Gammons: LaRoche Deal was a Salary Dump
It's an ESPN insider-only article. Basically, Peter Gammons reports that the Pirates had a deal in place with another team (perhaps the Giants?) offering a better package of prospects for Adam LaRoche, but that they took the Red Sox' package because the Sox assumed his whole salary. I wouldn't presume Gammons' reporting is infallible here, but I look forward to hearing more about whether this is true. It would be infuriating if it is, obviously, even in a relatively minor trade like this one.
It might not be wise to assume the worst here--it could just be that the Pirates were offered a prospect package similar in quality to the one the Sox offered, and the salary thing was a tie-breaker. I hope someone can get to the bottom of this, though.
UPDATE: The Pirates reply to the accusation that it's a salary dump. There apparently was another offer, but it wasn't from San Francisco.
0 recs |
142 comments
|
Comments
i can’t read it but i’m guessing it’s gammons opinion of the other offer vs. the two prospects we got + cash. unless the terms of the other offer come out it will be hard to judge.
let me make an understatement: it’s going to be an interesting few days ahead.
by johnnycuff on Jul 22, 2009 6:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Does Gammons identify the other two prospects? If not, his opinion is worthless.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I should have said the other package of prospects.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t totally disagree with you, but you can read the relevant portion here:
http://joyofsox.blogspot.com/2009/07/gammons-red-sox-rejected-trade-of.html
It sounds like the information he got came from the Red Sox.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That doesn’t convince me of anything, other than somebody in the Red Sox’ FO bragging to Gammons about how clever Theo is and Gammons happily agreeing. If there are no names attached, the information is worthless.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
What are the other names? Then we can judge for ourselves…otherwise we have no way of knowing one way or the other.
by maguro on Jul 22, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that’s all I’m saying. I expect Dejan Kovacevic will probably look into this and have something for us tomorrow.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and i’m sure one of the other PG columnists will not look into this at all but nonetheless be lighting the torches and sharpening the pitchforks.
by johnnycuff on Jul 22, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Think the PG’s editors will chime in on this one too? I give them +300 odds for LaRoche. -150 for Freddy.
by Chad Bahamas on Jul 22, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's getting something from the team...
it’s probably tonight. Dejan had already indicated he wasn’t making the Arizona-SF trip. I just can’t remember whether Chuck is making the trip or Colin Dunlap.
by Thunder on Jul 22, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gammons
Gammons is no doubt the biggest blowhard of the ESPN geeks. He is the only one who ever has any scoop and he is never wrong. Personally I think he is a shill for the big team GMs and a lot of agents who love to use him as their mouthpiece. And the Pirates are easy fodder.
by Batavia on Jul 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You guys are right
Peter Gammons goes out of his way to find ways to pick at the Pirate franchise. I’m sure he just made this all up. In reality, he has the same opinion of the Pirates as everyone else who follows the game..that the franchise is run by pathetic liars who would rather take your money than ever deliver on their words.
by slick720 on Jul 22, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
??
Gammons has picked Benson to win the cy young, Perez to win it.. He picked the Pirate as his darkhorse a few times over the last few years, I wouldn’t say he picks on them. He is calling it like he sees it.
by psunate77 on Jul 22, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I think he would go out of his way to dump on the Pirates if he knew there was a team in Pittsburgh. The Red Sox source he talked to probably had to show him the Pirates’ franchise page on bb-ref so Gammons would know what he was talking about.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a thoughtful....
mature response.
by dtoddwin on Jul 22, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn’t even care if it was. LaRoche sucked. Not just performance wise. His attitude was terrible. I watched an at-bat friday night where he didn’t even move the bat a centimeter for 4 pitches and struck out. He hardly shows ANY hustle. I was sick of seeing him destroy potential innings and swing at pitches a golfer would have a hard time hitting if the ball was still. I’m glad he’s out of Pittsburgh, that’s obviously want he wanted.
Steelers - Immaculate Reception. Penguins - Immaculate Rejection. Pirates......Immaculate Resurrection???
by JR89 on Jul 22, 2009 7:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gammons is very legit
Wow you guys are really knocking peter gammons he knows more baseball than anyone here, denial is something you guys should be concerned about if the offer was better why would you not be upset. Nuttings are tight wads they need to step up and stop being all business, spring for some dough, and get off gammons case HE’s RIGHT now everyones first step is to accept it……….
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 7:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How do you....
have any idea if he’s right or wrong? If you don’t know the other prospects you can’t even begin to judge the story. And better or worse is subjective.
by dtoddwin on Jul 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gammons used to work for a Boston paper for many years. Most of his sources, columns and opinions are very Red Sox-centric. I think WTM’s scenario is very likely. Gammons isn’t at ESPN for real analysis, especially after the stroke. He’s there because a lot of people like him and he tells a good story. Nice guy, just not someone to trust in situations like this.
by Chad Bahamas on Jul 22, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually like Gammons and I think he’s raised the quality of baseball reporting a great deal by getting people to focus more on what GMs do and by making some effort to popularize stats like OPS. But he has some major drawbacks. One is his myopic focus on the Red Sox. Here’s a good anecdote on that subject. Late in Jason Bay’s rookie season, when he was clearly a serious ROY candidate, Gammons wrote a column on ROY candidates in the NL. He never mentioned Bay. When I checked out the guys he did mention, I found they had all played against the Red Sox that year. Bay hadn’t. I doubt that was a coincidence.
The other problem with Gammons is that he’s well known to be an unquestioning conduit for FO types who want to plant stories. GMs go to him with bogus trade rumors they think will help their negotiations knowing he’ll report whatever they tell him.
For both these reasons, I give Gammons no credence when he reports a rumor like this about the Pirates.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Gammons is a smart guy who knows a lot about baseball...
…but when he reports rumors, it’s often at the behest of a particular source, as a quid pro quo.
If Gammons is commenting on the trade, then my guess is that the other mystery team’s GM called him and said that they offered this totally awesome package but Huntington only cared about the money as a way of getting a narrative out there for his boss about why he didn’t come back with LaRoche.
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regardless of Gammons' legitimacy
He hasn’t given the names of the players that were offered by Sabean and I don’t see why he would not if he indeed had the names. So, it sounds like he is just taking the Giants at their word that they were offering better prospects. Sabean is generally a very poor judge of talent, so maybe in his mind, the Giants offered better prospects, but in NH’s mind, they sucked. We can’t begin to judge the decision without knowing the prospects. Also Baseballssp3, you are essentially saying that since Peter Gammons knows more about baseball than anyone here, nobody here can question anything he says about baseball. Clearly this is ridiculous. If Gammons doesn’t back up his opinions with facts and reasonable analysis, his opinions can and should be questioned.
by uneasy rider on Jul 23, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dejan has said...
…that the second team is NOT the Giants.
For whatever that’s worth.
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who cares what gammons said...
the fact of the matter is LaRoche’s 7 mil is gone and we got 2 prospects for him is legit…didnt think we would get that for LaRoche.
by BigB23 on Jul 22, 2009 7:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
3 million of the 7 million is gone. Otherwise I agree. I mean that a-hole was only hitting slightly above .100 the last month, how pathetic. I usually wish former Bucs all the best when they leave here but with Adam I literally hope he breaks a leg. 40 RBIs while batting cleanup most of the year! We are fortunate to get more than a rosin bag for that bum.
by Jake B on Jul 23, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gammons is a Red Sox Homer
He’s just Theo Epstein’s pencil.
OK, big deal. All Gammons can know is that NH convinced Theo Epstein he had better prospects offered by the Giants. Otherwise he’d name names.
Maybe that’s why there was all the craziness this a.m. about whether LaRoche was going to Giants or Red Sox. Maybe it was that last second. But maybe the Giant guys were not better, and Esptein is just covering his butt.
Even if the Giant prospects were better, PBC got 2 legit guys and saved $2.95M left in LaRoche’s $7M 2009 salary.
If NH uses that $2.9M to help sign more 2009 draft picks or Miguel Sano, that’s money well saved. In other words, money = prospects.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 7:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree
Dont the Pirates still have more than half of the draft class to sign if possible and arent some of them the big upside guys everyone wants the Pirates to sign?? With this extra cash saved, this should help them sign those guys as well as Sano.
If Neal uses the money saved on Sano and the draft picks. then dumping LaRoche’s entire salary is a huge win
by Jett on Jul 22, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm still
Not sure those budgets affect each other. I think NH was going to have around 10 mill again to spend on the draft if he wanted, so I don’t think he now has 13 million or something. I could be wrong here, but I just don’t think each budget ties into the next.
by Slizeezyc on Jul 22, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It all comes from the same bank account.
I any business departments have their own budgets but when money is needed in one it is always taken from a department of less importance. The “overall” budget is what remains unchanged.
by Slick1 on Jul 22, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
More like 2/3...
they’ve signed 16 of 51.
by Thunder on Jul 22, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If there's a better deal
If there was a better deal pay the stupid 2.95 million left and get the better players that’s obvious I mean its not like we don’t have the money its we don’t want to spend the money
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 7:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The whole point
is that we don’t know who the other players were or whether they’re better than the ones we got. Until you know that it’s pointless to bitch about the great players we didn’t get.
by maguro on Jul 22, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Punctuation is your friend, not your enemy.
Formerly known as Econolodge
by Willton on Jul 22, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You made your point
Its just we don’t know so I guess we can’t bitch either way I see your way I hope you see miy view too
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You don't see his side?
I mean Peter effin Gammons said there was a better deal and NH didn’t take it! Who cares about who the “other players” are or the facts when we can just assume the Pirates are again dumping salaries.
Rabble! Rabble! Rabble!
Did that clear things up?
"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce
by gorillakilla34 on Jul 22, 2009 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't get a "harrumph" out of that guy!

by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“You watch your ass.”
(Swear to Jobu Thunder, that’s the next line.)
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or are you gonna light my ass on fire?
Formerly known as Econolodge
by Willton on Jul 23, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fire! Fire! heh heh

"So you think 25 percent of the country is retarded?! Yea. Atleast 25 percent. Well lets so a sample. There are 4 of us an you're retarded. Thats 25 percent." Southpark; Mystery of the Urinal Deuce
by gorillakilla34 on Jul 23, 2009 6:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A couple issues......
Gammons could have been fed a line. Heyman reported the Jays offered Holliday to the Mets for four psuedo-prospects and it has been denied left and right basically by everyone. Heyman of course stands by his story. This type of thing happens all the time.
The valuation of the prospect in any other offer would of course be up for debate even if we knew the names of the players. Since we don’t it is even harder to evaluate.
Even if everything Gammons reports is true then whether it was worth it to save the money and what the money will be used for is unknown.
This really seems to be a throw away bullet item filling up space from a national columnist with close ties to the team with which the Pirates traded. Nothing really to see there….. Doesn’t even really matter that the Pirates get a little extra bad press they may or may not deserve. It isn’t like it matters in the big scheme of things.
by haven on Jul 22, 2009 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heyman is often...
…the conduit through whom Scott Boras plants stories.
Take it for what you will.
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless...
the other team involved gets pissed off that the Pirates made the deal with the Red Sox…and says…“We offered them xxxx and xxxx”…we won’t know what the package was.
by Thunder on Jul 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Giant's beat reporters are pretty impressive
After all, they got the sealed grand jury testimony where Barry Bonds admitted using steroids, and the guy who gave it to them went to prison for it.
I wouldn’t underestimate their ability to get somebody in the Giant’s FO to sing, if there’s an actual story here.
I doubt there is, because I think Gammons is just doing his usual “Theo Epstein is Smarter Than the Average Bear” story, which he writes every week.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know. How does the Red Sox’ willingness to absorb extra salary make Epstein smart? This doesn’t come off as an obviously pro-Red Sox report.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The impression I got from Gammons article was that Epstein swooped in at the end and didn’t let a few measly $$ prevent him from getting his man.
In other words, Epstein had a better read on NH’s character than the unnamed team because Epstein understood that dollars were the correct leverage to move the Pirates, not overall quality of prospects.
In short, Esptein wins (as always) and unnamed other GM loses. Same as it ever was.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So Epstein’s a genius . . . or, he’s read any one of about a hundred comments Dejan’s made about how the Pirates’ unwillingness to eat salary has been a stumbling block in any number of negotiations.
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LaRoche salary-dump??
Unless the Giant’s offered a an excellent package or a solid prospect I have no problem with this being a salary-dump. LaRoche has been a bust since we’ve had him and quite frankly should be pleased we found someone to take him off our hands. I know that us long-suffering Pirate fans keep looking for the deal where everyone says the “Pirate’s got the best player” but that deal is not happeneing with LaRoche and probably not Wilson or Sanchez either. Teams are not moving their top prospects unless they’re getting a stud back and a stud is something the Pirates don’t have on their roster…..
by Marooned Pirate on Jul 22, 2009 7:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Teams are not moving their top prospects unless they’re getting a stud back and a stud is something the Pirates don’t have on their roster…..
Well said.
Definitely prefer dumping salary in favor of signing draft picks or Sano.
by Pensburgh Pirates on Jul 22, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Charlie!!
Can you add a question mark to the end of that headline?
I just saw it on Yahoo Sports and it looks bad. I read your headline as just reporting what Gammons is saying, but it looks on Yahoo like you are saying the trade is just a salary dump. If you are then you are more than welcome to ignore me.
But I’ve seen you perform magic with question marks in headlines in the past.
It’s not that I’m overly sensitive to all the bad press the PBC gets on any trade, but I sorta am. The jabronis on yahoo are all over the PBC — ignoring the fact that LaRoche himself has apologized for playing so bad for the team.
Gawd — the guy went from being “Lefty McThump” to “Rally Killer” in 3 short years.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 8:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What? On Yahoo the headline is exactly the same as it is here.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm going blind or Yahoo is smarter than me
You are totally correct (as is slick down thread).
I swear 45 minutes ago the word “Gammons:” wasn’t in the title.
I figured Yahoo was avoiding giving publicity to an ESPN guy by cutting his name.
Mea culpa, Charlie.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we’ll never know. If it’s your mistake, I’ve certainly been guilty of worse.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I may not be totally crazy (though I wouldn't take long odds on that)
i just read a Yahoo headline that says: “Police: No Criminal Probe of Big Ben”
when you click though to the article the actual headline is: “Deputy: No plans to investigate Roethlisberger”
So Yahoo does play with headlines.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Problem is...
Gammons stated that it “was” a salary dump. He wasn’t questioning that it was a possibility. That is the basis for Charlie’s post so in that context a “?” would not be appropriate.
by Slick1 on Jul 22, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Reporting Rumors Ruins Reliability
Evenin’ all,
I was going to pop in, pay a little tribute to Big Luigi as at least a hard-working, good-attitude blue-collar guy that we should salute on his way out the door, but ran into this thread instead. Mind you, I realize that the nicknames “LaWhiff” and “Rally-Killer” were well earned. It should tell us something that he went to a contender who needed a back-up or spot starter to give a good player a day off.
But anyway, about that Gammons claim that we were offered better from the Giants… about 2:30 today, MLB Trade Rumors.com had a report that “the Giants musn’t have wanted Adam LaRoche much, if they didn’t beat Boston’s offer….”
So what does that tell us? If LaWhiff were that valuable that the Giants needed him to bolster their flagging offense, they would have:
a) agreed to pick up his salary or
b) offered us a really lot of prospects if they wanted us to pick up his salary.
Again, given that Big Luigi is going to Boston to back up Mike Lowell, I’m all for grabbing the prospects we got, dumping his salary and moving on.
It would be nice to see something constructive done with the saved money. Lets bring back Doug Mientkewicz so we have some intangible leadership in the dugout.
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Epstein busy today -- Lugo dealt to Cards
From SI
Boston traded SS Julio Lugo to St. Louis for OF/1B Chris Duncan and a player to be named later (The Cardinals also received cash considerations in the deal.
I feel like NH dodged a bullet here. No way would Lugo be good for the PBC.
Duncan is really mostly a LF. Is Epstein signaling that there’s life after Jason Bay, if Bay thinks he deserves JD Drew money?
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 9:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Idk. but figure there’s several teams with big pockets and he plays for one of them. The only other big market teams i think would be the Dodgers(who have manny) and the NYY who seem to have a ton of talent in the Outfield. Then I guess you can go to slightly smaller markets. San Francisco could be nice (they need some offense) especially if they intend to contend next year. The Cardinals/Cubs? Idk. any other thoughts?
by lfhlaw on Jul 22, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sanchez and Wilson
Do you think we would trade sanchez and wilson to the same team such as the giants and get prospects and maybe a major league player? Just a thought since they know each other wouldnt sign unless the other one signed, you know stuff like that?
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 9:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Boston Fans Thought on the Trade
Checked out the Sports Nation Red Sox blog through the link on this page. The poll shows that they like the trade by a 3-1 margin. The write-up calls the prospects we got "fringe" and stated that "LaRoche has some pop and a good eye at the plate." I guess that all depends on what the word "some" means and an understanding that LaRoche has a good eye for balls to miss or ground into double plays. The comments were generally neutral, viewing the trade as a wash for both teams and then digressing to the Lugo trade and Mark Kotsay’s wife….what does that tell you?
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That is of course "...fans' thoughts..."
for the punctuation and spelling nazis
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Trade
I think its just fans being fans, they feel like they need some offense because they were in a slump so they look at Laroche as a good offensive option, but we know that it was a blessing to get rid of him, and get prospects. Thats how our system works, and im guessing thats how theyre system works. 50/50
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 9:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's the old selective use of statistics game
Guys are saying “he leads the Pirates in HRs” instead of saying “he’s hit 12 HR in 90 games, and 5 HR’s in the last 2 months.”
Or quoting his average post-July 1 statistics since he came up in Atlanta, but ignoring his .408 OPS this July.
Average Red Sox Nation fan is panicking big time right now. With Yanks in 1st place, if Rays pass them too it’s no playoffs for Red Sox in 2009. And it’s starting to look to them like that’s in the cards.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 9:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LaRo
Thats what they’re calling him in Red Sox Nation, hope he hits a few over Pesky’s pole, he’ll probably see 3-4 days a week of playing time. Maybe a little rest will do him well.
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 9:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s happened before. Hinske has been a monster since he got to the friendly confines of Yankee Stadium.
It doesn’t mean Hinske would have done anything in Pgh if he had stayed.
I usually wish the traded guys the best. It’s the general managers and reporters who crow about robbing the Pirates blind of whom I wish ill. (Please note that I avoided ending this sentence with a dangling participle.)
by WstCstBucco on Jul 22, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Limited Info on Trade from MiLB.com
All of this info is from the Portland Sea Dogs (Boston’s AA team) website. It looks like Diaz was their starting shortstop. Only 22 years old right now, but first year in Minor League ball was 2004 – does this tell us anything? He also played some "A" ball last year w/a consistent .280 BA.
Strickland, Boston’s 19th selection (18th round) in the 2007 First-Year Player Draft, was 5-4 with one save and a 3.35 ERA (31 ER/83.1 IP) in 18 appearances/12 starts for Single-A Greenville. In three professional seasons in the Red Sox organization, the 20-year-old posted a 10-9 record with one save and a 3.66 ERA.
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You’re aware that there are (at least) two other threads about this, including one on the font page that covers a lot of this information, right?
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm just joining the most recent one...
…was at work all day. Love the site, but not willing to read through 300+ posts to see what has or has not been said at the end of a long day.
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No need to do that. A lot of this info is right on the front page.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
New starting shortstop at indy
He’l get his time at short in indy but I don’t see him reaching the bigs if jack gets traded he has to prove his bat, his glove is amazing so no worry about that, I’m excited to see what he does.
by baseballssp3 on Jul 22, 2009 9:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A Song to Celebrate the trade
this would be sung to the tune of “The Beverly Hillbillies” theme song. Sorry, there’s not enough beer to finish the last verse tonight…and I’m betting that no one else posted this in the other two threads….
Come and listen to my story ‘bout a man named LaRoche
A hot hitter once, who suddenly went cold
Then one day he was takin’ some BP
When suddenly he got traded to the Boston Red Sox
Well the first thing you know, all the fans cried "bad trade!"
They said, "Come on, Neil, go get Doc Holliday!!"
They said, "Argenias Diaz ain’t the prospect that we need!"
So Neil spent all his bucks to sign Doug Mientkewicz
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 9:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I’m through maybe 1/3 of the posts in this thread and I’m not anyone besides Wilbur has ever read a word Gammons has written. What is this, the PBC Blog comments thread?
by KPatrick on Jul 22, 2009 10:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
typo
Should read “I’m not SURE anyone besides Wilbur has ever read a word Gammons has written.” But I’ll forgive my own haste under the circumstances. I’m not saying Gammons or anyone else is off limits, just that most of these comments aren’t even caricatures of Gammons.
by KPatrick on Jul 22, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Salary Dump?
Uh, according to the Tribune Review, the Pirates included cash to help cover some of LaRoche’s salary this year. I don’t really see why the Pirates would include cash in a salary dump
by glass0941 on Jul 22, 2009 10:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Post-Gazette says that’s not true.
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
(Or, rather, simply that the Pirates aren’t picking up any salary here)
by Charlie on Jul 22, 2009 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
does this surprise you?
if this surprises you then you better come back to earth. remember, this is the pirates, farm team for all major league teams.
by MrBasebrawlwer on Jul 22, 2009 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So you're saying
The Pirates should let Adam LaRoche walk away with NOTHING?!
This was a necessary move
by BadAndy on Jul 22, 2009 10:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Few thoughts on the trades
Throwing out some perspective
It can be said or at least argued that LaRoche is/was one of our better hitters. Regardless of slumps, terrible first halves, tendencies to hit into double plays and hitting solo homeruns when down by 8 in the seventh inning, LaRoche is/was a top three hitter (Doumit and Cutch) on the Pirates. Surprisingly, he should’ve be. He’s a 1B. A 1B should be the best hitter on the team. However, throw him in the ring with all the other 1B across the league and hes average at best. This year he’s been below average, so even as one of our best hitters, he was one our least valuable players, especially as far as trade bait.
Therefore a salary dump (if it is that) for some marginal prospects seems like good deal to me… which leads me to
Diaz. If he is as elite a defensive shortstop as what I’ve said, then I think we will be just fine, even if he hits .250. Give me Jack 2.0, even with a weaker bat defending up the middle and surround him with bats such as Tabata, Cutch, Alvarez, Milledge and hopefully Laroche.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2009 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You would really rate LaRoche ahead of Sanchez in terms of bat? Not this season I wouldn’t
by glass0941 on Jul 22, 2009 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That wasn't my point
You could easily argue that Sanchez has been better this year… Which proves my actual point…
LaRoche was way overvalued in the ‘Burgh, even by the biggest critics. He is a below average offensive 1B and 1B defense, while sometimes undervalued, isn’t CF, SS or C. The return was always going to be low and so I’d take a C- haul in exchange for LaRoche AND HIS SALARY over say a C+ haul.
Use that money to sign prospects and instead be willing to help on Freddy’s salary and see if we can’t get a better haul, especially if we can package Grabow.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2009 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Poll
There is a poll on ESPN that asks the question “Are the Pirates bad for baseball?”
The two choices are:
No, they have a plan to build, or
Yes, they’re not trying to win
A little harsh I think, but 54% of the nation thinks the answer is “Yes”
by Jett on Jul 22, 2009 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My guess is
95% of the people who think we are bad for baseball couldn’t tell you anything about the prospects we have snagged for Bay, Nady, McLouth, Nyjer and Adam. And if these are such great players, why was it that we couldn’t win with all of them on our team.
by Brakeman8 on Jul 22, 2009 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree
I just love how the “Yes” answer includes that “they aren’t trying to win”. I think thats a joke.
by Jett on Jul 22, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow, I was writing the exact same thing as my reply just as you posted this.
by Akshay R on Jul 22, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. Most people who aren’t Pirates fans look at us, see 17 straight years of sub-.500 baseball, and assume we’re not trying to win. That’s just stupid, because of course we’re TRYING to win, we just haven’t succeeded at it for 17 years.
The same fans also wouldn’t realize that of the 4 major trades (not counting today’s LaRoche deal), of Bay, Nady, McLouth and Morgan, only the Bay trade has worked out better for the other team. The other 3 deals have all ended up worse (based of course, on potential for the minor league prospects and success for the major league prospects we’ve acquired) than the Pirates have. I’ll take a 75% success rate on major trades any day, especially considering we’re attempting a full-scale rebuild of an organization which was crippled by Dave Littlefield’s terrible management.
If even half of the prospects and draft picks that Huntington’s acquired pan out well, then the Pirates will almost definitely be contenders in 2 or 3 years.
by Akshay R on Jul 22, 2009 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t remember . . . is that a few points more, or less, than the percentage who think Elvis is still alive?
by WTM on Jul 22, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"They don't want to win"
This is always a statement I don’t understand. As incompetent as the Nutting/McClatchy group has been in running the baseball team, I cannot for the life of me believe that they don’t realize they’d make waaaay more money if they had a winning team.
Sure you can say “They don’t want to spend too much money to win”, or “They don’t know how to win”, but I think we can all rest assured they do actually want to win.
by TravisDW on Jul 22, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not last year
I think Epstein was willing to gamble that 2nd-half- Adam would resurface and IMO there is no one that hits like he can, whien he is in the 2nd-half- zone. I was very surprised a contender didn’t take that chance last year to push them over the top. So, time will tell if Epstein is a genius or not. Whether the FO was dumping salary, I would like to think of it as dumping someone who didn’t want to be in the Burgh (other to play with his brother) because of the fact that he knew that the new philosophy of dumping veterans for prosepects = no winning and thus I feel he lost his will here. It is what it is for now in Pittsburgh and while the prospects received seem to be a little weak, we didn’t have much to offer in return. Good luck to Adam and here’s to the long term plan of 2012.
by long4willie on Jul 22, 2009 10:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Salary Dump
I don’t know how this can qualify as a salary dump. Laroche is in the final months of an existing contract and I seriously doubt that any team he played for would try to re-sign him. While the Pirates have engaged in salary dumps in the past, the only way this can be called one is if in every case in MLB when a team trades a player they don’t intend to re-sign, and the net effect of the trade is a reduction in salary dollars. My point – all teams do this – even the ones with lots of money.
Gammons is calling it a salary dump because he knows next to nothing about the Pirates. It is understandable that he would not follow them much, but he is just pulling that opinion out of his arse.
by Batavia on Jul 22, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If it was a salary dump
Stupid move by Hunntington. LaRoche is almost odne with his contract, which isnt that much and if we would get better prospects while keeping the salary lets take it. But Diaz is considered the best fielder in the BoSox system
by The_Fan on Jul 22, 2009 10:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For fun, go read...
McCovey Chronicles thread on this trade (its the SBNation Giants blog; there’s a link on the Bucs Dugout homepage). The first comments were posted while the report was that LaWhiff had been traded to the Giants – it sort of reads like the 5 phases of mourning….
by Trogluddite on Jul 22, 2009 11:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Charlie's last paragraph...
… is more or less where I come out here, in absence of absolutely any concrete facts or evidence about what SF was offering or anyone else was offering. When we talk about “a prospect package similar in quality to the one the Red Sox offered,” we need to define “similar in quality” against its opposite, “Better than Diaz/Strickland.” I don’t know how big the “better than” group is, but I’m betting it’s a big damn group. Big enough to include scads and scads of guys who, while better than Strickland/Diaz in that micro analysis, are “similar in quality” in the macro analysis, which is to say they are “probably unlikely to be important major league players, if they even get that far.”
If that is the case, then all things are, in fact, equal, and if you don’t have to pay Adam LaRoche approx. $3m to do what Adam LaRoche does for the next 2 months, then you don’t. That’s not a salary dump/
by KPatrick on Jul 22, 2009 11:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gammons
I quit paying attention long ago, when he starting saying things like, “50 percent chance this trade goes through.” I don’t miss priceless insider info like that.
by bucdaddy on Jul 22, 2009 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
News Flash: The day after Wednesday is Thursday
Of course the trade is a salary dump. I remember blogging here back when the Pirates traded for Mr. LaRoche that the trade wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. But today’s trade was sensational. Huntington is playing it right. If Pearce can’t cut it, he’s got Jones at first and Milledge in left. Sano’s still not going to be a Pirate, but I’m amazed at what the team got for LaRoche - Mike Lowell must be bad off. I hope LaRoche does well for the Red Sox, I think Jason’s Bay’s success actually helped the Bucs pull this deal off. Candymanfan aka JimBibbySweat
-
by Candymanfan on Jul 23, 2009 12:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sano’s still not going to be a Pirate, but I’m amazed at what the team got for LaRoche
Hmm? How do you figure?
by TravisDW on Jul 23, 2009 7:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
According to Dejan the only other offer on the table was a MLB player with similar salary to Laroche and a “borderline at best” prospect to balance it out.
http://community.post-gazette.com/blogs/pbc/archive/2009/07/23/morning-links-best-deal-available.aspx
by ravidesai1984 on Jul 23, 2009 12:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gammons is a sloth
Well , if he has this inside info , then he should just tell everyone what was the better deal that the Pirates turned down.
He has 2 stick his nose in, pertaining to any matter dealing with Boston, the team that keeps him drooling from April to October.
Sure the Pirates got crap, in his opinion. You don’t think
Boston is going to give away anything valuable.
If Boston trades a player, he was expendable, all others are future all stars, in mush mouth’s opinion.
I want names, Gammons, then i will decide what was the better all around deal, even though $$$ may have had to be included.
Apparently , this shortstop, is going right to AAA, so apparently some people feel he is 1 step from being a major leaguer.
I wonder what Gammon’s view of the Beckett trade was, when it happened.
Anybody have his disection of that deal, if so, i would bet he never classified Hanley(who was also in double A, at the time), as a future all star shortstop in the bigs.
Correct me if i am wrong, i would like to see proof how balls on he was when that trade went down.
Can anyone , with espn insider access go through his archives?. I am sure they can be found somewhere.
Screw him, typical Boston, Bob Stanley ass sucking columnist from the Harelip capitol of the Northeast.
I am just glad La roche is gone, opens up a whole new dimension in terms of position, and most likely PRODUCTION, from whoever mans that position.
I will give La Roche credit, he was a real smooth 1st basemen, but when you bat in the meat of the lineup, and are expected to drive in runs, he couldn’t pull it off.
Good bye, thanx for the memories, and a job , done!
Just hope Andy Laroche is a man, and doesn’t pout and slump, because he realizes he was the best hitting La Roche on the team, now he is just the only one.
Please, someone look up the comments pertaining to Hanley Ramirez, when he was trade from the beloved Red Sox, to Florida, just curious to analyze the master.
Maybe Gammons wasn’t drooling as much , back then, but he was still a jackass.
by tom p on Jul 23, 2009 1:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Argenis Diaz and his .619 AA OPS and 18 errors in 76 games is anywhere close to the majors that speaks really, really poorly of the Pirates.
by AdamHyzdu on Jul 23, 2009 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Every one who’s seen Diaz has criticized his offensive skills, so I think that’s a given.
But I wouldn’t go overboard on judging his defense based on AA errors. I’ve seen multiple sites where Diaz is hailed as having ++ defensive skills.
But your overall point, which seems to be that the PBC high minors are lacking is SS talent, is quite true.
(As an aside, in honor of Adam leaving I looked up the stats of SS Brent Lillibridge, who went to Atlanta when LaRoche and Jamie Romak were acquired. I remember many bloggers felt he was too good to give up back in ’06. Sadly, his potential has not been realized.)
by WstCstBucco on Jul 23, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
who cares?
laroche wasnt gonna sign anyways so why keep him around? we aint goin anywhere, his contract was up at the end of the season he was hitting barely .250 and had a terrible attitude. now garrett jones can play at 1st and moss and delwin young have the corner outfield slots and they did more today than laroche has done all month. plus now we have an open roster slot and we can hopefully bring lastings millage up and seen what he can do. plus we dont gotta pay laroche a dime. and according to the post-gazette we would have had to include someone else from the major league roster to get that other package. im just glad we got laroche outta here. he wasnt helping and we can lose just as well with out him.
by buccosfan on Jul 23, 2009 4:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I can watch this all day
The Moss video Dejan linked to…let it keep playing and you’ll see every bucco scoring play. (Also look for Vasquez and Young’s untucked shirts at home on the Moss homer. )
Although it wasn’t the biggest, seeing Cutch homer always makes me happiest. I saw him do it live in Philly (when we were feeling cocky before the collapse) and it was amazing.
http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=5680345
RIP NATE. RIP TONY PLUSH.
"I'D BE A CHEF"
-TONY PLUSH
by GTrain on Jul 23, 2009 9:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What is the deal with the untucked shirts?
Is that one of the unwritten rules of baseball like never bunt to break up a no no or does it relate specifically to the Pirate/Brewer rivalry (or “rivalry” if you prefer).
by WestCoastBuc on Jul 23, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
the CBA talks about how to wear the uniform…and shirts are REQUIRED to be tucked in during the game.
by Thunder on Jul 23, 2009 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
guess it is time to revisit the gonzalez-laroche trade
dejan nicely sums up how many felt back in 07:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07018/754774-63.stm
by vherub on Jul 23, 2009 11:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
Talk about overblown expectations. It reads like they just traded for Albert Pujols or Reggie Jackson…
by IAPiratesFan on Jul 23, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he'd just hit 32 HR
And seemed to profile perfectly for PNC. Who would have guessed, sight-unseen, that a lefty power guy would have power to the Northside Notch?
by JRoth95 on Jul 23, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could've checked his game charts.
But that was the Littlefield era to a T: Get whatever’s handy, and then market the hell out of it.
I think people here would’ve been a lot more tolerant of LaRoche’s streaks and slumps, and happier about the good things that he did, if he hadn’t been billed as the franchise-saving wunderkind when he was acquired. Too bad.
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do find it sad that even before LaRoche’s first game with the PBC, he’d already been anointed with the nickname “Lefty McThump.”
by WstCstBucco on Jul 23, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The nickname preceded LaRoche
Dejan started writing in early 2006 that what the Pirates needed, more than anything else*, was a left-handed power guy to play 1B or RF, and called him Lefty McThump. It then became a recurring theme in discussions around the team.
- primarily in the sense of “completely absent from the system,” not nec. that he would single-handedly make them WS contenders
by JRoth95 on Jul 23, 2009 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
even if it was a salary dump - why is that wrong?
LaRoche was providing such awful value for his contract. Are the Pirates going to suffer the remainder of this year without him? Why not save the money? It’s not like he’s in the long or short term plans. I’m still incredulous that they found any takers, much less one who would eat the $3 mil and give up only AAAA type non-prospects.
Weren’t the Giants dumping salary when they moved Morris to the Pirates? Would anyone consider that a bad move?
Above all else, you can’t question the baseball logic of parting with LaRoche. He’s at the borderline of even being an MLB starter. How many bench players earn $7 mil/season?
by chicos_pants on Jul 23, 2009 12:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's only wrong
if they don’t pump the saved money back into the organization.
by uneasy rider on Jul 23, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how would you know?
it’s not like there’s any transparent accounting in baseball. With Pirate crowds in the low 10Ks, I’m often surprised they have anything to spend. If not for the MLB revenue sharing (est. at $27 mil for 2009), the Pirates would not be financially viable in their current state.
Nutting will do his best to run the franchise profitably. That doesn’t automatically make him a cheap bastard (although it might), but let’s be honest that we’re looking at a pretty thin margin here.
by chicos_pants on Jul 23, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll miss his glove here and there,
but not his maddeningly inconsistent hitting.
I have no problem with this trade. We all expected it to happen. The only disappointing thing is that we were not able to get a SS prospect in return who looks more promising with the bat.
I’m still hoping for Jack and Freddy to be around for 2010, but it looks very doubtful now.
by patthatt on Jul 23, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think it’s a disappointment on any level. I am surprised NH got as much as he did. Adam is having a poor year for him and an awful last 30 days.
Plus LaRoche is a 2 month rental. The Red Sox will not even get a draft pick for losing him to free agency – in order to get a draft pick the Sox would have to offer Adam binding arbitration and he would certainly accept the offer (which would guarantee him no worse than a 20% pay cut from his current $7M+ salary) rather than risk free agency.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 23, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bucs sign two draftees
7th round RHP Trent Stevenson and 34th round LHP Zac Fuesser.
Stevenson was one of the major above-slot guys. Fuesser got $125K, which is far above slot for that round.
by WTM on Jul 23, 2009 3:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
And Fuesser isn’t a bad signing, either.
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PG Crosschecker on Fuesser
Fuesser showed very good pitchability in his start against Southern Nevada. The lanky 6-1, 170 lefty worked the corners with an 87-90 MPH fastball. Though it was often straight, good location made it effective and Fuesser also had command of his curveball. He still needs work to make his change-up a usable big league pitch and none of his offerings project as plus, but Fuesser’s know-how gives him a chance. His delivery is well-repeated and his arm-action is fine. Fuesser was a 19th-round pick by the Braves out of high school last year.
by WTM on Jul 23, 2009 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that’s what I’m talking about! Good work, NH.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 23, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That sounds familiar
No plus pitches? A straight “fastball” topping out at 90? Know-how?
Isn’t this every SP on the 2007 Opening Day roster, other than Snell?
I’m not trying to be negative, but geez.
by JRoth95 on Jul 23, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well it’s good thing he won’t be starting for them in 2007, or he’d be just like the rest of them.
by TravisDW on Jul 23, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol!
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 23, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a skinny kid.
As he bulks up, maybe he adds some extra velo.
And even if he’s just a #5 starter or middle reliever in the end, that’s still a pretty good return on a pick after the 30th round, isn’t it?
by Vlad on Jul 23, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, missed the 34th round
Yes, that sounds like a great kid for 34th round. If he’s teachable, then he actually seems like he could succeed.
WTM’s quote just seemed alarmingly familiar.
by JRoth95 on Jul 23, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few years ago everyone was excited
about the acquisition of Adam Laroche. How things change, huh. The Pirates weren’t gonna get much for him with his salary and him on a 1 year deal. And they didn’t. A couple of bodies to throw in their farm system. Nothing more than that. These guys aren’t prospects.
People are dreaming if they think this team is going anywhere by 2012. Unless the Pirates are sold to an owner with deep pockets to sign a few free agents. And actually keep guys like McCutcheon and Alvarez around awhile. I like that they are trying to build through the farm system. It’s about time! But you still have to be able to spend money to acquire a few free agents and to keep your homegrown talent. This ownership isn’t able or willing to do that. So all it means is a constant cycle of rebuilding.
by MrBasebrawlwer on Jul 23, 2009 8:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did you know that Mike Cameron and Jeff Suppan are the 2 highest paid Brewers? And that they make up roughly 25% of their payroll?
I’d really love to know who these mythical affordable-but-good free agents were that the Pirates should have signed this offseason in addition to keeping Bay/McLouth/Giles/Kevin Polkivich/et al. I hear about them all the time but going over the free agent pitcher list it was CC and crap.
by TravisDW on Jul 23, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever, I’m still mad about McCloth!!!!!! We had the best duo of OFs with McC as their first three letters evar!
by CptnAwesome on Jul 24, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Epic fail, CptnAwesome…his name was Nate McLOUTH, not Nate McCLOTH. I really hope you were joking…
by Akshay R on Jul 24, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
laroche wasnt a salary dump
the sox needed some better d (pun intended) at third, and, well, other places as well, right julio lugo?
9=8
by El Rayhawk on Jul 26, 2009 2:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













