Phillies Sign Ryan Howard to Three-Year Deal
Three years, $54 million, which doesn't buy out any years of free agency. Howard will get $15 million in '09, $19 million in '10 and $20 million in '11.
Players typically get raises each year they go to arbitration, so when a player asks for $18 million with three arbitration years to go, as Howard did this offseason, and actually gets it, I wonder what is supposed to happen after that, because there are few salaries in baseball higher than $18 million. Howard only made $10 million in 2008, so my guess is that he would have lost his arbitration case, been paid $14 million (which is what the Phillies offered and which, in my opinion, is a pretty fair offer for a good home run hitter who posted a .339 OBP last year), and had his 2010 and 2011 salaries rise from there.
In any case, Howard is a very good player, but he's pretty much the prototype of the guy who breaks down at around age 30--he's a slow first baseman, he's big, he's not a good defender, he strikes out constantly, he's had trouble hitting for average recently, and he's already showed signs of decline. Arbitration can be ugly, but if I were the Phillies, I'd have taken him there anyway. First on Howard's Baseball Reference comparable players list is Travis Hafner, and the four-year, $57 million nightmare contract the Indians gave Hafner in 2007 should've taught the Phillies something. The Howard deal won't save the Phillies much money in the next three years even if Howard plays brilliantly, and I wouldn't bet on him playing brilliantly.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with you, Charlie
No team option for his first year of free agency? Where’s the upside in this deal for the Phillies? Saving five or ten million dollars if Howard can revive his ‘05-’07 peak? Weighed (ha) against the risk of injury and the chances Howard goes all Mo Vaughn a season or two early, this is a bad deal. The Phils just took all of the financial flexibility which makes having young players so valuable and flushed it.
The upside is that...
…they won’t have to choose between non-tendering him and paying him $25M+ in his last year of arb, instead of $20M. Which doesn’t necessarily mean that they wouldn’t have been better off going in another direction, but if they wanted to keep him, making a deal like this one probably saves them something like $10-12M over the life of the contract, compared to probable arbitration awards.
Was The Offer...
…Howard for Kris Benson? I forget.
My immediate thought
was: Hafner? Without looking at any numbers, I figured Albert Belle would have to be high on his comp list somewhere, but now I see Belle was a much better hitter (!), with three OPS+ seasons above Howard’s monster age-26. Given Belle’s rather short shelf life, I’d say he wouldn’t have boded well for Howard either.
Belle is perpetually underrated.
I mean, look at those power #s for 1995. 50+ 2B and 50+ HR. That’s a beast. And he was even better the year before! The strike that year probably cost him his shot at 400 HR.
A strange and contradictory man (he was an Eagle Scout!), but one hell of a hitter.
whatever happened to Belle?
he only played thru 2000, yet the Orioles paid him some $37M from 2001-2003.
… never mind, degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip:
He kept getting listed on the 40-man roster for insurance reasons.
The policy would only cover him if they made a good-faith effort to see whether he could play, so they’d just list him on the 60-day DL at the start of the season. Pretty farcical by the end.
Kind of like Pat Meares with the wrist, actually.

by 















