Tigers to Keep Thames; Release Sheffield

by omar moreno on Mar 31, 2009 1:59 PM EDT Comment 13 comments

http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090331&content_id=4093976&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb

Well that takes Marcus Thames off the list of our possible acquisitions. I think this is a surprising move by the Tigers, given that they owe Sheff 14 million dollars this year and he will make that playing elsewhere. I wouldn't mind seeing the Pirates maybe take a look at Sheff, who says he can still play well as an outfielder. He would be extremely cheap and with 499 career home runs, exciting. What do you guys think?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

0 recs | Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

$$$ how much though...

i would go for it. A year with a potential HOFer would as always talked about help with bringing some of the younger players up to “speed” quicker.

1.God 2.Family 3.Bucs!! 4.Food

by Gfmotorsports on Mar 31, 2009 3:43 PM EDT reply actions

i think it will never happen. why would sheff want to come play for the pirates??? there is aboslutly no reason, he would much rather retire. He will sign on a team that has world series hopes, not .500 hopes

by PensRock1 on Mar 31, 2009 4:56 PM EDT reply actions

NO

nonononononononono.

"Gimme an 'F' ! " - Country Joe MacDonald

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 31, 2009 6:06 PM EDT reply actions

Ditto

Barry Bighead Lite.

by Hitman Easler on Mar 31, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions

not for us

his knees are in terrible shape so he’d only be viable at 1b and even then would be a huge injury risk. he may be able to DH somewhere but i don’t think he could sign with an NL team.

by johnnycuff on Mar 31, 2009 7:49 PM EDT reply actions

Getting him would do nothing.

I say no because we are going to be a 70 win team with or without him, and we won’t keep him around for more than one year anyway. Don’t waste the money. If we were good and had a shot at a playoff run, I’d say yeah, but this would be a bad move for the Pirates.

by thelumberco. on Mar 31, 2009 11:12 PM EDT reply actions

Willy Mo

Pena just got released by the Nats. I’d say he’d be a more realistic and cheaper option then Sheffy.

by phil79 on Mar 31, 2009 11:22 PM EDT reply actions

I don't actually know that this would kill the Thames thing.

They still have Raburn at AAA, after all. He doesn’t have Thames’s power, but he’d be a respectable option (his struggles last year notwithstanding).

by Vlad on Apr 1, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions

Raburn

Raburn is def a prospect the Tigers would like to see up in the Bigs this year. I dont think Thames is going anywhere now that Sheff is gone, but your right that is a very legit possibility. I would like to see the Pirates make a move for Wily Mo, I would even like to see him play everyday.

I GOT MY STREET BUZZ BEFORE I GOT MY PEACH FUZZ

by omar moreno on Apr 1, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions

Detroit is apparently...

…trying to put together a trade that’d send Raburn to the Cardinals (Link).

by Vlad on Apr 1, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions

hmm

So Thames will be there next year. I think we need to bring someone in. This roster is just not stable enough. It isnt. There are options on the market that would be cheap. McPherson (MAYBE), but I really do think Wily Mo would be a rock solid option. Doesnt anyone agree??

I GOT MY STREET BUZZ BEFORE I GOT MY PEACH FUZZ

by omar moreno on Apr 2, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions