Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Stan Van Gundy Fired As Head Coach Of The Magic

Let's Trade All Our Bad Players For Good Players

funny pictures of cats with captions

There appears to be a little excitement over the idea of trading Adam LaRoche. But here's a question for you: If you're so excited to ditch him, what makes you think that anybody actually wants to get him?

The fact is, Adam LaRoche is the 21st best first baseman in the major leagues right now. For perspective, consider that Nick Johnson, the Washington Nationals' first baseman is having a better season than Adam LaRoche is. And if you think that Adam LaRoche's second-half surge is so valuable, consider that the end-of-year stats from 2008, with LaRoche's famous second-half surge included, show that he was still only the 19th best first baseman. And he's one year older this year. What team has a burning desire to acquire a 29-year-old below-average first baseman?

I know it seems that since Adam LaRoche is one of the best hitters on the team, that he's a good player, but he's really not. Most first basemen are better. Way better.

Here's a list of how our other players compare, based on their performance this year:

Given that information, among positional players, Adam LaRoche is the Pirate who has the least real value. Only a team with a first baseman who's worse than the 21th best, and who also can't trade for one of the 20 players who are a better first baseman than Adam LaRoche would want him.

I'm sorry everybody, but if you want to get quality, you have to trade quality. This isn't saying that we might not get lucky and find some schmuck G.M. who is willing to overpay for a bad player, but it's unlikely. Our best trade-bait right now is Freddy, Jack, Nyjer, and Andy LaRoche, probably in that order. Our other players simply aren't good enough.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 104 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

But what if we package together a whole bunch of crappy players? That’s always a popular approach!

Alternatively, I’m sure Gunner has a secret trade he’s worked out that he can’t tell anybody about. Or he would if he hadn’t been whisked off to an undisclosed location.

by WTM on Jun 26, 2009 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Ha

Just throwing this one out there: The Mets are in a pennant race, and they’re putting anybody at second base who can find his left nostril with his right finger. We could offer them a real improvement with Freddy.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ever heard of “The Ransom of Red Chief?”

by WTM on Jun 26, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you trying.....

to meet your word quota for the month?

by David Todd on Jun 26, 2009 4:00 PM EDT reply actions  

If any other GM sees Nyjer as the 11th best left fielder, then sell him NOW. No time to think or breathe.

Also, what does the “Dips chart” have to do with anything? Mike Gosling is the most valuable pitcher in baseball?

By this silly method, McLouth is the 14th best CF and we got value for him as well.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 26, 2009 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

DIPS and Value

DIPS is just one more way to evaluate pitching skill, and it does so by ignoring things that the pitcher isn’t directly involved in. If DIPS is meaningless, then ERA is doubly-meaningless.

There’s a big difference between being the 14th best and being the 21st best. Since there are 30 major league teams, and 21-14=7, the difference is 7/30 or about a quarter of all teams. That’s a lot.

And there’s a huge difference between being the 14th best center-fielder and the 21st best first baseman. Center-field is the fourth most difficult position to play. First base is the easiest. You can convert any player to be a first-baseman. Not so with center-field. You’ve got to be a great hitter to be valuable as a first-baseman. And Adam LaRoche is not a great hitter.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still think there is a chance that if we traded mediocrities Nady and McLouth for building blocks, there is a chance that Huntington can work some magic and do the same for Adam and Sanchez (where the latter is above average)

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 26, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nady

At the time, Nady was probably the 11th best right-fielder. That’s better than McClouth was and Adam LaRoche is. And he got traded to a team that’s famous for overpaying mediocre veteran sluggers.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are still enough dumb/desperate GMs besides New York and Atlanta that may need contention to save their jobs.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 26, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

We Can Only Hope

If some G.M. overvalues LaRoche and we get a great deal, then I’ll be very happy about it. I’m not trying to predict how dumb G.Ms will be though. I’m just trying to estimate how much real value our players have.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why trade Duke when hes our best pitcher and it would only get worse and your not given Maholm or Ohlendorf any credit when Ross has played pretty good and half the games Paul has played he has gotten no run support if we r gonna trade anyone is should be ian snell if he gets bak to old form.

by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jun 26, 2009 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

OMG

can you use, like, commas and periods and real sentences?

Seriously, dude – it would make things a lot easier to read.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 26, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I had to have oxygen after I read that.

by WTM on Jun 26, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

And he blames Paul's mediocre season...

on run support, like we really give a fuck’s damn about a pitcher’s wins and losses. No matter how many runs our team scores, we can’t do anything about that ERA over 4.

by ryebr3ad on Jun 27, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nyjer Morgan: 11th best leftfielder

According to the link, Nyjer Morgan is better LF than Manny Ramirez. Do you expect that the Dodgers would trade Manny straight up for NyMo after review of this site?

I don’t believe the authors of this site intend their data to be used to make judgments on who is a better player than whom. Calling NyMo the 11th “best” ML LF based on this data is somewhat misleading I feel. Perhaps you can find a better word than “best?”


“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means”

by WstCstBucco on Jun 26, 2009 5:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Manny Isn't Even Playing

Given that Manny has only played in 27 games this year due to his suspension, I think it’s safe to say that the stats on Manny are gonna be a little biased.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The system doesn’t look like it’s weighted on basis of number of AB’s — you just gotta have 100 PA’s. If anything Manny’s short season is to his advantage since he started out so hot.

How about 2 LF that have been totally healthy this year. The site you link to has Juan Rivera ahead of Jason Bay. Would Theo Epstein make that trade straight up?

Or back to NyMo, he’s listed as 8 slots higher than Carlos Lee. Would the ‘Stros make that trade straight up (I’d love it) given Lee is only 19th “best” LF?

by WstCstBucco on Jun 26, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

WARP

WARP is a counting stat, not an average-based stat. So, you’re wrong. You seem to have no idea what you’re talking about.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please, no personal attacks.

To get back to the subject, then you think NyMo is substantially better than Carlos Lee based ib this site? I can’t imagine anyone, including NyMo, believes this.

by WstCstBucco on Jun 26, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nothing Personal

I think it’s pretty funny that you start a thread by quoting the Princess Bride in an attempt to make fun of someone, and then you request “no personal attacks” when I point out that your understanding of the stat in question is nonexistent, even though anyone could have looked up what WARP is before starting to criticizing it.

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about, nor do you care to do the smallest bit of learning on your own before making fun of people over something you don’t understand.

So now, “the subject at hand” is you, even though you would wish it not to me. I have no idea why anyone would want to get into an analysis of statistics with you, when what you seem to like to do is make fun of statistical systems and people before you know the first thing about either one.

So no, I’m not going to explain to you how WARP works. This is something you could learn for yourself if you cared to open a book or find the right Web page. The onus is not on me to explain WARP to you. The onus is on you to learn it, and to stop being a jerk.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

you’re both jackasses. now we all feel better, right?

by Blyleven Curve Ball on Jun 26, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about I explain something to you, then.

WARP is not the be-all end-all of baseball statistics. No statistic is. Nyjer Morgan is not a more valuable player than Carlos Lee. Earlier this year, he was ranked higher in WARP than Jason Bay. He’s not better than Bay either.

DIPS is not the be-all end-all of pitching stats, either. Again, no stat is. It removes defensive influence, which is nice, but it doesn’t much matter if a team is built to have a good defense. Pitchers like Mike Pelfrey and Rick Porcello and yes, Zach Duke can be successful in the Major League level by inducing ground balls and relying on the defense. Not every pitcher has to be a K machine.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Never Said It Was

I just brought it up, and then some dickcheese starting criticizing and making fun of people it before he even knew what it was.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on the DIPS. Strikeouts are nice, but they build up the pitch counts quickly so that pitchers can’t go as deep into games. Halladay may not be a strikeout machine, but he is still the best pitcher in the game and goes 7-9 innings almost every start.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 27, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pitchcount May Not Matter

There’s a good bit of evidence to strongly suggest that pitch-counts don’t matter. What matters is the length of time a pitcher has pitched for in a game.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Halladay

Also never walks anybody. He was 6th in the AL in Ks in ’02, 3rd in ’03, 3rd in ’08, and is 6th this season.

He also also led the AL in K/BB ratio in ’03, ’08, and so far in ’09 as well as 6th in ’06. He ranks 10th among all active pitchers. He is 4th in BB/9.

You picked a bad example. Halladay is a great example of what DIPS teaches: strike guys out, don’t walk guys, and don’t give up home runs (he is 8th among active pitchers).

by matskralc on Jun 27, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

do we really have a good replacement for nyjer right now any way i mean id rather have him than monroe out there adn if we trade moss thts where young will be

by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jun 26, 2009 5:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Good Replacement Does Not Matter

The Pirates are not gonna win any trophies this year no matter what they do. If they can get good value in a trade and receive talented young players, that’s all that counts. Now is not the time to balance the roster. Now is the time to load up on all the young talent we can find. And if you don’t enjoy watching that sort of a baseball team, then I hope you’re good at catching hot dogs.

Personally, when I’m at a game, I can’t wait until the hot-dog toss.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think nyjer can be a good upcoming player he has shown shines of what he can do

by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jun 26, 2009 6:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Happy Birthday!

I think Nyjer Morgan is gonna be 29 years old next week. Players typically do not improve through their thirties. Their either gracefully decline, or catastrophically fall apart.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is an excellent base runner and may not hit for much power but his speed takes care of that also he had a .300 BA during most of the yr but went through a slump which lowered it but he has potential

by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jun 26, 2009 6:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Thunder?? Thunder???

Would you please put this guy straight. I’ve shouted so much I’m hoarse.

by WstCstBucco on Jun 26, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry WstCst...

was out of pocket…spent much of the late afternoon and evening in the ER. A kidney stone…which hasn’t passed yet. About to take another pain pill…so I better do this before it kicks in.

Nyjer Morgan…all games after the first 9 games of the season…counting tonight. BA of .243…OBP of .326 and SLG of .314 for an OPS of .640…which is actually up quite a bit over the last few days.

Those numbers would be…
BA…behind every current position player with more than 10 AB
OBP…behind every current position player with more than 10 AB except Wilson and Diaz.
SLG and OPS…behind every current position player with more than 10 AB except Vasquez.

How’s that WCB?

by Thunder on Jun 26, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's Worse?

Passing a kidney stone or the Pirates?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

don't know...

I will let you know once I find out though. Just hope it’s fairly soon.

by Thunder on Jun 27, 2009 1:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

ok my bad but i still think he worth keeping and see how the season plays out with him unless till next yr

by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jun 26, 2009 6:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I hope NyjMo doesn't know about that Fangraphs page

because it currently values him at $7M per year. Yikes.

Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89

by wg1of5 on Jun 26, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions  

To follow up on my post above, I don’t believe even NyMo’s agent believes this.

by WstCstBucco on Jun 26, 2009 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with the general premise of your post...

I think fans tend over value their own prospects. That is true with just about any fan of any team. That being said I don’t think the argument you make for Laroche is a simple as you are making it out to be when determining is trade value. You point out that Adam is one of the 21st best 1B in the league, however, all 21 1B will not be available for a trade. Names like Berkman, Pujols, Youkillis, Texeria, Gonzales, Morneau, etc. do not apply when evaluating the trade market for Laroche. So where would he be on the list after you exclude all of the unavailable players? Also, I think you need to look at only his 2nd half splits when evaluating his trade value. He will be a FA at the end of the season so he is likely a rental. The team that will be receiving him will be receiving 2nd half Adam which increases his value more than it would for a player with historically minimal 1st/2nd half splits. The fact that he is a rental means we will not receive a terrific return but I think we will receive more for him than what you imply given the WPA stat. I would be curious to see where he ranks using only an average of his 2nd half performance.

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

LaRoche's Value

I’m personally unconvinced if the second-half surge is real. It might just be a coincidence. I think it’s unclear. But in this case, the important question is: Does the trading partner strongly believe that it’s for real?

If the Pirates received a guy in a trade today who was way below average in the first half of the last three years, but slightly above average in the second-half, would you feel excited about that, or kind of suspicious?

And I think when you’re looking at the market for first basemen, you have to remember that basically any major leaguer can play first base. It’s the easiest position to play. Right now, there are 79 better hitters than Adam LaRoche in the major leagues. Any of them could play first base.

And at any rate, the whole point in saying that he’s the 21st best right now is to say that even if you exclude the untradeable players like Pujols and Youkilis, there are only 9 teams who would view LaRoche as an improvement on what they already have, and even those would only see him as a marginal improvement.

I just don’t see a lot of demand for Adam LaRoche.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m personally unconvinced if the second-half surge is real. It might just be a coincidence. I think it’s unclear.

Dude, I think it’s pretty well documented that Mario is a “second-half” player.

And, as a side note:

You TOTALLY snagged the pic I posted up. Where’s the love?

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 26, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

As For Adam LaRoche Being A Second-Half Player

On the one hand, you’re right. No one could disagree that his stats have been better in the second half than they have been in the first half. And in fact, no one could disagree that most if not all of it is due to the fact that he has performed way better in the single month of July than any other month.

The thing is, in the past three years he’s had few more than two hundred at bats across those three Julys. Is that data really enough to know that his better performances in the month of July aren’t due to just a little more luck in those Julys than in recent Junes? Can we know that he truly has the skill of being a Good July Hitter as opposed to a guy who had a few good Julys?

Or think of it this way: If you were on the team that was receiving Adam LaRoche in a trade, would you feel confidant that he’s going to have another great July, or would you start doubting it then?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or think of it this way: If you were on the team that was receiving Adam LaRoche in a trade, would you feel confidant that he’s going to have another great July, or would you start doubting it then?

If I’m a contending team that had the dough, and needed him as a “final puzzle piece,” or one of such, Yes. I take the chance. Odds are pretty good, IMO.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 26, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

There Are Still Better Options For Those Teams

But still, that team who needs the final puzzle piece is gonna have to be one of the few teams who is both close to winning and who has a first baseman who is clearly worse than Adam LaRoche, which in my estimation is the Dodgers, the Giants, and the Cubs, and for one of those three teams to be interested in Adam LaRoche, that means that they’ve probably already tried, and failed, to get one of the twenty first basemen who is better than Adam LaRoche. None of this stuff seems particularly likely to me.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would think three years worth of data is a large enough sample size...

to infer that Larcoche is a second half performer. And my whole point is that a contending team looking for a second half rental would be inrigued by Laroche. He’ll be relatively cheap for the performance he’ll bring if he lives up to his second half expectations. There will be a market but I do agree that the market will be limited to strictly teams in contention needing a 1B or DH.

One other thing, your argument about there being 76 other hitters is irrelevant when we are discussing teams that need an upgrade a 1B. No one is going to convert a player to 1B for a second half run at the playoffs. That being said, there are not a whole lot of teams needing 1B. I think overall we are in agreement except that I feel the market for Adam will be a little better than you do.

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Dunno

it’s not three full years of stats. It’s three good Julys — about two-hundred at-bats. It’s suggestive, and interesting;but when trying to support such a far-our hypothesis as the idea that there’s a baseball player who somehow is better in July than any other month for some unexplainable reason, then I want more proof than two-hundred at-bats.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that would be enough for a GM making a playoff run though.

It’s not like Laroche is going to drain the farm system. If Casey Blake can bring back a Santanna then I’m sure Laroche could bring back something of interest. Plus you keep saying three years…you are ignoring his Atlanta years where his performance pretty much followed the same trend.

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except One Of Those Years It Didn't

So what’s to say that this year isn’t one of those years?

It’s just such a weird pattern that I have trouble believing that there’s anything to it. I mean, how do you explain it? Does he just really like the fourth of July? Does he like the warmer temperatures (if so he should hit better when playing in Florida than in Milwaukee, and his stats should have been overall better in Atlanta than in Pittsburgh), does he just really love the all-star game and it puts him in a great mood? What kind of explanation is there?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

And All This Being Said

Since LaRoche is such a scrub, in my opinion, if he can bring back anything, we should take it. It’s just that I don’t think he can bring back anything.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I'm assuming by "anything" you mean anything of value.

Raja Davis brought back a 10 million dollar worthless arm in Mat Morris. That’s not the kind of “anything” I’m suggesting we should receive for Laroche. I don’t think you are either I’m just saying…

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, Of Course

Yeah. There’s no reason to bring back an overpriced player. By “anything” I mean two marginal prospects. Anything means anything young and cheap.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Basically

What I’m looking for in a trade for Adam LaRoche is the same thing I’m looking for in a hooker.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah!!!

I can’t add to that…lol!

by Slick1 on Jun 27, 2009 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

So.....

What you look for in a hooker is two young men with potential upside?

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jun 27, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fine Cinema

I think I saw a movie once where that was the exact plot — two young men with potential upside in a hooker.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Career second half stats:

2008:
Post All-Star 181 25 55 14 0 14 42 17 1 49 0 1 .304 .361 .613 .974

2007:
Post All-Star 253 32 79 19 0 8 37 24 1 49 1 0 .312 .371 .482 .853

2006:
Post All-Star 229 49 74 17 1 19 48 25 2 62 0 1 .323 .387 .655 1.042

2005:
Post All-Star 204 24 49 11 0 9 26 19 1 44 0 2 .240 .305 .426 .731

2004:
Post All-Star 172 25 52 15 1 10 30 18 1 46 0 0 .302 .368 .576 .944

That looks like enugh evidence to me to suggest he is a 2nd half performer. He has had one year away from his norm which looks to be a statistically anamolly a this point. Other than that, I would say hell yeah this looks like a guy I’d want on my team for the stretch run!

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

That Being Said

If any team is foolish enough to make an offer for him, and the offer is half-way reasonable, we should take it immediately before they change their mind.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

There we agree...although "reasonable" is a relative term.

Reasonable by what standard? Reasonable by what the Pirates’s FO considers reasonable than I agree. Reasonable by what you consider I would proabably disagree since your opinion of Laroche seems to be extremely low.

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's Okay

He’s a serviceable major league first baseman, which is nothing to sneeze at. But his WAR is 1. Travis Ishikawa, for example, has a WAR of .5 (that’s point-five, or one-half, in case it’s hard to see). Is it really worth it to the Giants to give us anything of real value for an extra half a win? Or, best case for us, if LaRouche’s second-half surge is real, for an extra .75 of a win?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

If You Can Find That Stat

You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din. I just estimated that he might be worth, in a best case scenario, an extra .25 of a win in the second half, if this surge thing is for real.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 26, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

I tried finding that too then gave up. Guess I’m not a better man than you. Again, I agree with your general premise I just think Adam has more trade value than you do. I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

It HAS to be said:

*WAR! *

HUH – yeah..

What is it good for?

Absolutely nothin’.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 26, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lol...

you couldn’t resist?

by Slick1 on Jun 26, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

With the Fangraphs valuations, I am especially skeptical of the defensive measurements. Pujols is all of a sudden a minus defender this year after being the best for years? McCutch is a minus defender? Maybe putting the last few years of data together would actually mean something.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 27, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

He Was Hardly The Best For Years

Here are Pujols career defensive stats.

I’m not sure where you got the idea that he was the best for years. According to UZR, he’s been just about passable most years, had a good year in 2007, and now has gone from barely passable to bad.

McCutchen’s defensive stats are screwed up because he’s played in so few games. His UZR will catch up.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

He Was Hardly The Best For Years

Here are Pujols career defensive stats.

I’m not sure where you got the idea that he was the best for years. According to UZR, he’s been just about passable most years, had a good year in 2007, and now has gone from barely passable to bad.

McCutchen’s defensive stats are screwed up because he’s played in so few games. His UZR will catch up.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

OK, those are different results than Baseball Prospectus’ Fielding Runs Above Average (FRAA) which still has Pujols as the best 1B fielder this year. It also doesn’t have Adam below sumo wrestler Prince Fielder unlike Fangraphs, which makes me question the usefulness of UZR for sure.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jun 27, 2009 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're making a big mistake.

You can say “he only ends up as an average first baseman.”

Yeah, when you look at his whole year. Teams that would trade for him wouldn’t be trading for a full year. They’d be trading for the second half. Nobody is going to pick him up for next year and sit through his crappy first half. He’s a rental for a contender.

Now, let’s talk about a few other things.

You assume that Adam LaRoche is below average offensively. That’’s not true. He’s above average, even with his bad first half. His lowest career OPS+ is 100, or exactly average. In his monster year with Atlanta, he had 130. Since coming the Pirates, he’s had OPS+es of 108, 123 last year, and 128 so far this year. He’s a good offensive player who gets better in the second half. Like I said, you have to look at more than WARP.

Finally, let’s look at the list you posted with the players ahead of LaRoche. They may well all be better than him, but how many of the players ahead of LaRoche do you think their teams will trade for anything other than a huge bounty that makes the trade not worth it for the receiving team? I count three, and none of them are that impressive.

The Mariners might sell on Russell Branyan, but who’s going to buy on a 33 year old career platoon player that never impressed anyone until this year? The Jays might sell on Lyle Overbay for prospects, but I haven’t heard any trade talk about him. The Cubs may sell on D-Lee, but again, I haven’t heard any trade talks about him. In addition, he’s in the decline phase of his career and is coming off of any injury this year. He’s not someone teams would hone in on. I bet the Marlins will trade Jorge Cantu, but he’s only one slot above LaRoche and the difference is marginal. Even assuming he gets dealt, there will be other teams that need a first baseman.

Outside of those names, you’re on crack if you think any of those first baseman are getting dealt for anything resembling a worthwhile price. The Yanks aren’t trading Teixiera. The Sox aren’t trading Youkilis. The Reds aren’t trading Votto.The Tigers aren’t trading Miguel Cabrera. It’s just not going to happen.

You can say those players are better than LaRoche, and a good deal of them probably are, but it doesn’t MATTER if teams won’t selll on them. A number of those players are on teams that are contenders themselves. LaRoche is probably not one of the best ML first baseman, but he’s probably one of the best on the market this year, and that’s all that matters. Baseball doesn’t work in a world where a team can go out and get whatever player they want.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Average For A First Baseman?

You’re right in saying that an OPS of 100 is average by definition. But the difference is, the average first baseman is an above average hitter. Position counts.

A shortstop with an OPS of 100 is an above average shortstop. A first baseman with an OPS of 100 is a below average first baseman.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

He had an OPS+ of 100 for ONE SEASON. The mean OPS+ for a first baseman is 115. The median is 108. Adam LaRoche has a career OPS+ of 116, which still makes him above average, and it still makes him better than above average for the last two years. His career OPS of .907 in the second half makes him way above average, even in regards to position during the second half.

Your move.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

My Knees Hurt

He has a career OPS+ of 116, but he’s getting older, not younger. For Adam LaRoche, it’s all downhill from here.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good thing that teams trading for him would be looking for a one-year rental, not a full time solution at first, huh?

You keep making the fallacy of assuming that every team is building like the Pirates: for the long-term. That’s not the case. A team in contention is building for THIS YEAR, and screw the future if they can win the World Series.

You think the Brewers were looking for a long-term solution when they traded the farm for Sabathia? No. They knew they couldn’t sign him after he played out his year, and that’s why they rode his arm like a horse. Long-term, the Brewers would have been better off keeping LaPorta et al, but they weren’t looking at that. They were looking at THIS YEAR.

Of course, I’m not saying LaRoche is on par with Sabathia, but do you think a team would sweat giving up a couple mid-level prospects for him if it meant they could compete for a World Series? Nah.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

But That's The Whole Thing

If they know that they can only get a half-year rental out of LaRoche, you can’t expect them to give up any real value for it.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can.

Did you expect Jose Tabata for Xavier Nady and Damso Marte?

Yeah, me neither. And we got three other players, too. Those players both only had the rest of that year left on their contract.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay

Good point. But still, you’re essentially hoping that Neil can pull of a steal.

I am too. Just sayin’. If he gets real value in return for Adam LaRoche, it will be a steal.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I’m saying Neil has all the leverage here.

We don’t HAVE to trade LaRoche. There’s no rule that says you have to trade a player when he only has the rest of the year left on his contract and won’t be a part of your next winning team. If we don’t get any offers better than whatever kind of draft pick we’d get from him, there’s no need to pull the trigger.

LaRoche can become a free agent next year. No sweat, we just have to hold on to him. The unlikelihood of this actually happening doesn’t remove the leverage from Neil’s hands. LaRoche’s free agent status next year doesn’t help a team that’s trying to win this year.

That’s not even considering the fact that there’s probably more than one team on the market for someone that’s probably the best first baseman on the trading blocks. That’s when we get into “OK Giants, the Mets are offering me this. Can you top it?” “OK Mets, the Giants are offering me this. Can you top it?” The seller has ALL the leverage in a trade.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's A Very Good Point

The career high point of Adam LaRoche’s value will have been at 11:59 on July 31st, 2009.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Unrelated

For fun, do a Google image search for Adam LaRoche. What’s the second hit?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

Whoever that is is significantly more attractive than Adam LaRoche, that’s for sure.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have mine without.

Not sure if that would affect it though. It’s not a NSFW picture or anything, unless your workplace is VERY strict.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 29, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

And one last thing

Where are you getting your second half stats for LaRoche?

Using Baseball Reference, I come up with 1164 PA for LaRoche in the second half. I’d say that’s a relevant sample, wouldn’t you? In those PA, he’s gone .297/.360/.538, leaving him with a .907 OPS. Yeah, I’d trade for a guy like that.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m not going to, but I bet there are players out there whose statistical histories show that they hit better on Tuesdays than on Thursdays. That doesn’t mean they have some repeatable skill that improves on Tuesdays, and it doesn’t mean that Adam LaRoche has some repeatable skill that improves only after an arbitrarily-decided date.

by matskralc on Jun 27, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

After a certain date, probably not.

It’s not like he’s a werewolf.

As the season goes on, though, doesn’t seem too implausible to me.

www.sixtyftsixin.com

by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 27, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

This topic went downhill...

…when you suggested Nyjer has more trade value than Andy LaRoche!

Adam will be dealt and the prospect or prospects he brings back won’t bring much excitement.

My guess: One upside High A or Low AA young position player (SS, 2B) and a AAA semi-useless arm.

by jlk9697 on Jun 27, 2009 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Think About What's Eaiser To Find

What’s easier to find, a first baseman with a little pop, or the best defensive outfielder in the major leagues?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Most valuable is not the same thing as best. It is as much a function of opportunity as it is skill.

by matskralc on Jun 27, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's True

But still, if you’re looking for a great defensive outfielder, Nyjer Morgan would be it. At least for this year. Can he sustain this performance in the future? Dubious.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jun 27, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you really do know so much about sabermetrics,

you should know that UZR sucks unless you have a large sample size. Also, Colby Rasmus or Jack Wilson would probably be the best defender in baseball, seeing as CF and SS are much harder positions to play. A +15 UZR in LF isn’t as valuable as a +11 UZR in CF.

I am like your Dan Aykroyd and biglow would be Jane, the ignorant slut. -Chad

Good ol' KO

by thecoolest on Jun 27, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not the Rangers?

They’re tussling with Angels for the division with a 1B sporting a .212 BA in Chris Davis?
I realise it’s awfully simplistic however them’s the stats.

by BlindSquirrel on Jun 28, 2009 8:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why I think the Bucs are playoff bound
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 42: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Hitting Coach???
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
I Admit that I Was Wrong About the A.J. Burnett Trade
Small
not Adam Lind
Small
Adam Lind
Smiling_small
Why is Merrero still considered a first rounder?
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 41: Pirates @ Tigers
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Game Score Game 40: Pirates @ Tigers
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 39: Pirates @ Tigers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas