Bucs Dugout: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

News Roundup: Zach Duke, Freddy Sanchez Ride Pine

July 14, 2009 All-Star Game Play-By-Play and Box Score - Baseball-Reference.com
Neither Zach Duke nor Freddy Sanchez got into last night's All-Star Game. I have better things to do than watch a bunch of silly pageantry, so I don't know why this happened. (Well, okay, I half-watched a few innings with the sound off. But I still don't know why this happened.) But it seems there's a tension between the game "mattering" and the fact that you have to include guys from last-place teams. It's true that the NL didn't have to include two Pirates, but the rosters are so huge and Sanchez and Duke were buried so far at the end of them.

Selig says Pirates are on right track - Pittsburgh Pirates news, fan forums, schedules and blogs - PiratesReport.com
Bud Selig apparently thinks the Pirates have one of the best farm systems in baseball. Selig said it, so obviously it isn't true, but it hopefully will be in a year or so, once there's been two or two and a half full years to clean up Dave Littlefield's mess. The farm system is probably about average now, or maybe a little above. It's thin in top talent and major-league-ready talent, but it's filled with very inexperienced players with upside.

Post-Gazette: Sano affair still wide open
Miguel Sano's people deny Jorge Arangure's report that there is a "90 percent chance" that the Bucs will sign Sano, although the Pirates remain very much in the running.

Pedro Martinez agrees to one-year contract with Phillies - MLB - SI.com
Pedro Martinez has agreed to a one-year, $1 million deal with the Phillies that includes $1.5 million in possible incentives. The report claims that the Pirates were also interested, but I'm fine with them staying away--as great as Pedro once was, he hasn't had a really good year since 2005. I'd say the odds of him helping any team this season are remote.

0 recs  |  Comment 140 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

a minor pet peeve

I have no doubt St. Louis provides an outstanding baseball atmosphere, but this “great baseball town” stuff is a bit overdone. St. Louis has geographic and historic advantages that no other team, perhaps other than Boston, can match.

Start with the fact that it (like Boston) owns a huge region while other MLB cities like Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Philly, Cincy (to name four) are hemmed in geographically. The Cardinals used to be it for anyone west of the Mississippi, with KMOX booming their games pretty much across the land (I grew up in Central PA with a guy who was a cardinal fan because he picked up their radio signal so clearly). I work with a guy who grew up in western Nebraska whose choice of red as a wardrobe color is as equally influenced by the cardinals as the huskers.

Yes, it’s been nearly six decades since KC’s had MLB, but being a Cardinal fan has been imprinted in the genetic code of generations of people from Memphis (my son went to Rhodes College, I saw it first hand) and west TN to the gulf coast to Texas to the Great Plains.

Many people in those regions make long drives several times a year to see the Cardinals play. My son told me about guys he was in school with whose families planned vacations around seeing the Cardinals.

Even the Cubs and White Sox have to share Illinois with the Cardinals. It’s similar here in New England, where despite some Yankee intrusions into western mass and CT, it’s pretty much exclusively Red Sox country – especially now that the Expos aren’t siphoning off fans in Northern VT). So, IMO, St. Louis is not necessarily a great baseball town as much as a very fortunate market. And its fan base has been fortunate as well, in that the team is almost always competitive.

More power to them, but I’m glad the ASG is over now so I won’t have to hear ESPNers getting all misty over the superior race of fan that inhabits Busch Stadium on a daily basis. Hey Cardinal fans, try 17 straight losing seasons and see how you stand up. I think the superior race of fan is right here on this forum.

Atlanta may also fit this mold – not the historic as much as the geographic. And, the old days of TBS sending Braves games nationwide didn’t hurt.

by mocasdad on Jul 15, 2009 6:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes,

it’s not so much a superior town as a superior fan base. They come from hundreds of miles, they dress in red, they fill the stadium and sweat in massively unpleasant summer weather. And I’d guess that when you make that kind of commitment you’re probably in general a much more knowledgeable fan than the yinzers who show up for bobbleheads and fireworks. And while there might be hundreds of us, there are thousands of them.

I haven’t been to St. Louis for like 25 years, but the 2-3 times I was I enjoyed the city (except for the heat and humidity, which are awful).

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It isn't a dead-on fit, but...

I’d argue that there are strong parallels between Cardinals baseball and Steelers football.

I’m not sure what the problem is, I think St. Louis should be admired for their devotion to the red birds.

Good day.

by Uncle Nate on Jul 15, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

St. Louis

I grew up in Pittsburgh, but I went to college in St. Louis and lived and worked there from ‘94 through ’07. I can say without question it is a GREAT baseball town. I don’t dispute any of the points above about geographical factors that contribute to this, but that doesn’t change the fact that people love their Cardinals. Being from Pittsburgh, the easiest (and most accurate) comparison is to look at Steelers fans. Cards fans are just as hardcore and rabid as Steelers fans are.

Now, that being said, I have trouble with the thought that they are the “best” baseball fans. They are, for sure, the nicest fans when it comes to rooting on the hometown team, but they aren’t any more knowledgable about the game or their team than Red Sox or Yankees fans are (to name two). The biggest claim to fame from my perspective is that they lead the league in curtain calls every year. I’ve seen Cards players get curtain calls for making a diving catch in the 6th inning of a mid-May game. I’ve seen games where there are 3, 4 or 5 separate curtain calls. This always annoyed me to no end, but it’s one of the things people see and say, “oh, these are the best fans…”.

The other thing is they almost NEVER boo the home team. In fact, in 13 years of going to games, I only recall seeing the home team get booed once…and it was the immortal Kip Wells.

Side note from last night’s game – Does anybody else think that Freddy would have been a better choice to hit against Nathan in the 8th inning than Howard? All the NL needed was a single to tie or take the lead.

by mak_DC on Jul 15, 2009 8:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The facts are

Ryan Howard is a St. Louis native so the Cards faithful would’ve had Manuel’s head on a platter if he didn’t play him.

On a different subject I was a little peeved Manuel didn’t play Sanchez or Duke. Duke I can understand but Sanchez had value as a pinch-hitter off the bench.

I hope the Pirate faithful boo Manuel when the Phils come to the Burgh.

by BadAndy on Jul 15, 2009 8:39 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I agree about Freddy. Yes, there was a bettter chance that Howard hits a homerun to put the NL in the lead but I would say there was a better chance that Freddy puts the ball in play and gets the tying run in. Oh well!

by biglar33 on Jul 15, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Touch call on putting freddy in. Freddy is a good contact hitter. I thought about that too. But really I think Ryan Howard could have hit a single possibly too. It’s not like Ryan Howard is chump change. To me it’s like saying Ryan Doumit is up to bat with tying run on 3rd base, but we have freddy sanchez on bench and we should pinch hit for Doumit because he strikes out alot. Also were all the 1B players used up? I know Pujols played at 1B for a bit, so if Howard had been pulled who was available to play 1B?

I was a bit disappointed neither Freddy or Zach Duke got in, but then again they were add-ons by the management to get a representative of each team to the all-star game(which imo is kinda of silly). I mean if the pirates didn’t have Duke or Sanchez would you really want someone else going from the pirates like say……….Mario, or Luigi, or Brandon Moss? It takes the shine off being an all-star i think.

by lfhlaw on Jul 15, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was disappointed as well. I think Manuel could have squeezed Freddy in with a pinch hit or as a defensive replacement late in the game.

As for Howard, if I am not mistaken, he was pinch-hitting for the pitcher as Adrian Gonzalez played first base after Pujols for the rest of the game

by Jett on Jul 15, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate unnecessary curtain calls

The Mets used to do that all the time in the 80’s.

by azibuck on Jul 15, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had to look at the sig

I figured that was Jimmy, going on another “Nobody deserves a curtain call, they should all be treated the same” rant.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Selig

Even if he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, it’s still good for the Pirates that he said that because all the casual fans that are doubting the FO can look at it and go “hmm”.

by ILLZ on Jul 15, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sano

Why is this investigation dragging out so long? And why was it done exactly the same time that everyone was able to sign him, instead of being done before this time period? If I’m NH, I’m a little annoyed because the Bucs spent their own resources to check this guy out, and now when they have a chance to sign him, they can’t because the MLB decides to do the same investigation for the rest of the teams.

by Danatural08 on Jul 15, 2009 8:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

On the plus side

his price should drop some with everyone else out of the running.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

that the rosters are too big. But this is a great opportunity for the managers to use platoon advantages offensively and defensively, pinch runners and defensive replacements. They weren’t creative or committed enough, or both.

weak-hitting left fielder in coffee league baseball

by Bukanier on Jul 15, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

All Star Sanchez and Duke

Pirates always seem to get snubbed with having our players play in an all star game. I’m telling you its Larussa, remember when Larussa played everyone player on the NL roster except for Jason Bay. I do not like Larussa I never will respect him because of that, he might be a good coach but some of the things he does bothers me. Sanchez could have atleast came in the 9th as a defensive replacement for hudson, but whatever we never get the respect we deserve.

by baseballssp3 on Jul 15, 2009 10:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They might not boo the home team, but I think they booed the President Obama. That surprised me.

I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household.

by chodan11 on Jul 15, 2009 10:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree. I was surprised. Even if you don’t like the President, it’s pretty disrespectful to boo him.

by mak_DC on Jul 15, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was somewhat split

between boos and cheers. Maybe it was his White Sox jacket. Seemed a bit childish considering the All-Star Game and his position.

weak-hitting left fielder in coffee league baseball

by Bukanier on Jul 15, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do you both think it was disrespectful when President Bush was booed?

