Tony Sanchez
David Laurilla has a very nice interview with Tony Sanchez in "Prospectus Q&A" in Baseball Prospectus in which he tells about his work ethic and how he believes he has matured physically since his sophomore season when he was characterized as a singles-hitter with little power. He also talks about learning his craft, becoming a better defensive catcher, and his new-found interest in weight training.. He seems pretty knowledgeable.
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8980
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
thanks
for the link. Sounds like he has a pretty good head on his shoulders. He looks up to Molina and Varitek, if he plays like either this bucco fan will be happy!
by g021g0 on Jun 11, 2009 12:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
IPF
You changed your avatar. If that’s your daughter, I bet she takes after your better half.
by patthatt on Jun 11, 2009 1:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Patthatt
Yes, it is my daughter and she does take after her mother, thankfully. I’d have been disappointed if you hadn’t noticed. LOL
by Illinois Pirate Fan on Jun 11, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Say what you want about Sanchez being a reach, but he’s a Pirate now and I’m not going to hold his draft position against him.
I’d say the fact that he has improved greatly every year and took it upon himself to get his diet and conditioning under control as a sign that he is a hard worker with a good head on his shoulders. His ceiling may not be out of this world, by everything about him says that he will do whatever possible to reach the absolute maximum, which is that of a very good pro catcher.
I don’t think this is a guy who’s going to show up to workouts out of shape, but exactly the opposite. I can’t wait to see him at WV
RIP NATE. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN...MISTER TONY PLUSH!
by GTrain on Jun 12, 2009 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well said.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 12, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tony Sanchez
is officially a Pittsburgh Pirate.
Let’s hope he stays in shape, brings quality “D” to the plate each time out, and hits better than expected.
by patthatt on Jun 12, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Amen,
Pat.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 12, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wonder how much you’ll get robbed in the up-coming Ryan Doumit trade?
I’d hate to be a Pirate fan.
by Ohpityme on Jun 13, 2009 8:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The talk when we drafted this guy was that he was a great defensive catcher with not very much offense. His stats from this year at Boston College: .346 average, 14 HR, 59 RBI. Not too bad for a guy with an “average bat”. I know that the offense isn’t where he nor the Pirates want it to be, but I don’t think we’re giving him enough credit on the offensive side. Remember, those numbers were against ACC competition, arguably the toughest baseball conference in the entire country with the likes of UNC, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Florida State and Miami. I think this guy will be a solid player in the bigs and if his power comes around, he could be a great player for the Pirates.
by mspirate on Jun 13, 2009 11:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As much as I hated the pick at the time...
…and as little faith as I have in him going forward, he’s one of us now and I hope he exceeds my expectations.
by Vlad on Jun 13, 2009 3:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Vlad:
What do you think of his time in the wood bat league (Cod?)? He was an All-Star, after all… doesn’t that bode better than some have projected?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 13, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll admit, I became much more excited when I found out he played in the Cape Cod league. He posted good numbers there, too – .323 average, 3 homers, 4 doubles. I think we’re underestimating his offensive potential. His numbers have improved every year in college, particularly the power numbers.
I’ve read some reports that say he has 20-25 HR potential in the Majors. That’s not the power bat we need, but for a catcher, that’s nothing to scoff at. That’s Ryan Doumit with a much better glove. If his defense is as good as the scouts say it is, he’s not just a solid catcher, he’s someone like Pudge Rodriguez – a great defensive catcher that can also hit.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 14, 2009 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's better than not hitting in the Cape...
…but not enough, in and of itself, to get me to sign off on him. Sorry.
by Vlad on Jun 14, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, don't worry...
I look forward to him surprising us all.
;-)
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 16, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that it’s interesting the different reception Sanchez has gotten on this blog than Moskos. The drafting of Moskos was obviously much more of a reach and there were much better players available while there were no Matt Wieters when Sanchez was drafted.
Just seems that people are willing to give Sanchez much more of a chance than they were willing to give Moskos. I realize that Moskos has also performed rather poorly and deserves criticism for that but it seems that people were never willing to give him a chance. Effects of a popular front office?
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 14, 2009 3:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Moskos
I think he was just the personification of the Littlefield era. Well, not Moskos the person, but his selection over a possible once-in-a-lifetime catching prospect.
The popular front office theory also is probably a factor too. Everyone knew, after the second day of the draft anyway, that Sanchez was taken in that spot because, not only did they like the guy but, saving money on him and spending later was the overall draft plan where as Moskos being selected as a reach was just incompetience.
If NH and co. bombed on last year’s draft then the selection of Tony/Jorge wouldn’t be accepted on here either.
So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded!? Yea, totally. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets do a sample. There are 4 of us and you're retarded. Thats 25 percent. -South Park; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce.
by gorillakilla34 on Jun 14, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was never Moskos I hated.
Against all odds, I hope Moskos turns out to be a valuable player.
It was the idiotic idea of passing up a “once in a generation” talent for someone who, at best, will be a pretty good reliever. There was no “once in a generation” talent when the Pirates picked this time, so I’m cool with them getting the guy they wanted. I do think Sanchez will be better than most people think, as well.
There’s also the fact that it was reported, again and again, that the money to sign Wieters was made available to Littlefield. He just didn’t take him. That’s just horrible GMing, plain and simple.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 15, 2009 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I mean as I noted and as you guys pointed out further, the comparison between Moskos and Sanchez isn’t exactly apt.
However I feel that people are willing to give Sanchez a shot while I always felt that no one wanted Moskos around simply because of what he represented. Not that Moskos has showed us anything (besides a pretty funny blog) that we should get excited about.
I’m obviously happy that people are giving Sanchez a chance and I wish him the best (and Moskos too).
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 15, 2009 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I can agree with what you’re saying. I think the main difference is draft class, though. Moskos WAS a top-10 prospect in that class. If Wieters wasn’t on the board, I don’t think anyone would have been too upset that we took him. But what he represented was the latest in a long line of bad moves by a bad GM, and when Dejan reported that the money to sign Wieters was on the table if Littlefield would have taken it, the shit hit the fan.
On the other hand, the highest upside players in this draft were already taken by the time the Pirates picked. Strasberg and Ackley went 1-2, Donovan Tate went 3 and was far from a sure sign anyway, and what was left was mediocre prospects like Crow that projects to be a #2 or 3 starter. Someone like Crow or Green may have been a better choice, and that’s why there are still grumblings about the Sanchez pick, but they’re not leaps and bounds better than Sanchez, who does project to be a pretty good MLB catcher. At no point were we talking about great upside from any of the first-round talent, it was all middling prospects. The Pirates front office just disagreed about which middling prospect was the best.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 15, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I agree with you 100%. I think it will be interesting to see what happens in public opinion if Sanchez is underwhelming in the minors. Although I think a lot of that depends on how the other draftees do and how the system as a whole does.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 15, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know about "anyone"...
…but I hated the Moskos pick right from the start – and I hadn’t even been pulling for us to take Wieters (I was a Heyward man).
I just disagree on a fundamental level with using your first-round pick on a reliever. Even if they max out, they’re still worth less than a star SP or position player. And I didn’t like Moskos in particular because a) I didn’t like his delivery (looks like I was wrong here – he’s been healthy so far) and b) I thought he was getting too much credit for the improvement in his stuff after the move to the bullpen (which seems to have been a pretty accurate complaint).
by Vlad on Jun 15, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
An interesting take on Sanchez
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jun 15, 2009 2:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sure they say some nice stuff, but still only rank him as the 217th best prospect in baseball.
by johnnycuff on Jun 15, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
















