How much more can you take? (with poll)
generally speaking, I have supported Neil Huntington and all the moves he has made since becoming general manager of the Pittsburgh Pirates. he inherited a mess at the major league and at the minor league level, and there is little wonder why the Pirates haven't had a winning season since 1992. let me repeat: I understand what NH is doing in the draft and with trades, and why he has basically burned the Pirates' major league roster to the ground since he took the job.
let's consider for a moment the 2009 opening day lineup... of the 8 position players who started that game, only Ryan Doumit, Andy Laroche, and Brandon Moss remain (and if Doumit hadn't been injured, he arguably would have been traded as well). go back even further to the 2008 season opener and only Doumit remains (Ian Snell started that game, and is now gone). now, look at the lineup John Russell used today vs. Matt Cain and the Giants. with all due respect to Andrew McCutchen and Garrett Jones (who began the year at AAA and hopefully will continue their excellent rookie campaigns) and Zach Duke (who has pitched very well this year, and actually has a higher batting average than both his first baseman and the guy who pinch-hit for him), does that really look like a major league lineup? is there any wonder they only managed three hits and zero runs?
our Pittsburgh Pirates have now lost five games in a row, scoring a total of four runs in that span (including three shutouts), to move a season high 15 games below .500. no matter how good the pitching is the rest of the way (who knows, NH might still decide to dismantle the rotation and/or bullpen), the Pirates' offense is likely to be deeply offensive to fans of major league baseball. and the problem with sticking to a plan to build a winner in 2010 (or 2011, or 2012, or ...) is that there's still 61 games to be played this year... which brings me to my poll question. to paraphrase SS Decontrol:
How much more can you take?
it's been 17 years since the Pirates fielded a winning team, so what's 2-3 more years of horrible baseball, right?
right?!?
anyone?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Modified poll
What do you think the Pirates should do:
1. Hang onto the current roster and keep losing forever?
2. Blow money on crappy free agents who are willing to sign with Pittsburgh and keep losing forever?
3. Trade for prospects and rebuild?
4. There is no 4.
obviously, the Pirates are rebuilding
I’ve been a Pirates fan since the days of Stargell, Sanguillen, Parker, and Tekulve. as I stated in the fanpost, I know what and why NH is doing what he’s doing, and I cannot see another way to return to another championship other than complete rebuilding from the minors up. yet such a wretched lineup as today’s game shakes my faith, much in the same way a religious person’s faith might be shaken after a horrible natural disaster.
I meant this fanpost not as troll material, but as a serious question, one that I hope to answer for myself (I have not voted in my poll yet). I am glad that you still have faith, Wilbur — if someone like yourself, who follows Pirates prospects better than anyone outside the PBC, still has faith, then there is hope for all.
I can wait
till 2020, if necessary, coz (as WTM puts it) i m not going to turn into a Nats fan or a Yankee fan. If I do need to wait till 2020, I will have different opinions of the management than I have now, but i’ll still be following the team.
The team’s not gonna be a pretty sight for a bit, but boy if they get on a streak anywhere, I’ll be cheering them on. If they don’t, i’ll wait for things to turn around. As long as the moves make sense, I m happy, unlike DL’s ridiculous trades. Sure they may not all come together, quickly, but heck, we are always taking chances. The point is, did we do our best, and keeping Freddy and Jack to make the team watchable (when those 2 were not injured and when Jack wasn’t whining) was not doing our best.
There’s a fellow Pirate fan I often meet at minor league games—the two of us have been speculating for years what a real rebuild would look like and whether it’d be “interesting” to watch the team during it. This is not easy. Seeing Freddy and Jack in different unis today in the PG was tough. When they’re looking really awful for the next year or so, I’m just gonna swallow hard and tell myself it has to be done.
The saving grace here is that the pitching is getting very close already. It’s good enough to prevent the ’62 Mets scenario.
/start sarcasm
Kill NH /end sarcasm
But really, it will be frustrating if we don’t break .500 by say 2013… but at least it won’t be because of a lack of effort and plan.
What I don’t understand (not pointing out anyone here) is why people think change (aka trades) is a bad thing. Obviously what we’ve had hasn’t worked for oh.. the last two decades.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 30, 2009 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Think about it this way: last season, before we traded Freddy, or Jack, or LaRoche, or Morgan, or McLouth, or Bay, or Nady, we were still a losing team. At that point, which was just a little over a year ago, we were still well below .500. We are right now, currently, also well below .500. Both seasons we really had/have no real chance to even get to .500, let alone a postseason berth.
Here’s the difference: At that same time last season, we had a barren farm system, which had been wiped clean of almost all value by the horrible deals that Littlefield made. Right now, we have a heavily stocked minor league system, which is now probably one of the top 10 in the league.
Had we kept the players we’ve traded over the last 2 seasons, we likely would have been able to get to .500 either this season or next, but it would have been a miracle if that team ever made the playoffs. I’m more than willing to wait 2 or 3 more seasons for our minor leaguers to develop, if it means that we’ll not only be above .500, but also a legitimate championship contender when they do.
This question has outside factors
Will they continue to draft (AND SIGN) overslot guys? Will they continue to pursue top international talent?
Will they avoid stop gap signings like Burnitz, Mondesi, Stairs, Sanders, Lofton, etc?
It’s really hard to judge this management team. I’m very excited about the recent trades. However, we have seen that they can dismantle a team for young talent. How will they judge this talent and figure out if we’re ready to compete? I’m still very in favor of the Buccos, and I can wait a few years, but I want to see improvement. Maybe not in the W-L column (I think we’ll be worse next year), but I want to see continued improvement of talent infusion. We’ve made big strides, but they’ve moved a lot of chips. Where do we go from here?
you're right
that it’s still early for this management team, but i can say with at least a modicum of confidence that the answer to your first three questions is “probably”, whereas two years ago the answer to all three would have been “not a snowball’s chance in hell”
just look at all the pirates top prospect!!!
Neal brought all those guys in except for Lincoln… i wouldnt be surprised if the pirates minor league system is top 10 ranked next year in baseball maby even top 5 after we deal Duke here by friday lol
Mark me down as ........
a Pirate Fan 4 Life. I expect Indianapolis to be a better club than Pittsburgh next
spring. Would’t that be a great problem to have?
by Pirate in Ole VA on Jul 30, 2009 1:04 AM EDT reply actions
By better do you mean..
if Indy played the Pirates in a best of seven they would win, type thing… cause that sounds scary.
Maybe we can get FSN to broadcast Indians games instead, haha.
As long as that Indy squad is the pirates squad in three years, ya that sounds great.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 30, 2009 1:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Yep
Pirates fan for life.
(Unless, of course, Bud Selig manages to land a team in SLC… that might cause issues. But I don’t ever see that happening, so yeah…)
True Blue Jazz
Thoughts From The Couch
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
Can wait...and will wait...
are two different things. I still need to see signs of progress continuing. We are at the point now…where the roster churn has to end shortly. Otherwise…there is nothing to look forward TO. You can always use the excuse that management is trying to improve the roster…but at some point…they have to take the approach that the future is now.
2010 will be Brutal! But 2011....
I see that the rest of this year and next year will be brutal. But when Spring Training for 2011 rolls around, let the games begin! The guys competing for spots then will be something to behold. Alvarez, Lincoln, Tabata, Sanchez, etc. We will have so many options at almost all postions that we will have to send many deserving guys back to AAA.
The 2011 team is the one I am waiting for!
PS: I go back to the Maz, Clemente, Stargell days (the 60’s). I have to say the upcoming bunch is as (or more exciting) than the bunch that came up in the late 60’s/early 70’s which resulted in the ‘71 champs. The only thing is that I don’t see two HOfers anywhere on the horizon. But then while Roberto was clearly a HOF guy; Willie did not look like one then.
This is a bad poll question.
I can’t answer this question since I will not give up being a Pirate fan under any conceivable scenerio.
from what I understand, when the NHL left places like Winnipeg and Quebec City,
many people there realigned their focus and enthusiasm to youth hockey, and retained only a passing interest in pro hockey. if I decided “I’m done” with the Pirates (and note that I haven’t voted in my own poll yet), that doesn’t mean I gotta become a Nationals fan (or change to any other team), or throw out my Roberto Clemente baseball cards. hopefully my 2-year-old son will want to try baseball when he’s older, and my wife and I will be behind him every step of the way. my point is, one can be a baseball fan without following a MLB team.
you’re right that it’s a bad poll question, though… there’s no “none of the above” option. just as I took a break from MLB following the 1994 work stoppage (and devoted my energies to grad school and playing in punk rock bands), I’ve decided that I need a break from these Pittsburgh Pirates.
I’ll be 40 next year… I work a full-time job that I love but has long hours, and have a young family at home that I love even more. right now, my “recreational” time is just too scarce to stay up late to catch the final score for a West Coast game, or “watch” a game via yahoo’s boxscore on a slow home computer with a dialup connection, or stay at work a little later so I could write a fanpost like the one above. (partially because I became a first-time father after I started writing it, it actually took me 2 years to finish my previous fanpost, re: which Pirates would you choose for the Atari RBI Baseball game.) and right now, I simply cannot justify my time and energy with such a guaranteed unrewarding short-term return.
finally, please understand I mean no slight to anyone here — I admire and respect your youthful enthusiasm, and hope the rest of you stick around until (if?) the PBC finally turns it around. but as a wise man once said, “I gotta go now.”
peace out!
The thing I'm worried about:
Is that the fan backlash when they lose 100 games next season is too much for Nutting to take and he hastily fires NH before the “plan” comes to fruition. I told my brother today that if THAT happens, and the GM that’s hired isn’t a forward thinking “modern” GM, but rather a money-making-keep-the-team-around-70-wins-Littlefield-wannabe then I’m done. And I really mean it.
Luckily, losing 100 games is pretty difficult. I’d take the 63+ win side of the wager for any team. I don’t expect the Pirates record to be substantially different than it has been the past decade or so.
by wickethewok on Jul 30, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I can see your point there. However, every single trade that Huntington’s made so far has been intended to further the team in 2011 or 2012, not make us a .500 team this season or next season. Through all of these moves, every single one of which has been met with backlash from both Pirate “fans” and the baseball community in general, Nutting has stuck with his GM, knowing that he has a plan in mind.
Currently we’re on pace to go 69-93, which isn’t good, but it certainly isn’t completely horrible, as the Nationals are likely to be. Let’s hope that this team will gel a little and get our record a little close to .500, but even if they completely fall apart and lose 100 games, there would likely be more backlash from real Pirate fans for firing Huntington than there would be from Pirate “fans” for losing 100 games, so I think Nutting will keep Huntington on.
I think we can rest assured
that Nutting would make such a rash and impulsive move by firing NH that way. If anything, I think Nutting is willing to take a new approach of leaving the difficult decisions to FC and NH and simply giving a “yes” or “no” when it comes to his approval.
And with a team president in FC that actually knows how a MLB team should be constructed (as opposed to a clueless media mogul who abused it like a bad fantasy team), and a GM in NH that has experience with taking a small market team and making it competitive (as opposed to bad talent evaluators and money managers like Bonifay and Littlefield), I would feel confident putting my trust and faith in them.
It’s funny when I read and hear people talking about “more of the same” with all of the moves being made. Then I have to remind them that the days of “Operation Shutdown”, Pat Meares, Jason Kendall, Jeromy Burnitz and other bad baseball/money moves are over.
If NH did what the fans want, like sink a bunch of money into players who weren’t worth it, put all of his eggs in the free agency basket, and put less emphasis on the draft and player development, then it actually WOULD be more of the same!
But it’s not. What he’s doing is taking the same approach that Branch Rickey did five decades ago that laid the groundwork for what became the ’60 World Series team. And it took moves like using a Rule 5 draft pick on a skinny outfielder from Puerto Rico, knowing that someday he could blossom into the first Latin-born star and an icon in the sport.
I don’t want a guy who just spends ridiculous amounts of money just to look like everybody else. I want someone who knows baseball, and what it takes to win. And while we won’t see the proof immediately, I’m fairly confident that guy is here. And for that, I can wait to see his work come to fruition.
As I've stated many times
I don’t expect to see another winner in my lifetime, so I;ve set the bar really really low. That means I’m in, for good.
it's not about just waiting
it’s about waiting, knowing a bus is coming. Whether that bus comes at 11, 12 or 13 matters less than if the bus is coming at all.
I see a contending team forming, and the better odds it develops, the less it will feel like waiting.
Pretty funny
18 people so far are ‘done right now’ but they are still scouring Pirate blogspace.
Makes sense.
I seriously think that someone should go through all the fanposts from the last 2 days and find all the people who are “done” with the Pirates after these trades. Then, if we’re a contending team again in 2011 or 2012, then those guys should be banned from the site for not having faith in Huntington’s rebuilding plan.
I'm in!
In the words of David Ortiz, “we’ll kick their ass, drink their beer, and fuck their bitches!”
"Straight ball I hit very much, but curveball, bats are afraid." - Pedro Cerrano
10 percent
If they move Grabow and his salary the Bucs 2009 team salary going forward will be 10 percent of the Yankees and close to half of the Marlins. The Marlins! Holy smokes, that is an unbelievable statistic.
Here’s hoping that the castoffs we’re getting will amount to more than the loveable losers they are replacing.

by 
















