Boras Claims Alvarez Signing Was After Midnight
"The Pirates on Wednesday announced that at the team's request, Major League Baseball has placed Alvarez on the restricted list because Alvarez's agent, Scott Boras, informed the team that Alvarez would not sign the contract and wants it renegotiated."
UPDATE by Charlie: Dejan Kovacevic has more, including the full text of a statement from the Pirates, which points out that the commissioner's office received the agreement of another Boras client, Kansas City top pick Eric Hosmer, after Alvarez's, so Hosmer's contract could come into question if Boras continues to pursue this.
This is pretty unbelievable, even for Boras. My guess is that he will not get away with this, Alvarez will report soon, and then the Pirates won't have to make deals with Alvarez for six or seven years after that.
This article at MLB.com actually cites a source who says that Boras only wants another $200,000 for Alvarez, which would tie Alvarez with Buster Posey for the largest bonus paid in the draft. As far as I can tell--and I'm not a lawyer, so correct me in the comments if I'm wrong--this could jeopardize Alvarez's entire bonus. He's from a poor family, he just got $6 million, and he's letting his agent put all of it at risk (and also putting Hosmer's bonus at risk) for $200,000. If true, this is just amazing, and it's the sort of BS that will hopefully convince other talented amateurs to avoid Boras--it seems to be all about him, and not the needs of his clients. Alvarez has a Vanderbilt education, so it'd be shocking to me if he weren't smart enough to figure this out. If Alvarez is actually encouraging this, rather than foolishly trusting his agent to do the right thing, he's a spectacular jerk and it's going to be really hard to root for him.
By the way, there's no limit on the amount of time a team can keep a player on the restricted list. You better hope Boras wins the grievance, Pedro--the Pirates can wait forever, and you can't reenter the draft.
about 1 year ago
Sky Kalkman
63 comments
1 recs |
Comments
UNION
When I see the players union get involved, I get nervous. There is no way that they will let one of their guys marinate for 6 years. Some kind of deal will be worked out with the Bucs and this kid will have the JD Drew label. Even if they were to lose him, #3 and #5 next year would be fine with me.
by vanslyke on Aug 27, 2008 3:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This dude is satan
F*@% Bor-ass.
Welp...
by phillybucco on Aug 27, 2008 3:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Claims he only wants 200,000 more
give him the money so he can be on the team where he can actually help the pirates.
you already paid him 6 mil what is 200,000
by Cence on Aug 27, 2008 3:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's the principle of the thing.
At this point, I tell him he can show up and play or return the $6M and go pound salt. And I’d be OK with either outcome.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
The Pirates don’t need to look any more like an easily manipulatable(is that even a word) club.
6MM is more than enough to be set for life, even if he sustains a career ending injury while still in the minors and never sees the majors. Alvarez either takes the money or the Pirates dump him.
I see the future. I see cake.
by Blicks on Aug 27, 2008 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...$200K?
OK, so on the reverse logic, here’s a few questions for Alvarez if that report is true:
1. Why not start your negotiations a little earlier (say, 11:30 PM that day?) and tell the Pirates you want $6.2 million. My feeling based on what the Pirates have said is that they would have given it to him (they said they would give him a ML contract if he had asked for it and agreed to the physical!).
2. Now that you did say you would take $6 million, why possible ruin your future as an MLB player (for example, what happens to him if the ruling goes against, which it looks like there is a good chance it will?) to try to squeeze a measly $200K out of the Pirates? I mean, if you delay this process and in turn it means you make the majors a few months later than you would, you risk losing MUCH more than $200K when arbitration and free agency are factored in vis-a-vis MLB service time.
by SpacePirate on Aug 27, 2008 3:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Pedro needs to be a man here
and realize that he hired Boras, not the other way around, and this assclown is ruining his reputation and his future by using him as a pawn. Boras got outnegotiated, and now he’s being a baby.
I don’t wish death upon anyone, but I have no problems wishing him a city bus to the skull… as long as it doesn’t kill him.
The Pirates are cursed :(
Welp...
by phillybucco on Aug 27, 2008 4:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If he wants $200,000 more,
then that just sounds like a stupid game to get more than the $6.15 million that the #1 overall, Tim Beckham, received.
I don`t want Alvarez in the Pirates` organization. Go somewhere else and play.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's actually about Posey
Who got $6.2. When Boras is recruiting clients next year, he wants to be able to say that he got the highest deal on the market for his guy.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point, Vlad,
but I bet we are in agreement that the Pirates had better not give in on this nonsense orchestrated by Boras.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're darn right we are.
Millions for defense, but not a cent for tribute.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The extra 200k
is to match Posey as the highest bonus at 6.2MM. Though it is ultimately his decision, I hate to see Alvarez get used like this and his reputation ruined so that Boras can recruit new clients with claims of negotiating the highest signing bonus again this year.
by #1BuccoFan on Aug 27, 2008 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alvarez is not getting used.
He’s not a kid straight out of HS, he’s in college (and a good one to boot, Vanderbilt).
If he does not know his financial rights, that is all on him. He can fire Boras, take the 6MM, give Boras his commission for the 6MM signing bonus, and cut all ties. HE has ultimate control over the negotiations, not Boras. Boras is his spokesperson.
I see the future. I see cake.
by Blicks on Aug 27, 2008 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Boras just wants him to be the highest paid draftee so Boras can save face...
…then I say give him the $200,000 and then tell Boras that he owes us one. A big one. I’d much rather have Boras owe us one than have him upset over such a small amount. It just makes good business sense to bite the bullet on this one and place Boras in a position of owing us one—even if he refuses to honor the committment.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 27, 2008 4:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
IPF
Your post simply proves that you do not have the slightest clue what is going on here.
Boras would only take a capitulation by the Pirates as a sign of weakness and a victory for himself. He would never view it as “owing” the Pirates anything in return.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
patthatt
What you don’t understand is that this mess is not personal. It’s about money and power and nothing else. When you begin to worry what others think about you then you have lost and that is precisely why I do not become angry with you. It’s not personal. I don’t know you and all I have to judge you by are your posts. When I disagree with you it is your posts with which I disagree and not you as a person and that is how you must envision Boras. So what if he thinks he “won”. As long as we get what we want at the price we’re willing to pay then that’s all that matters and nothing more. Boras’ perception of Coonelly doesn’t impact the situation as long as Coonelly doesn’t it allow it to happen. What is important is that he does not become so angry with Boras that he refuses to deal with his clients or that he does not overpay out of fear of Boras. Nothingelse matters.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 29, 2008 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Boras really believes that the signing was after midnight,
then it was too late, hence there is no valid contract.
How can the MLBPA file a grievance on behalf of someone who doesn`t have a contract, if we believe Boras?
The Pirates say the proof is on their side that Alvarez unequivocally agreed to the deal and it was submitted properly before midnight-actually before Hosmer`s contract.
Sounds to me like Boras is a liar, and that Pedro Alvarez is stupid.
If the Pirates are right, they absolutely must not renegotiate this contract.
If Boras doesn`t like it, he knows where he can go.
If Alvarez doesn`t like it, he can join him.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Principles vs. Common Sense
Principle = Don’t satify Boras’s ego by giving Alverez $200K to give him the highest signing bonus in the 2008 draft class
OR
let Alverez (who pretty much made the signing happen according to Coonley) who has never played at the professional level dictate his terms
Common Sense = $200K to get the best player in the draft in the fold is peanuts in the scheme of $6M
My advice (since it is worth what you paid for it) is to let him sit on the restricted list until he agrees to play by terms he agreed to. I may not like it as a fan, but I can stand by an organization that shows integrity.
by vanslyke on Aug 27, 2008 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A contract is a contract
If Boras is able to duck the terms of the contract here, because we cave and cough up the $200k, there’s no reason for him not to pull the same stunt against us every year, with every client on his books. It sets a precedent that we can’t afford to set.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how about giving Alvarez the money on the condition that he fires Boras as his agent?
my blog // calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy // past results do not guarantee future performance
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 27, 2008 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still say no.
Either you negotiate with terrorists, or you don’t.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep-
We draw the line in the sand this time.
If the Pirates are correct in what they are saying in their press release about the events surrounding Alvarez`s agreement to the contract, and it`s proper submission, then Pedro Alvarez either joins the Pirates under the terms he agreed upon, or he doesn`t play at all.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drawing a line in the sand
Also, let’s not forget – let’s NOT forget, Dude – that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uhhh, domestic… you know, within the city – that ain’t legal either…
by bryanzane on Aug 27, 2008 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Black and white
It’s difficult to see how Boras and the Players Union have a viable grievance. Alvarez either: 1) agreed to a deal before midnight and is contractually bound to the Pirates; or 2) agreed to the deal after midnight, voiding the verbal contract and putting him into the 2009 draft pool. Seems to be a one-or-the-other situation. And in neither case does it give Boras room to negotiate with any leverage.
Boras is smart and tough, but he is matching up against his own kind with Coonelly. It will be interesting to see these two go head-to-head on this. Coonelly certainly doesn’t sound like he is going to cower.
After reading some comments on Bucs Dugout, I would caution against the verbal persecution of Alvarez. Boras is highly manipulative and has an axe to grind with the MLB draft system, so my hunch is that he is leading this effort … not Alvarez, who, from what little we have seen since the college season ended, seems excited to play pro ball and join the Pirates.
by Alleghenys on Aug 27, 2008 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Alleghenys
You are right about Boras “having an ax to grind” about the draft system. We have discussed this before.
I completely disagree with you about your comments concerning Alvarez.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boras
What else is there to say really. He is the absolute definition of a scumbag. I have no doubt in my mind that we would kill his own mother for a couple hundred bucks. Sadly enough im dead derious. What a shame. Theres more to life than money.
by baseballgg24 on Aug 27, 2008 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Remember
Agents always play bad guy. Remember Rosenhaus for TO during the Philly divorce. There is always the athlete behind the agent. Alverez has part in this too. Yes he may be getting bad advice, but where there is money, there is a camp (entourage so to speak) and they are all taking Boras’s advice.
by vanslyke on Aug 27, 2008 4:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
MLBPA can file a grievance
Contract states that grievances can be filed for players, or those who will be players at some point during the agreement. This includes draftees.
by hisjazziness on Aug 27, 2008 4:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Even if you`re right, jazziness,
it still makes no sense from Boras` whining standpoint.
If he contends the contract was done after midnight, then it was too late, so there can be no contract-period. And it would also invalidate Hosmer`s contract from what the Pirates say in their official press release.
If there is a contract, which the Pirates adamantly assert, then Alvarez has no choice but to sign it and abide by its terms, if he wants to play in MLB.
I don`t see how MLBPA`s grievance will do anything but bring more grief to all parties involved, especially in the Boras camp.
by patthatt on Aug 27, 2008 4:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I work for a union and do contract administration/arbitrations/negotiations for a living
and let me tell you…as I’m sure you could figure out…but I get calls about stupid grievances all the time. It seems like a desperate attempt by Boras, and if all the facts laid out by the Bucs are right, he has no case.
But, remember that’s what everyone thought with TO and the 9ers a couple of years ago. They heard the case before the “special master” and then worked out a deal, so something wasn’t told to the public from the 9ers perspective.
by hisjazziness on Aug 27, 2008 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a piece of work
Boras is a scum, just like Bud Selig.
by Deaner on Aug 27, 2008 5:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
bizarre, acidic situation
This needs to end and end quickly before it creates some drawn-out circus atmosphere.
And while Alvarez may have a responsibility, he is a 21-year old thrown into a crazy world where no one has his interests as their top priority and even good advice can be overwhelming.
People make poor choices, 21 year olds make poor choices, people getting their first job out of school make poor choices.
I’d like to say if I was him I would stick to the contract, and get rid of Boras. But it’s not as simple when it’s your own life.
by vherub on Aug 27, 2008 5:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They must not back down
Coonelly’s statement was terrific, and I hope Boras’ hubris impels him to pursue this and costs both Alvarez and Hosmer a year. Personally, I don’t give a rat’s ass anymore whether the kid shows up or not. They need to make Boras cave.
by RichieHebner on Aug 27, 2008 5:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It seems likely that we are not in possession of all of the facts
Boras is not stupid and it doesn’t seem logical that he would allow this matter to go this far without some “ace in the hole” of which we are not aware. For instance, he may want to challenge the current draft system altogether and he has cut some kind of agreement with Alvarez to allow himself to use Alvarez for that purpose. The events that have transpired so far are simply the necessary first steps in this process.
It just doesn’t seem reasonable that he and Alvarez would go to this length over a measily $200K.
BTW, I read somewhere on this site that the Pirates had already paid Alvarez $3 million of his signing bonus. Does anyone know if this is actual fact?
by WestCoastBuc on Aug 27, 2008 6:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Dejan says
no money has changed hands, and would not until ink is actually on the contract.
by Thunder on Aug 27, 2008 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If 20,000 concerned Pirates fans ...
would pledge $10 each to this financially disadvantaged athlete, this issue could simply go away. Don’t want PBC to re-negotiate his contract. I hereby offer a $10 mercy pledge to Pedro Alvarez to attain the status he feels he needs and deserves. As for Boris, he has a reputation to uphold … and … publicity to be gained.
by Pirate in Ole VA on Aug 27, 2008 6:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you feel like giving away $10...
…there are a lot of deserving charities who could use the help a hell of a lot more than Scott Boras. I prefer Doctors Without Borders, but there are plenty of other good choices, too.
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Admittedly...
I haven’t read any of the posts yet, but I want to post several of the thoughts I’ve had since the story broke and before I could get to a computer:
1. There is far more potential for this to be bad for Pedro/Boras than the Pirates.
2. FC’s statement is beautiful on several fronts. I think our lawyer may be better than Pedro’s.
3. For those who are not familiar, there is legal doctrine called the Statute of Frauds that applies to contract law and which sometimes holds that a verbal contract is not sufficient. It has been a while since I brushed up on it, but I’m guessing that the SOF is superseded in this case by the CBA between the owners and the union. I would further guess that the CBA allows for verbal confirmation of tentative contracts to satisfy the deadline requirements. I suspect that is what happened here.
4. I can’t imagine that Boras wants the contract voided as that would seemingly leave Pedro with no money and needing to go back to school/otherwise entertain himself for another year without big bucks.
5. Boras’ apparent goal of negotiating a bigger signing bonus now seems counter to the fact that the deadline has expired.
6. It is my understanding that the Pirates put $6m on the table shortly after the draft. There was no response from Pedro/Boras until about 10 minutes (or less) before the midnight 8/15/08 deadline. Had Pedro/Boras tried to neogtiate in a more traditional manner – and perhaps been willing to play professionally this summer – the Pirates were willing to negotiate a bit from the initial $6m offer. If this is so, then this is simply Boras getting pissed because his strategy back-fired.
7. I recall my initial post after the deadline wherein I hoped that someday there would be a “perfect storm” that bit Boras square on the ass after he pushed matters a little to close to the deadline. I wonder if this isn’t that very scenario.
8. Finally, it should be noted that we haven’t heard Boras’/Pedro’s side of the story. That said, I sure like the stance the Bucs are taking on this.
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Aug 27, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He can't go back to school.
That bridge is burned, since he tossed his eligibility when he signed the deal (even if it’s later deemed invalid). And he can’t play indy ball or foreign ball without risking a lifetime ban from MLB for contract-jumping (which has happened before, though not since the ’50s).
by Vlad on Aug 27, 2008 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i asked this in the other thread
but how does an invalid deal count as a deal in the eyes of the NCAA?
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 27, 2008 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think anyone here really has enough knowledge
of the facts of the relevant law to be certain of the answer to your question. I suspect that you are correct and that if the deal is invalidated Alvarez will be able to return and play ball at Vanderbilt for the reason you give.
by WestCoastBuc on Aug 27, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I answered in the other thread
Once he declared an intention to pay Boras for his services (even if that didn’t ultimately work out), he forfeited his amateur status. MLB prospects are only allowed to have unpaid advisors, not a full agency relationship, and Boras wouldn’t have let Alvarez attempt to sign the deal without entering into an agency relationship. Even if the deal falls apart, he can’t un-grant that consent.
The only way he could still go back to Vanderbilt on his athletic scholarship is if Boras agreed to broker the deal for free. Which, given what we know of Boras, seems rather unlikely.
by Vlad on Aug 28, 2008 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you are right it then seems likely that we are not
in possession of a critical relevant fact with the potential to help Alvarez/Boras in the resolution of this matter. Otherwise, the course chosen by them would be far too risky to contemplate given how much Alvarez has to lose (no contract and not able to play professional or college baseball for the next year) and how little they stand to gain. They must know if they are permitted to continue to negotiate, the Pirates are not going to budge much, if at all, from the $6 million offered. Boras is not stupid and he must have something in mind beyond permiting Alvarez to continue to negotiate the contract with the Pirates.
If they were simply dissatisfied with the offer, it would have been far simpler to just reject the offer in the first place and go back to college. Why go through all of this?
It seems more likely to me that they have something else in mind. Perhaps Boras sees an opportunity to have Alvarez declared a FA as a result of this matter. Another possiblity is that Boras wants to challenge the legality of the dead line altogether and needs a client willing to help him in this regard. I’m not sure how this would make sense to Alvarez but they may have worked out an arrangement of which we are unaware witht he potential to substantially benefit him in some way.
by WestCoastBuc on Aug 28, 2008 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Boras just miscalculated
He thought he could shake the team down for a quick $200k by threatening to blab about finishing the deal after the deadline and stirring up trouble with the union over the CBA. Coonelly called his bluff, though, and so now he has to play out the hand that he dealt himself.
by Vlad on Aug 28, 2008 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could be and I hope you are right
If so, this could turn out to be a real embarassment to Boras especially if the contract is voided and Alvarez has to sit out a year and reenter the draft next season.
by WestCoastBuc on Aug 28, 2008 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could be
The real embarassment for Boras would be if he ends up accidentally fragging Hosmer’s deal, too. Hosmer was happy to turn pro, and was happy with the deal he cut, and might be pissed enough to dump Boras if Boras screws it all up over a deal for a different client.
by Vlad on Aug 28, 2008 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh, gotcha
as soon as he hired Boras, he couldn’t return to baseball.
but aren’t there tons of players who enter the draft, attempt to sign contracts and return to college? do they ALL only have unpaid advisors? i guess you’re claiming yes.
by Sky Kalkman on Aug 28, 2008 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
All prospects are “advised” by an agent, through an elaborate bit of kabuki theater, right up until the moment when they sign their deal.
The NCAA knows what’s going on, of course (how could they not?), but they go along with it anyway because they just don’t care that much about anything beyond basketball and football.
by Vlad on Aug 28, 2008 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what raised my eyebrow now that I see it.
Boras stated that Pedro never received a contract from the Pirates. IIRC, for players involved in the draft, a contract offer has to be in place within 15 days of the draft. I can not imagine the Pirates missed THAT deadline (late June). I would also assume that was done by registered mail or courier, etc. Something requiring a signature. If that offer and terms were eventually agreed to on August 15th, Boras has no grounds to claim the Pirates didn’t offer a contract.
by Thunder on Aug 27, 2008 7:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay, but...
that still doesn’t explain what Pedro gains by showing that there is no contract. If there is no contract, regardless of the reason, he loses a year and doesn’t get paid (unless Boras is going to pay him, which is possible) while we get the #3 pick next year. That doesn’t seem like motivation for Pedro.
Either Boras miscalulated or there is some key information missing here.
Regardless, Boras is bad for the game. I love the Bucs’ stance on this and hope they stay strong.
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Aug 27, 2008 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And did anyone actually read the last sentence of the Pirates release...
it certainly leaves the door…and window open for that money to end up showing up.
The quote…
“We will sit down with Pedro and his family as soon as Mr. Boras’ claim is rejected to chart a new and much more productive start to Pedro’s career with the Pittsburgh Pirates.”
That sounds like…drop the grievance and we will see what we can do.
by Thunder on Aug 27, 2008 7:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boras is feeling like he is losing his grip in MLB,
looking back at the A-Rod situation last year and the August 15th signing deadline put in place last year. He has repeatedly complained about the signing deadline and wants it to come to an end. He has a great working relationship in KC, with the 3rd round pick Hosmer signed and playing in the Northwest League, he wouldn’t dare screw with that, no way, uh-huh! Yet his decision to pursue this route could hurt it since Hosmer’s deal came in AFTER Alvarez’s. Way to bring in a third party to the dance, Boras!
The funny thing to me about this is Scott Boras has decided to flex his muscle with MLB using the Pittsburgh Pirates as his whipping boy. Don’t think for an instant that this will blow over and end easily. If Boras has to give in and take what was initially agreed upon with the Pirates, he loses more face in a year when MLB is considering investigating his hand in the Manny Ramirez/ Boston trade fiasco. This is a must win for him.
Pedro Alvarez, I understand you are a bright young man befalling a fortune that 99.9% of the people that post at this blog will never see in their lifetime, or any other lifetime for that matter. Do you really want to be a byline in Boras’s history of Jacka$$-dome? Show us that Vanderbilt education you worked so hard to get and kick this jackal in Armani to the ditch where he belongs.
by ElliottBayBucco on Aug 27, 2008 7:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I said it in another thread
but the Pirates are in trouble on this one.
by hisjazziness on Aug 27, 2008 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I Don't Get it
I don’t get what Borass or Alvarez seek to get out of this whole mess they have created. No way the Bucs will cave on this one. MLB won’t let them. If the Bucs cave, then the whole draft process become moot. Alvarez is no worth the Bucs caving in.
I agree , either he reports based on the agreed upon contract or he sits until next year’s draft. I doubt if anyone would pick him next year!
I agree that Alvarez needs to make his intentions clear here. Just ’cause Borass is his agent, Alvarez needs to take charge. Just like A-Rod did when he had enough of Borass.
Go get ’em Bucs!
by zogger on Aug 27, 2008 8:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As I posted in an updated string...
My guess is that Boras has filed the grievance to challenge the draftee signing deadline. It sounds like MLB unilaterally extended the deadline which – argueably – would be an unfair advantage to the clubs of the players and could cause the deadline to be thrown out or the extension practice to be voided.
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Aug 27, 2008 9:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Uncle Nate
If your assumtion is correct that the Pirates extended the deadline then I believe your conclusion to also be correct. However, FC has stated that the contract was accepted before midnight in which case I do not understand Boras’ complaint. However, if both facts are correct (Pirates extended deadline to complete the contract and Alvarez accepted prior to midnight) then the arbiter is truly faced with a difficult decision that could conceivably be settled in favor of Boras. If that happens I am confident that MLB will not be allowed to extend contracts in the future. As to the dispostion of Alvarez, I can only guess how it will be settled but I would then place my money on Boras’ ability to squeeze some additional funds out of FC.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Aug 29, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs














