Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Another opinion from the crowd...

Regular reader, first time poster.  Since the bomb was dropped on all of us last night, people seem to have clearly split into one of two camps.  I've read a lot of good points on both sides of the argument.  Here are my thoughts....

Nate was a good player....but not a great player.  I loved him as a Pirate, and we'd be hard pressed to find anyone on here that didn't like the guy (Jim Tracy isn't a reader here, is he?).  But you have to take emotion out of the equation.  That's why we are fans and not running the team.  Nate was not going to make us a contender this year, or in 2010.  We are nowhere even remotely close yet. Be honest with yourself.  Jesse Chavez is our best reliever right now.  We have about 7 good players on our 25 man roster.  There are even less in Indy.  We need a ton more help.

Now the point that we didn't get enough in return is certainly valid.  I personally don't know anything about these 3 guys. And I can also buy the argument that we could have sat on this for a while and let multiple teams bid the price up.  That is fair.  But every argument that starts with "We have been a terrible organization for 16 years"...is completely pointless.  The last 16 years are gone.  We can't do anything about them right now....sunk cost.  Making baseball decisions in the present to somehow try and undo what different people in different situations did in the past is irrational. 

Every player needs to be assigned a value.  With a team in a position like we are in, if you think you are getting more value than you are giving up then you make the trade every time.  As some people have suggested, I would not be upset if Doumit goes next.  Again, try to think objectively and block any emotional attachment you have to Doumit. If another team would give us a similar deal with 2 of their top 10 prospects (probably not realistic for Doumit, but stay with me), I would take it in a heartbeat.  If we lose Doumit's bat, which like Nate also good but not great, and have to temporarily live with a fill-in like Jaramillio?  I think that is worth the minimal pain during a season or two when we already have no prayer, to help give us a legit chance in 3-4 years.

We live in an instant gratification society.  Everything is at our finger tips. Giving up a good player now for something that we won't have any return on for 3 years does not sit well with a lot of people.  But just ask yourself what your ultimate goal is?  Do you want us to ride the guys we have, and hopefully be an 85 win team who sneaks into the playoffs once ever 5 years?  I personally prefer the approach to stock pile talent, and try to build something special.  Look at what Tampa has done, why can't we?

And for all the angry people out there....why not get behind the organization?  We are all passionate Pirates fans or we wouldn't be here.  Current management has NOTHING to do with the pain that has been caused in the past.  Let me say that again. Current management has NOTHING to do with the pain that has been caused in the past. (This is meant to be said about 4 more times in a row like Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting).  Since neither you nor I have any idea how things are going to pan out....why not take the optimistic approach?  I think you’ll be happier people in general if you at least consider what could be, instead of automatically saying this can't be.

Let's go Bucs



This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 5 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post man

I actually think Doumit would bring more than Nate (after he comes back and proves he is still Dewey). He is a switch hitting catcher who can hit for power(for a catcher) and average. There is always the initial shock after a trade like this, especially when you have no idea the player might be traded, but I agree, when evaluating a trade you have to look at players as assets and not family. I personally liked the trade from the beginning but like I said before, I’m a gambler.

So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded!? Yea, totally. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets do a sample. There are 4 of us and you're retarded. Thats 25 percent. -South Park; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce.

by gorillakilla34 on Jun 5, 2009 3:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Another Opinion...

An excellent post. Too many forget that baseball is a business, as well as a sport. It’s become more ruthless as sports/entertainment has been monetized. Like any business, the fundamental objective is the creation and satisfaction of customers. A sports franchise does that by winning; it doesn’t much matter how.

For the outraged: As former Vikings coach Bud Grant said, “you’ve got to get a death grip on reality.” The evil owners only care about money? You’ve been drinking the Union Kool-Aid too long — or maybe it’s just a Pittsburgh mindset. How does continued losing and alienation of the relatively small fanbase increase the value of your franchise?

Huntington should have gotten more for Nate? We all wish. By the way, I’ve got a 2002 Buick Century I’d like to trade you straight-up for a 2009 Lexus. Please reply w/details through this blog. I’m not making invidious comparisons. Pirates fans love Nate. Reports of his departure from the clubhouse and his teammates’ reaction to the trade confirm that he was a loyal Pirate and a valued teammate. Do what I’m going to do (and what I do with Jason Bay) check the boxscores every day. Rejoice in his success. Hell, I hope he gets four hits every game against the Pirates — as long as the Pirates still win.

Look at the rosters of the Pirates farmclubs: Indianapolis, Altoona, Lynchburg and West Virginia, or as I call them: No Hope; Maybe Some Hope; A Little Hope, and Will They Ever Make It. As Mr. Cup points out above, this trade had to be made, and will be made again.

I remember the Rickey-dinks (and also when you couldn’t give away a Steelers ticket): Gene and George Freese, Johnny and Eddie O’Brien, Clem Koshorek, Curt Roberts and the little lefty, Lino Donoso. I believe Bob Friend, Vern Law, Dick Groat and a few others from 1960 were on those teams; and, if I’m not mistaken, Roberto Clemente was a Rule 5 draft pickup.

Live for the Future. Lets Go Bucs

Lino Donoso

by Lino Donoso on Jun 5, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

Great Post

I GOT MY STREET BUZZ BEFORE I GOT MY PEACH FUZZ

by omar moreno on Jun 5, 2009 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I meant to respond to this earlier...

Well thought out, well written. Particularly this (emphasis mine):

We live in an instant gratification society. Everything is at our finger tips. Giving up a good player now for something that we won’t have any return on for 3 years does not sit well with a lot of people. But just ask yourself what your ultimate goal is?

Welcome aboard!

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Jun 6, 2009 7:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Authors

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas