Bucs Dugout: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



At the risk of sounding skeptical...

Is anyone else becoming concerned at the lack of hitting on the part of Pierce, Adam LaRoche, and Moss.  Absolutlely none of these three are hitting for any type of average and Pierce hasn't hit a homerun in over 100 at-bats.  What's with this guys?  Did everyone expect them to struggle to this extent or could we have a problem.  I thought at least one of them might begin even mildly warm and then cool down.  As it is now, they're all ice cold and poking holes in Al Gore's "Global Warming" scenario.

On another note, I wish someone would explain to me why McCutchen was not brought up to play CF instead of Morgan.  This guy should have concentrated on hockey because he's never going to be a major league hitter.  He's got speed and a terrific glove but until MLB allows us to have offensive and defensive squads he's useless.  What was the think behind his promotion to the MLB?  Seriously.

0 recs | Comment 53 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

who knows

1) I think Moss will be a low-average, decent power guy. Much higher minor league K rates than the guy he’s been compared with — McLouth.

2) I don’t think LaRoche is healthy.

3) As a member of this winter’s “don’t hand Pearce a job by giving away Xavier club,” I obviously don’t view Pearce as can’t miss. I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t like his swing and he’s not that athletic.

It’s obviously way too early to judge. All three could be in the 2010 All-Star game, and all three could be washouts. Prospects are mysterious.

by bolton on Aug 21, 2008 5:22 PM EDT   0 recs

A little perturbed

I’m a bit worried because none of them are doing very well but I also think that Andy LaRoche is still suffering from his injury.

It’s way too early to draw any conclusions from this if they still aren’t hitting this time next year, then I think it is time to make some major adjustments.

I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.

by Chester J Lampwick on Aug 21, 2008 5:26 PM EDT   0 recs

it is definitely

way to early to send up any warning flares. moss has shown flashes, he just needs regular playing time. i agre, andy needs the offseason to let his thumb heal (and maybe get operated), and pearce will never be a long-term solution until he stops being a guess hitter (ala syaing he had no clue what pitch he hit for the RBI against the mets the other night)

by geeves on Aug 21, 2008 5:26 PM EDT   0 recs

Cutch

Maybe the reason they recalled Morgan instead of Cutch is the new management doesnt want to risk any negative effects on Cutchs development (ala not getting his at bats)

by ihs44024 on Aug 21, 2008 6:19 PM EDT   0 recs

In 10 days this reasoning becomes irrelevant...

because after September 1st…Cutch won’t be getting ANY at bats unless he gets called up. There’s an opening on the 40 man roster now.

Depending on the health of Minky’s wife, Jodi, there could be as many as 3 roster moves tomorrow.
1) Gorzo up, Davis down.
2) Minky back, Morgan down.
3) Capps up, Sanchez down.

by Thunder on Aug 21, 2008 8:10 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

What is happening here?

Let me start by saying that I dont care that Jose Batista is gone. He was going to be nothing more than a utility man for the Pirates which tells me that there are very few other teams where he could make the 25 man roster. I think that Coonley and Huntington have done an good job as far as getting value for Bay and Marte and they obviously did a nice job with the draft. What bothers me is the illusion that they were able to create that the Nuttings are actually making a bigger financial commitment to the organization when they are actually stuffing more and more money into their pockets.

The opening day payroll this year was just over 48MM. Substract from that Morris (10MM), Bay (6MM), Nady (3.3MM), Marte (2.1MM) and Bautista (1.8MM) and you are down to 24.8MM. Assuming that we will trade Jack for prospects (6.6MM) we are at 18.2MM. The raises for Freddy and Snell put us in the 23-24 range. Even if we assume that they spend another 6MM or so to “fill out the roster” (which they wont) the highest the team payroll will be next year is 30MM.

Sure they spent around 10MM on the draft but they spent 5 last year being cheap and only taking players that would sign for slot money. The way I see it they just put an additional 13MM in their pockets (18 in saved payroll minus the extra 5 spent on the draft) and managed to look like they turned over a new leaf and are concerned about more than just the bottom line.

Once again the Nuttings win and we lose by paying the same ticket prices next season to see a far less talented team.

This was probably a little tough to follow but I am curious to know what you guys think.

by #1BuccoFan on Aug 21, 2008 6:29 PM EDT   0 recs

Hold on a moment,

the PBC is still paying the $10 million to Morris. They let him go, he didn’t retire. If he would have retired, they would have been off the hook for the $10 million. Of the players traded, the salaries are pro-rated unless the teams that picked them up agreed to pay Pittsburgh the cash for April, May, June and July. Considering what they got back in player/prospects, I would say that Boston, NYY and LA didn’t pay Nutting for games played as Pirates.

Having said that, they might have cut $6 million off of the actual payroll for 2008, not $24.2 million dollars. I am not 100% on the numbers, just a guestimate based on the $$$ amounts listed above.

I’m not taking the Nutting side on this, just pointing out that the savings aren’t quite as high as one might think.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 21, 2008 6:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Also

Remember Billy Beane’s famous line “you’re either building something that’s special or you have something that’s special. In between is just no man’s land” They can have a losing record without the aforementioned players. $100 million payrolls dont win pennants, just ask the Orioles. You have to build a team from the ground up, and thats what is finally happening, so people are excited for good reason.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 12:18 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

OK, I was looking at the now, not 2009...

Nine of the current Pirates are arbitration eligible and I would expect raises to be higher than each is being paid now. It has been mentioned that the Pirates are looking at offering McLouth and Doumit contract extensions that would buy out at least one of their free agent years and give them raises ABOVE what they are making right now. If they want to keep Mientkiewicz and possibly Gomez, it might take a little more than what it cost them this season. As far as free agency goes, I really don’t see them kicking out any serious cash but who knows what they might do there. I can see the payroll increasing over the number previously stated ($24 million) but nowhere near where it was.

Maybe they will spend the extra money on scouting, player development and international signings as well as the draft? Or maybe they will spend it on a small island in the Caribbean known for fishing and the beaches? All that I know is they won’t give it to you and me, that’s for sure!

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 21, 2008 7:30 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I can see the concern for Pearce, LaRoche and Moss,

based on their performance to date. To expect these kids to immediately step in and replace the bats and the experience of Jason Bay and Xavier Nady is not reasonable by any means. Injuries could (and in the case of Andy LaRoche) have something to do with it. Facing Danny Haren, Branden Webb, Randy Johnson and Johann Santana might have something to do with it as well. Since the trade deadline, the PBC has played Arizona, Philadelphia, New York Mets and the Chicago Cubs, teams competing for playoff spots with better than average pitching rotations. Even when facing the Cincinnati Reds, they faced both Volquez and Cueto, both up and coming pitching studs in MLB.

Also, this is their first real taste of MLB pitching on a consistent basis. Many MLB All-Stars and HOFers have had slow starts to their careers, only to catch fire down the road. Trust me, I’m not saying that Pearce, LaRoche and Moss are future All-Stars or headed to the Hall of Fame, all I am saying is that three weeks of baseball does not predict the future of these three guys. Look at Zack Duke’s start and compare that with where he is now in his career.

Patience, patience, patience…

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 21, 2008 7:11 PM EDT   0 recs

I've heard

that it takes 1000 AB’s for a player to really figure out what it’s like playing in the major leagues. Very few prospects tear it up Evan Longoria style.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 12:20 AM EDT to parent up   1 recs

ElliottBayBucco

Your explanation of the high quality of pitchers faced by these guys is a good point that I had not considered and could be an explanation for poor performances of these three in addition to LaRoche’s injury. I realize new hitters have to adjust to MLB pitching just as the pitchers have to adjust to the styles of the new hitters and so I’m hopeful that our bats will adjust so we can see an improvement. However, I had hoped that at least one of the 3 would have started out hot just to give us some hope upon which to cling but that hasn’t happened.

At this point, I would be satisfied if management returned Gorzo to the rotation and sent Duke either to Indy or the bullpen. I’ve totally given up on him and never expect him to add anything to our team. He’s simply not a MLB pitcher and we must realize that fact. He has done nothing to prove me wrong. He simply gives up too many hits and does not register enough strikeouts all which tell me that he is neither capable of fooling anybody nor overpowering anybody. The league has him figured out. Stick a fork in him…he’s done.

by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 22, 2008 11:58 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

IPF

the Bucs get Sabathia on Sunday, might be a good day to get some work done around the house. As far as Duke is concerned, a shift to the bullpen seems like a good plan for the remainder of the season. If some team, any team, has an infatuation with Duke during the off-season, lets hope they can move him for a prospect or two or three. I am anxious to see if Gorzo’s time in Indy has made a difference and got him back on track.

In regards to Moss, sometimes a switch in leagues (AL to NL, vice versa) can take some time to adjust for players. Different parks, different pitchers, different styles of play, all factor into initial performance. HItting in that lineup in Boston also has some perks, just ask Jason Bay!

I’m glad they are taking their lumps now and hope the lessons learned prove valuable for the start of the 2009 season.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 1:34 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Stop being delusional....

We aren’t getting one, let alone two or three prospects for Zach Duke. The guy has been awful, doesn’t strike anyone out and has the highest BA against the last three years. Would you give up a prospect for a guy like that on another team? Of course not.

by dtoddwin on Aug 22, 2008 1:37 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I forgot...

Bill Bavasi is out of a job in Seattle. But, Sabean, Wade and Bowden still have jobs, so who knows?

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 1:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Bivasi

Is a “special assistant” in Cincy. Pair him with Dusty Baker’s crazy requests and we might have a winner.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 1:51 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Left handed pitchers can have

long careers if they get their sh!t together. Every time I see Duke pitch, I think of this guy and wonder if a change of scenery and a switch in leagues would turn him around.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 2:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Even if Duke is on the Moyer career path...

…Moyer didn’t start to put it all together until he was 31. If we keep Duke that long, he’ll be long past the end of his arb years, and thus not only struggling for another six or so years, but doing it for top dollar, too.

by Vlad on Aug 22, 2008 6:49 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

failed prospect

Some scout might think he needs a “change in scenery” and then you can trade him for another failed prospect. Those sometimes work out.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 1:52 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Why start Andrew McCutchen's MLB clock now,

on a season lost months ago? Bringing him up now loses the PBC a year of service in MLB, having McCutchen go to free agency a year early on a wasted season (one month’s worth of playing time) would be unwise. Let him work out his kinks for the remainder of the AAA season, focus on management’s suggestions during the off-season and come to spring training competing for the starting CF position in 2009. McLouth, McCutchen and Moss in 2009!

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 21, 2008 7:35 PM EDT   1 recs

Major league service time is measured in days not years

so the Pirates wouldn’t waste a year towards McCutchen’s FA by bringing him up now. Even so I think you have the right idea, since they may want to make sure he has less than one year of service time at the end of next season so why waste any now.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 21, 2008 8:41 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I Agree-Be Patient!

Looking at the Barry Bond’s first 4 seasons (2082 ABs) he hit only .256, averaged 21 HRs per season, 29 SBs, and 56 RBIs (he batted leadoff mostly). Did anyone think he would amount to what he did the next 3 seasons? He avg was .301, 31 HRs, 111 RBIs, and 45 SBs over those 3 years. Sure he was young (ages 22-25 for the 1st 4 years; age 26-28 for the last 3 years), but at age 25 he hit only .248 with 19 HRs. Almost Jose Bautisa like numbers at age 25!

Who would take the same numbers of Andy LaRouche, Moss, Pearce, or McCutchen today over their next 4 years? I think we would feel that they were not going to develop and try others.

Andy LaRouche (age 25) has only 200 ABs over 3 years, Moss (age 25) 164 ABs, Pearce (age 24) 126 ABs. These guys have yet to even broken in their hats yet!

I am not saying any of these guys will be next Bonds, but they have yet to get their feet wet. So let’s see how things go.

by zogger on Aug 21, 2008 7:57 PM EDT   0 recs

zogger-

Your comments are well thought out, reasonable, and suggest patience. GET OFF THE INTERNET PLZ! ;-)

by wickethewok on Aug 21, 2008 11:16 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Numbers

Don’t always tell the whole story, but you are dead on. Every player has a different timetable, and you dont want to be the team that gave up on a guy too soon. To think that the Indians almost gave up on Cliff Lee before this year…

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 2:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Apparently

I just looked it up and apparently they looked at trading Lee for Carlos Quentin, how rediculous would that have been. The D-backs cant be happy they gave up on Quentin.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 2:08 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Quentin...

another guy that took a little time to come around.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 2:25 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

The Indians.....

didn’t almost give up on Cliff Lee. They sent him down last year, just as we sent down Gorzo this year. That in no means we are giving up on Gorzo. Duke is not going to turn into Cliff Lee.

by dtoddwin on Aug 22, 2008 3:38 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

They almost traded him

And trading him means they gave up on him, so therefore they almost gave up on him IMO.

Duke may not turn into Cliff Lee (very few pitchers do), but Duke could definitely turn into a 4/5 starter.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 4:26 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Rumor was during the winter that the Indians were trying to trade Lee to

the Pirates for Jason Bay. FC crushed a potential deal if I remember correctly.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 6:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I just remembered the D’backs potential trade, but apparently the mets looked at him too

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/05/odds-and-ends-b.html

So they were actively shopping him to multiple teams

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 7:18 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Trading isn't giving up ........

We didn’t “give up” on Bay or Nady. We tried to do something that we thought was beneficial to our club. I’m sure Boston and NYY felt the same way.

What shred of evidence is there that Duke can turn into a back end of the rotation guy? The last three years are a mountain of evidence and it’s clear he isn’t that good. Sure it CAN happen, but expecting it to happen is how teams become bad and stay that way.

by dtoddwin on Aug 22, 2008 5:04 PM EDT   0 recs

Unless washed up pitchers end up in St. Louis where David Duncan

turns them around. There is no evidence that Duke can turn it around BUT there is no evidence that says he can’t either. Look at Jamie Moyer for christ’s sake! He sucked in his early years yet turned it around and still has a career at the age of 45. Left handers have some value that baseball people see that we don’t. Just because a player can’t make it in one organization doesn’t mean he won’t make it in another.

by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 6:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Well

There is a difference between trading for prospects by selling high on a player, and trading a player who has struggled because you are giving up on him. The Pirates did not give up on Bay, or Nady but were selling high. The Indians almost traded Lee at a low point would have been giving up on him.

Duke’s 2.37 career minor league ERA is evidence that he could be a Major League starter. Teams become bad by poor scouting, drafting, and management decisions and not simply because they keet giving starts to a 25 year old with decent stuff who performed well in the minors. Pitchers with decent stuff sometimes “figure something out” like confidence, learning to pitch to contact, or add another pitch. I am not saying it will happen, but it could happen and its not like we are attempting to contend this year.

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 22, 2008 7:27 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Zach Duke does not have “decent” stuff. He performed well in the minors because a) he did not give up home runs and b) lower-class hitters can’t hit breaking pitches. His final year at AAA, in 2005, saw his strikeout numbers beginning to collapse and his hits allowed beginning to increase as he finally encountered batters how could lay off the junkballs he throws. His ERA (2.92) looked OK, and was largely aided by Duke rarely surrendering home runs, but it was already headed the wrong direction.

In the majors, Duke has struck out only 4.67 batters per 9 innings. This is terrible. There’s a reason he leads the world in hits allowed: because batters put TONS of balls into play against him.

by matskralc on Aug 24, 2008 9:57 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Not ever pitcher K's a ton

But they are sort of the exception. Maybe Duke is destined for the bullpen, but what is there to lose by starting him this year?

by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 24, 2008 10:56 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Opportunity cost

We’d lose the opportunity to have other, better pitchers with higher ceilings in the rotation instead.

I don’t think we should cut Duke outright or anything like that, but it might not be a bad idea to move him into Dumatrait’s old long relief role.

by Vlad on Aug 25, 2008 11:39 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Way too early...

…to draw many conclusions about any of these guys.

by Vlad on Aug 22, 2008 6:50 PM EDT   0 recs

Vlad:

This may come as no surprise but I disagree with your assessment of Duke. I sincerely believe that he does not have the talent to pitch effectively in the MLB and needs to be sent down. Quite frankly, I don’t think that even Dave Duncan could resurrect Duke’s career because the talent just isn’t there for Duke to succeed. I’m upset that he’s taking the spot of someone else and I don’t care who that pitcher is as long as his name isn’t JVB because he isn’t as bad as Duke. Just look at the massive amount of hits Duke allows. Nobody can survive by giving up that many hits. He has to go and the sooner the better. I don’t even want him infecting our bullpen with his garbage pitches because somebody might accidently use him in a meaningful game (if we ever play in another one).

by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 23, 2008 10:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I was talking about...

…the guys in the diary post: “Pierce, Adam LaRoche, and Moss”.

That said, if you want to talk Duke, I think people in both camps are being too reactionary right now. He’s not one of our five best starters right now, so he doesn’t belong in our rotation, but he’s one of the 11/12 best pitchers of all types on the roster, so he belongs in the majors, probably in a long relief role.

Duke hasn’t pitched well, but he hasn’t pitched quite as badly as his stats would indicate, either, since our DER (the rate at which balls in play are converted to outs) is among the worst in the majors. That hurts Duke disproportionately, because he puts many more balls in play than the average pitcher. Thus, any defensive improvements we make (like moving Nate to a corner) will be extra-effective when it comes to his pitching. He gives up too many line drives, but I think he can exist as a workable fifth starter/long reliever, and that has value as long as it comes cheap. People have been tossing Moyer out there as a best-case scenario for Duke, but I think Kirk Rueter is a better fit.

Tossing him outright at this point would be crazy. That’s the whole point of having depth in the first place: You keep inexpensive guys like Duke as backup plans, so that when you lose three starters in a week, you don’t have to call Yoslan Herrera up from AA to get his ass handed to him.

by Vlad on Aug 25, 2008 11:51 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Vlad

“Tossing him outright at this point would be crazy. That’s the whole point of having depth in the first place: You keep inexpensive guys like Duke as backup plans, so that when you lose three starters in a week, you don’t have to call Yoslan Herrera up from AA to get his ass handed to him.”

I can see your point to some extent, but is he worth keeping around as an arbitration-eligible player? How much do you think he will make in 2009? Couldn`t Huntington find another depth guy or two, perhaps someone like Dumatrait much cheaper in the offseason?

With the addition of arms like Ohlendorf, Karstens, and D. McCutchen, to go along with Snell, Gorzo, Maholm, and Dumatrait, we can forget about organizational fodder like Gunner`s boy “Hip Hip Herrera” next year. I know the injury bug bites everyone`s pitching staff, but is Duke really even necessary for the 2009 Pirates?

by patthatt on Aug 25, 2008 3:06 PM EDT   0 recs

First year of arb is fairly cheap

I don’t know that you’d be able to get an equivalent pitcher for much cheaper. And Duke is nice because he’s LHRP insurance (career .712 OPS vs. LHB) – Grabow’s probably coming back to the pack a bit next season, if they don’t trade him, and I trust Burnett about as far as I can throw him.

It’s 2010 that’s going to be the tough call.

by Vlad on Aug 26, 2008 10:15 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

patthatt

You brought up an excellent point about Duke once he becomes arbitration-eligible although it’s hard to imagine any arbitrator awarding Duke more than the Pirates offer him considering his extraordinarilly high number of hits allowed. These arbitrators only have stats upon which to judge their decisions and I don’t think an agent could possibly demonstrate anybody with a worse performance. If management wants to keep him for long relief, garbage innings, and a replacement for an injured starter I wouldn’t be opposed but I don’t want him taking up a slot as one of our regular starting 5 pitchers because he simply isn’t worthy of it. Other than Herrera and JVB, anybody would be hard-pressed to find a less talented pitcher than Duke.

by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 25, 2008 10:12 PM EDT   0 recs

There are many, many pitchers less talented than Duke in the majors

For just one example, Cincinnati has given 29 starts so far this year to pitchers with an ERA of 6+. They’d KILL to have someone who’s only as bad as Duke on staff – they’ve been having to make do with Matt Belisle and Josh Fogg.

by Vlad on Aug 26, 2008 10:19 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Maybe we don't know how good we have it in Pittsburgh

getting to watch Duke start every fifth day. I’m sure you’re right that there are quite a few ML pitchers worse but aren’t they mostly back of the bullpen guys? I doubt that there are many worse than Duke, who also have as many starts as he has had.

I wouldn’t want to give up on him though since I can’t understand how he was so effective his first year up. It doesn’t seem impossible that he will rediscover what he had – unlikely perhaps, but not impossible.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 26, 2008 1:34 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

He was effective his first year up...

…for three main reasons:

a) The bullpen stranded 84.2% of his inherited runners.
and
b) Only 5.8% of his flyballs went over the wall – 10% is a more typical figure.
and
c) 16.9% of his flyballs were popups – that’s potentially sustainable, but he’s been between 5.9% and 7.9% for the rest of his career, which argues that it was a fluke.

Basically, he got lucky in several different ways at once, and that luck went away at the end of the year.

by Vlad on Aug 26, 2008 2:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I could be off base,

but my guess is that those flyball/homerun/popup numbers stem from a lot of swings—and off-balance contact—at his curveball his first year up. I remember thinking that Duke had one of the best hooks in the game, but now it seems that it is his only effective pitch and people don’t chase it anymore.

by DITO on Aug 26, 2008 2:23 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

NL starters...

…with 10+ starts this year and a worse ERA than Duke (5.29).

Josh Fogg – 12, 7.66
Greg Reynolds – 11, 6.71
Charlie Morton – 13, 6.39
Brad Penny – 17, 6.05
Micah Owings – 18, 5.93
Jorge de la Rosa – 17, 5.86
Shawn Hill – 12, 5.83
Adam Eaton – 19, 5.80
Andrew Miller – 20, 5.63
Mark Hendrickson – 19, 5.62
Ian Snell – 25, 5.60
Brandon Backe – 27, 5.54
Tom Glavine – 13, 5.54
Jeff Francis – 20, 5.52
Barry Zito – 26, 5.31

There are a bunch in the AL, too.

by Vlad on Aug 26, 2008 2:12 PM EDT   0 recs

Grozelanny

18, 6.82

Pittsburgh Lumber Co.
http://mvn.com/mlb-pirates

by MBandi on Aug 26, 2008 2:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

AKA Gorzelanny

Pittsburgh Lumber Co.
http://mvn.com/mlb-pirates

by MBandi on Aug 26, 2008 2:33 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks, good catch.

Not sure how I missed that.

Duke is only 0.03 behind Dumatrait, too.

by Vlad on Aug 26, 2008 2:48 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks for taking the time to post

that list. I wouldn’t have thought there would be so many starters that have been that bad. I still hate it everytime I see that Duke is pitching though.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 26, 2008 3:18 PM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bring Back the X-Man?
Small
Defense Doesn't Win Championships...in MLB
Small
Foul Balls, Broken Bats, Fan Injuries
Small
BP posts Pirates Top 11 Prospects
Linda_s_birthday006_small
Team Salaries
Small
Colin Cowherd and Bill Parcells
Dockellis_small
doumit signs
Small
Dock Ellis Passes At Age 63
Small
Jody Gerut still a Padre
Small
About McLouth

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter