contention in a few years (if things work out they way they should) is the best thing your GM could do.

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, this is what I’m getting at. Occasionally you have your Luis Gonzalezes, but nine times out of ten, when a 29-year-old breaks out like this, he’s going to be closer to where he was before by the time the next season rolls around.

by Charlie on Jul 26, 2008 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Coke may be filler

but he’s had 4 double digit strikeout games at Trenton, and has only had one really bad start since April.

by Thunder on Jul 25, 2008 10:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Phil Coke

The Bucs got exactly what they were expecting, although I wish they could have improved more.

This is from Pending Pinstripes. Note the dates.

Doug says:

January 17th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
I have followed Coke throughout. The thing you failed to mention is that A. the more innings he throws in a game the better he gets. and B. as he has aged his pitching is getting better and better. I’ll bet he shows up to spring training looking better and throwing better than ever. Dont let his laid back persona fool you he is worth watching

Doug says:
July 11th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Gee, I guess I was right!! I just know ya’ll have been watching this kid. His Era is down to 2.96, with 88 K’s and its only 1/2 way through the season. Oh by the way Any one check out his breaking ball he showed up with this year??? WOW

by Pinstripe Pirate on Jul 25, 2008 10:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Coke

“Is who we thought he was!”?

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- HST

by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 25, 2008 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just looked at Coke's game log for Trenton

since May 1st…

89.1 IP, 67 H, 21 R, 15 ER, 29 BB, 90 K, 5 HR. 1.51 ERA, 1.075 WHIP. .204 BAA and a 9-3 record.

by Thunder on Jul 25, 2008 10:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

For an immediate jolt like X and Marte, to a team who needs that to make a push, you’d think we’d get more than Hope. You’d wish we would, anyway. Maybe that’s all that’s out there to get - at the deadline, it seems to be. Look at it for a minute not from the perspective of what Nady and Marte mean to the Pirates, i.e., “we won 75 with them, we can win 75 without them.” Look at what it means to the Yankees. “yeah, we’d love to have two high caliber major leaguers - actually, we really NEED two high-caliber major leaguers. Tell you what; we’ll give you four guys that we don’t really need, and aren’t really sure will make the majors.” Really? Um, no, you must not want these guys that badly, then. “No, we do. But we’re not giving you guys we know will be major leaguers.” Um, well, shit, guess you don’t want two high-caliber instant-help major leaguers then.

I’m not going to trash the deal just yet, because yeah, if Kontos and Tabata live up to the hype, we’ll have them for a few years, and I’d rather have 5 years of them living up to the hype than another 1.5 years of X and Marte being great on a team that’s going nowhere. It’s just that Kontos and/or Tabata living up to the hype is far from a sure thing, and Coke and Ohlendorf don’t appear to have much hype to live up to. It seems to me that if you really want both Nady and Marte, you can come up with more than that.

by KPatrick on Jul 25, 2008 10:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Heh. You should watch the video above, where Steve Phillips says that Tabata has been described by the Yankees as “untouchable.” I don’t think this is a case of the Yankees giving away players they have no use for.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, more comforting at least to watch the video and see he was reporting what someone else said. But I don’t need to hear him report that (a couple years ago) to be intrigued by the possibility. Regular visitors to this spot have been wishing for years that we had guys in our system who had the chance to be not average, or even above average, but to be A Wizard, A True Star. I’m one of them, and what comfort I draw from this is the possibility that Tabata is that kind of guy. Somewhere between that statement and today, however, he got touchable. We have to hope that he got touchable because the conversation between Cashman and Huntington went differently than I portrayed it above—that Cashman parted reluctantly with a wizard, a true star, rather than the flip side of that dream. That’s why Huntington gets the big bucks, and it will be a while before we know if he earned his pay. I just wish it was more evident RIGHT NOW. You watch this team long enough, you start to wish it would be easy for 30 seconds every now and then.

by KPatrick on Jul 25, 2008 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, can’t fault you for that.

by Charlie on Jul 25, 2008 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AWATS

Any TR reference is good enuf for me!

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- HST

by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 25, 2008 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Trade

I wholehearted agree with jcassara that this is a good first deal for the C & H boys.

1) The Pirates’ greatest need is pitching. They are getting three pitchers that all have decent upsides and have pitched either in the majors, AAA or AA. Ohlendorff has always been highly thought of, but he has yet to reach his potential. The other two pitchers I need to research.

2) Jose Tabata looks very poised for a then-17 year old on the YouTube clip and he was batting against Philip Hughes in the USA-World game. He handles himself at the plate like a young man who has all the tools. I just wish that he was a left-hand hitter or switchhitter.

3) The most we would have ever gotten for Marte alone would have been two near first-round picks in 2009 since he would have been gone after the season anyway. I would much rather have some well-regarded prospects with professional baseball experience than two high school or college lead bat supposed ‘phenoms’

4) I prefer to have no part of Hu from the Dodgers. He is at best a utility infielder. But I would be happy to give them Wilson, Bay and LaRoche for Hu, Kemp and Loney!

I like the deal on its face value. Let’s see what happens,

by thegunner on Jul 25, 2008 10:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I also like it

The trade brings players similar to what Huntington has wanted and targeted before this. Tabata is a young high upside offensive player. He strikes me very similar to the potential of Pedro Alvarez, good stroke and plus power. They even have a similar injury and even body build, though Alvarez is bigger. Ohlendorf is another guy that could enter the picture in the rotation. We all know that we have been looking for that all year. And Coke and Kontos are power pitchers, again something Huntington has been looking to add. And they are all upper level guys, something we needed because of Dave Littlefield.

http://hyzduhq.blogspot.com

by hyzduhq on Jul 25, 2008 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Plus power?

How does he strike you that way? I know he’s young, but his IsoP doesn’t indicate much to me right now. Scouts, and the Yankees, may have loved him, but his bbref page doesn’t jump out at me in any way, other than youth-for-level. I am glad I saw that viddy though, that’s a nice stroke. I don’t want to even say who it looked exactly like (to me).

Still love your blog by the way, it really deserves more traffic.

by azibuck on Jul 25, 2008 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh, I guess I can feel free to say who he looked like

I just read the game thread and see all the Manny comparisons. I have to think a lot of that stems from the swing though. His plate discipline isn’t great other than, again, him being young for AA, and he looks several years of development away from showing real power.

by azibuck on Jul 26, 2008 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wrist

well you should discard his lack of power numbers this year because of his wrist injury, and truthfully a lot of it is potential. He is 19, the power should come in time, but it may or may not. I think Sickels said he should have Bobby Abreu power at the beginning of the season.

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 26, 2008 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you want to talk about plus power

Lots of people develop power “later”, whether it means later in the minors or later into their pro career. The main thing is the guy has a solid stroke and some plate discipline from what I’ve heard.

Look, for example, at the Greek God of Walks, Kevin Youkilis. The guy is obviously a great hitter with a great eye throughout the minors, but he only hit 30 homies in FIVE minor league seasons, 8 of which came in the last season where he had only 152 at bats before being called up. So from 2005 on he’s hit 9 (AAA and MLB combined), 13, 16, and now 17 home runs so far this season. Looks to me like he’s developing his power. True, not monster power but on track for 26 this season; pretty good.

Now consider that Youkilis started his minor league career at the ripe old age of 22.

by poorboywilly on Jul 26, 2008 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Should have clarified

That he is projecting some power. I will agree that he really has not shown anything as of yet. It is all just projections right now.

http://hyzduhq.blogspot.com

by hyzduhq on Jul 26, 2008 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Glad you are not the GM, gunner.

“But I would be happy to give them Wilson, Bay and LaRoche for Hu, Kemp and Loney!”

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm putting

the baseball with the “Damaso 43” autograph on it under my pillow tonight.

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. -- HST

by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 25, 2008 11:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Now

sign Alvarez with the freed-up cash.

by bucdaddy on Jul 25, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm hoping this trade works out well.

A winning season before I graduate (next year or the year after) seems highly unlikely.
Maybe a winning season before I’m done with grad school (or in grad school or w/e)...
it’d be nice to cheer for a winning team for the first time in my life.

Whatever. I guess we’ll see soon. Maybe.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 25, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Its looking a lot better for the Buccos

McCuttch, Alvarez, Tabata + whatever Bay brings back is looking to be a pretty good start to an offense.

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 25, 2008 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope that too.

:)

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Build for the future

I like the trade because we are selling high two veteran players, Marte is 33 and X-Man is 30. X-Man had a good year last year and a fantastic one this year and is definitely at his prime now. Both of these players will most likely start their downside of their career in the next year or two, so if the Pirates are trying to build a long term winner, these two would not have been part of that process. Therefore, I think this is a great start to getting the pieces to the long term puzzle, but it can not be done in one year, solely because the Bucs have no strong minor league system. Even if Bay brings 2 or 3 prospects and Grabow 1 or 2, there are still many many holes to be filled. Patience Patience. The Pirates now have at least 1 more prospect than they had before today – it is a start.

by long4willie on Jul 25, 2008 11:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

build for the FUTURE?!?!?!

Bucs haven’t had a winning season since they let Barroid go. Another set of decent players has been traded away. Where is the nucleus ownership keeps promising? Every year someone good is traded away, and the Bucs get next to nothing in return. Betcha money when it comes down to the final year of their contracts, McClouth and anyone else who is decent will be going to a contender and we’ll get nada. Only Duke football fans are such gluttons for punishment as Bucco fans.

by bryan2008 on Jul 27, 2008 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You'll never have a decent nucleus...

...without good work in the draft and international signings. Period.

In general, we haven’t had good drafts or a strong international presence during our decade-and-a-half in the wilderness. Ergo, the ML team has sucked.

by Vlad on Jul 28, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well,

I`m not particularly impressed, but not as ticked off as a number of people here seem to be, either. I tend to think a little more of Ohlendorf`s future than some others do, and I like what I`ve read about Kontos` stuff. Have a Coke and a smile. We`ll see….

I don`t buy so much into all this Tabata hype. He`s probably not as young as they say, he`s hurt, he`s had discipline problems according to some other sites, and I dread the thought that we could be getting a few years of Jose Guillen II. I hope I`m wrong about him. I really do.

Barring further big trades, I sure hope we collect a lot more talent for our farm system with the signings of Alvarez, Scheppers, and some other later-round gambles.

In the end, though, we won`t be able to conclusively judge the trade and the draft for at least a few years. I think this simple fact is something that eludes many commenters.

By the way, where are the Trade NOW! faction members? I would`ve expected some expert commentary on the trade pieces we have received by now. They are the ones who dogged Huntington for months about his near-criminal inaction on the trade front.

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 12:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

attitude schmattitude

I heard that on Rocco’s show on the way home. that complaint gets thrown around an awful lot. It doesn’t seem to have hurt Jeff Kent. No offense to the 19-year-olds lurking around here, but y’all can be tempermental. We can’t afford to turn away guys with “questionable attitudes.”

by KPatrick on Jul 26, 2008 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true that

You just hope that he matures like a lot of 19 year olds do. Bad attitude can just mean he’s being 19.

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 26, 2008 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

While reading other sites about Jose Tabata,

the name Midre Cummings just popped into my mind.

God help us if the only thing we have to show for this deal 2-3 years from now is whatever production we get from Ohlendorf.

Here`s hoping that Kontos and Coke turn out to be more than the Yankees ever expected. We deserve some good luck.

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 5:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

KPatrick

attitude schmattitude?

From Keith Law`s blog on ESPN:

“The return for the Pirates hinges on whether Jose Tabata turns into anything at all. Among the game’s top prospects if we’re only considering his ability, Tabata has great hand-eye coordination and good bat speed, and I think he’ll hit for power down the road despite his short stature because he makes solid, hard contact. Or, at least he made solid contact before mailing in his 2008 season, one in which he earned multiple unofficial suspensions for his behavior and took a lazy approach to at bats, swinging right through 90-mph fastballs down the chute. There’s a high probability that Tabata never amounts to anything in the majors….”

You`d better hope he has a major attitude adjustment before the 2009 season because it sure would be a darn shame if we get little or nothing out of him down the road. The Yankees went from Tabata being untouchable to unloading him to the Bucs in this deal. Why?

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 5:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would concur with Law that there’s a high probability that he doesn’t make the majors, but to me, attitude isn’t - or shouldn’t be - one of the factors in that. That Law is focusing on the attitude worries me a little bit, but I think it’s overrated in every sport. Give me ballplayers. Tabata may or may not be that, but unless he’s a criminal, or poops on the clubhouse floor, whatever personal issues remain as he ages ought to stay just that.

by KPatrick on Jul 26, 2008 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to that theory...

Buccos should’ve kept Bonds. But then again, every time a good player is around in Bucco-town, they all seem to disappear… Maybe same happens with Tabata???

by bryan2008 on Jul 27, 2008 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with patthatt

It’s not an awesome return, but I’m not angry about it either. I supported keeping Nady this winter, rather than give him away or release him, so I’m happy we were able to get more than an organizational soldier for him. Marte is a fine pitcher, but having a good loogy/setup man is the least of the team’s worries. I think one of the problems with this trade deadline is that it seems to be a down time for prospects in general. There are few teams with strong systems.

by bolton on Jul 26, 2008 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Patthat

I’ve tried to get some info on this deal from Baseball Prospectus but they don’t have much to add that hasn’t been said already on this board except to say they don’t have any glaring negatives about this group. I firmly believe Nady is having a career year and don’t expect him to repeat it and so because of his age (30), agent (Boras), and propensity to get hurt, I’m not upset about losing him. Neither am I upset about losing Marte and so I’m willing to give NH the benefit of the doubt and wait to see how these prospects mature. In addition, I was somewhat surprised to hear that many people feel NH has over-valued our talent and agree with others that we do not want to become the KC A’s farm team to the Yankees as was the case during the 50s and hope this will send a message to other teams that we are not easily ripped off. This was probably a good deal for NH on which to cut his teeth but I doubt we’ll be able to evaluate it for a couple of years. I just wish it would have been made with a team who’s farm system has a reputation for being a little deeper like the Brewers because the Yankees seldom rely upon home-grown talent preferring instead to buy their players on the FA market.

by Illinois Pirate Fan on Jul 26, 2008 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One might guess

this could be part of Tabata’s “attitude” problems, besides being 19, is that he was in a system that shows little regard for young offensive talent. If he has any talent at all he should get fast-tracked here. They can dangle the carrot of him being a regular in the majors in maybe two years if he gets his act together. The Yankees want to keep Jeter-Posada-A-Rod etc. until they’re 60.

by bucdaddy on Jul 26, 2008 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AHHHH!

Just got home, and while I’m glad we are making moves, I was kinda hoping that it wouldn’t be until after tomorrow night when I go to my one and only Pirates game of the year :(....

.500 or bust...

by phillybucco on Jul 26, 2008 12:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So

Who can I expect to see in the outfield tomorrow night? Bay, McLouth and…. probably Michaels or Minky, I guess… :/

.500 or bust...

by phillybucco on Jul 26, 2008 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

missed the Pearce talk above….

.500 or bust...

by phillybucco on Jul 26, 2008 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I think all the commentary I've seen from Pirates fans so far underrates Kontos

Could well be. His numbers this year are quite unimpressive, but there was some buzz about him last year.

“George Kontos could be the best-kept secret in the Yankees system, according to farm director Mark Newman.

“He was named among the top 10 prospects in the Hawaiian league and nobody talks about him.”

If the secret to success is to buy low, sell high, NH seems to have done just that. Ohlendorf has shown he was not ready for Yankee Stadium, and both Tabata and Kontos have struggled a bit this year. But all three of them are potential major leaguers.

Viva Clemente!

by Roberto on Jul 26, 2008 12:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well put

Some of those guys might just need some low stress playing time to get a feel for the major leagues.

by Reddrummer9187 on Jul 26, 2008 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, wannabe GMs ...

Xavier Nady ain’t that good and other general managers knew it.

Despite the Pirates’ demands - and the rumors floating out there - it’s likely they never planned on trading “can’t miss” talent for a 30-year-old corner outfielder with a .793 career OPS.

While NH could’ve held out for more (perhaps a younger pitching prospect in place of Coke), he did well to deal Nady at his peak value. Had he shipped Nady to New York last winter, what might the return have been … Ohlendorf straight up?

by woobie on Jul 26, 2008 1:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice post,

woobie. Some real good points.

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 1:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hugh Risk for the Yankees

A lot of question marks for the Yanks. X-Man has not played in the American League and Marte not since 2005 for the White Sox. What if X-Man goes cold and what if they both choke in the playoffs. Can Marte find the new strike zone in the AL quickly. IMO, Bay would have been a much better bet for the Yanks and it probably would have only taken another high prospect to get him and Marte.

by long4willie on Jul 26, 2008 1:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute...

Yanks go to the playoffs??? When’s the last time the BUCS have been to the playoffs??? Nevermind…

by bryan2008 on Jul 27, 2008 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How excited are we if this trade is made January 25, 2008?

Well, probably not very excited, per se, but I think most people would have at least given it a thumbs up for a LOOGY and journeyman OF.

by azibuck on Jul 26, 2008 2:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A few things to keep in mind......

1. It’s not like the Yankees called out of the blue and caught us by suprise with an offer and said its now or never. Huntington talked to several other teams and if there were a better offer out there he would have taken it.

2. This is a classic case of buying low and selling high. If this trade had been done in spring training every “expert” would have said that they could not believe that the Yankees would trade Tabata for this trash. Even if this is the real Xavier Nady we still did fine.

3. Keep in mind that Tabata is only 19. If he had been in the draft this year he would have easily been a top ten pick. Its like getting that #1 prospect without having to pay the steep signing bonus.

It will be years until we will be able to accurately judge who won and lost on this deal but on the surface i like it very much. I have no problem with selling off a few pieces of a team that is nowhere close to contention.

by #1BuccoFan on Jul 26, 2008 9:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

"a team that is nowhere close to contention."

I think the negative reaction stems from the fact that a lot of people think this team IS somewhere close to contention.

by matskralc on Jul 26, 2008 9:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Close to contention?

I try to be as positive as I can be about the team but realistically they are 7 games under .500. That is not close to contention!! They are certainly more entertaining to watch than they have been in recent years and the seasons that McLouth and Doumit are having gives us some hope that there is a young core here to build around but they are still a few years away from contending.

The two guys that we traded are solid major league players but by no means are they allstars or guys that you build around. Based on where we are as an organization this was a good and necessary trade.

by #1BuccoFan on Jul 26, 2008 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree

I think it is laughable that some think this team is close to contending. But those are the people most upset about the trade.

by matskralc on Jul 26, 2008 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends what you mean by contending.

If we had any semblance of a pitching staff, the team would be in the playoff race this year.
The next couple of years? Who knows… guys drop off and all that. But this offense with a pitching staff would be “contending” for a playoff spot.

Most of what worries me, I’ll admit, is what everyone else is saying about the deal. I don’t know much about the 4 guys we got… just that Ohlendorf’s ML numbers this years aren’t very good, and that I’ve heard a ton about Tabata the last couple of years. I know no-one can predict the future or what-not, but everyone (seemingly) thinking the Yankees just stole X-Man & Marte from us is kinda worrisome. I know it’s stupid to listen to them because there is no way they know everything, but reading it everywhere is kinda… idk… worrisome.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

UtesFan89 is...

the smartest guy I’ve seen on the forum yet…

by bryan2008 on Jul 27, 2008 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Misunderstood

I thought that you were implying that they were close to contention.

I agree, for some reason alot of people seem to feel that we are just one or two pitchers away. Maybe this will give them a better idea of how far away we really are:

Right now the Pirates have a team ERA of 5.24 and teams are batting .290 against them (both MLB worst). Even if you substitute Ben Sheets and CC Sabathia’s (the top two starters in this years FA crop) stats in place of our #4 (Duke) and #5 (Morris, Dumatrait, Herrara) starters stats we would still have a team ERA of 4.48 (24th in MLB) and .269 BAA (21st in MLB). So even if we shelled out 30MM per year to sign these two our pitching would still be two weak from top to bottom to realistically compete. That is why trades like this one are necessary.

by #1BuccoFan on Jul 26, 2008 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But at least they have been entertaining!

While the Bucs are a starting rotation away from being close to contention, these guys have been smacking the ball around and at this point I am happy with that—it is the best watch in 15 years. Nonetheless, if one of these guys is 3/4of Doug Drabek, they might have a #1 starter which would move them closer.

"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway

by SubLime on Jul 26, 2008 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the trade

Won’t know for a few years how it all plays out, but right now, getting prospects in bulk is the way to go

by vherub on Jul 26, 2008 9:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nate the Great......

Hey, I’m a Cardinals fan (well, A’s and ChiSox too) but what about your outfield dynamo—his improvement seems to have come incrementally-so this year seems like it’s not a fluke. So tell me-did anyone see this coming? Everything I’ve read projected him to be a 4th outfielder-a good one, but a fourth outfielder. A late bloomer-or just a fellow that needed someone to stick him in the line up and just keep him there? It’s probably a good thing that Littlefield is gone-wouldn’t he have kept him in the minors in favor of Morgan?

Thanks for any insight. I think he’s a terrific player-pretty solid in all areas of the game.

She isn't crazy, she's just not impressed.

by jillsinmo on Jul 26, 2008 10:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll give it a B/B+ grade

I think the Pirates made a good trade. It could have been better had they been able to pry Ian Kennedy away as part of the return. Ohlendorf has good stuff and should be better than anyone we have had at AAA. A return to starting may be the motivation he needs. The poor numbers he posted in NY were in relief. I hate to see Nady and Marte go, but they are being traded at their highest value….something we have not seen in a long time. I think NH got a good return. We’ll not really know for a couple more years.

by Brakeman8 on Jul 26, 2008 10:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nady, Marte trade

I thought Huntington was supposed to be different than Littlefield. This is just the same actions with a different name. The Yankees are laughing all the way to the bank on this one. Now we can be sure that the Pirates will have no respect of any other GM. Every team that the Pirates deal with will know that Neil Huntington will ask for a lot, but will have no problem taking other team’s wastes and cast offs for top proven players. This is nothing but a huge dissapointment and an embarassment! All you need to do is look at the Yankees news posts. THEY ARE LAUGHING!!!! Way to go Neil Little…I mean Huntington. What’s next? Are you going to trade Bay for a couple of kindergardeners? I hear the Yankees may be interested. Though I’m sure you’ll settle for preschoolers!

by hopsfan on Jul 26, 2008 10:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

“This is nothing but a huge dissapointment and an embarassment! All you need to do is look at the Yankees news posts. THEY ARE LAUGHING!!!!”

Sorry, but while I’m ambivalent about the trade - albeit a little bit more at peace with it than I was last night, having mulled it over while doing the morning chores - I’m not going to rely on the views of Yankees Nation to support my ambivalence for one fat second.

It appears that this trade is going to reveal two large truths, from where I sit:

(1) It’s a reflection of just how screwed we are from an organizational depth standpoint that one of the reasonable reactions to this trade is to be quite happy about it (not the only reasonable reaction); and

(2) more to the point of this reply, that it’s a mistake to believe damn near anything you hear in the media about trade talks. See, e.g., Buster Olney; see also Yankees fans crowing about what they got. There’s a reasonable analysis of the trade that says the Yanks gave up something they had a lot of for something they didn’t have and needed right now. That they succeeded is certainly cause for celebration in Yankees Nation, but it doesn’t indicate that the Pirates are fools, in and of itself.

That might be more words than it deserves, but it’s worth that risk.

by KPatrick on Jul 26, 2008 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes you can learn a lot...

by reading what the other side has to say about the deal:

“Jose Tabata is the only really major piece that the Yankees gave up in the trade. Tabata has been our #1 position player prospect for a couple of years now, but has had a disappointing season, hitting .248/.320/.310 with AA Trenton. In most rankings, he has been passed by Austin Jackson, who is less than a year older and is hitting .298/.377/.457 at the same level.
Probably the most concerning thing about Tabata is that he has become a disciplinary problem this season. He has been suspended twice for inappropriate behavior.
The only real concern about trading Tabata is that the Yankees could be selling him at the low point of his value. However, there is also a large possibility that the Yankees want to get rid of him before it sinks any lower.
Ross Ohlendorf is the other noticeable name in the trade. He had shown some promise in his time with the big club, but is a guy not likely to become much more than a 7th, maybe 8th inning reliever. Coke and Kontos both had potential, but were primarily spare parts.”

I read very few negative responses about this trade from the Yankee perspective and that is probably not a good sign but far from definitive.

by Illinois Pirate Fan on Jul 26, 2008 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yankees fans

ALWAYS think they win every trade, because it was made by the Yankees, who can do no wrong, ever, as a team. Because anything that’s wrong with the Yankees is A-Rod’s fault.

by bucdaddy on Jul 26, 2008 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sort of my point

I wouldn’t say Yankees fans aren’t knowledgeable about baseball - no one who’s ever spent a lot of time at PNC Park should ever say that - but I think it’s fair to say that their perspective can be a little slanted.

by KPatrick on Jul 26, 2008 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know

I’ll say it: anybody who thinks this trade was even remotely Littlefield-esque is just an idiot.

First, Littlefield would never have traded Nady in the first place. DL was probably already planning the ceremony for retiring Nady’s number.

Second, Littlefield would not have settled for high-impact talent like Tabata and possibly Kontos. Littlefield would have got Ensberg, Molina, and Billy Traber in return.

by matskralc on Jul 26, 2008 11:44 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bingo.

Well put.

http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Jul 26, 2008 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

Ensberg plays 3rd base. We could use a 3rd baseman this year.

:)

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was "remotely" Littlefield-esque

Still feel that way on the rework?

If he would have traded Nady and/or Marte at all, it would have been when their value was lowest, not highest.

However,

Littlefield would not have settled for high-impact talent like Tabata

High impact? High ceiling maybe, but he’ll have no impact whatsoever for at least two years as far as I can tell.

and possibly Kontos. Littlefield would have got Ensberg, Molina, and Billy Traber in return.

I disagree. He would have gotten three low-ceiling pitchers, which is exactly what happened with the re-worked deal. I think the re-working is pretty horrible. I liked Kontos, and despite being old for AA I thought Coke was interesting. I don’t think Karstens or McCutchen are interesting at all. Three low-ceiling guys and an injured tempermental kid years from the bigs? Yeah, I could have seen DL doing that.

by azibuck on Jul 26, 2008 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I respect about this trade...

...is that both Ohlendorf and Kontos (and to a lesser extent, Coke) fit what seems to be something of a profile for Huntington—big guys who strike out a lot. I’m not sure if that’s a successful profile or not, but I just respect that they seem to have something of a plan and are sticking with it. It’s a nice change from the last GM.

In all, I think the bottom line is that we’d have all be more or less ecstatic about this trade if it had happened last offseason. But then Nady went and put up career numbers (that probably won’t be sustained for tremendously long), and Tabata went and had an off-year (that probably won’t be sustained for tremendously long), so it looks worse. But whether it happened in the offseason or yesterday, we still wouldn’t have been able to predict jack because it all depends on where Tabata is four years from now.

http://www.rockmnation.com
Thrust nunchuk upward!

by Bill C. on Jul 26, 2008 11:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Now we have

2 McCutchen’s in the minors!

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just heard this ...

I just looked up McCutchen … nice addition. Can’t say the same for Karstens, though,

by woobie on Jul 26, 2008 11:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Karstens can start off in the majors though...

“MLB ready”, I guess.
Him and Ohlendorf both… with McCutchen & Tabata being in the minors. At least for now.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 12:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Deal...

McCutchen, Karstens & Ohlendorf are all 25-26 y.o.
Tabata is 19.

The new version gives the Pirates a couple “older” prospects.
“MLB ready”, I guess.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 12:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

More info ...

Per Yankees writer Peter Abraham:

Once the teams decided on Tabata and Ohlendorf, the Pirates had a list of players to choose from. Coke and Kontos were on that list.

I don’t know enough about Coke to have an opinion on him. But I have watched McCutchen enough to know I think he had a chance to be pretty good. But it’s still a deal they have to make, both for this season and next.

http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/07/26/breaking-news-trade-reconfigued/

I’m not sure why NH opted Karstens instead of Kontos, but despite his age Yankee people seem to like McCutchen.

by woobie on Jul 26, 2008 12:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Karstens and Kontos

I agree. I would much rather have Kontos instead of Karstens. Who knows for certain what the players will be until the trade is finally sorted out officially.

http://hyzduhq.blogspot.com

by hyzduhq on Jul 26, 2008 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

From rotoworld.com

For what it’s worth:

This is clearly better for the Pirates. McCutchen is arguably the Yankees’ best remaining pitching prospect, though he’s not a big upside guy and he doesn’t rank with Phil Hughes or Ian Kennedy.

Okay, but I still don’t understand, if given the choice between the two, NH picked Karstens over Kontos.

by woobie on Jul 26, 2008 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

40 man roster

It probably involved we had to choose him to free up two spots on their 40 man roster for Nady and Marte.

by buccoben on Jul 26, 2008 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Karstens over Kontos

I would guess its because Karstens can start in Pittsburgh right away.

It is odd though that Coke was pulled from his start last night and Karstens was not.

by #1BuccoFan on Jul 26, 2008 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Extra stuff

Here’s some more info. from Dejan’s Post Gazette blog:

McCutchen is fresh off a fine run, with three runs over his past 25 innings for Class AAA Scranton/Wilkes-Barre. He struck out 10 in his last start, walked none, in a five-hit shutout. The key, according to one report, is that he added a slider to an already versatile repertoire. Mostly, he is a fly-ball guy, which is fine at PNC. Another report said that Brian Cashman had been refusing to include him in deals, with the possible exception of the Yankees’ failed attempt at CC Sabathia.

by woobie on Jul 26, 2008 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did something come up

during the physical exam reviews?

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 12:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The pitching McCutchen is good

I feel a little better about the deal, if this is true.

by Vlad on Jul 26, 2008 12:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Vlad

Do you feel Karstens has a chance to do much for us? I`ve never been particularly impressed with him-seems more like another guy destined for long relief.

What kind of stuff does McCutchen have?

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 12:39 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What I've read:

Four pitches: Two-seam and four-seam, curve, and change. All are at least average, curve is probably best, none are a true 80.

His FB velo is maybe 90-93, which isn’t extraordinary, but is enough to get by, certainly.

He had a positive PED test a couple years back, but it looks like it was from a prescription med he was taking in college, so not a big deal.

by Vlad on Jul 27, 2008 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this trade sequence

keeps getting weirder and weirder.

by Bad Andy on Jul 26, 2008 12:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The more I read,

the more I like the re-worked deal.

I`m not crazy about Ohlendorf, Karstens and McCutchen individually, but taken together something seems better than the inclusion of Kontos and Coke.

At the least, we have some “live” arms to work with this year and beyond-which is something we desperately needed.

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

McCutchen

I must admit, the deal does look a little better. Perhaps a reprieve for NH…for now.

by hopsfan on Jul 26, 2008 2:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Have your cake and eat it too

I know the Bucs starting pitching is terrible and I suppose this change in Yankee players will help the Bucs now. The only problem with that is, is this management team trying to make the major league team better or put the pieces together in the minors for a run in 3-5 years. A 23 year old pitcher would most likely have been a part of that 3-5 year span, but 26 year old pitchers, probably not. I realize jobs are always on the line to win now, but the minor league is the key and prospects, other teams have good ones that we need, so why not focus on one or the other. This season and next mean nothing, unless your job depends on winning now. We can not have our cake and eat it too.

by long4willie on Jul 26, 2008 2:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe they're looking for guys

that’ll be veterans then. 5 years from now, the 26-y.o. will be 31… a prime age to be a veteran on the young team.

Yeah… I’ve got nothing.
Just trying to make sure we have enough guys in AAA in case Snell has to go down or if the bullpen sees guys’ arms falling off or what-not.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blake to the Dodgers to play 3rd

Any one know if LaRoche is the real deal. Having a dismal year to date, but is only 25 years old. Maybe it would help brother get going in the Spring….

by long4willie on Jul 26, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Casey Blake trade horrible

From truebluela blog:

“Casey Blake gives the Dodgers quite possibly the worst defensive infield in baseball, and that doesn’t seem wise when your four best pitchers are all ground ball pitchers.”

Blake seems to be having a Xavier Nady year at age 34. Colleti would make a deal for Jack, I am sure now. I think Jack and Grabow for Laroche and a couple prospects. LaRoche can be bought at a low price and then sell at a high price later, if he gets back to what he did in the minors. What do you think?

by long4willie on Jul 26, 2008 3:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it has been made clear

that Wilson is staying unless another team offers up something overwhelming for him.

“LaRoche and a couple prospects” for Wilson and Grabow ain`t it.

Wilson`s contract with the option exercised would keep him in Pittsburgh through 2010 at what is a very affordable price by MLB standards.

by patthatt on Jul 26, 2008 3:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

FWIW

(probably not much)
Joe Buck & Tim McCarver think the deal was a steal for the Yankees.

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 26, 2008 4:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Assclowns

I would be willing to bet McCarver has no idea who we got in the trade.

by Hitman Easler on Jul 26, 2008 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Guys like McCarver and Mark Grace dont have a clue who any of the guys are that we picked up. They just assume that if the Yankees were willing to trade them they must not have any potential. Assclowns sums it up pretty well.

The same goes for Buster Olney and his claim that all the other GMs are “livid” over the deal. If this is true lets, hear who they are and what they offered that was better than what we got. I really doubt Huntington turned down a better deal.

by #1BuccoFan on Jul 26, 2008 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Calling Joe Buck an "assclown"...

...is an insult to asses. And clowns.

He’s so obviously disinterested in baseball, it’s really painful to watch. I know he’s successful doing what he’s doing, and all that, but I wish he’d go find something he’d actually enjoy, and leave the baseball stuff for people who care about it.

by Vlad on Jul 27, 2008 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, he could

but I don’t know if he could make a living commentating about The Bachelor.
:)

The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".

by UtesFan89 on Jul 27, 2008 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.
Start posting about the Pirates »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

101_0170_small
40-Man Moves
18470r_small
Rule 5 possibilities
20080124sgrammy_330_small
Small Market Teams Pocketing Spare Change
Small
Jeebus Cracker
Small
McCutchen's defense
Small
Roberto calling
20090612mf_fleury_cup_500hp_small
Pirates would trade Doumit!
Leo4_small
John Sickels' Comments on Donnie Veal
Pitt20_small
LaRoche to the Phils?
Bloody_mary_small
Ohlendorf Blogging: USDA can't keep him "down on the farm."

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Mariners Eyeing Doumit
Tabata 5-5 w/3 Ribbies - Hitting .390 @ EOS
Bay rejects $60M over 4 years
"[Chase D'Arnaud] does everything well enough," said an American League...
Pirates hire Steve Williams as Major League scout
Jim Tracy, Baby! NL Manager of the Year!
2009 Minor League Six-Year Free Agent Listing
NL Rookie of the Year: Chris Coghlan
2010 CHONE Projections
2010 UZR Projections

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SPONSORS


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie