Nate McLouth Traded to Braves
Wow. The deal opens a spot for Andrew McCutchen, who will join the Pirates immediately, presumably as their starting centerfielder. Wow. Wow wow wow.
UPDATE: The Bucs get pitchers Jeff Locke and Charlie Morton and outfielder Gorkys Hernandez.
Locke is a hard-throwing lefty starter who should report to Lynchburg. He pitched well for Class A Rome as a 20-year-old last year. He gets a lot of groundballs, but control is an issue. Lefties who start and throw hard are pretty rare commodities, so he's a very nice prospect to have around and probably the headline player in the deal. The Pirates prospect most similar to Locke in terms of value and career path is Bryan Morris, who maybe serves as a cautionary tale, but Locke does have good upside.
Hernandez came to the Braves in the Edgar Renteria deal and is a pretty nifty outfield prospect. He doesn't have much power (yet), but he has good contact ability, some speed, and a decent batting eye. He's a notch below the McCutchen/Tabata class, but that doesn't mean he's a bad prospect. He also fits the Pirates' plan of using fast outfielders in center and left. He has a good chance of posting decent OBPs in the majors, and if the Pirates are very lucky, some power will come along too.
Gorkys Hernandez (photo: Josh May)
Morton is a 25-year-old starter who was pitching at Class AAA Gwinnett. He pitched a bunch for Atlanta last year and wasn't especially good, but he has excellent stuff and his minor league numbers are solid. He also has a starter's arsenal. His reputation also suggests he's a bit of a headcase. In terms of his value, think Ross Ohlendorf when the Pirates got him. He'll be lucky if he turns out as well as Ohlendorf has, but he has upside, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Pirates try to find space in the rotation for him very soon.
In the comments from a Braves fan, was385:
Despite the whining on our board, I really like this deal for both teams...
Charlie Morton- When he’s on, he’s nasty and has a very nice sinker and some pretty good secondary stuff. Consistency is his biggest problem as he gets that sinker up a little too much and that’s when he gets hit. If you can fix the consistency, he’s got the stuff to be a very solid middle of the rotation starter.
Gorkys Hernandez- When healthy, he can absolutely fly and plays a fantastic center field with a strong arm. Hasn’t really developed the power that some hoped he would and has dealt with some nagging injuries over the past two years, but the talent is there to be a very good leadoff type and centerfielder.
Jeff Locke- One of my favorite prospects. He’s a hard throwing lefty who draws a lot of ground balls and whose control is usually a plus (though it has led to his struggles this year). He’s got a very strong curve and a change that has gotten much better (though still below average) since he added it to his repertoire. A long way off with a lot of potential.
I'm not sure this is a bad deal, but it seems like a bit of a grab bag. McLouth was playing well and was under team control for several more years, so there should have been no rush to trade him. This deal does have the nice side effect of making room for McCutchen while avoiding a playing time logjam in the outfield, but neither Nyjer Morgan nor Brandon Moss are worth restructuring your franchise for; not even close. (And I doubt those considerations played much role in the Pirates' decision to trade McLouth, anyway.)
Perhaps some perspective is in order--McLouth is a solid hitter in every phase of the game, but not a great one, and statistically, he's been a little worse than last year. Before last year, he was widely regarded as a fourth outfielder. To our eyes as fans, he's always looked like a good defender, but every statistical measure says he's awful. Outside Pittsburgh, he's a very solid complementary player, but not a star, and he's in his age-27 season, so now might be the best possible time to trade him. I'm just not overly excited about this package of talent. Locke or Hernandez could end up making this deal look good for the Pirates, but I would have preferred to get either a surer prospect or one with more upside. There is something to be said here for the depth the Pirates are acquiring, and the Bucs' young pitching looks a good deal better than it did yesterday.
I'm naturally predisposed to be excited by these sorts of trades--I like prospects, and I don't get as attached to established players as most fans do. I'm fine with the idea of trading McLouth; it makes perfect sense in terms of the Bucs' overall plan, and they should be listening to offers on other veterans too. I'm just not sure about the return. I'm intrigued, but I'm not blown away. I think the best way to explain this deal is to say that McLouth probably isn't as good as most of us think he is. The Pirates, like a lot of people around baseball, have probably come to view McLouth as defensively challenged and better suited to a corner, where his bat isn't anything special.
0 recs |
329 comments
|
Comments
Pirates are getting...
Pitchers Charlie Morton and Jeff Locke along with outfielder Gorkys Hernandez.
Locke is a second-round pick from 2006, but has had control problems this year.
Hernandez is a speed and defense centerfielder. Why do we need someone like this??
And Morton is in Triple A who’s been up before and struggled.
Thought??
by Jett on Jun 3, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My thought is that I might seriously be done with the Pirates! This is absolutely terrible! I thought we were done with with bad trades and bad negotiationg when Littlefield and Co. left. NH is turning out to be just as bad! How in the world do you trade one of the best centerfielders in baseball and not get Tommy Hanson in return?!?!?!?!! And WE JUST GOT A YOUNG CF FROM THE YANKEES LAST YEAR!!!! WHY ANOTHER ONE?!?!? This trade makes no sense. Morton is not that good! This is absolutely awful, and I might be done with the Pirates. The FO continues to be a joke!! I’m outraged!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tabata isn't a CF, long-term.
He projects as a corner OF.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
MLB.com
Says it’s RHP Charlie Morton, LHP Jeff Locke, and OF Gorkys Hernandez
link
Obscure baseball records and more at my blog, Recondite Baseball.
by TheJay on Jun 3, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
one question is settled
I think the debate over “will they try for .500” is pretty much over with.
by KPatrick on Jun 3, 2009 7:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cutch will be up and starting tomorrow.
IMO, this is not a “blow us away” kind of deal.
WTF?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i agree with ms pirate
this seriously hurts and is disrespectful towards us pirate fans…i am still hurting from the jason bay and xavier nady trades from last year (before the trade we had the best outfield in the MLB)…how can they do this? I am SICK of this 17 rebuilding plan, we are constantly getting these “prospects” who NEVER evolve into anyone good…the pittsburgh pirates have become the MLB’s AAAA Minor League Team, our only role is to groom our young talent until they are good enough to ship them off to red sox, yankees, etc. this is BS
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No disrespect, but
If you’re still “hurting” over last years’ trades, well…
We got “prospects” like Andy LaRoche, who is contributing well to this year’s team, and B. Moss, who will contribute given half a chance, and 2 of our 5 current starters.
I’m not “all in favor” of this trade, either.
I’m just sayin’.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And there goes that idea of finding a young nucleus of McLouth/Doumit to build around! When does Doumit get traded? I can’t believe we didn’t make Tommy Hanson the center of this trade! NH is terrible. The whole Pirates organization is terrible!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 7:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A little shocked too
When I first saw this I thought they’d get someone we’ve ‘heard’ of or whatever you want to call it. Nope. No Tommy Hanson, no Yunel Escobar, no Jair Jurrjens, no Jordan Schafer (not that I want him), no one like this. I thought I read somewhere this was an offer the FO “could not refuse”. I dont see it.
by Jett on Jun 3, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
FWIW...
…I’ve heard of all three of these guys. Both Hernandez and Locke are among the Braves’ top 10, and Morton is a solid young SP (although he struggled in his first look at the bigs last year).
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also...
something for Kerrigan to sink his teeth into?
by BlindSquirrel on Jun 3, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Concerned
I just spent some time reading the Braves board:
http://www.talkingchop.com/2009/6/3/898115/braves-acquire-nate-mclouth-from#comments
Looks like they are elated that they got a good player for 3 quacks, that were never going to make the vet team.
That’s great. They gave up our best offensive player for three more rookies.
You know earlier today I made a post about my optimism that the Pirates could finish with 78 wins – barring a bonehead deal like this. Now they’re on track for 66, if that!
I thought all these prospect trades were gonna be reserved for expendable players, not what was considered the core they were building around!
WTF
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is this a good return
I know about the prospects, but I’m still trying to figure out McLouth’s true value.
by woobie on Jun 3, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's what makes the whole thing interesing.
McClouth is a solid player. He was probably our most valuable player but that is only because we severely lack true major league talent. Because of that I think we tend to over value him. No way was Nate going to bring back Hanson or Heyward. Locke alone could make this a great deal down the road. But because some of the best players we got will not help the team for a couple of years this deal will look like a loser. We got 2 of Atlanta’s top 10 prospects and a starter who’s on the verge of cracking the starting rotation at age 25 – Morton. As far as Hernandez, I don’t know what the future holds for him in the Burg but he is a talent and we need talent. We can’t be worried about trying to fill positions. Overall, I like the deal. I’m not overwhelmed by any means but I like it. Even more than that I like the fact the we are officially rebuilding and not shooting for .500. I think Doumit is ( and quite possibly Duke/Sanchez) are now far behind.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This really seems like too little return for a guy like McLouth but I’ll reserve judgment until I hear the opinions of more knowledgeable ones than myself.
I’m not unhappy that we traded McLouth just the return. And this is an awful PR move. I realize that’s not why you play baseball but the PG blog might crash from all the venom the commenters will spew.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see this as a big win for the Bucs. Looks more like yet another money saving move. If not Hanson, getting someone like Medlen would have excited me, but not Morton or Locke. Locke has been pounded in four of his last 5 starts. His last start lasted 2 outs and he gave up 7 runs.
Sorry to see you go Nate. You will be missed.
by Brakeman8 on Jun 3, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Locke is at least 3 years away
from pitching in the big leagues.
He’s a sub-par A+ pitcher. It’ll be at least 3 years for him to make it to the pro team, assuming he doesn’t get injured or traded before then.
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man, I’ll miss Nate. I’m not excited about Gorkys or Morton either. Huntington said he’d have to be blown away by an offer to trade Nate or Doumit, so he must really love these guys we’re getting back. I just don’t see the value right now.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 7:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just answer this: If you’re NH, how in the world do you not say, “We get Hanson or it’s no deal!” It’s crazy. The Pirates still don’t have anybody in its front office that has a clue!! This is just shocking!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hanson could be an ace in the future and is probably a solid major league starter today. He’s under team control for at least 6 years too. That is more valuable than McLouth, so saying that gets us nowhere.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true but...
i agree that andy laroche has been playing good but regardless jason bay is playing better than both of them combined….my concern is who do they want to build a friggin organization around? they constantly trade away anyone with a little bit of value or potential…even if these “prospects” we get from the nate deal develop, we will just trade them in 3-4 years anyway!! ahhhhhhh im fed up
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bay’s situation was different since he is going to be a FA this winter. Having Bay this year (and presumably starting Bautista or someone at third) would have gotten us nowhere, and all we’d have gotten back would be a couple draft picks.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forget JBay. No really, dude, let it go...
Bay is gone, and won’t be re-signing with Boston, either…just like he wouldn’t have with PGH.
Ever think the helluva year he’s having is because there are other hitters in the lineup?
Like I said, I’m not “blown away” by this trade, either, but it means – if nothing else – that Cutch comes up, and we get 1, maybe 2 live arms.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we re-sign Bay after this year…
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Braves fan here
Despite the whining on our board, I really like this deal for both teams. McLouth helps the Braves a lot because our outfield plain sucks, but I figured I’d come over and give a rundown of the guys you got.
Charlie Morton- When he’s on, he’s nasty and has a very nice sinker and some pretty good secondary stuff. Consistency is his biggest problem as he gets that sinker up a little too much and that’s when he gets hit. If you can fix the consistency, he’s got the stuff to be a very solid middle of the rotation starter.
Gorkys Hernandez- When healthy, he can absolutely fly and plays a fantastic center field with a strong arm. Hasn’t really developed the power that some hoped he would and has dealt with some nagging injuries over the past two years, but the talent is there to be a very good leadoff type and centerfielder.
Jeff Locke- One of my favorite prospects. He’s a hard throwing lefty who draws a lot of ground balls and hose control is usually a plus (though its led to his struggles this year). He’s got a very strong curve and a change that has gotten much better (though still below average) since he added it to his repertoire. A long way off with a lot of potential.
by was385 on Jun 3, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
for coming aboard to give us the 411.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
while i appreciate your input ...
On Morton: I can’t be the only one here who wonders why we need another mid-rotation starter? Except for Duke (this year) the rotation is all mid-to-low rotation starters. Plus Gorzo, VV, and DCutch are all doing fine on their own. What this means to me is to look for Duke to be traded next.
On Hernandez: I guess this means Tabata get’s either promoted or now has more competition in CF at the 2A level, since ACutch will be on the pro team. Tabata still has more upside, so I think Hernandez stays at 2A.
On Locke: Like I posted above He’s a sub-par A+ pitcher, that 3+ years from the pros (except in the Pirates farm where he’s 2 years away).
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see this as a big win for the Bucs.
There’s a shocker. The Pirates don’t know how to win. The Pirates don’t do ANYTHING to try to win. They are losers!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You'd think
we could have got them to throw in Glavine, as long as they were gonna cut him anyway. Unless, as someone noted, those bonuses would still kick in or something.
The Braves obviously see a division they think they can win and they’re going for it. Usually you can take advantage of a team like that. Whether we did, we won’t know for a few years.
by bucdaddy on Jun 3, 2009 7:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The bonuses would still kick in. If he were traded to us, we would assume his contract, and someone would have to pay that bonus. There’s no point.
(Also I think he would have to approve the trade given his veteran status.)
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh ...
The Braves wouldn’t trade Hanson or Heyward for Jake Peavy; they certainly aren’t dealing them for Nate McLouth.
If I’m upset about anything, it’s that the Bucs didn’t get a power bat like Freddie Freeman or Cody Johnson.
by woobie on Jun 3, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
Would the Pirates trade Pedro Alvarez or Brad Lincoln for Nate McLouth? Not freaking likely.
by IAPiratesFan on Jun 3, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Jayson Heyward!? A great prospect that is a lot closer to being major league ready than Gorkys. If you’re going to give up McLouth, you have to get more than two Single-A prospects and a Triple-A prospect. Not even one major leaguer?!?!? Give me a break! It’s a complete joke!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do the Pirates need to get major league prospects? It’s not like the team is going to be contending this year or next. It will be contending when these prospects will have potentially matured.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what about the “prospects” we got from trades back in the 90’s? the truth is “prospects” the pirates almost never amount to anything, and if they do by some freak of nature develop into a decent player, we trade them away for more worthless prospects
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Different management. They know what they’re doing. Just relax.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
90’s…really? NH has been here how long? He has yet to make a Littlefield trade or Bonifay move. We are getting legit prospects for our average players. Thats how you build a championship team.
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Braves aren't going to trade Heyward.
They hung up the phone on both Bay and Peacy when his name was mentioned. It’s not happening.
We had our shot at him two years ago, and we picked Moskos instead.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cody Johnson
I would have loved to see Cody Johnson traded to the Bucs. He was a good friend of mine in high school.
by unexpectedorc on Jun 3, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
precisely
Why can’t they ever trade for someone with real power, not rumored power (Moss, LaRoche)
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm changing stances a little...
I’ve been talking to two of my real good friends who I went to college with and both follow the Braves as close as possible. I will quote them both on their reactions to this trade.
“Good trade for the Braves, great trade for the Bucs.”
They both think getting Locke, Morton, and Hernandez for McLouth is a good haul and will benefit the Pirates in the future. Obviously, in the future is the key.
by Jett on Jun 3, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Really getting tired of all the negativity. Keith Law, one of the more respected analysts out there, thinks this a very good haul for an “over-rated ‘gold-glover’”. I couldn’t care less about finishing .500. Billy Beane said that if you’re not gonna win 90 games, you might as well lose 90 games, and I believe this is the approach NH and company have taken. I admit I don’t know much about the prospects other than what I’ve read on here, but I love the idea of trading guys at their peak values, much like Bay and Nady last year. McClouth is a solid player and most definitely the Pirates’ best player. But on a contending team his numbers would be much less impressive (though much better than 4th outfielder quality as Law often states).
by wertdogg21 on Jun 3, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
still
it is what it is but there is no excuse for the way the pirates organization has been managed during the past 16 years…some fans blame it on our tiny payroll but the marlins and rays have less money than us and find a way to win
the most pathetic part is that since the LAST time we had a winning record, the rays and marlins DIDN’T EVEN EXIST AS TEAMS, and since then have come in to the league and made it to the world series and won 2 titles, respectively…thats pitiful
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yea, it is pitiful, but don’t associate NH with past management because I really think he knows what hes doing. The more and more I research this trade and talk to people that know their stuff the more I like it. The Pirates are moving in the right direction.
by Jett on Jun 3, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t! He gave up Jason Bay for a fourth outfielder last year! Need I say more. He’s not as bad as DL, but he’s not far behind.
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moss was just a throw in. LaRoche and Morris were the prime prospects.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's the point, though isn't it?
They been so badly managed for 16 years, why not try something different?
The cycle of losing and entering the “Drive for 75” every April is tiring.
The important part is that they are taking all offers for LaRoche, Sanchez, Wilson, and Duke. They have to go all-out if they are going to try to rebuild. Because, frankly, they haven’t attempted a true rebuild in those 16 years. just sold a part here and a part there
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but how different is it?
i can see what you are saying but it still seems like they are doing the same BS they always do…once a player reaches any kind of potential they ship him off for a prospect or two and repeat the process…whether its aramis ramirez, jason schmidt, nady, bay, mcclouth, it is the same recipe for the doormat of the league
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is....
they only have a player or two like that at a time, when other teams have 7 or 8.
Just go through our starting lineup and try to figure out how many of the guys are in the top half at their position in the NL. Quick and dirty analysis, but the fact remains that they are still a ways a way from competing for championships. And when you look at the depth in the minors, it’s even scarier.
I would agree that it would look like the same ol’ Pirates if they don’t continue with moves.
The other thing that kind of bothers me here is that it seems (From the PG’s account) that Wren picked up the phone, gave NH an offer he hadn’t considered before/couldn’t refuse and that he accepted. You have to hope that he called every team to maximize the return. Turn the Mets against the Braves. Or get other teams involved to bid up the price.
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So,
did you join BD today to remind us of this?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no,
i am venting my frustrations because each year we as fans are repeatedly let down
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps you are repeatedly let down
because your expectations are unrealistic. I don’t expect to see another winning Pirates team in my lifetime, and the actuarial tables give me like 30 more years.
by bucdaddy on Jun 3, 2009 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where's my pitchfork and torch???
and which way to the castle?!!!!
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 7:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Castle?
Well it’s somewhere around Waveland and Addison in Chicago. Burn it to the ground!
by IAPiratesFan on Jun 3, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
If only for the fact that I would NEVER get to see the Buccos otherwise.
;-)
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is a pretty good return, but we all know Brave pitching prospects tend to fall apart when they reach a new organization. I’ve always liked Gorkys, and Morton should be adequate in the majors. Locke is the wild card, sort of like Bryan Morris from the Bay deal. He’s got the most upside, but it seems a longshot that he’ll ever realize it.
by bolton on Jun 3, 2009 7:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What about Jason Schmidt?
Of course he didn’t get good until he was traded away from the Pirates…
by IAPiratesFan on Jun 3, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t get the timing. If you want to get rid of Nate, why not at least wait til closer to the deadline and maybe get “more than his value”. He’s the best player we had, didn’t cost a whole lot, and was still young. I get they want to make room for McCutchen, but I would have never believe that Nate was gonna be the one we got rid of. Moss and Morgan seem to be much more expendable. And here I was beginning to think things were getting better……
by bmarlin on Jun 3, 2009 8:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
According to Dejan on the PBC Blog, the Pirates weren’t shopping Nate, but the Braves came with an offer they felt they had to take.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess the fans are gonna see A. Cutch. Sooner than later.
by lfhlaw on Jun 3, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Littlefield
Always waited until the last moment to make a deal, apparently in hopes of maximizing return and yet he always seemed to settle for crap in return. I’m not saying that waiting is always bad, but it isn’t necessarily a panacea.
I love the fact that NH is prepared enough to jump and not afraid to do so. Two trends over the last few years have been that the better prospects are more highly valued than has historically been the case and the more of the bigger prospect packages have been dealt in trades early in the trading period (which has just started per the addage that you need 2 months to determine what you have).
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Jun 3, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they had the Braves coming to them with this
They could have shopped him around a bit first. Did they? Who knows?
What’s the word Charlie, did they shop him around, or did the just say yes without much care for the details?
I hope they at least bargained for what they wanted. A draft pick would have been nice too.
Sorry, I just don’t see it. We got a Rookie pitcher, a 3rd CF (behind (ACutch, Tabata) and a pitcher that years away from the pros. For a starting OF that hits .270’s in the MLB, with 25 HR, and 100 RBI.
Where’s our power hitter?
Seems like the old days to me.
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow is right. I’m shocked.
Bob Smizik says the Pirates are giving up on the present with this deal. Well, duh.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 8:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good thing he mentioned that
I was confused for a second.
True Blue Jazz
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
by UtesFan89 on Jun 3, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OF Defense
We might catch everything reachable but we might not total 30 HR’s in the entire OF.
by buccoben on Jun 3, 2009 8:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, we think our offense was bad wit Nate in there, we haven’t seen anything yet. We may get shut out every other game until Doumit gets back!!!! I want to cry!!!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh noes!!!
And this team had such promise of contending this year too!!!
Oh, wait, …..
Formerly known as Econolodge
by Willton on Jun 3, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
contending no
But a year ago they told us McClouth was part of the nucleus they were going to build around.
What they left out was that they meant until he became too expensive and then they would swap him for fodder.
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 3, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Nate McClouth bobblehead I picked up during the Rockies game a few weeks ago is making me sad.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 8:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
hahahahaha…see if you can trade it in for a Charlie Morton bobblehead.
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So who’s next to go? and I thought that signing these players was the reason to have hope to build a nucleus of players. McClouth, Doumit, Snell, Maholm. Now with McClouth gone, who’s next?
I understand the minor league’s need help, but so does the MLB team. of course if A.McCutcheon comes up and hits better or just as well as McClouth, I think NH may get off the hook for that trade.
like bmarlin said, perhaps if he had waited he might have gotten more, but I suppose pitching was and is a sore spot for the pirates. With Snell really bailing on us, I think they’re looking for another starting pitcher or someone to start soon. all the other pitchers have been somewhat competitive.
by lfhlaw on Jun 3, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
an interesting fact
prospects can one day play for you major league team
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Jun 3, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think maybe the important thing here is the timing of the deal. why now? to get AM up to the bigs and lots of playing time? if all the prospects peak at the right time then this turns out to be a great deal, but thats a long shot
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying
I’m not shocked and wondering. I’m just saying the whole point is that we got three prospects who can help the Tabata/McCutchen/Alvarez/Lincoln team win
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Jun 3, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who knows? McCutchen and Alvarez may be traded tomorrow.
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let’s get back to reality, shall we?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cocktails
I’m beginning to think mspirate is an intimate acquaintance of our recently departed friend, thelumberco.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've been thinking that
for a coupla days now myself.
There are ways of finding out, as Charlie did when he re-joined under another screen name.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
mspirate is cool I think. He’s been fine until tonight. He’s upset and understandably so. I think he just needs to calm down and sleep on it and then think about it in the morning.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and they go and do it again. trade away the best player for some prospects that may or may not pan out. wtf.
heres an idea, lets trade mx talbot from the pens for a 4 round draft pick and money. that makes about as much sense. i would imagine to see snell and doumit otd next.
at least the pens are rockin
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Um. The Pens are in the Stanley Cup Final. If we traded McLouth when we were leading the division, I would have been angry.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
missing the point. dumping players to try and get prospects to build a team around is one thing when your team has been winning for years and the contracts are almost up.
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the Rays got to the Series by paying big bucks for free agents.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
again not the point. the point is that if the bucs are ever going to be a viable team in the nl central they need to figure out which direction the franchise is going to go and what its identity is. i personally thought i would see mclouth and doumit as fixtures and cycle in free agents and developing prospects untill they find a crew that meshes togeather. so whos the core now?
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I love McLouth, he is not good enough to be the best player on a World Series team. Utley, Longoria — these guys are impact players. McLouth is very good, but not at that level.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The core...
McCutchen, Alvarez, Lincoln, Lil’ LaRoche, and now maybe some of these guys? Maybe Sano if we sign him? The core you’re talking about was going to be in their 30s by the time we had a real core of players.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 3, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nate is gone...
and now according to oldtimehockey Dom Deluise is dead too ?!?!?
I’m more shocked about this one. I took the Jason Kendal trade hard. He was the first homegrown guy we got rid of that was really great during the past 16 years. Losing Nate the Great will be tough, but these tough decesions are the ones that are going to bring us back to the World Series. I hope these kids coming from Atlanta are studs and that Nate has a great rest of his career but goes 0 for 12 when the Bucs go to Atlanta.
"Baseball is better than football. Think about it, eighty degrees, a cold beer and a short-sleeve shirt is better than 30 degrees, a hip flask and six layers of clothes under a lap blanket. Take your pick: suntan or frostbite. " - Thomas Boswell
by Ketcham Bruce on Jun 3, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
poor boy
had a great thought
I’m not saying
I’m not shocked and wondering. I’m just saying the whole point is that we got three prospects who can help the Tabata/McCutchen/Alvarez/Lincoln team win
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Jun 3, 2009 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snickels had Locke and Hernandez as B- prospects before the season. Morton apparently met the service time that makes him not a “minor league prospect”.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 8:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Locke, LHP, Grade B-: I’ve liked him since he was in high school. Like Rohrbough, worry some about injuries.
great another risky, injury prone pitcher, exactly what we need more of right now
by bmarlin on Jun 3, 2009 8:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, Lincoln isn’t looking so bad right now.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah thats true, but odds are he wont be ready til at least next year
by bmarlin on Jun 3, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Odds are we weren’t winning the division this year, either.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s not the point man. We had started building a foundation with McLouth and Doumit. Now it’s back to rubble! This trade really pisses me off!
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They weren’t the foundation. They’d all be past their prime by the time guys like Tabata or Alvarez would make major contributions.
Sleep on this trade and see how you feel in the morning. It’s easy to get emotional at first.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cutch is the foundation, and has been for several years. We’ve been building around him for 2 years now, not Doumit and McLouth.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All pitchers are risky and injury-prone.
There’s no avoiding it, unless you don’t want any pitchers at all.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no doubt
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How good could McLouth have really been???
50% of the fans still spell his name wrong.
I just hope Sydney Crausby delivers a Cup!!
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
omg lolololol
How good could McLouth have really been???
50% of the fans still spell his name wrong.
I just hope Sydney Crausby delivers a Cup!!
priceless
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best post I've ever seen, anywhere.
by hisjazziness on Jun 3, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
" I AM CAPATIN CHAOS, and this is my trusty Sidekick cato. Say hello Cato"
Dom Deluise 1933-2009, Cannonball run
by oldtimehockey09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best reaction this trade could possibly have had.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 3, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant to reply earlier
THIS is a wonderful post.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Liked Nate But....
I always liked Nate. I thought he and Doumit were the two players on the team who played hard every game (also maybe Nyjer). That being said, Nate was not going to get us to the playoffs anytime in the next 3 years, By that time he would have been a FA.
Nate has not hit for average since last July. His power has still been there but not his average. Also, before last year we were even sure he could start for us! Then he became a 20/20 guy!
I would have liked him to stay a Buc but if we got 3 players who can help us more in 2011/2012, then I like the deal.
Best wishes to Nate. I hope he does well.
One thing you can say about the New Leadership team is that they are not afraid to make deals. They appear to send a message than no one is safe on the team.
by zogger on Jun 3, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes but...
the Old Leadership team wasn’t afraid to make deals either…that’s why we are in the position we are in, a perpetual cycle of bad trades and poor management
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Littlefield traded for veterans Jose Hernandez, Xavier Nady, Matt Herges, Matt Morris, Benito Santiago, and Randall Simon. As far as I can tell, Huntington has acquired in trade exactly one player older than 25 (Tyler Yates). NH isn’t afraid to make deals to acquire prospects, which is a very different thing. Time will tell how it turns out.
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree.
The old leadership waited to move players until we had absolutely no leverage and sold low in most cases. Two exceptions: Giles and Ritche. We are in the position we are in because old management never truly committed to rebuilding and traded to fill needs as opposed to taking the best player available. The new FO is not even close to being in the same league as the old.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, But They Were Bad Deals
The old deals were straight salary dumps. Even the Giles trade, while it turned out well for us, was really dumping salary.
by zogger on Jun 3, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Locke
Baseball America calls him the best pitching New Hampshire prospect since Chris Carpenter
Locke has the ability to be a workhorse in the middle of a major league rotation.
Does this trade make sense? Perhaps.
Viva Clemente!
by Roberto on Jun 3, 2009 8:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
best pitching new hampshire prospect?
i’m not an expert on baseball talent in new hampshire but i can’t really see how great of a compliment that is to be “the best pitching new hampshire prospect”, other than chris carpenter who the heck has come out of new hampshire
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's hope...
it’s not like saying a movie is the “Best Rob Schnieder film since Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo”
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some good players from the Granite State.
Best hitter is probably Arlie Latham, a 19th century third baseman (and all-around awesome dude) who’s eighth on MLB’s all-time SB list. For pitchers, you’ve got Mike Flanagan, Bob Tewksbury, Stan “Big Daddy” Williams, and Lefty Tyler.
Among active players, you’ve got Carpenter, Brian Wilson with the Giants, and three guys currently in the minors: reliever Chad Paronto, outfielder Sam Fuld, and backup catcher Matt Tupman.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the biggest question is what the fuck am I supposed to do with my Nate McLouth jersey now?
I except a reimbursement check in the mail from NH in the next two weeks or I’m going to become a Yankees fan.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 8:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good point. You know ARod, Sabathia, Burnett, and Teixeira aren’t going anywhere; no one else will take their contracts… :)
by shayborg on Jun 3, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still wear my ones for Craig and Bay.
Nate’s still awesome, and I’ll still wear it to remember him.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I wear my Craig jersey to about half the games I see the Pirates play.
by Charlie on Jun 3, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you didn’t have a “Thor” one made?
heh.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
On days when we need extra help...
…I wear my dress Kendall jersey over a Craig tee. It’s badass.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I made this mistake of getting the “custom name jersey tee” with nates name and # last year cuz they werent available. THis was before the “custom font” versions came out. It’s just white block letters and looks like a softball league jersey
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think my favorite one I ever got was a Jeremy Burnitz t-shirt jersey that my friends got me as a joke. Still wear that one to games occasionally.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really like Hernandez and I hope he’s in Pittsburgh by September.
Morton is a spare part.
I know nothing whatsoever about Locke.
by Suffering Buc on Jun 3, 2009 8:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh,
Hansen, Freeman, or even Schafer would have been awesome.
by Suffering Buc on Jun 3, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't want Schafer.
I’m glad he wasn’t in the deal.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Schafer any day
over Hernandez for me. Not one tool is Hernandez better at.
by buccoben on Jun 3, 2009 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not even the...
…don’t-get-suspended-for-taking-illegal-substences tool? Schafer is kind of lacking there.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, I would imagine it’s a lot easier to trade Mario, Jack, and Freddy now.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t mean to imply it was hard to trade them or whatever before, but to the extent fans would be concerned the Pirates were just trading away our players to save cash, this move will at least make that easier. I’m sure most casual fans are going to miss the larger picture on this one.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lord, if they’ll trade McLouth, they’ll trade anybody. We may not have a team come July 31. All of our players will be gone.
by mspirate on Jun 3, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
That’s the one thing I don’t like: Hernandez might be good, but he won’t hit for power.
by woobie on Jun 3, 2009 8:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
disgusted
this is a bigger joke than when the pirates signed those two “pitchers” from India after they won that reality tv show….so if you can hold a baseball in your hand and have a pulse you can play for the Pittsburgh Pirates
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that's a bit unfair...
those acquisitions were like a $2 flutter on the poker machines.
by BlindSquirrel on Jun 3, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Still Baffled
Flipped to MLB.com in time to catch some talking head discuss the trade. A solid “good” f/Atlanta, as they need offense and their entire OF is suspect.
What I heard 3 times on the Pirate haul was
“good prospect but….”
…but, raw (i.e., like Nyjer, he doesn’t know where to go)
…but needs polish (i.e., like Moss who is still unpolished like a great 4th outfielder)
…but whatever.
Prospects are like the dirt that surrounds a gold nugget in a stream, you wash a lot of them away to get the one star. I wish we would’ve gotten one player who could come to the team tomorrow and play, like Nate is f/Atlanta.
Chris (or Kris) Medlin is no Hansen, and he could have replaced Snell or Karstens
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 8:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
HOW DO YOU TRADE YOUR BEST PLAYER AND NOT EVEN GET ONE OF THE OTHER TEAMS BEST PROSPECTS?
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 8:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because . . .
. . . the best player the Bucs had simply wasn’t worth their best prospect (Hanson).
by biggyv on Jun 3, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
right but Medlin? Schaefer? Diaz??
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference between Medlen and the arms we got...
…is pretty slight. And I’m not sure who you mean by “Diaz”, in that Matt Diaz is pretty old to be considered a prospect.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because Atlanta's best prospects
are two of the best prospects in the game and are completely untouchable
by was385 on Jun 3, 2009 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
then heres a suggestion
DONT TRADE HIM TO ATLANTA
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
your caps lock is broken
Are you worried about fighting it out for the wild card?
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We did get one of their best prospects.
Hernandez was one of their very top guys. He’s a consensus top 100 prospect in the whole minors, and one of the best CF prospects in baseball.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Umm...
Two of the prospects were ranked in the top 10 of the Braves system. Morton was considered a top prospect in their system for a while, then fell off with bad ML numbers last season, and was climbing his way back up with excellent AAA numbers before this trade.
We didn’t get one of the other team’s best players. We got three.
As other have said, the Braves declared Hanson untouchable when the return was Jake freakin’ Peavy, one of the best pitchers in the Major Leagues by far. What the hell makes you think they’d send him to Pittsburgh for a slightly above average outfielder?
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 3, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh
Because our best players aren’t that good.
by woobie on Jun 3, 2009 8:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That too.
Contending teams’ best players:
Evan Longoria, Alex Rodriguez, Kevin Youkilis, Manny Ramirez, Vlad Guerrero, Ryan Howard, Miguel Cabrera, David Wright, Ryan Braun.
Our best player: Nate McLouth.
McLouth was never going to be the franchise player of a WS team. At best he could be a piece.
www.sixtyftsixin.com
by Sixty Feet, Six Inches on Jun 3, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some obervations from CBS Fantasy (sports, not swimsuits)
Morton went 4-8 in 15 starts with the Braves in 2008 with a 6.15 ERA. I guess we need someone to compliment John Van Benschoten….
But he is 25-year-old. So far this year, 7-2 down at Triple-A Gwinnett, 2.51 ERA and 55 strikeouts in 64 2/3 innings pitched. (That’s new, a Pirate pitcher who doesn’t hit the bat every other throw.
Hernandez was batting .316 for the AA Mississippi Braves. 10 stolen bases, 19 RBI in 212.
The other guy is too raw to have any info
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 8:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
webster's definition of prospect is:
“the possibility of future success”
so why is it that our prospects NEVER AMOUNT TO ANYTHING?! i am so sick of hearing about these “prospects” that we get evvvery year….what’s the point of having eggs if they never hatch into anything??
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 8:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"Never amount to anything?!"
Again, you’re conveniently overlooking Andy LaRoche, Moss, Ohlendorf, etc. Players on the current ML roster who are contributing.
Perhaps you should take a couple of deep breaths, and maybe make yourself a cocktail.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not his fault. He does when he plays….
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps you should take a couple of deep breaths, and maybe make yourself a cocktail.
Sound advice for everyone here I think : )
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
None of those eggs have been sat on by NH and FC though. We don’t know what kind of chicks they produce yet.
I made most of my life decisions at a Foghat concert... I stand by them.
by Chester J Lampwick on Jun 3, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not our best
I know we all love McLouth but he is not our best player. IMO Sanchez and Duke are leading the way in that category. I really don’t get too excited for a no.3 hitter batting .250. We pulled in the no. 4 and 7 prospects which is pretty impressive for McLouth.
This trade opens up a few things for the Bucs: Obviously the McCutchen move, but also frees up some money for next Tuesday. This allows the pirates to draft someone such as Crow at 4 instead of an incredible reach such as Tony Sanchez.
I’m kind of excited to see what we got back. This years team wasn’t going anywhere. Personally I could care less about the consecutive loss record if we become a competitive team year in and year out. What is more important: getting 82 wins, for fighting for division titles on a yearly basis?
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And the cycle continues
Just seems totally unnecessary at this point. A reasonable, long-term contract for a productive player for three lottery tickets. This sucks.
http://www.rakesofmallow.com
by CW on Jun 3, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One other rational thought on Nate the Great
He is 27-year-old and was an All-Star last season w/these stats (all career highs):
.276 average
26 homers
94 RBI
I hate to admit it, but those numbers are not #1 outfielder numbers. More importantly, right now he’s hitting .256 with nine homers and 34 RBI this season. We had no guarantee that he would catch back on fire and he might settle where he’s at now.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right now, he's only ~30 points of OPS...
…off of his 2008 pace. It’s just less concentrated in BA.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's right but
by, say, 2012 when it might matter who we have playing in the OF it is likely that Nate’s OPS will be less than it is now.
by WestCoastBuc on Jun 3, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It sounds like we got
some pretty good prospects. We’ll just have to see how things pan out, but many of us agree that the team wasn’t going to be in any position to contend for a few more years.
The Pirates traded McLouth at his peak trade value, it seems to me, so I hope time proves it to be a good deal.
Charlie talks about Gorkys Hernandez as “a notch below the McCutchen/Tabata class.”
This is just a gut feeling on my part, but I’m not so sure the team considers Tabata in the same class as McCutchen now with Tabata’s constant injuries and significant playing time missed. (And not to mention some of the other nonsense going on in his life.)
Mere speculation on my part, of course.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s a good point. It’s more like McCutchen>>>>>>Tabata>Hernandez.
by Charlie on Jun 3, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was surprised we got that much for him. His numbers reflected one good season. Typical Bucco centerfielder the last decade +
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 8:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't think he's a typical Bucs CF...
but I do think the return was decent.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BA
Baseball America said with Schaeffer and Hernandez the Braves had “2 of the premier center field prospects in the game”. Happy with that and its just one piece
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Prospect" being the key word
Schaeffer is stinking up the majors, isn’t he?
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea, he was sent back down to AAA the other day
by Jett on Jun 3, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As a fan, I'm unhappy.
Nate’s a fun guy to watch, and an easy guy to root for. He made watching a lot of losing ballgames more palatable over the last few years. I hope he’s happy and successful in Atlanta.
I’m too shocked to do a good job of analysis right now, but the three players we got back are all significant talents, worth having on the roster.
by Vlad on Jun 3, 2009 8:55 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You'll be missed, Nate McLouth.
Thanks for all you did for the Pittsburgh Pirates’ organization, its fans, and the city of Pittsburgh.
I think you did your best each and every day you stepped onto the field wearing the Bucco uniform.
When Dave Littlefield and others doubted you could play the game every day, you proved them wrong.
You made an All-Star game, you got a Gold Glove, you were an all-around solid player for the PBC the past few years.
You’re a class act, Nate.
Good luck in Atlanta.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 8:58 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
hear hear
or is it here here?
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Jun 3, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just wish Nate wasn’t going to Atlanta. I hate the Braves.
"Baseball is better than football. Think about it, eighty degrees, a cold beer and a short-sleeve shirt is better than 30 degrees, a hip flask and six layers of clothes under a lap blanket. Take your pick: suntan or frostbite. " - Thomas Boswell
by Ketcham Bruce on Jun 3, 2009 9:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s actually the best argument against making this trade. McLouth is going to kill us when we play them in the NLCS.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jun 3, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"when we play them in the NLCS"
Hah! Good one!
Formerly known as Econolodge
by Willton on Jun 3, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't mind trading Nate...
But you gotta get something better than this, I’m all for trading everybody and rebuilding but this return is crap. Hanson and Heyward were never coming here so that doesnt matter, but Hernandez is real young and another centerfielder, more speed, less power, better average than McCutcheon but we have 2 prospects of our own, one is a centerfielder and one is a 3rd baseman and now we have traded for another centerfielder(Tabata, I know he’ll move but…) with no power. A real young pitcher with a lot of upside but we may never hear of him again and 25 AAAA pitcher like 2 other crappy pitchers we have at the end of our rotation. All this for our best player who was reasonably priced and DIDN’T HAVE TO BE TRADED!!!!! Again, I dont’t think their was anything wrong with trading him but get something we are missing, get a power hitting first baseman or left fielder, or a SS who can field and hit the ball, but we got one of the 2 things we already had prospect wise, a fast centerfielder with little pop, the A’s got a better deal for Joe Blanton than we got for our best player. Hate it!!!!
by SteelCity G on Jun 3, 2009 9:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nate isn’t a good enough player to yank someone’s power hitting 1st baseman (although I wish he was). Hernandez isn’t a throw in bum. He is a top prospect from the Braves. Nate would’ve been gone before we became truly competitive anyhow.
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a perfect picture choice Charlie. It captures my frustration in Nate form
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 9:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
give it four years
i can’t even get excited about the opportunity this deal has created for Andrew McCutchen because within 4 or 5 years he will be at the top of his game and we will trade him away to the yankees for some more prospects…it’s we’re playing chess but all we have are ponds…then out of the 3 prospects we get for Andrew 1 will develop and we will trade him anyway…the pattern will never end
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
one implication
is that Freddy is basically guaranteed an All Star spot now….unless we think anyone else deserves it? I think Duke could but I also think it’s pretty tough to get in as a pitcher with two great 80 inning segments bookending 5 years.
another implication – Altoona is going to be a lot more interesting to follow, especially when Tabata gets back too. Does this push Tabata out of CF?
Jason
The Hanging Curve
by poorboywilly on Jun 3, 2009 9:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On Tabata...
that’s a really good question. Has been relunctant to move him from CF even though most scouts predict he’ll have to move to a corner. My guess is yes. Hernandez is definiely he better CF of the two.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From an Organizational Perspective
The Pirates suck at message delivery. They are an organization that has to shape the news that affects them. They also know that news like this will leak and that they have to be prepared to counter the negative spin that comes from a lack of solid information.
They have done a terrible job at message management. And that counts for a lot.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ummm....what?
And what does that have to do with building a sustainable championship caiber club?
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just saying they would have made everyone happier
by announcing you got a $50 gift certificate to Hooters if you bought a ticket
and in real small print (oh by the way, we traded Nate McLouth).
Part of the reason we’re up in arms right now is we no nothing about the people we got and we feel like this is a desparation/spur-of-the-moment move that just guts the team/isn’t part of any organized plan going forward – as many people have said, why do we need another speedy, slap-hitting center fielder?.
They knew a substantial part of the fans would grab their pitchforks and torches. Nate was a popular guy. No Mientkewicz, but popular nonetheless.
If they want to convince the fans that there is a plan and that this trade contributes to it, that message has to go out the instant the news hits the wires.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
HOOTERS!
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Upon further review
I think we got fair value for Nate. I don’t buy that it was a deal we “couldn’t refuse,” but decent value. I like Nate and he certainly was a very goosd player for us. But, has been pointed out, Nate is an average to slightly above average OF in MLB who just had a career year. Could we have held out and got more, maybe, but a bird in the hand….yadda, yadda, yadda.
First of all, the best player on the Pirates is….Andrew McCutchen. Make no mistake, he has more talent than anyone else. He may not have McLouth’s power, but he will be a better OF than Nate….write it down.
If Ian doesn’t shape up, I think Morton will take his place. Although his final numbers in MLB were ugly last year he apparently had some back issues. During the offseason he dropped weight, got in better shape and has no such issues this year. He put up solid AAA numbers last year and is doing so again this year. Since he doesn’t have much MLB service time, we control him for 5 1/2 years.
Locke is another bitg upside guy who could turn out to be a complete bust. Neil seems to be collecting these guys in hopes he gets one or two that do reach that star potential. It’s a risk, but it is the kind of risk a franchise like the Pirates have to take.
Hernandez is probably more insurance than anything else. McCutchen, Tabata, Moss, Young and hernandez is a pretty nice collection of young OFs. It’s true none of them have developed great power, but it’s a much better foundation of OFs than we have had since the days of Bonds, Bonilla and Van Slyke.
So, although I will miss Nate and I wish him well, I’m excited to see what McCutchen can do with his opportunity and I will be very interested to see what else we add when guys like Adam, Jack, John G, NyjMo and possibly Freddy are all traded.
So, I’m going to withold my final judgement on Neil, Frank and the gang until I see how things start to shake out.
by Brakeman8 on Jun 3, 2009 9:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
but
it’s like i said, give it four years and we will all be in this same position except the names are changed…instead of nate being traded it will be McCutchen, who at the peak of his development will be hastily shipped off to the yankees, red sox, etc. for a handful of prospects who never amount to anything
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’re good at predicting the future. Can you give me the lotto numbers for Illinois for Saturday?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could, if the lottery system in Illinois followed a predictable pattern like that of the Pirates, which is easier to predict than predicting what day tomorrow will be if today is Wednesday.
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Braves fans
I’m shocked to read that Braves fans are unhappy. Have they seen the OBP of their starting outfielders this year? Neither Anderson or Franceur are over .300 OBP, and the centerfielder is at .303, with a .205 BA.
I would think they would be happy to have someone who can get on base.
by Blyleven Curve Ball on Jun 3, 2009 9:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Look at it from their side, to them this is like trading D.McCutchen, Lincoln and Tabata.
by Brakeman8 on Jun 3, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. You give up your no.4 and 7 prospects for a guy that had a good year last year and thats it. I would be livid as well
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing Personal
Intended toward anyone on this board, but the respected opinions that I am waiting for are WTM, Charlie, and Vlad.
Everyone’s initial reaction can be discarded, because of the shock, if you can call it that, of the trade. Remeber, it is considered a landslide in a political election of if 2 go one way and one the other (66.67% vs. 33.3%), so one out of three will be upset in the best of cases.
Personally, I trust the decision made by Huntington.
by God Loves on Jun 3, 2009 9:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nothing Personal
Geez, thanks tons.
I’m heading over to C42’ s place to get over my shame by raiding his liquor cabinet.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don’t hafta raid it, amigo.
I’ll gladly pour you whatever you’d like.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
P.S.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ooops.
P.S. God Loves is okay, perhaps he phrased it less than optimumly (not a word, I know – shaddap!), but I agree with the concept. WTM & Vlad are probably the top posters as far as that stuff goes.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
I scanned the whole comment thread just to see what they said. WTM, please? J/K, you probably have a life, at least more of one than me (and apparently like 30 other posters).
by hisjazziness on Jun 3, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree. No umbrage was taken. It was just too good a straight line by GL to ignore.
I want to see what Vlad and WTM say too. We got Charlie’s initial thoughts in the main post — thanks Chas!
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, but don’t they think they can win this year? those prospects likely don’t help make the playoffs this year. was i wrong in thinking that they are trying to win now?
by Blyleven Curve Ball on Jun 3, 2009 9:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
meant to have this one up on the previous string.
i like this trade. they get someone to help them win now, and we get guys to help win in 2-3 years.
by Blyleven Curve Ball on Jun 3, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well at least the PBC is not overvaluing its players
This deal does have the nice side effect of making room for McCutchen while avoiding a playing time logjam in the outfield, but neither Nyjer Morgan nor Brandon Moss are worth restructuring your franchise for; not even close.
This has been another episode of “What Charlie Said.”
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 9:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would have thought McLouth was worth more than someone who “could be a leadoff hitter with a good OBP and some power who makes himself an above-average player by virtue of outstanding defense” (from Keith Law’s Top 100 prospects list) and a couple of pitchers with obvious questions marks. They probably couldn’t have gotten much more out of the Braves, but I do wonder what other clubs they fielded offers from.
by wickethewok on Jun 3, 2009 9:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
according to DK
They weren’t shopping Nate in the first place. ATL came to them with this deal, so there was no comparative offers.
I do not know all of the details, nor do I claim to. It’s just what I read.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im trading my anger for 3 whiskey Gingers. Evan williams is kind of crappy but it’s a decent whiskey at a price my organization can afford. Hopefully one of them can contribute in the future, but I wasn’t going to stay sober anyway so whats the point of focusing on expensive booze now? The streak continues
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 9:31 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Amen
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
by cheese09 on Jun 3, 2009 9:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We should Trade Russel to Colorado for prospects. They need a manager and think of how excited he’ll be when he wakes up (he’s asleep no doubt) and finds out that he gets to shuffle seth smith, fowler, hawpe and spillbourghs in the OF and Barmes, stewart, atkins, helton in the INF. AND he can go back and forth between torrealba and Ianetta. Its perfect. He can use the thin air as an excuse to rest the good players even more
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 9:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t have a problem with dealing Nate…in and of itself. What I have a problem with is the return…and mainly because it doesn’t address some of the problems facing this team.
Unless we acquire it in future trades or FA signings…there is going to be a severe lack of power on this roster. When you see tomorrow’s starting lineup…if it is as we anticipate…Adam LaRoche will have more career HR’s than the rest of the starting lineup combined. Second in career HRs in the Pirates starting lineup…Jack Wilson. (Because I don’t expect Hinske or Monroe to start).
We have little or no depth at the middle infield positions above Class A. Brian Friday is about it as far as prospects go…at least for the next couple of years.
Catching…below the major league level…is about as sparse as it can get.
I’ve indicated three obvious shortages in the Pirates system that we’ve been talking about ALL season. How many of them were addressed in this trade. ZERO!!
by Thunder on Jun 3, 2009 9:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree and disagree.
Yes the Pirates lack power and that is a definite need. However they lacked pitching depth more than anyting else and this trade definitely addressed that need.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t consider them “deep” in any position. Just acquire talent and worry about where they’ll play later.
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's kind of my point.
We’ve been burned to many times b DL having to have a mojor leagure ready player, or major league ready 3B. If would have spent more time worrying about getting the best player regardless of what positions we already had we might have Ryan Howard playing for us right now. Albeit.. we may be trading him for three lower level prospects…lol!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
even though he is sruggling right now you have to count Shelby Ford as a middle infield prospect.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How the heck do you know that
Shelby Ford is “snuggling” right now???
Just asking.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cuz last time I checked his numbers weren't too good.
Ahhh…just got it. Yep my typing ability is severly lacking!!!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
you have to be an ESPN “insider” for that.
Heh.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More beer is in order
Nothing personal to Chi-town, but what is this cocktails stuff?
Sounds like a namby-pamby, panty-waisted, pinky-finger out New York drink…
Are we not steelworkers and coal miners and lumberjacks and stuff?
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Beer is wonderful. Have you tried bourbon
McLouth is The Trouth
by GTrain on Jun 3, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
HA!
Trogs,
While my bedroom fridge (yes, I have a bedroom fridge!) is well stocked with beer (and unlike many of the yinzers, I like IC – just can’t get it here), when dealing with the Pirates – games, discussions, etc. I find that I usually need something stronger. Double vodka works for me.
;-)
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've sworn off
Vodka and such from my younger days.
Why? Seven ounce shot. I’ll say nothing more.
Fortunately, during football season, I have a source f/IC….
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've only found
one place in the Chicago Metro area that has IC. And it’s waaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy out in BFE (if you catch my drift), so I only get a case or two a year.
I.C. > Old Style.
Fortunately, my liver has not gone into “Operation Shutdown” yet.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cocktails... where'd you find IC?
I’ve had it @ L&L Tap off of Belmont and Clark – which I realize is an awful yuppie intersection but the bar itself is like a timewarp back to when that neighborhood was cool.
by RetireNutting on Jun 3, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Already almost 200 comments...
So I haven’t read them yet, but I love the THEORY behind this deal. Trading at peak value a non-star player to add to the prospect base and build the organization. I can’t speak much about the return – I agree with Charlie that it seems like a bit of a grab bag – but the theory is such a refreshing change from the Littlefield days.
I know the majority of the fanbase – the less educated – are going to hate this deal, but I’m more likely to buy a ticket to a Pirate game now than I was before because there seems to be a reason to have faith in the direction of the team.
That said, it is critical that the baseball evaluation be of high quality to ensure that we got a good return.
One last thing: I love that unlike Littlefield, NH seems to be able to read the market and stay ahead of the curve. Trading early instead of late; recognizing that he likely wasn’t going to get an uber prospect in the current environment but trusting his baseball people to make strong evaluations to bring in good prospects that they think may be undervalued by the other team (or else the other team wouldn’t be willing to trade them ala Hanson).
Exciting as hell. Too bad nobody will see Cutch’s big league debut – though I guess he should get one at bat in before faceoff.
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Jun 3, 2009 9:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tomorrow's Game was
Get out of town Thursday afternoon wasn’t it? we can all watch at work
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about the money issue? To the extent the Pirates were balking at Sano, I imagine having Nate off the books would free up some money.
I know that it was possible for the Pirates to sign Sano anyway, but I have to think that these prospects are cost-controlled for many years. I would think this move makes it easier to sign him and maybe even spend lavishly if a guy like Ackley falls to us.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 9:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That is one of the big reasons I am excited for this deal. For the draft next week, NH won’t have to make a deal for a no.30 picked at the 4. I hope that Crow falls to us and we can pay to get a top of the rotation starter in our minor league system. Also shift some of the money and get Sano signed
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't believe money was the issue...
it may turn into an unexpected benefit if the Sano dealing get out of control,
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the money aspect. I think it played no part in this trade. I am excited that this extra money is an extra bonus that can improve our draft and international signings
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree it wasn’t the issue in that we didn’t have to move McLouth (we just signed him, after all) for cash reasons. Nor was a Sano signing an issue of finding the money / balking at paying.
That being said, money is always a finite resource, and that’s even more important to a team like the Pirates. So I would think that getting three cost-controlled guys lessens the “sting” and justifies investing more in a guy like Sano, who would hopefully come up a few years after other young guys come up to the MLB.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again the Plan or message thing
With the draft tomorrow (?) or whenever, what do we pick. Yet another center fielder, who may get here in 2018? Or a middle reliever specialisht? Or Chesty McThump at catcher/1B? That will help decipher whether there is a plan or this is just a bunch of random darts thrown at the dartboard.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again...
no offense meant but…huh? We all have to stop blaming this front office for the mistakes in front office’s past. Both Coonely and Huntington have said that signability and Sano will not be a factor in their draft decision at #4. They are going to draft the best player available. I guess we’ll just have to wait til next Tuesday to find out if they are telling the truth.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, Posting while on
my fourth beer is not a good idea.
But the whole point is that even when you do the right/best thing, if you don’t have a spin-meister out explaining why that is the rigth/best thing, the peasants will revolt because they think its a bad/not good thing.
We are all revolting because we think we just dumped a star player for a lot of “I’ll love you in the morning” promises. Part of the PBC organization’s problem is that the fan base doesn’t trust them. This trade does nothing to take care of that problem unless it is packaged and sold well.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get
what you’re saying, Trogs.
But we ain’t got a spin doctor. Or a good one, I should say.
The casual fan is not gonna accept the “silk purse/ sow’s ear” spin anyway, IMO.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that does make sense.
In that respect I agree with your comments because I do think the Pirate Nation is going to be screaming about this one the rest of the season. Hopefully Cutch tears it up and makes us forget about Nate.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The majority of my friends, who are casual baseball fans, are disgusted. They think this is a salary dump. One of them said that if we had kept Bay and Nady, we’d be above .500. It’s unfortunate Neal and Coonelly inherited such a bad situation.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 9:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whoooh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .5000 Yeah!!!
I am so hopeful that my daughter grows up o be average!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I tried explaining that to them. They didn’t agree with my argument that being slightly above .500 isn’t much better than 65 wins or whatever, except in a “feel good” sense. If we have any hope of being a winner, blowing up the team is our best shot.
In response, one of them said if the Pirates were serious about winning, we’d just re-sign Bay and Nady and then get more good players in free agency.
I’m not saying my friends are dumb. They just don’t really care much about baseball beyond seeing the local team do well. That’s a variant of rational apathy, IMO. If I didn’t love baseball as much as I did, I probably would be missing the forest for the trees, too.
The success of the Rays last year made a lot of them think it’s just an issue of throwing money at the problem. I tried to say that’s what the Pirates are trying to do, but they don’t see it the way.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BRING BACK YOSLAN!!!
I wonder who would be at the back of the rotation now if those trades didn’t go down.
by lost_zero on Jun 3, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn’t imagine being in their shoes with what Littlefield left behind. Every move that is made gets destroyed. Truth is Bay and Nady stay, who fills out the rest of this winning roster? I’m really surprised more people aren’t excited for the ML debut of McCutchen
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, if we had Bay and Nady
Nady would be out for the season w/an elbow injury and
Bay would be hitting f/a lower BA/OPS/Slugging because his protection is Jack Wilson or Adam LaRoche and he’s hitting things to Death Valley in PNC Park instead of bouncing long outs off the green monster.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That...
unfortunately I do agree with. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Nate’s numbers have dropped a bit since the Bay and Nady trades. You really can’t undestimate the importance of having enough solid hitters to provide protection for your middle of the lineup guuys.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What.......
If the trade was for the three guys we got and Cutch? Would the hate crowd change their view.?
Do you think the Bucs are going to be appreciably worse tomorrow with Cutch in center rather than McLouth? The short answer is no. He probably won’t hit for much power but he has been absolutely raking in AAA the last month.
He’s up and he’s going to play. So Nate is better than Nyjer and Moss, but this team isn’t going to be much different than the team that played Tuesday night and you now have three more guys in the system.
Seriously the vitriol from four or five people on this site is insane. They honestly have no idea what is going on.
I think the only legitimate question is should we have shopped Nate. I’m guessing Atlanta said here is our offer, you have 24 hours to make the deal or it is off the table. So, we took it.
by dtoddwin on Jun 3, 2009 9:54 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
We didn’t “get” Cutch in this trade. The fact that we now have room for Cutch cannot be equated with trading for him. That needs no further comment, it’s facially obvious.
If we got a highly ranked prospect like Cutch, I’m sure most people would be ecstatic.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not my point....
Cutch is up. The team we field will be about the same and the organization is now deeper and more talented.
by dtoddwin on Jun 3, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It seemed like you were saying we have to view this trade from the perspective that since Cutch was at AAA, and is now on the major league roster, that’s it “really” a 4 for 1.
I still think you’re making that argument, since you say our field is about the same. In any event, your argument doesn’t address the value of Nate at all, which is, it seems, where the “haters” have a problem: We could still “get” Cutch in the manner you speak of AND get back additional players.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ummm...
Hernandez is pretty highly rated. Right now I’d say he’s Cutch with a little less plate discipline. Cutch has yet to show the power numbers we expect him to show and I do think his power will develop and be better than Gorky’s but w cannot say we did not get a highly ranked prospect back. Check BA’s top 100 coming into the season and you will find Gorky on it.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I caused some confusion.
I took it as the OP saying this trade is “like” getting those 3 guys plus also getting Cutch, due to the fact Cutch is now on the major league roster. Thus, the trade is “really” a 4 for 1.
I’m not sure where you got that I said Hernandez is not highly rated.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From this comment...
“If we got a highly ranked prospect like Cutch, I’m sure most people would be ecstatic.”
I guess I thougt you were saying that we didn’t get one in this trade. Now I’m assuming you meant that the Bucco nation thought we should have got a Hanson in return and anything short of that meant we were getting robbed. Sorry if I misunderstood.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, that was sloppy on my part. I’m trying to do a bunch of things at once in addition to reading up on these prospects.
That sentence was meant to say, I think everyone would be ecstatic if we got those three back PLUS a prospect on Cutch’s level.
I was only responding to the notion that the “haters” should be placated because we have room for Cutch. So yes, I understand the “haters” view to be that we theoretically could have gotten even better prospects, which would still ultimately make room for Cutch, which negates that part of the OP’s argument.
As for me personally, I’m largely deferential. Neal seems to have his stuff together, and unlike DL, who gave me every reason to be skeptical, I’m willing to trust their judgment that this was an offer that we couldn’t refuse. If they thought this was the most we’d get, I’m willing to accept that for now.
The miscommunication is my fault.
by CptnAwesome on Jun 3, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quote from NH on ESPN
….trading McLouth “may be the toughest decision we have made in my time with the organization.”
“When we signed Nate to a long-term contract, we did so with the intent on having him remain part of our core of homegrown talent. But the quality and quantity of talent we are receiving in this trade moves us closer to our goal of building that sustainable championship-caliber club.”
I guess the sustainable part is giving us some pitching when our other talent moves on.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 9:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Your implying that the pitcing receieved is talentless?
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not cessinarily
Just that eventually, Duke, Maholm, Snell, etc., will be free agents and that we will need someone to replace them. These guys we got – if they are good – will give us sustainable pitching w/less of a recession/depression when our current crop moves out.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My uneducated take, FWIW
There really are two camps here about the Bucs: you either want them to have a winning season, or you want them to contend for championships. There really aren’t others camps. If you’re upset with this trade from a baseball perspective, you want a .500 season. I understand that sentiment. My (yarrr) Unroll Parchmentpoint has always been that .500 seasons are nice but unless you are the 2006 Cards, they don’t win championships, which is the ultimate goal.
The only way to do this is through the draft and international development. Since Huntingdon took over, the Bucs built a new state of the art facility in Latin America, drafted a guy no one thought they’d take and gave him more money than they ever thought they would, spent a ton on the draft altogether, signed players from 6 different continents (no confirmation of a scout on Antarctica), traded away decent players for some guys that should contribute and a few guys who have superstar potential.
The Bucs, as constituted yesterday, had about 17 guys that other teams would consider useful in some way (and maybe 2 who could be above average). This isn’t enough to win championships or compete for them. We have a better future because of this trade, even if the team this year will almost assuredly suffer.
Look at the guys who comprise the Pirates top 10 prospects; how many of them were here before Huntingdon came aboard? McCutchen, Lincoln…that might be it.(yarrr) Unroll Parchment
Now, others in the top 10 could include Alvarez, Grossman, Quinton Miller, Tabata, Locke (acquired today), Hernandez (same), Bryan Morris (eventually), and some of the shortstops drafted last year (D’Arnaud, can’t remember the other). This is incredible in just 1.33 seasons on the job. Add in the #4 pick next week (hopefully Aaron Crow), maybe a couple of other people who fall due to signability issues, and the rumored stud from Latin America (Sano…rhymes with Cano as in Robinson).
This is such an improvement over the Littlefield era…it can’t even be debated.
by hisjazziness on Jun 3, 2009 9:56 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I love it.
I think this may have been the best trade Huntington has made. The return for, in my opinion, an above-average ML outfielder, is awesome.
by northsidenotch on Jun 3, 2009 9:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to say that I’m not the least bit crazy about this trade from the Pirates perspective.
BA has a tendency to spend too much love on guys like Hernandez. Hernandez has improved as a player overall, but his skills aren’t anywhere near the level they need to be at to make up for the completely lack of power development. He’s going to be 22 in a few months. Sure, his 316/361/387 is decent at a glance, but it’s also a .402 BABIP, which is completely unsustainable for anyone and you’re probably looking at a realistic translation a tad about the .600 OPS range. Of course, you don’t just throw away a player like Hernandez, but the odds of him being a productive major leaguer are fairly long.
Locke has a good fastball, but he’s not super-young and having some problems with his command in the Carolina League. Morton still has promise, but he can’t keep the ball down against strong competition and is apparently a little on the headstrong side. Babe Ruth can dangle his manager out the back of a moving train but a guy with a 6.15 ERA in the majors has to be a little more amenable to the coaching staff.
Is McLouth a star? No, but the contract situation does make him pretty valuable. Essentially, you’re selling, conservatively, about 8 wins above replacement for the next 2 2/3 years for about $13 million. They’re giving the Braves this production for less than half what it would cost Atlanta on the FA market, so to not get any guys the Braves can reasonably expect to miss is an error.
--
Dan Szymborski
dan@baseballprimer.com
by D.Szymborski on Jun 3, 2009 10:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One Thought About The Pitchers We Got
We actually have a pitching coach. Remember, many of our losing years we had “Spin” Williams, who was Minor League Pitching Coach of the Year in like, 1983 or so. Then we had whoever for the last two years.
The guy we have now was a key part of the great Braves pitching staffs. If he doesn’t kill himself out of despair, he could have a big influence on the two guys we got.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like this trade!!
In for a penny in for a pound.
Only way for the PBC to get better is to get more prospects. Unless you wanna settle for 82 wins as a goal.
Teams won’t give up prospects except for ML talent. And they won’t give up their top prospects for anybody (in the last couple years). It’s the “why can’t Huntington get Phil Hughes for Xavier Nady” stuff? Those days are gone — Atlanta maybe killed them by trading for Mark Teixeira in 2007. Essentially Atlanta gave up 3-4 super prospects for Casey Kotchman.
Once you start trading Bay and Nady and Marte, you gotta keep going. That means you Freddy Sanchez, you Adam LaRoche and you Jack Wilson. Everyone on this site has admitted that, but some hoped that McLouth could hang on until 2012+ teams.
And he could have. But that doesn’t mean that Huntington shouldn’t pick up the phone when some GM calls. Just the opposite — no one is untouchable on the PBC.
Did Huntington get “full value”? You will only know in hindsight. McLouth or any of these 3 guys could be out of baseball tomorrow. If Nate McLouth is a real “all star” maybe he should have drawn more in trade. If Keith Law is right about McLouth, a bag of balls is a fair trade. The truth is somewhere in the middle (as it so often is).
So I applaud Huntington for letting the PBC players and fans know he means what he says. I hope he got full value.
Bottom line for me — it’s a more exciting team to watch because of these changes. Thank you Charlie for your public service in running this monkey house.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice post...
For all of Keith Law’s comments about McClout I doubt he thinks NAte is only worth a bag of balls. Although I’m curious to hear his comments on this trade because I’ll bet he thinks we got a pretty good deal in this one.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't being sarcastic...
I do agree with everything you said except the Keith Law part.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
G'nite all
I’m sure we’ll all wake up tomorrow saying, “…and then I had my fifth beer, and I had this horrible nightmare that the Pirates traded Nate McLouth for some prospects.” Thank god I’m awake now…..OR AM I???
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Who can say?
“Maybe we’re just a speck of dust under a giant’s fingernail.”
All the more reason to make another drink.
P.S. I’m off work tomorrow, and only have to go to phys. therapy in the morning, so I can totally make this statement.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Line Up Tomorrow?
Nyj
Cutch
Fred
Adam
Andy
Moss
JJ
Jack
McCutchen hit second or lead off?
by God Loves on Jun 3, 2009 10:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would think 2nd. I wouldn’t put that pressure on him in his first game up
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you flip flop Cutch and Andy.
I see lil LAroche hitting second for most of the remander of the season.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope to You that McCutchen leads off.
He’s already a better base stealer than NyMo. If I’m JR, given NyMo’s recent offensive troubles, I call it this way:
McCutchen
Freddy
Luigi
Mario
Moss
JJ
NyMo
Jack
pitcher
Keep the OBP guys at the top of the batting order.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If NyjMo is hitting anywhere else but leadoff, he shouldn’t be in the line up.
With that in mind:
NyjMo
Freddy
Cutch
Adam
Andy
Moss
C de jour
Jack
SP
Unless we pull a LaRussa, then:
Cutch
Andy
Freddy
Adam
Moss
C de jour
Jack
SP
NyjMo
God help me if that is the way we go. lol
Remember, NyjMo is not the future. The Buccos will want to feature him as a lead off guy until they deal him.
by Brakeman8 on Jun 3, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Cubs
go up on Nate’s new team 3-2 in the 11th.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay, just stopping back
to add this comment from Chop Talk, the Braves, Sports Nation website
Amen Brother, these are prospects that we traded away with the exception of Morton. This is a huge steal we just raped the pirates.
Now I need to go get that next beer
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You handpicked that post.
I was just there and they are split at best. A lot of posters felt they gave up too much for Nate!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well handpicked or not...
It really lept out at me.
I’d say they’re running 60/40 or 70/30 in favor of the trade. The good thing is that they are saying that the players they gave up are expendable, not because they’re bad players, but because they are players who would be blocked given the Braves current lineup and rotation.
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
McClouth trade
Hey Mr. Nutting, F$%^ YOU, I will never spend another red cent to fatten your pockets ever again. I"m done with this franchise…As long as your the owner…..
Mario Lopez
by southernBURGH on Jun 3, 2009 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't let
the door hit you where the good lord split you.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Prediction — This will be the one post Smizik quotes in his next column.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I approve of this product or service
I like Nate, but I’m a gambler too. I think the upside here is very high.
by azibuck on Jun 3, 2009 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Refreshing too. Anyone else refreshed?
I feel like the stink of the DL era is at my feet, circling the drain. The franchise smells good again.
by azibuck on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was my feeling.
I’m excited knowing that Neil Hutington and Coonelly have big, brass balls! These guys came to play and whether their talent evaluaton skills are good or not remains to be seen but for the first time in a while I am real excited about our future!!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
azibuck
You’re about right, but I think the drain is a little plugged up with Danny Moskos.
I
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ha!
excellent.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watching the Red Sox and their dire need
for a SS on display again tonight, don’t be suprised if Neal Huntington parts with Jack Wilson for a package of prospects in the coming days. I’m on record for wanting to keep Jack and Freddy together through next season for a number of reasons, but the Pirates might really be able to work a deal to their advantage.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 10:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
And given their need for a DH I wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t see a package deal with DOumit being the other player. They need a DH for this year and a catcher going forward. They have a deep system so there could be a match there.
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doumit would have to come back
and reestablish himself first. He’s not going anywhere this year that I can see. I tend to think more of the catching platoon we have going right now than some others here, but Doumit will be a Bucco for the time being.
The Red Sox will have to upgrade SS to get into the postseason, let alone take the World Series. It’ll be interesting to see how things play out.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jack Wilson for Jason Bay?
(remember, I’m on my fourth or fifth beer – only my frau is counting)
by Trogluddite on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh sure
blame it on the beer.
;-)
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please check this out -- Some perspective from last winter
Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune had an article yesterday [12/13/08] involving a couple of failed Padres trades. Krasovic says the Padres and Braves were discussing a 4-for-1 Jake Peavy deal in November. Yunel Escobar and Gorkys Hernadez were agreed upon. The conflict came as the Padres wanted Charlie Morton over Jo-Jo Reyes as well as Jeff Locke or Tyler Flowers over Blaine Boyer. To me that gap looks pretty sizeable, so maybe the trade was never close.
Now Escobar ain’t chopped liver. But PBC got 3 of 4 guys Padres wanted for Jake “Cy Young” Peavey for Nate “PBC’s got to have an all star representative” McLouth, including 2 prospects Atlanta refused to give up for Peavey.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice post.
It reititerates the fact that we didn’t exactly acquire bums!
by Slick1 on Jun 3, 2009 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Escobar is certainly a great deal more valuable than “ain’t chopped liver.” 4 pre-FA years of an already established borderline-star major leaguer is ridiculously valuable. It’s 3/4 of the players involved, but it’s not remotely 3/4 of the value of the package.
--
Dan Szymborski
dan@baseballprimer.com
by D.Szymborski on Jun 3, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh hey guys,
Any new PIrates ne—HOLY CRAP WE TRADED MCLOUTH!
Welp… after my initial shock and disappointment, I came to terms with it and now, to be quite honest, I like this more and more.
By the way, sorry I had to disappear for a while, I had some other crap going on in my life, and had to put some stuff on hold, including following the Buccos. Missed ya, Cocktails…
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome back!
You were truly and honestly missed.
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, right...
you have a life.
Welcome back, Amigo!
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup, I'm in it for the long haul now
as long and painful as the rest of the season will be…
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hope
all is well, and worked out to your benefit.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bucs
are back at Wrigley Aug 14-16.
Maybe my custom-made iROMULO! jersey will arrive by then.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Frank Wren on Baseball Tonight
for anyone thats interested, he’ll be on after the commercial break talking about the trade and Glavine move
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 10:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Can you summarize for those not near their set?
by WstCstBucco on Jun 3, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
BBTN still showing US Soccer here.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its on ESPN...it fooled me too
I missed the beginning of the show talking about the trade
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
im certainly glad i registered here.as always this site actually is knowledgable and somehow made me not that angry bout the trade ha. Slipped back to my casual we need to win this year mindset. much obliged. i love the actual rebuilding and not the DL crap. we have no depth in the minors and so far ive had nothing bad to say about the NH trades as theyve turned out great
by JR89 on Jun 3, 2009 10:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome aboard.
relax, and breathe deep.
We’ll field a winner yet.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 3, 2009 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wren
-Gave up 3 very good players
-Knew who the Bucs liked from Bay talks last year, so trade could be fast tracked
Thats pretty much it
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 10:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks
at this point my biggest irritation is having to use an on-screen keyboard since mine is broken
by JR89 on Jun 3, 2009 10:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ravech
He appears to think this was a great deal for the Braves and was surprised how quickly the deal was completed. He said 28 GMs would have been after McLouth (a big exaggeration IMO)
by BattlinBucs on Jun 3, 2009 10:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Where in the hell are IPF and thegunner?
All those two have done is whine and cry for Trades, Trades, Trades from Team Coonington.
by patthatt on Jun 3, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let’s move discussion to the new thread, please.
by Charlie on Jun 3, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 











