In my opinion having Delwyn and Delmon Young on the same team would be way too confusing so no.

has always been his glove. I don’t recall reading anything about him being a head case. Well, he did throw that bat at an umpire, but I think that whole thing was overblown. His brother has had trouble and Delmon came up with Hamilton and Dukes. They both had/have problems. His minor league numbers indicate that he has the potential to be a decent hitter, so he might be worth a shot. I don’t think the Buc’s should give up that much for him. Certainly nothing close to Garza and Bartlett (Twins were hosed). Although, if the Bucs want to take a flyer on a guy like Young, I’d rather see them do it at a position that is more of an organizational weakness (Middle Infield!!).

Also, Runs batted in is plural, but does that mean that an “s” should not be added to the abrieviation? I’m not a grammer expert, so I’ve consulted Wikipedia. It was all very confusing, but here is what it says

A particularly rich source of options arises when the plural of an initialism would normally be indicated in a word other than the final word if spelled out in full. A classic example is Member of Parliament, which in plural is Members of Parliament. It is possible then to abbreviate this as M’s P.3132 (or similar33), as famously by a former Australian Prime Minister.[citation needed] This usage is less common than forms with s at the end, such as MPs, and may appear dated or pedantic.
The argument that initialisms should have no different plural form (for example, “If D can stand for disc, it can also stand for discs”) is generally disregarded because of the practicality in distinguishing singulars and plurals. This is not the case, however, when the abbreviation is understood to describe a plural noun already: for example, U.S. is short for United States, but not United State. In this case, the options for making a possessive form of an abbreviation that is already in its plural form without a final s may seem awkward: for example, U.S.’, U.S’, U.S.’s, etc. In such instances, possessive abbreviations are often foregone in favor of simple attributive usage (for example, the U.S. economy) or expanding the abbreviation to its full form and then making the possessive (for example, the United States’ economy). On the other hand, in speech, the pronunciation United States’s sometimes is used.

So, I think this is saying that, even though we say “RBI” stands for “Runs Batted In”, it actually should stand for “Run Batted In” or else it would be RBIs or RsBI. In fact, it is often used to be mean “Run Batted In”. If Wilson singled with a runner on third, we would say he picked up an RBI. So, I think BigB was correct in his usage, but yeah, RBI’s are not a very reliable measure of a player’s true ability.

the Twins are far from idiots, if they thought Young was useful at all to anybody they’d be asking for something serious in return. I’m figuring it’s how they ended up with him in the first place, they took a chance on a cheap dump from Tampa. It’s how they manage to survive and succeed. We seem to be emulating that strategy, which I like.

He’s the outfield version of Ian Snell.

A ton of talent but a complete idiot and headcase.