And I ask this sincerely; I think it’s disrespectful when any President is booed. Some people are hypocritical about this.

by hisjazziness on Jul 15, 2009 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hated Bush, love Obama…but I agree with you. I don’t know if I could’ve brought myself to boo him in person, as much as I couldn’t stand him.

RIP NATE. RIP TONY PLUSH.

"I'D BE A CHEF"

-TONY PLUSH

by GTrain on Jul 15, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, I couldn't stand Bush either, but probably wouldn't have booed him

rather than booing Bush (or simply not cheering him) in such a situation, I probably would have used that time to use the bathroom or grab a beer.

by humbucker on Jul 15, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Definitely

Regardless of political leaning, respect is due to the President. I’m all for free speech, but there’s just no need to boo a guy throwing out the first pitch.

by mak_DC on Jul 15, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What if you really hate his guts? That’s a good enough reason to boo anybody else, isn’t it?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

call me disrespectful and a hypocrite

but i would have booed the sh*t out of him

by johnnycuff on Jul 15, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

booing

I don’t have a problem with the theory of booing a president. I seriously doubt that I would do it, especially at function such as the ASG, but I don’t see anything inherently disrespectful about it.

Good day.

by Uncle Nate on Jul 15, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

mostly gut reaction. were this the forum for it i would go into detail but it suffices to say i was greatly displeased with his actions.

by johnnycuff on Jul 16, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn,

Did I enter Democrat Underground by mistake?

by Hitman Easler on Jul 15, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s hypocritical. Bush lied us into an illegal war and tortured hundreds of people to death. I think that might merit some boos.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think that any and all Presidents deserve to never be booed. If there’s a good reason to boo Obama, then fine. Maybe there is one. But I don’t believe that all Presidents are the same and deserve the same equal respect.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As long as I get to define my reason for booing (if I choose to) then I’m ok with that too.

by mak_DC on Jul 15, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure.

I just absolutely reject the idea that the President always deserves respect and decorum. Sometimes, the President doesn’t deserve that.

He’s not a King. He works for us.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's your world Andro

I will make sure the next time a beat writer or President does something to ask your approval to show respect.

by vanslyke on Jul 15, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very Clever

Apparently, I’m an elitist for suggesting that we’re all equals.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe first among equals

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 15, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ask a question, Jimmy?

Just to see how far you’re willing to go with this: If we’re all equal in life, shouldn’t we all be equal in death too?

We just had a two-week death orgy over Michael Jackson while, I dunno, 1,000 or 2,000 people died on our highways with little or no notice. Should Jackson’s death have been treated like anyone else’s? Should everyone else have been treated like Jackson?

I’ll take it out of the realm of celebrity: Every year in West Virginia about 50 people kill themselves, one or two at a time, riding ATVs, and few people outside their families seem to think this is much of a problem or think much about it at all. But if somebody takes an assault rifle to a college campus and kills 50 people at once, it’s a huge deal sparking weeks of national mourning and breast-beating, or if a bus load of 50 senior citizens or 50 kids in a day care goes off a cliff, same thing.

Meanwhile that day, across the nation, I dunno, 500 people died of cancer.

Would you say “They all deserve the same level of attention”?

And “Yes” is the easy answer. I’m talking about the real world.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think those are great questions.

In the case of Michael Jackson, since a lot of people cared about him, it makes sense that a lot of people should know, and our mass media is a way of letting lots of people know about something.

However, if during life, Michael Jackson walks into a room, and a person who never at any time before did any such thing, stands up from his chair, walks to the door, and said “Thank you so much for coming, Michael.” I’d think that person was a fanboi.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So ...

there’s something wrong with being a fanboi? I don’t like most music I hear today, but I like Charlie’s band a lot. I asked him to go to lunch with me a couple weeks ago when he was in town so I could ask some questions about his band and blog (we split the check), and I’ve suggested we try to go to a game together sometime in September.

Does that make me a fanboi? Or does it just mean I’ve found someone who shares interests and I’d like to find out a little more about him?

I probably said something like, “Thanks for joining me” or “Glad you could make it” or something like that, but I’d likely do the same for you or anyone else who took time out of the day to hang out, unless you were an utter jerk or something.

Anyway, if it makes me a fanboi, so what? Why is it important to you?

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny that...

you aren’t critiquing the media about the Jackson “death orgy”, Jimmy. It’s been 3 weeks, tomorrow. And we are seeing the same stories…over…and over…and over…and over. You can’t watch a national news show without seeing something on it…and they have no more news on his death now than they did 2 weeks ago.

Frankly…I would just as soon some other big news story come along…because I’m sick of seeing his face on TV. Unfortunately…for that to get bumped off the front page…it’s probably going to take a story involving death. The old “It bleeds, It Leads” adage from the newspaper world.

Jackson was a man…just a man…he made some music…and he died. He wasn’t Mother Teresa or the Pope. And he wasn’t without failings. You don’t hear about what good he did for his fellow man…other than make music. Where are the stories about his charitable efforts. I don’t think I’ve seen one story. Frankly, I never cared much about him, and still don’t. But yet…he’s being worshipped as if he was a god. That’s FAR worse than what has been going on here…so far that it’s not even comparable. Yet you don’t have a problem with it.

Some of us actually show decency and courtesy to strangers…believe it or not…and to friends. You seem to have a problem with this. Evidently…you must feel that you were slighted when you began participating…not being thanked for commenting…you have a problem with someone else being thanked. Everyone in this world is important to someone. If we happen to miss thanking one person for something…it happens…no one is perfect. If I missed thanking you a few weeks ago…I’m sorry. When someone is working a bunch of evening and midnight shifts…stuff happens. I’m not in every thread…so I don’t necessarily see when someone new shows up.

Charlie runs a great site here…and I…for one appreciate it. It has garnered enough respect that some professional writers have dropped in at times. I enjoy hearing their views. Knowledgeable input is always welcomed. Since we don’t know your background…your choice…we take your input about the way we do from the rest of the regulars here…with a grain of salt…and frequently a lot of joking.

by Thunder on Jul 15, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWIW

I don’t really watch TV, so I have no idea about the “death orgy” as you say. I really don’t know anything about it, so I’m not going to comment on it.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, the President deserves...

Decorum and respect regardless of party affliation. I have my opinions on the current President and his predecessor. No he isnt a King but you simply do not treat him with disrespect.

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that the President isn’t a monarch, but that doesn’t mean he/she deserves our utmost respect.

They are actually the opposite of a monarch in theory; they are public servants.

  The New York Times and other establishment press does enough idol worship of the President without us adding to it. Bush should absolutely have been booed, and Obama doesn’t deserve appalause either until he actually accomplishes something. OK, that’s enough soapbox for today.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Agree

I would like to see the man actually accomplish something before the Obama-splooge begins. He came in with some high hopes, but right now, he’s a rookie prospect.

But if he manages to do what no President has been ever been able to do — what Thomas Paine wrote about in Common Sense in 1776 — universal health care, then I’ll stand up and clap for the guy.

But if he’s just going to be the President who covers up the crimes of his predecessor, maybe I’ll boo him. We’ll see!

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK...

Well I and many others are here to discuss baseball…I am sure that DailyKOS or the Huffington Post can take over from here right?

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably

But if people are gonna bring it up, I’m not gonna ignore it.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you Mick!

Let’s definitly cut the political debate. It’s like trying to figure out which prostitute has fewer diseases….

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 15, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait. You know one with fewer diseases?

Do you have her number?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope

That’s why I’m saying I don’t debate politics. I don’t care which one has less diseases. They’re all dirty so take your pick. :)

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 15, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What if he treats you with disrespect? Do you still have to respect him then?

Why is respect a one-way street when it comes to the President?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Office of the President deserves respect

If that office is not respected by it’s incumbent then he deserves to be booed. As Jimmy said the President works for the people.

by Bucs Fever on Jul 15, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He Works For Us

We are his boss, not the other way around. The issue isn’t if we’re showing him enough respect or not. The main concern should be: Is he showing us enough respect? When he waved to the crowd, was it conciliatory enough? When he smiled, did he do so in a deferential enough way? If we’re going to be concerned with the level of respectfulness in the interaction between the President and the crowd at the All-Star Game, those are the real questions.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No member of the gang of thieves, be he carrying a D or an R next to his name, deserves my “respect”.

by matskralc on Jul 15, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

dola,

That said, I probably respect any of them more than I do Tony La Russa or now Charlie Manuel!

by matskralc on Jul 15, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That reminds me, I’ve always wanted to read Three Nights in August. I think it was one of the Fire Joe Morgan authors who said the purpose of the book is to make you think he’s brilliant, but you come away thinking La Russa is a madman.

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me too

I’ve always been worried I’d wind up gouging my eyes out or melting my brain something, though.

by matskralc on Jul 15, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was fine to boo Bush.

Particularly in light of his restriction of protesters to “free speech zones” at other public events. A ballgame might be the only opportunity people had to express disapproval in a public setting.

I think it’s dumb to boo Obama, since he’s been a pretty good President so far, but if people want to take dumb positions, they have that right, just like if they were speaking in favor of white supremacy or 9-11 “truth” or a flat earth. The freedom to be wrong/stupid is one of our most important and cherished rights as a culture and a society.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right, there’s really no other side to the argument.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jul 15, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m glad that you can hold your dumb position!!

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jul 15, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can’t wait until Vlad starts booing Obama like a dumb person.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, I want to see Vlad’s opinion on this too.

I can easily see Obama becoming another Bush, because his devotees are already claiming he’s done a “pretty good job” despite him not doing anything. And the things he’s done have been very Bush-like such escalating Afghanistan

It’s been six months already. If we don’t raise our standards, Obama will play the American people like a country fiddle just like his predecessor.

Remember, he works for us.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

From Obama's scouting report:

He’s a young, high upside president with large monetary demands.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jul 15, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A Pedro Alvarez comp is accurate at this point.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

The last guy was from Texas, so he played us like a country fiddle. The new guy is from Hawaii. He’s gonna play us like a ukulele.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you actually bother to read my post?

When a politician uses free speech zones, that means that it’s legitimate for people to find alternate methods of communicating their displeasure to the politician.

That doesn’t mean that their arguments automatically acquire any inherent merit, however. Criticizing Bush for being part of the David Icke-reported conspiracy of Jewish space lizards to enslave humanity would be stupid, because it’s counterfactual and illogical, even though Bush was a terrible President who used free speech zones to try and stifle dissent.

Similarly, most criticism of Obama at the present time is stupid, because the arguments themselves lack merit. If people want to shout about birth certificates until their faces turn blue, that’s fine, but it’s a dumb criticism regardless of the setting or the context.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read your post...

…and it seemed like you totally missed the thrust of my post.

A particular criticism of a particular politician can be smart or dumb without regard to whether that politician uses free speech zones or not. Most of Bush’s criticism was deserved, and thus smart, and most of Obama’s criticism is not deserved, and thus dumb.

This is entirely separate from the issue of free speech zones, except insofar as a President who tries to insulate himself from criticism in public forums doesn’t have any right to complain about people using different methods to express themselves in his presence. [He can still complain, of course, if the points that they try to make in that fashion are dumb.]

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's Look At Your Whole Original Post
I think it was fine to boo Bush. Particularly in light of his restriction of protesters to "free speech zones" at other public events. A ballgame might be the only opportunity people had to express disapproval in a public setting.

I think it’s dumb to boo Obama, since he’s been a pretty good President so far, but if people want to take dumb positions, they have that right, just like if they were speaking in favor of white supremacy or 9-11 "truth" or a flat earth. The freedom to be wrong/stupid is one of our most important and cherished rights as a culture and a society.

You said that booing Bush was fine because he had free speech zones. You said that booing Obama is dumb because he’s a pretty good President. I pointed out to you that Obama does the exact same thing that you say made Bush boo-worthy — free speech zones.

I have read your post. Did you?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You read, but not carefully enough to understand.

You apparently need practice with the concept of “opposites”. “Fine” is not the opposite of “dumb”. Indeed, I took great pains to say that booing Obama was both fine AND dumb.

Think of it in game terms. Fans have the right to boo whatever players they want. Booing Cutch right now would be dumb, because he’s done a good job thus far this year, but if someone wants to buy a ticket and come and boo him, they can (and should) do that. Booing Craig Monroe would have been less dumb, since he was a lazy guy who played like crap, but the fan booing Monroe is no more or less within his rights than the fan booing Cutch.

I only brought up free speech zones as a way of explaining why it was reasonable within the context to dispense with the normal decorum of an event like a President attending a baseball game. This is true regardless of which President is using free speech zones.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

GROUP HUG THEN BACK TO BASEBALL

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of Bush’s criticism was deserved, and thus smart, and most of Obama’s criticism is not deserved, and thus dumb.

This strongly sounds like selection bias to me. You say you didn’t like Bush, which is (obviously) fine.

However, it’s been repeatedly shown that most people—even those who consciously wish to—won’t go out and find intelligent, substantive criticisms that run counter to viewpoints they hold. This basically amounts to a claim that “Obama is a good President” is an objective truth, because you’re saying there exist few valid substantive criticisms of Obama. That strikes me as extraordinarily silly.

That last point was actually a big focus of my First Amendment class when I was in law school. It informed a lot of the debate about how integral the right to protest is, precisely because the vast majority of people would never be exposed to such viewpoints absent public displays like that.

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In other words, almost all criticism of Obama will be shrugged off as “birth certificates”.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That Seems To Be What He's Saying

If you have a problem with Obama, then you’re clearly an insane conspiracy theorist. Bush was bad because he had free speech zones. But Obama’s free speech zones have magical ponies in them and are better and nicer.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s just like hoe every Bush critic was a 9/11 conspiracy theorist in the Republican view…

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

English: Do you speak it?

All free speech zones are bad. They are bad regardless of which politician uses them. However, if a politician uses free speech zones, that does not legitimize otherwise illegitimate criticisms of him (except, of course, the accusation that he uses free speech zones).

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re the only one bringing up these supposed illegitimate criticisms of Obama, and assuming that people who boo him are some kind of crazy conspiracy theorists. I don’t recall any birth certificate signs at the All Star Game. Only boos. You assume that the boos mean that the booers must be nuts.

Obama’s haters are all ca-ray-zee. Bush’s haters are all very smart. Do I have that right?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, of course.

Because you’re trolling. But that’s fine, I can keep this up all night.

That said, if you’re going to make shit up and pretend that I said it, you can probably fill in both ends of the conversation just fine on your own.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I quote your own words back at you in their entirety and that makes me a liar and a troll. Got it.

Do you have any Obama tattoos?

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You quote my words back at me...

…and then respond to something entirely different than what I said. Which is not particularly conducive to a constructive dialogue.

There is a lot of stupid, irrational, illegitimate criticism of Obama out there. A few examples, in case you’ve forgotten:

Obama the secret muslim. Obama the secret socialist. Obama the secret fascist. Obama the secret anti-Christ. Obama the secret homosexual. Obama the secret racist.

The birth certificate. The arugula. The terrorist fist-jab. The lipstick on a pig. The flag pin. The public greeting as an endorsement of terrorism. The date night. The census. The volcano monitoring. The DHS’s report on right-wing extremists.

That’s not even close to exhaustive. It just goes on and on and on. And anyone who booed Obama because of any of those things is dumb.

There are intelligent criticisms of Obama to be made from a conservative perspective. If you’re interested in some, I recommend Reason and The American Conservative (particularly Daniel Larison at the latter). But they are very much the exception right now, rather than the rule. Unfortunately.

Now can we get back to baseball, please?

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And how many of those crazy ideas were brought up at the All Star Game?

Three?

Seven?

Even one?

I think it was Zero.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The number of people who simply see Obama as all style and no substance (including Clinton Democrats and other Democrats) is probably hundred times more than the number who believe in the crazy conspiracy theories that Republicans brought up last year in the campaign.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's unlikely, Gorkys.

Look at this recent Pew poll, for example. According to it,a full 11% of all Americans still think that Obama is a muslim. Plus 10% who say that they don’t know because they’ve heard info both ways, 27% who just weren’t sure, and 3% who refused to answer.

You greatly underestimate the number of idiots, ignoramuses, and lunatics in the general public.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted

for Bob Barr, but I just want to say we really shouldn’t be encouraging everyone to vote. I know civil rights types would have a fit, but maybe you SHOULD have to pass a civics exam to vote.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

11% would still only lead to approximately 4,000 people at the game.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure it's only 11%...

…but then again, that’s 11% who are willing to admit it to a pollster. And it’s only one stupid criticism among many. There’s probably some crossover among the people who think he’s a muslim and the ones who think he’s foreign-born/homosexual/sexist/socialist/whatever, but I doubt that all the sets are mutually exclusive.

And of course, what % of the crowd was booing? Less than half, certainly – there were a lot of cheers as well.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lee Elia

says it’s 15 percent. “The other 85 percent are earning a living.” So it’s probably people who lost their jobs since January who booed.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There’s probably all crossover in that 10 give or take percent. If you believe Obama is a Muslim, you probably believe he is a terrorist and foreign-born as well, and so on.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 15, 2009 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Then You Assume That People Who Boo Are Conspiracy Theorists

You’re probably right that some of the people at the All Star Game were crazy conspiracy theorists. But what you said originally was that booing Obama is dumb because he has done a pretty good job. And there are plenty of non-conspiracy-theorists who would disagree with the idea that Obama has done a pretty good job so far. There are plenty of liberals who don’t approve of Obama.

Obama’s unfavorable rating is about 34% So while 11% of the country think he’s a Muslim (and probably disapprove of him for that reason) that’s still leaves 23% of the people who disapprove of Obama for other reasons — maybe even liberal reasons.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 16, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You seriously expect me to believe...

…that 23% of the crowd was booing him for not being liberal enough?

That’s an… interesting theory.

by Vlad on Jul 16, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right. No liberals have any reason to be upset with Obama. He’s ended the wars, passed gay marriage, shut down GITMO, and is prosecuting Bush for war crimes.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 16, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s a cynical view. Look on the bright side: at least we’re moving towards single payer health care now that the Great One is in office

…or NOT.

by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 17, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Know

It’s cynical to bring up boring, depressing facts. I’m changing my tune.

OBAMA IS A GOOD PRESIDENT! YOU CAN READ ALL ABOUT IT ON DAILYKOS SO IT HAS TO BE TRUE!

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 17, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the devil is in how you define “illegitimate criticisms.”

You seem to think that category is quite narrow, and I think it is quite broad. I’m of the viewpoint that the category of legitimate and intelligent crticisims for almost every political ideology in existence is quite broad.

It’s extremely arrogant to think that one side of a debate is so clearly correct that to hold a contrary viewpoint is “illegitimate.”

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Err, “political” debate. Obviously, arguing that 2 + 2 is 6 is an “opinion” that is clearly wrong. Or that Garrett Jones is likely to turn into a super player. Holding those opinions is clearly wrong!

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's Almost As If Vlad Is Saying
“You’re either with us or against us…” — George W. Bush, November 6, 2001.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For me:

A legitimate criticism is one that’s logically valid and based on demonstrably factual evidence. Squishier criticisms based on subjective judgment may or may not be legitimate in and of themselves, but are often sufficiently legitimate to at least merit discussion.

A lot of the current criticisms of Obama do not meet this standard. Some do: his trust of Paulson, his treatment of the Uighur detainees, etc.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it’s dumb to boo Obama, since he’s been a pretty good President so far, but if people want to take dumb positions, they have that right, just like if they were speaking in favor of white supremacy or 9-11 "truth" or a flat earth. The freedom to be wrong/stupid is one of our most important and cherished rights as a culture and a society.

Are you claiming that people who think Obama is doing a bad job are most akin to people who believe in flat a earth, white supremacy, and 9-11 truthers, or are you just picking ridiculously dumb positions merely as an illustration of how people have a right to say stupid things?

If the former, yeesh. I don’t know anyone who would claim “Obama is doing a bad job” is an objective truth, much less a truth so obvious that people who believe it are comparable to the things mentioned. That includes one of my friends who worked for the Obama campaign, wears Obama shirts probably 3 times a week, and covers almost everything he owns with Obama stickers.

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If the former, yeesh. I don’t know anyone who would claim "Obama is doing a bad great job" is an objective truth, much less a truth so obvious that people who believe it are comparable to the things mentioned. That includes one of my friends who worked for the Obama campaign, wears Obama shirts probably 3 times a week, and covers almost everything he owns with Obama stickers.

by CptnAwesome on Jul 15, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I picked dumb positions as examples...

…because I think that free speech is particularly important when it applies to stupid and unpopular minority viewpoints. Constirutional rights are really the only protection that those groups have.

Some criticisms of Obama have a lot of merit (his willingness to trust the Goldman Sachs foxes with control of the henhouse, for example), and some (like the birth certificate thing, or Michele Bachmann’s concerns that the census will be used to create internment camps) are like something out of a Marx Brothers movie.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just because YOU think he has done a good job doesn't mean it is so...

and that someone whos opinion differs is taking a “dumb position”.

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 16, 2009 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry Vlad

I made this comment before reading through the hundred or so comments after your comment that I commented on (thats alot of comments). You already cleared up what you meant about smart and dumb arguments about his job thus far…

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 16, 2009 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Which is to say, I think it’s fine to be okay with booing one President and to not be okay with booing another.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely.

Democracy promises us a lot of wonderful things, but uniformity of thought is not one of them. Neither is decorum.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or maybe hitting him in the head with a shoe

if any of the fans got close enough to toss one his way.

by WestCoastBuc on Jul 15, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK...

I have read your missives with slight amusement thus far but come on…Lets keep to the topic(s) at hand…ASG, Sano, The merits of STL as a baseball town etc.

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He wore the

jacket because he had a huge bullet proof vest on underneath. The guy is a Chicago fan, so he supports his team. Because he’s a politician he has to be neutral and pretend he doesn’t care? I love that he has a team and cares about them and doesn’t deny it.

by dtoddwin on Jul 15, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ASG

The whole “this time it counts” thing is just stupid.

It’s an exhibition game to honor the guys who have been playing well (or fan faves, whatever).
The point should be to get every guy to play, not to sit a bunch of guys because you’re “trying to win” a for-fun game.

I hate Charlie Manuel now.

True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09

by UtesFan89 on Jul 15, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Duke’s benching was understandable, but Sanchez’ was not. He could have come in as a defensive replacement in the eight or ninth and maybe squeezed out an at-bat.

I agree, Manuel should get booed when the Phils are in town.

by Suffering Buc on Jul 15, 2009 11:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Get over it......

not everybody gets to play. Freddy didn’t. It’s not a snub and neither got “benched”, it’s just fricking hard to try to get 33 guys in a game that “counts.” People want to see the stars. You don’t pinch hit with Freddy Sanchez when Ryan Howard is on the bench. And you have to have some guys available in case the game goes extra innings. The I hate Charlie Manuel thing is so childish is sad.

I wondered how bent out of shape people would be that neither Pirate played last night. Now I know.

by dtoddwin on Jul 15, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh

It would have been fun to see some Pirates in the game, but honestly, it was just nice to watch a baseball game played by good players against other good players for a change.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I don’t understand why it’s wrong that we’re annoyed we didn’t get to see our guys play.

by matskralc on Jul 15, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I agree I’m sure the players aren’t mad they didn’t get in charlie manuel doesn’t deserve to get booed sorry, I’d like to see you guys fit all 33 Players in a 9 inning game stop the whining life goes on it looks worse on you.

by baseballssp3 on Jul 15, 2009 11:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It's Time Has Passed

Bathed in sepia tones and David McCollough narration is where the game belongs. Stan Savran made a good point yesterday about how the game was more meaningful and important to the fans really up until the early 1990s. Before ESPN became ubiquitious and there was no Extra Innings package most people didnt see Major League stars play but for the World Series and the ASG.

If you grew up in an NL city in the 50s-60s, you never got to see Mickey Mantle on TV or in person. The ASG gave the fans that…now, it is a spectacle. No need to stop holding it, but I really wish that FOX and MLB would stop trying to make it more than it is.

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just have over the air TV, and I quite enjoyed seeing the best guys in the league play. That was the first time I got to watch Greinke – holy shit!! I’m obviously in the minority with the ESPN thing, but I just thought I’d give a shout out saying I enjoyed it.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jul 15, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ESPN Is Not Ubiquitous

No ESPN at my house, and there probably never will be. I enjoyed it.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mine either

Unfortunately, that means no FoxSports either, but I decided a while ago that life is too short to spend it watching four-hour ballgames on TV anyway.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup. I think radio is better for baseball anyway. And that’s good money I can spend on hookers and blow instead.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And beer

Ballpark’s a different story, of course, but I DO care if I never get back. My ideal game is 3-1 in 2:17 and three bars on the way home, which describes the last game I went to.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t even know what cable costs. Like $50 a month? That’s tickets to five games in person.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Baseball might be the best radio sport…Football not so much…Hockey works on the radio for the most part as well…

That said, nothing like a baseball game on an AM radio while under the hood of your car in the driveway…

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the way you think, sir....

But thats why I just kept searching for higher wages…….so I can enjoy TV, hookers, and blow. Isn’t our country great?!

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 15, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But you can have sex with a hooker while listening to the game on the radio. Buf if you’re trying to watch the game on TV at the same time, that’s just rude.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the difference between a real date and a paid date myfriend...

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 15, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jul 15, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Reminds me of the old joke about the favorite position in Canada…for those of you familar with that joke, it certainly applies here!

by Mick Kraut on Jul 15, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

They have to trick it up with FanFests and Home Run Derbies and other circus acts, to try to create the illusion of continued relevance.

I couldn’t possibly care less about the All-Star Game, so you can imagine how much I care about who plays and who doesn’t. All I care about is that it ends early enough that I can get it in the next day’s paper and go the hell home. This one made me happy.

by bucdaddy on Jul 15, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sano Says

Sano would be stupid not to deny the rumors that he’s 90% likely to sign with the Pirates. If he wants to get the best deal he can, then he has to act like he might sign with someone else.

Sano is probably the least reliable source on the matter right now.

by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 15, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Are people here honestly surprised...

…that when Howard reached for a PH, he went with the guy from his team rather than the guy from a different team? Personally, I’d tend to expect a manager to play favorites in that situation, and be kind of shocked if he didn’t.

by Vlad on Jul 15, 2009 3:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not the least bit surprised

And i probably would have done the same thing in that particular situation. Doesn’t mean I have to like the fact that in every other single situation, he decided against putting my guys in!

by matskralc on Jul 15, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just to make a baseball comment

Milledge hit 2 HR tonight for Lynchburg

by Jett on Jul 16, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What is this base...ball...you speak of?

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce

by gorillakilla34 on Jul 16, 2009 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Off-topic troll. I’m going to ask Charlie to ban you!

by CptnAwesome on Jul 16, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.
Start posting about the Pirates »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

101_0170_small
40-Man Moves
18470r_small
Rule 5 possibilities
20080124sgrammy_330_small
Small Market Teams Pocketing Spare Change
Small
Jeebus Cracker
Small
McCutchen's defense
Small
Roberto calling
20090612mf_fleury_cup_500hp_small
Pirates would trade Doumit!
Leo4_small
John Sickels' Comments on Donnie Veal
Pitt20_small
LaRoche to the Phils?
Bloody_mary_small
Ohlendorf Blogging: USDA can't keep him "down on the farm."

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recent FanShots

Mariners Eyeing Doumit
Tabata 5-5 w/3 Ribbies - Hitting .390 @ EOS
Bay rejects $60M over 4 years
"[Chase D'Arnaud] does everything well enough," said an American League...
Pirates hire Steve Williams as Major League scout
Jim Tracy, Baby! NL Manager of the Year!
2009 Minor League Six-Year Free Agent Listing
NL Rookie of the Year: Chris Coghlan
2010 CHONE Projections
2010 UZR Projections

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

SPONSORS


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie