Huntington: Neil Walker Could Compete for Starting Third Base Job
Huntington has indicated that there are still checkpoints the organization would like Walker to meet in the Minors before earning a promotion. However, if LaRoche doesn't show improvement by Spring Training and Walker does, Walker may force management's hand to rethink its initial stance.
"Andy has already done some things at Triple-A that we are anticipating Neil will do," Huntington said. "But if it's not Andy, then certainly Neil Walker becomes a candidate."
Huntington also brought up the possibility of "creatively exploring" other options through the free-agent market or the waiver wire this offseason to bring in an external solution for third. However, with the Pirates hesitant to impair the development of both LaRoche and Walker, such a move seems unlikely.
The idea that Walker could compete for the starting third base job in Spring Training is absurd; he was so bad this year in Class AAA that there isn't much choice but to send him back there.
What I suspect we will actually see is that the Pirates will acquire some cheap free agent, possibly on a minor league contract, to fill in for a while in case LaRoche can't put himself together. Russell Branyan would be excellent--he hits very well, is left-handed, and can also fake his way around in the outfield corners or at first. He can't field, but that's okay. At the very least, he could spell LaRoche against tough righties and let LaRoche pile up a disproportionate number of at bats against lefties. He's not really a pull hitter, but he did hit a bunch of homers to right field this year.
I still heartily endorse LaRoche as the Pirates' starting third baseman next year and wouldn't want the Bucs to sign anyone who might call that into question, but I can understand why they'd would want to hedge their bets a little, particularly if they can get a player like Branyan who'd be useful even if LaRoche hit well.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Andy LaRoche
What has he done in nearly two months that enables you to say that you “heartily endorse” him.
I hope that Lil Andy proves me wrong, but the Pirates better have a good 3B alternative by next February/March.
by thegunner on Sep 26, 2008 7:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And . . .
. . . the PBC better have a good alternative at 1B, 2B, SS, RF, LF, backup C, SP slot nos. 2-4, the entire bullpen except for closer, and the bench
This story could have been written about 6 of the 8 PBC starters.
1B — can’t get off to another Black Hole start from April to July.
2B — can’t have another year of lowest OBP in MLB
SS — will probably be trading Jackie Boy, and can’t leave Bixler and Cruz as only alternatives
backup C — will Ronny Ballgame get a 3rd chance? (or is it the 4th?)
RF — will Moss recover from upcoming surgery?
LF — can’t possibly go with Morgan unless PBC wants me to cry
SP — only Maholm and Duke (1st and 5th starter) set
RP — don’t get me started on anyone not named Capps on this arson squad
bench — Michaels did nothing after May, Eye Chart probably gone, Gomez and Rivas hopefully history, Pearce had the same 2008 AAA year as Walker.
So I wouldn’t spend too much time obsessing about poor Luigi. The 2009 PBC doesn’t have to worry about McLouth, Doumit, Maholm and Duke (assuming no winter or Bradenton mishaps). That leaves 21 guys to worry about, and still not much in Indianapolis.
by WstCstBucco on Sep 26, 2008 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was a consensus top 25 prospect...
…entering each of the last three seasons. He was a minor-league All Star. He played in the Futures Game. He has good measurables and a major league bloodline.
He has better prospect bona-fides than anyone in our system with the possible exception of Andrew McCutchen. It is highly, highly unlikely that all those scouts were wrong about him for all those years. Ergo, we need to play him so he can develop into the quality player that he’s capable of being.
by Vlad on Sep 28, 2008 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minor League numbers
Andy has good minor league numbers and by most accounts that I’ve read rate him as a pretty good prospect. I have no problem with him starting every game next season to see if he is a legitimate future star (or at least starter).
The Pirates are going to be terrible next year with or without LaRoche starting at 3B, I have no problem giving him a shot. I wouldn’t mind having a player like Branyan there to provide some competition but there is no reason to overpay or give away too much to get a player. At this point the Pirates just need to find out what LaRoche can do in a full season when he is healthy.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Sep 26, 2008 8:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We don't need Russell Branyon
Or another aged, weak-hitting veterans to take up valuable playing time for our youngsters. Instead, we need to eliminate the ones we have such as Gomez, Rivas, and Michaels and proceed with our youth movement. There is no reason to hedge any bets upon Branyon because we will assuredly lose them if we do.
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Sep 26, 2008 9:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
IPF
Our bench players should NOT be youngsters because they won’t get enough playing time. If Mient., Michaels and other vets can be signed FOR THE RIGHT PRICE, we should go in that direction. Youngsters need to play almost everyday to develop.
by thegunner on Sep 27, 2008 1:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see...
Lugi LaRoche moved to second, Neil Walker at third, trade Jack Wilson & Nyger Morgan for starting pitching and move Freddie to short depending on his shoulder. In theory that should be the strongest offensive infield we’ve had since 1992 and after the All Star break when Mario LaRoche begins to hit, that would be the strongest infield since 1979. Lugi and Neil will hit better the more pitches they see. Same with Pearce, I’d start him in right.
by Ketcham Bruce on Sep 29, 2008 6:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I shudder to think...
…what kind of pitcher we’d get back for Morgan.
What’s Don Wengert up to these days?
by Vlad on Sep 29, 2008 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














