Link Roundup: Pirates Acquire Robinzon Diaz From Jays
Photo: Larry Coor
-P- Catcher Robinzon Diaz has been named as the PTBNL in the Jose Bautista trade. We were told to expect the PTBNL to be a prospect, so this return initially seems underwhelming--Diaz is nearly 25 and has never hit for power or drawn walks. He has consistently hit for average, however, and his defense gets the job done, and the Pirates have/had a glaring organizational need for catching. Here's a description from Baseball Prospectus:
Diaz is a little bit of an anomaly: A catcher who hits like a middle infielder, with good contact-hitting ability, a very low strikeout rate, and above-average speed. His defense is quite good, and repeating the level can`t be held against him because the organization gave priority to Curtis Thigpen. Still, the toll of the catching position is going to make it hard for him to keep legging out base hits, so there may not be much development in his bat.
That actually sounds fairly interesting. He could be a little like Ronny Paulino without Paulino's annoyingly indifferent fielding and utter lack of foot speed. He could do a decent job as the Pirates' backup catcher next year. He's probably stretched as a starter, but he could be useful and cheap for a few years.
He has been added to the Pirates' 40-man roster and sent to Indianapolis.
-P- I don't mean to put too fine a point on it, but you should always beware reporting like this:
[Zach] Duke felt encouraged by his performance Friday night, when he used a glove-over-his-head windup designed to loosen his delivery for the first time in a game.
"We're definitely going in the right direction," he said. "The ball had life out of my hand. It's comforting to know that when you're trying stuff to get better that it works. It's a weight off the mind."
It's not that the Post-Gazette is wrong to report this, or anything, just that it would be wrong to assume it has any meaning. First, let's look at what Duke actually did Friday night:
6 IP, 4 K, 2 BB, 4 ER
There's nothing particularly inspiring about that. Even if there were, pitcher performance can vary widely from game to game, and pitchers and coaches are often quick to chalk up ephemeral gains to changes in mechanics and repertoire that almost never have any meaning.
The blog USS Mariner, which I know I cite a lot, has done a great job illustrating this point. There's too much good stuff in this post for me to paste a good excerpt, so you should click the link and read the whole thing, but anyway:
After last night’s game, [Seattle beat writer Geoff] Baker talked to Carlos Silva about why his results were so much better than his first couple of months as a Mariner. Silva pulled out the trusty old mechanical change, which, as we’ve noted before, pitchers use all the time to take credit for positive results they have nothing to do with...
Unfortunately, it’s just not true. Thanks to Pitch F/x data, we can quantify just how much Silva’s pitches move both horizontally and vertically, and we have the data for both 2007 and 2008... The sink on his fastball is virtually identical to what it was last year...
I’m sure Carlos Silva actually did make a mechanical adjustment - I’m not accusing him of lying. I am saying that trying to draw a correlation between the mechanical adjustment, increased movement on Silva’s sinker, and the results he got tonight is total crap, and the kind of completely wrong analysis of pitchers we’ve come to expect from the M’s and most of the local media. Silva didn’t get a bunch of outs tonight because he lowered his hands - he got a bunch of outs tonight because the A’s have a bad offense, and as we’ve been telling people for years, pitch to contact strike throwers are wildly inconsistent from game to game, as the results of their performance are almost completely in the hands of their opponents.
In any given year, you'll hear lots of reasons for the most minor performance changes. Most of them are just noise. I understand Duke looked pretty good Friday night, but chances are he won't keep his gains.
-P- Pat has a really excellent writeup of one of Indianapolis' recent games, complete with photos.
0 recs |
20
comments
Read Related
Comments
Fine with me
If nothing else, he’ll probably be a better option than Chavez or Ronny Slow-Mo next season.
by woobie on Aug 25, 2008 2:52 PM EDT 0 recs
bucdaddy
That was exactly my initial thought. Another player who resembles “o-for-3-vas”. Oh, boy. Just what we needed!
As far as Zach Duke: the only good news we are ever going to receive about him is when he announces his retirement because he will never, ever, contribute anything to our team or any other. I’m sure he’s a fine man. He’s just not a MLB pitcher.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on
Aug 25, 2008 4:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'd be kind of happy
if we got a 25 year old Jason Kendall type to back up Doumit for a couple years.
by DITO on
Aug 25, 2008 4:22 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Nothing like Kendall
Kendall was starting in the majors at 22, and when he was Diaz’s age, he was slugging .511 as the second-best all-around catcher in the NL. Even if you meant old Kendall, it’s not a good fit, because Diaz doesn’t work the BB/HBP the way old Kendall did.
by Vlad on
Aug 25, 2008 9:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Now if you want a Pirate comp...
…he’s more of a poor man’s Manny Sanguillen. A guy who carries most of his value in his glove and BA, who might hit .285/.320/.430 or so with good D as a starter if he develops well.
That’s a decent return on Bautista.
by Vlad on
Aug 25, 2008 9:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
not a 22 year old kendall
well, he is not a 22 through 26 year old kendall.
maybe a 27 and 28 year old kendall with a 78 and 86 ops+.
by haven on
Aug 25, 2008 9:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
In overall value, maybe
But the shape of that value will be very different, for the reasons I state above. It’s very, very unlikely that Diaz will ever have a Kendall-type OBP.
by Vlad on
Aug 26, 2008 12:05 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Picture says a 1000 words
If a pictures says a 1000 words, I’d have to say his defense sucks….
by long4willie on Aug 25, 2008 3:39 PM EDT 0 recs
I was going to ask what the hell you were talking about,
because I assumed he was fielding a throw from the outfield. Looking at how the umpire is positioned, however, it seems like Diaz is receiving a pitch, in which case you are spot-on. Is he “blocking” a fastball at the belt, or was he way too late getting down on a 55 foot curveball?
by DITO on
Aug 25, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Great photos say 1000 words,
crappy, poorly cropped images that don’t show the whole story leave you guessing, “What in the h*ll is going on there?”
I’m not slamming the photo, just pointing out it doesn’t tell the story properly.
by ElliottBayBucco on
Aug 25, 2008 6:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I cropped the photo to take out Gookie Dawkins. I honestly didn’t mean to start a controversy—I just wanted to put up a picture of Diaz. But if you’d like to continue it, you can see the whole photo here.
by Charlie on
Aug 25, 2008 7:02 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Is it just me
or does it look like the umpire is trying to feel him up in that pic?
Vogt early, Vogt often.
by Brickhaus on Aug 25, 2008 5:32 PM EDT 0 recs
Really guys...
It’s pretty clear he’s attempting to block a pitch that was in the dirt and is bouncing up, which means he’s already willing to make more of a defensive effort than Paulino.
by buccoboy on Aug 25, 2008 6:30 PM EDT 0 recs
love the bit calling b.s. on Duke's new delivery
just another reason you guys are my Pirates’ blog of choice.
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 25, 2008 6:30 PM EDT 0 recs
OK PTBNL
So we traded Jose Bautista (who at best would be a utility player) for a guy who could backup Doumit and not stink. I’d say that NH did OK. Swapped from what is now our strength (3B) to add depth to our weak position ©. I don’t see Littlefield making this kind of move.
Now for adding depth at SS/2B. Will NH trade Paulino (a C we don’t need) for a middle infielder who is better than Bixler?
by zogger on Aug 25, 2008 6:49 PM EDT 0 recs
Unlikely
Paulino isn’t worth an infielder better than Bixler.
by Vlad on
Aug 25, 2008 9:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well...
if we have 2 “Bixler’s”, maybe one of them will surprise and be a bit better than what we have now.
The Utah Jazz. The Jazz... duh.
The best NBA team in Utah... no doubts about it!
Playing For Pride. Pirates, Utes, Panthers, and more...
Because, in the end, only one team can "win it all".
by UtesFan89 on
Aug 25, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
and the Bucs saved money
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on
Aug 26, 2008 2:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs





