Pirates Trade Jose Bautista to Jays
For a player to be named later. The Bucs' treatment of Bautista continues to baffle me. He's no one's idea of a great player, but he can play five positions and isn't worthless as a hitter. Why he wouldn't be valuable to the Pirates as a bench player is beyond me. He'll be arbitration-eligible again this winter, but he shouldn't be that expensive.
Maybe the PTBNL turns out to be a good one, but I doubt that highly--it looks like the Pirates just dumped him. I wonder if there's more to this story than we know right now. Again, I know Bautista isn't great and he shouldn't be starting at third for the Pirates anymore, but he's a competent, inexpensive ballplayer and I don't understand why the Pirates would toss him away for nothing.
UPDATE: See my post above.
0 recs |
54 comments
Comments
can jose
play a bunch of positions? sure. he isn’t completely worthless as a hitter, but from what I feel I’ve seen, he is that unfortunate combo of a guy who can’t hit well enough or regularly enough to be a starter, but needs regular everyday at-bats to get into any kind of hitting rhythm at all.
the pirates would have to pay him a bare minimum of 1.5 million, but it’s much more likely that his salary goes UP and pushes two million, and he is certainly not worth that kind of money.
it’s a move, but it doesn’t really mean much in the long run.
by geeves on Aug 21, 2008 5:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
Charlie,
I actually looked through your archives first for the best reasoning supporting this trade. Wasn’t it you this offseason who said, essentially, that it doesn’t matter what the Pirates do with the nobodies who won’t make up the future core?
Bautista has to be near what could be considered his peak, and he’s never put up even a league-average OPS+. He wasn’t completely valueless, but he wasn’t appreciably better than Chris Gomez (especially if you compare contracts).
The bench makeup is important, and could definitely improve for next season. I just don’t see any reason to be baffled over the loss of a do-nothing utility player. Selling low? Probably — but the price wasn’t high to begin with.
by coryh64 on Aug 21, 2008 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
The inconsistency in this blog is baffling. Bautista is a bit player and we should be thrilled that someone gave the Pirates something for him. Hopefully the Pirates fascination with 4th outfielders and groundout prone utility infielders is over.
by Blyleven Curve Ball on Aug 22, 2008 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are assuming that someone gave
the Pirates “something” for him. If that is the case, then you are right, but we don’t know for sure.
by DITO on Aug 22, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's confirmed Toronto will be paying his salary, right?
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 22, 2008 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Um, am I inconsistent on a regular basis? Serious question.
When blogging with no editor to point out these things and usually without leaving much time to reflect before posting, some inconsistency is probably likely.
by Charlie on Aug 22, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, no more so than anyone else who does this. I think in general, most good bloggers hold true to overarching philosophies about their teams. So long as you don’t deviate from that too often, I think it’s okay to flip-flop on minor details. (Especially on stuff like this, where one post is made seven months after another.)
by coryh64 on Aug 22, 2008 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heh. I didn’t see this comment before I posted above, but your first paragraph is right.
by Charlie on Aug 22, 2008 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bautista
I agree, Charlie, but he will not be inexpensive in 2009 as a bench player unless you consider $2 million ‘inexpensive’ since he is being paid $1.8 this season.
I very much dount that the PTBNL will be significant. I think that Bautista would have been better utilized as a throw-in a multi-player deal.
by thegunner on Aug 21, 2008 5:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is with a heavy heart
That I announce the closing of and my resignation as President of the Jose Bautista “My Boy” Fan Club. :-(
by matskralc on Aug 21, 2008 5:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't
join any club that would have me as a member.
— Former president and CEO, Chris Duffy Fan Club
by bucdaddy on Aug 21, 2008 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked Joey Bats...
and I think he’s got more value than “0-for-three-vas”, Gomez, and MInky combined. Plus, he can play all of those positions. So, who’s going to play 3B next year? LaRoche? I wonder if he’ll hit his first HR by then? They’ll never bring up Walker and Alvarez can’t possibly be ready by then. I sure wish we would have kept him and dumped the three guys I mentioned earlier.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 22, 2008 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Come on.....
this is just silly. Who cares that he can play “all those postions” when he doesn’t play any of them very well. And when is he going to play them. You want him playing center rather than Nate or McC? He plays third and he can stand in the outfield just like anyone else. Christ, DM has never played there until this year, Pearce had never done it. It isn’t that difficult.
He is also making $1 million more roughly than each of the guys you mentioned and was going to get more next year. Clearly not worth it. And boy am I gonna enjoy watching you and all the guys on PBC blog eat your hat on Andy LaRoche next year. That’s gonna be fun. And just for the record he’s already hit two homers with the Pirates in 50 at bats. Translates to 20-25 over the course of a full season.
by dtoddwin on Aug 22, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you probably
don’t want to see bautista at shortstop over rivas.
by johnnycuff on Aug 22, 2008 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked him for some reason but I don’t think this is either a good deal or a bad deal. Sure he would be a fine bench player but no better than Rivas or Gomez in my mind.
Still I feel he was treated a bit harshly by the team but like Charlie said, there may be more to the story.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Aug 21, 2008 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's see...
Minky, Gomez, Bautista…all interchangeable parts…and all expecting 7 figure salaries next year. Pirates had to make a choice. Right or wrong.
by Thunder on Aug 21, 2008 5:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I got the feeling
that after losing his starting job the day LaRoche joined the team and followed by his demotion to AAA, the new regime no longer thought Bautista was in their plans. He was just shoved aside.
I’m sure Bautista is glad to be out.
by northsidenotch on Aug 21, 2008 6:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bautista cost way too much to be a bench player. But like most people have said, its neither a good or bad deal.
by ihs44024 on Aug 21, 2008 6:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What is going on here?
Let me start by saying that I dont care that Jose Batista is gone. He was going to be nothing more than a utility man for the Pirates which tells me that there are very few other teams where he could make the 25 man roster. I think that Coonley and Huntington have done an good job as far as getting value for Bay and Marte and they obviously did a nice job with the draft. What bothers me is the illusion that they were able to create that the Nuttings are actually making a bigger financial commitment to the organization when they are actually stuffing more and more money into their pockets.
The opening day payroll this year was just over 48MM. Substract from that Morris (10MM), Bay (6MM), Nady (3.3MM), Marte (2.1MM) and Bautista (1.8MM) and you are down to 24.8MM. Assuming that we will trade Jack for prospects (6.6MM) we are at 18.2MM. The raises for Freddy and Snell put us in the 23-24 range. Even if we assume that they spend another 6MM or so to "fill out the roster" (which they wont) the highest the team payroll will be next year is 30MM.
Sure they spent around 10MM on the draft but they spent 5 last year being cheap and only taking players that would sign for slot money. The way I see it they just put an additional 13MM in their pockets (18 in saved payroll minus the extra 5 spent on the draft) and managed to look like they turned over a new leaf and are concerned about more than just the bottom line.
Once again the Nuttings win and we lose by paying the same ticket prices next season to see a far less talented team.
This was probably a little tough to follow but I am curious to know what you guys think.
by #1BuccoFan on Aug 21, 2008 6:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you are right
I would only add that Coonington probably means to offer Maholm, Doumit and McLouth long-term contracts. That would add money to next years’ budget.
I believe Nutting deserves praise for hiring competent people. But not for opening the checkbook.
Steve Z
by steve_z on Aug 21, 2008 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
even with that $30MM payroll, the Pirates should be nearly as good as they were this year
sure, the owners could pocket the money, or Huntington could have convinced them to save the difference for future seasons. in 2010, they could have a payroll at $60MM instead of having two seasons at $45MM, for example.
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 22, 2008 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If only
we knew that they were saving it for future seasons I would be all for it. However that has to fall into the I’ll believe it when I see it category for me.
by #1BuccoFan on Aug 23, 2008 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just blindly speculating here, but
I imagine they saw him as a potential attitude problem after he got demoted. He clearly wasn’t happy with the decision at the time, and made it fairly well-known in interview clips and such following the move.
Welp...
by phillybucco on Aug 21, 2008 6:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That makes him different from every other player that's been in MLB a couple years then sent down, how?
by azibuck on Aug 21, 2008 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunno...
hence “blindly speculating…”
Welp...
by phillybucco on Aug 21, 2008 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another roster move likely
Gorzo not starting at Indy tonight, and it’s his turn (Mike Thompson starting), and the game notes for Indy do not have him listed as starting in the next 4 games.
My only question is…does Gorzo start tomorrow in place of Duke…or early next week instead of Davis?
by Thunder on Aug 21, 2008 7:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My question is,
who is next on their way out the door?
Paulino? Wilson? Sanchez? The Pirates broadcasting team?
by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 21, 2008 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not Bob Walk!
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Aug 21, 2008 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I vote
for Greg Brown to go next!!!
Check out my blog at thoughtsofrs@blogspot.com
by Count Vertigo on Aug 21, 2008 10:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Broadcasting Team Just Fine
I listen to alot of games on XM and I think the Pirates broadcasting team (except for Wehner) is superior to most.
by pirateinvirginia on Aug 21, 2008 11:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Greg Brown
For the most part,I agree.
Lanny Frattare is fine and I like Bob Walk.
Steve Blass and Wehner are ok,if a bit dull.
I think a lot of it is Wehner’s voice,which almost has a sleep inducing monotone to it.
But I cannot stand Greg Brown,he could go at any time and I would be thrilled!
Check out my blog at thoughtsofrs@blogspot.com
by Count Vertigo on Aug 22, 2008 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Long-term contracts
I an a huge advocate of signing outstanding players, like Longoria or Tulawitzki, to long term contracts. But it is very important that these long-term contracts be given to the players who are consistent in their play as well as consistent and mature in their approach to the game.
I don’t know the Pirate players’ makeup; but, as far as I am concerned, it appears that at this time, Maholm and McLouth MIGHT be deserving. I am not so sure about Doumit. The Pirates need to be very careful. They may have already been duped by Snell.
by thegunner on Aug 22, 2008 1:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
every player has a price where a long-term deal is a good one
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 22, 2008 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Upon seeing "Bautista immediately becomes Blue Jays HR leader" ...
I was shocked! Looking around, he would have been an upgrade for several teams.
While obviously not gettin’ the job done in Pittsburgh, we should have kept him over Rivas and Gomez, and, I do like Gomez (always have). I’m convinced there was more to this “off the field.”
Likewise, Paulina would be an upgrade at catcher for at least a half dozen other
MLB teams. If traded wisely (upsides in a down year), he could bring more young talent. I do like the Huntington ‘strategy’ of acquiring young player’s in their down
year (Tabata, LaRoche). A year ago, LaRoche would have been extremely costly to acquire.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 22, 2008 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Could you please.....
tell me which of the “several teams” Bautista would have been an upgrade for? He’s playing in Toronto because Rolen is injured. He isn’t better than Rolen. He also will probably make about $2.5 million next year. The Pirates would have no tendered him.
Too many fans are delusional about the talent in our system. We weren’t getting anything more than this for Bautista. NH took advantage of Toronto’s desperation and hopefully got a decent prospect at the A level. We’ll see. We aren’t getting much, if anything for Paulino. And the same for Jack Wilson. When looking at other teams you need to look at their prospects as well and who they see developing internally. Bautista is an “upgrade” for probably zero teams. Paulino, at this point, maybe less.
by dtoddwin on Aug 22, 2008 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I must ...
A. Giants (Castillo), Twins (whateverhisnameis), Indians (no-Blake), A’s (no Chavez), Astros (Wigginton).
Delusional? The Twins don’t have a lot of talent … they just find a way to win. Hat’s off to them.
B. Paulino would be an upgrade in Houston, Seattle, Florida, Cincinnati, San Diego, and YES,
Milwaukee.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 22, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bautista is on the bench once
Scott Rolen is healthy.
by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 22, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rolen is a flop ...
He wouldn’t/couldn’t play for LaRussa … and all indicators are the same w/Toronto.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 22, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
huh?
he’s been a good hitter and a phenomenal fielder this year. almost exactly the same overall value as Carlos Quentin. why? because he’s 20 runs better than the average third baseman in the field while Quentin plays a weaker defensive position and is 10 runs worse than the average right fielder.
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 22, 2008 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will Scot Rolen ever "be healthy"?
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 22, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is the question
But he could possibly be the best defensive 3B of this generation.
by Reddrummer9187 on Aug 23, 2008 12:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quite true ...
for the 60 or so games, per year, he’s not on the DL.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 23, 2008 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude....
you’re right about Rolen being injury prone. No question, but you are so wrong about evaluating talent. And your list of teams that could be improved at third and catcher doesn’t take into account injuries or prospects they may have that are close (which I knew you wouldn’t do). So, more accurately the list should be None and None.
by dtoddwin on Aug 23, 2008 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injuries and prospects (futures) are typically not in the lineup
What team do you scout for? I’ll send a check for your expert advise.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 23, 2008 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take.....
a full time salary from any team than thinks Bautista should be there starting third baseman and Paulino their starting catcher and they should give up prospects to have that? Not sure how you want to build a team, but put me on the payroll.
by dtoddwin on Aug 24, 2008 9:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You're my guy ...
When my ship comes in, if I’m not at the beach, I intend to purchase the first expansion
team awarded to the Dominican Republic. If successful, you will be assigned to oversee
the organizations minor league player development, reporting to General Manager Jose
Bautista, and, club President Ronnie Paulino. I would expect you to coordinate closely with Manager Jeremy Burnitz. Pack your bags and make your family arrangements, I’ll call.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 24, 2008 1:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













