Garrett Jones
Just curious about how everyone feels about Garrett Jones and the playing time he’s been getting lately? He’s only hitting .250 since his call up, but he’s got two homeruns and three RBI and five games. He has four strike outs already too. Personally, I’d rather see him in there than Moss or Pearce for the time being, but I haven’t heard much from the fan base yet in regards to him. He's got some speed and seems to be average in the field.
0 recs |
67 comments
Comments
Based on everything I've heard about him
He seems to be a below-average fielder with decent power and average speed but with marginal talent at best. He should be given ~200 AB to prove he can/can’t play in the ML, but I’d be very surprised if he turned out to be anything but a bench player.
by DialedtoGiles on Jul 5, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think he should get a chance to play if Lasting struggles when he comes up or Moss/Pearce dont perform. Hes done a pretty good job in the last couple of games.
Pow Right In The Kisser!
by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jul 5, 2009 7:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, personally I wouldn’t see him getting much time if it weren’t for the fact Moss has underperformed. Russell seems to like him quite a bit and that said, I guess he’s worth playing for the time being. Once Milledge is up, that will change some things if he is consistant.
by Scully on Jul 5, 2009 7:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think what we have here is a case in which the Pirates are overlyexcited about a player with good power because of the team’s abysmal offense. To a contender such as the Red Sox, Yankees, Phillies or Dodgers, Jones would be looked at as a solid bench player and nothing more. To the Pirates, a team desperate for any kind of offensive spark and power, Garrett Jones looks like a great candidate to be an everyday outfielder for the rest of the season. The Bucs have tons of trouble scoring runs and anytime a guy that has a chance to legitimately hit a ball over the fence enters the equation, he’s going to look good. This guy was blocked by great talent in Minnesota, and if he can continue to hit (because he’s going to get a lot of starts the rest of the season), he could stick around for another year or two. I think the Pirates are willing to give this guy a chance and see what he can do. Heck, he already has the same number of HR in four games that Moss has for the entire season. But having said all of that, I think the Pirates may be putting a bit too much stock in him because of how bad their offense is.
by mspirate on Jul 5, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
From what I've seen
Despite his 4 strike outs, Garrett Jones has had really good at bats in his games – much better than most of the Pirates. The thing is, he really is a first baseman, and I would expect to see him there when Adam LaRoche gets traded and Lastings Milledge comes up to play left. I think he’ll be here for the rest of the season and duke it out with Pearce for 1B for next year. I think Jones wins that battle and probably is the Pirates’ 1B until Alvarez comes up sometime in a couple of years.
by MarkInDallas on Jul 5, 2009 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heck, he already has the same number of HR in four games that Moss has for the entire season.
Yes, and he has the same number as DY, and MORE than Hinske, Vazquez, Diaz or Cutch, and only ONE LESS than Jack, JJ, or Monroe.
Hell, he’s only got TWO less than Luigi.
Yet, you keep throwing Moss in there.
Tiresome, mspirate, tiresome.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 5, 2009 7:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's see...
He trails our powerless SS, a guy who wouldn’t even playing if it weren’t for an injury to a starter (JJ) and a guy that isn’t even on the team anymore (Monroe). He has the same number of HR as another outfielder that doesn’t hit home runs and really is a bench player (DY). Lastly, he barely has more HR than another guy (that was a bench player) that isn’t on the team anymore because wasn’t producing (Hinske), a veteran bench player (Vazquez) and our 22-year-old CF who known for his speed, not his power (Cutch). Moss is a guy that supposedly has “tons of power”. So….what the hell is your point, cocktails? Once again, you’re laughable.
by mspirate on Jul 5, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laughable?
Perhaps. I make a lot of humor-based comments on BD.
I don’t, however, cherry-pick stats.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 5, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I could see Jones at first actually. I had to disagree with a comparison between him and Brad Edlred I read recently. Jones has some speed. The fielding might be an issue, but how many times did hear a radio broadcaster seriously consider that Eldred could lay down a bunt and beat it out? Jones has more tools than some of the other late bloomers we’ve seen wonder by lately. I like Adam LaRoche but if he goes I wouldn’t mind seeing Jones holding first for now.
by Scully on Jul 5, 2009 7:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, comparisons to Eldred are not valid, from what I’ve seen. Eldred really looked befuddled many times. I see Jones up there battling and looking to put the bat on the ball, rather than swinging and hoping that the ball hits the bat like Eldred. Despite the strikeouts, I have not felt Jones was over matched at the plate. The first game, he seemed a bit tentative, feeling things out, but since then he has put together some really good at bats.
by MarkInDallas on Jul 5, 2009 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
I see him as a younger version of Eric Hinske. In a roundabout way, he was called up to replace him. We upgraded at significantly lesser cost.
by vanslyke on Jul 5, 2009 8:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Done with Moss
After I think about it, even if we keep LaRoche (which seems unlikely) and after Milledge comes up, I’ll be disappointed if we don’t use Jones over Moss. If LaRoche goes (and Jones goes to first), I’d actually rather see Pearce get more time than Moss in whatever corner Milledge doesn’t hold down. Of course, I am assuming Milledge will hold down a corner..
If Jones can keep his slugging percentage up, he’s okay in my book. We need some power from somewhere. It’s only been a few games, but I feel more confident when Jones is at the plate.
by Scully on Jul 5, 2009 9:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
quick question about milledge...
why and how is he not on the 40 man roster? when we first got him he was on there and now he is not? wouldn’t we have to clear him through waivers to take him off of the 40 man roster? because im pretty sure he was still on Washingtons after he got sent down???
by BigB23 on Jul 5, 2009 10:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think...
That he’s on the 60-day DL, retroactive to when he broke his hand, and as such doesn’t count against the roster limit.
He’s not listed on the website, but they may just be waiting to add him to the web list until he’s ready to come to Pittsburgh.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball Prospectus has a major-league translation for Jones of .283/.323/.477 (which is .800 OPS) based on his AAA numbers. That’s not anything to write home about, but it’s not nuclear waste either and he could be a decent fill-in transition player with Pearce, Moss, and Delwyn Young until better young talent arrives for the Bucs.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 5, 2009 11:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, I think Pearce is as good as done with the Pirates. He’s not getting any starts in the outfield, and I think he’s strictly a bench player now. Maybe he plays some 1B when LaRoche gets traded, but the timing will probably be just right in that Milledge will come up to play LF (or RF) and Jones will move over to 1B. With Milledge, Moss, Cutch, Jones and DY in the outfield now, and Tabata and Hernandez waiting in the wings, there’s no room for Pearce to break through with us. Unless management sees him as a bench player for the rest of his career, I think we should let teams know he’s available in a trade and just get whatever we can in return for him.
by mspirate on Jul 5, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
About Pearce…I’d actually give him more opportunities than Jones, as he has a better translation of .270/.352/.476 which is a greater OBP because he draws more walks and almost the same slugging. 1B should be a L/R Pearce/Jones platoon at the very least without Adam. Trading him isn’t too bad either if he fits another team’s needs and we can get pitching.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 5, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to write Pearce off and I know it’s really too early to see who deserves more time out of him and Jones, but Jones seems like he’s already won over management and he actually hits left hand pitchers just about as well as righties.
Aside from that, I’d rather see the team give Pearce the chances they’ve given Moss this year. I know Moss is young, but it would be interesting to see what Pearce or Jones would have done up to now with Moss’ number of at bats. If Moss collects the same number of at bats in the second half and can figure out how to hit .275 or so with 10 homeruns, I wouldn’t complain, but he’s need to pick it up – just one hit for him the entire Marlins series (even though Jones only had two, he generally had better at bats and actually managed a hit off Nolasco).
by Scully on Jul 5, 2009 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That'd be pretty awesome
considering that’s better than half our starting lineup.
by DialedtoGiles on Jul 6, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let him play, and please NH , deal Snell by Wednesday at the latest.
We have seen what Moss can do, now son, take a seat for a few weeks, hopefully more.
Moss just don’t have the makings of a MLB player, sorry if you all disagree. I have seen enough of this guy.
If he has to stay on the team, his role should be a pinch hitter, maybe a start or 2 a week, and a 7th inning defensive replacement.
If the team is not going to take off the blinders, and let Doumit continue to catch upon his return. Jones should get the majority of the Ab’s in right field.
If and when, and pray when Adam La roche gets the boot, he gets that position, on a steady basis, depending on the Pirates positioning of Doumit.
After the AS break, i would like to see an outfield of Milledge, Mc Cutchen, and either Jones, or Doumit.
If 1st base becomes a new open position, one of those 2 can play there a few times a week.
If Doumit is going to return, and hopefully stay healthy, the team should not let him play more than 3 to 4 games a week there.
Pearce, that is another guy i group in the Moss categorie. He has shown me nothing this time with the club, and i think his swing and approach at the plate, is just obnoxious.
Wish they could package him with Snell and Bixler and get back a AAA shortstop who is ready to play in the bigs NOW.
This performance by Snell had to give NH a woody, thinking offers will be more serious, for this clown, than in the previous weeks.
Hopefully NH can dump Snell by wednesday, thursday is his next scheduled start, and if he goes through with it, the team is playing with fire.
No reason this guy should have to throw another pitch for the Pirates organization, with all these other ML teams looking for starting pitching help.
I would think the White Sox, Angels, Phillies, Rockies and Rangers are the teams that NH should be burning up the phone lines with.
It’s simple in return for Snell, the team needs back a major league ready SS, in AA or AAA.
Throw is Pearce and Bixler, but that is all the team needs in return for this clown.
No deal?, then move on to the next club, and keep repeating this procedure until Snell is sent packing .
Don’t need him, don’t want him, can’t win with him.
Make the deal , Neil, and don’t drag your ass about it either.
by tom p on Jul 6, 2009 2:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A year?
That’s all we need to pass judgment of a player! It’s not like Moss is blocking anybody important in the minor leagues. Let him play out the rest of the year.
by ryebr3ad on Jul 6, 2009 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moss
I just think the Pirates have handed him a lot of playing time and he hasn’t done a lot with it. I am not impressed, regardless. He should be fighting for time, just like Young, Pearce, and Jones (we could even toss Salazar into the mix for now). Between now and the break, even to the trade deadline, I want us going with the hot bat. After the deadline, if there are spots open because Freddy and Adam are gone, that’s great – hope Moss can get it together and earn some more time. Garrett Jones might just be slugging out of the gate, but he’s matched Moss’ homerun total in five starts… Delwyn Young isn’t far off Moss’ production in a little over half the at bats.
If the Pirates can get on a roll (and I know that’s a big if), we might actually have a little something working for us this year. Moss has been up and down this year with his average, and he’s sitting at .259 right no without any clear sign of approaching a power surge. I thought having Pearce, Salazar, and Jones around might motivate Moss, but that hasn’t been the case – he has two hits since Jones’ call up. If Adam LaRoche goes we’ve absolutely got to get some power from somewhere, and Jones could be that source, however unlikely – we need to know.
I have no idea how the roster is going to look by the first of next month and Doumit may not be confined to behind the plate. As far as I am concerned, after the deadline if we’re less than ten games back and there isn’t a spot for Garrett Jones, there shouldn’t be a spot for Brandon Moss.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of playing time?
He gets every other game, and rarely faces LHPs.
True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
by UtesFan89 on Jul 6, 2009 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jeebus Christmas
stabs self in the ear
by bucdaddy on Jul 6, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ONLY .250
that pretty good for a Pirate “power” hitter, seeing how we have no power hitters. I like the way he busts his butt down the line on infield grounders. He deserves as much a shot at regular playing time as the majority of the team. Leave him in, and if he fails you now to look elsewhere next year.
by rocket25 on Jul 6, 2009 9:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A useful reminder:
Brandon Moss, AAA, career: .282/.359/.485
Garrett Jones, AAA, career: .265/.321/.463
Brandon Moss: Good-to-great OF defender
Garrett Jones: Poor OF defender
Brandon Moss: 25, still improving
Garrett Jones: 28, already at peak
Don’t fall in love with Garrett Jones. It won’t end well.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But The Ponies
What if magical baseball ponies come and grant Garret Jones his wish to be a good major leaguer at the late age of 28 despite being a mediocre minor leaguer?
You’re forgetting about the ponies.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 6, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stupid ponies
Now if it was a penguin… (or a unicorn)
True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
by UtesFan89 on Jul 6, 2009 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another useful reminder:
A lot of people here loved the shit out of Xavier Nady in 2008, wished we hadn’t traded him (“best outfield in baseball!”), etc. Huntington described Moss as a Nady type when the Bay trade was made, and has compared the two on numerous occasions.
Xavier Nady, through age 25: .265/.319/.396 in 449 AB, 93 OPS+
Brandon Moss, through age 25 (to date): .254/.312/.410 in 473 AB, 91 OPS+
But by all means, bail on Moss to make more PT for a AAAA lifer.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Next Morgan or McLouth?
The best case scenario for any of the trio of Moss, Pearce, and even Jones is that they out-perform their 4th outfielder/bench player forecast and become a valuable asset. I’d even add Delwyn to the mix as well because he has a good bat. We could have cited stats all day to show why McLouth should have never gotten a starting opportunity, but when he got to the majors his power went up way past what he had shown in the minors. Morgan appeared to be the quintessential pinch-runner/defensive replacement only type as a career minor leaguer up to age 28, but his plate discipline improved this year (along with outstanding defense) to where he is a competent leadoff hitter and was an attractive target to other teams.
The overwhelming odds are that none of them will be average or better players, but the only to find out is to give them shots. We’ve given Moss a lot of opportunities, and he hasn’t capitalized like we had hoped. I’d take that to mean giving Pearce and possibly others more opportunities to see if something is there, but your mileage may vary.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
While the odds are against all four...
…the odds aren’t equal among the four. Even after Moss’s mildly disappointing 2009, he’s still got a much better shot of becoming a productive corner starter than the other three, based on defensive abilities and career performance.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The anti-Pearce sentiment is for defense, right? But he has a better bat and especially more power than Moss, which should more than offset the defense factor. But, he is also on Huntington’s shit list, which means never getting into the game. While we see more of Neal’s acquisitions because he wants credit for everything. I like most of what Neal has done, and like you said the odds are against any of them (though I think you’re overrating Moss) and this is a very small deal, but it still doesn’t sit right.
Given the other OF options, 1 start in 2 weeks is a potential waste.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 6, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm OK with Pearce getting some OF starts for now to stay warm...
…but at this point his future (here or otherwise) is at 1B. If/when LaRoche is traded, he’s going to get his own chance to sink or swim.
I’m not hugely sanguine about Moss, and if we had a ML-ready guy of, say, Tabata’s pedigree, I’d have no qualms about making Moss a backup. I just don’t see the point in tossing aside the 5% chance (or whatever) of Moss becoming an asset so we can give OF PT to a guy like Jones who has basically no offensive upside and can’t even field the position.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not so sure Pearce gets the playing time at 1B when/if Mario gets traded. IF (big if) Garrett Jones continues to hit and hit for power, he will probably get a majority of the playing time at 1B. And as far as Moss goes, he hasn’t done anything this year in the power department. They call Garrett Jones up and he hits 2 HR in his first 4 games with the big club (as many as Moss has for the entire season). That is getting the Pirates excited, maybe too much, because on a team so desperate for any kind of offensive spark and power, a guy hitting the ball over the fence is going to look appealing, and he is going to get playing time. I’m not saying it’s right or wrong, but I don’t think fans can be upset with Jones getting PT because Moss continues to show that he is a fourth outfielder in this league at best. Moss has been given a year to prove himself and hasn’t done anything with it. How long can the Pirates wait?
by mspirate on Jul 6, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I’m not saying it’s right or wrong..."
I am. Specifically, I’m saying it’s wrong.
Giving PT to Jones is a waste, when we have so many other options that would actually benefit from it, who might actually be useful parts of a future team.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, Moss has had a full year to prove himself. How long can the Pirates wait?
by mspirate on Jul 6, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, no he hasn't.
He’s had 115 starts, about 2/3 of a season’s playing time, scattered across three seasons. It’s very hard for a guy to get into a rhythm when used like that.
And even if you were going to count all three seasons’ worth of starts, then you’d also have to count all three seasons’ worth of hitting. Which brings him back up to a 91 OPS+…
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, you make a good point, but it’s obvious that the Pirates aren’t committed to letting him be an everyday player. Whetheror not we want to see Moss playing every game in order to get that fair shot, it looks as though the Pirates have already made up their mind about him as he only plays once every three games. I’m not the biggest Moss fan, but this is what I don’t understand about the Pirates. They made the Bay trade and got Moss in return. They want to see if Moss can be an everyday player and if he’s going to be part of the future, yet he only plays once every three days or so like I mentioned. I don’t understand what they are doing with him. If they aren’t going to let him play everyday, then they might as well just relegate him to the bench. Maybe they’re already in the process of doing that. Who knows.
by mspirate on Jul 6, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also also:
Since I get accused of being a Moss fanboy from time to time, let me just throw this out there. I’m one of the lowest guesses in the thread.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 11:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Moss vs. Jones
I’ve read everything regarding Moss that you mentioned here, and I understand where you are coming from: Moss is younger, although he’ll be 26 before the season’s end (Jones just turned 28), and he has a better long term upside. Right now, he’s not getting it done. If you think he’s gotten too little play time to prove himself, the bottom line is that he’s had 212 at bats to do something and he hasn’t. Remember how long it took it to collect his first RBI and HR his year? He’s playing a corner outfield spot, and we need more now. Moss will still be here next year (can’t say the same for Jones) and maybe we’ll remember ’09 as a terrible season for Moss, but I don’t like seeing him out there. He was actually more offensively productive last season in ¾ the at bats (.222/6/23), sans his average. I hope Moss turns it around, but I want to win now – not keep awaiting for the guy who, in the best case for him, is going to be displaced by Jose Tabata in few years anyway. I have not been convinced by Moss at any stage that he’ll consistently produce in the majors – he was great in class A, so-so in AA, and had mixed results in AAA, and was okay with Boston. Since being a Pirate.. well, everyone here knows.
Not saying that Jones is a gift from the heavens to the Pirates, but at this point I ready to see anybody until Moss really picks it up. His .259/.311/.377 isn’t worth preserving at this point. You give Jones 200-250 at bats over the next 81 games we could see .260/.300/.500 with more speed and possibly way more power. They both bat left, so we aren’t going or losing anything there. And not that it matters, but Jones has to be at least somewhat more intimidating to opposing pitchers – he’s almost half a foot taller and 40 pounds heavier. Jones will probably go down on strikes a bit, but it’s not as if it’s impossible to strike out Moss. Best case scenario: we trade Jones for a prospect at some point next season if he stays somewhat productive. Worst case: Jones goes ice cold, proves that he is in fact a career minor leaguer, looks like a fool in the field and we send him down by mid-August. If that happens, I just hope we don’t fall back on Moss by default. I rather see us give Pearce a shot, even them he appears to be stuck in the doghouse.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you think Jones
will have a slugging percentage of 500?, wow
by Green_Wave on Jul 6, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very possible
He only slugged .338 in Minnesota during his other major league stint in 2007 (where he also hit a dismal .208/.262 in 77 at bats) but I am thinking he can greatly improve on that in a different environment and more playing time where, for the most part, he isn’t under the pressure he was in Minnesota. He has to feel a little safer here, at least for the next few weeks, given the deadline approaching and our other outfield options, who, aside from Moss, probably won’t be given a fair chance. He’s slugging a .700 right now, and while he’ll lose that very quickly, not reason why he couldn’t hover around .500 in that department given the fact he does have some pop and speed to possible pick up doubles. Let’s not forget, at meaningless at it is to mention, his guy almost hit for the cycle last week, which you say something about his speed (or the Mets poor fielding).
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be shocked if Jones put up a .500 SLG in the majors.
He managed a SLG of .500+ only two times in his eleven minor league seasons, counting this year’s .502, and it’s not like the pitchers in MLB are easier than the ones in AAA.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point Taken
Jones career SLG number in the minors is only .450. And he was wasn’t too fantastic in the slugging department during his stint with the Twins. However, over the last three years he’s been in the minors, counting his one, (granted he had only 277 at bats this year at Indy), his SLG number has been closer to .480. Jones would have to get his act together to post a .500 SLG, but this is his last good chance at the major league level in my opinion. If Garrett Jones is going to do it, he’s going to have to do it now. The Pirates should get the very best play from him right now.. and if that play is like 2007 in Minnesota, then by all means bring on Brandon.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do realize
that there are only around 40 guys that have slugging percentages at or above 500 each year…you are saying that Jones can be one of the top 40 guys in terms of power in the entire major league
by Green_Wave on Jul 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am not trying to figure what he’d do over a full season and I doubt he’s muster that type of slugging number over, say 450 at bats. I am looking at him right now, apparently with a somewhat hot bat, over the next 81 games.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Even with half a season's worth of at bats
around 40 people have 500 slugging percentages.
And two good games does not qualify as having a hot bat. You are just being reactionary to someone hitting two home runs and almost hitting a cycle in his first few games. There are players that have done that before such as Daryle Ward.
by Green_Wave on Jul 6, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Daryle Ward..
I am not arguing the difficulty of posting slugging percentage of .500 and I am not being reactionary. In response to that, I’d say don’t hold the fact that the guy has never had a great opportunity against him. I’ve followed Jones since his last couple years at Rochester and he’s streaky. If he is on a hot streak right now and gets into a grove with decent playing time, his slugging percentage is going to be great, .500 or not. If he’s cold, he’ll wind up at back Indy or worse, end of story.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And don't forget Hoyt Wilhelm
who hit a home run in his first major league AB but never hit another in his entire 20 + year career. Let’s at least wait until Jones hits, say, 5 in his first 100 ABs or so before we start considering him a slugger.
by WestCoastBuc on Jul 6, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Put him at first after we trade ad. Laroche, we wouldn’t be missing much in avg and I think he’s got a more consistent pop in his bat and actually hustles on ground balls, at least he looks like he wants to compete
CITY OF CHAMPYINZ
by YINZER on Jul 6, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Power in the line up?
I like the idea of a power right fielder. What kind of arm does jones have? I would like a milledge, mcutchen, and jones. With cuth’s speen there would be no such thing as a defensive liability. Playing next to him would make me a good right fielder. Any one else notice our little losing streak since Nyjer left?
by jimmutt on Jul 6, 2009 1:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We had
losing streaks with Nyjer on the team if you didn’t notice the not so little one after we were 11-7
by Green_Wave on Jul 6, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones at First
Jones doesn’t have a great arm, but I agree – McCutchen would make him look like a better fielder than he is.. And I hope we reserve the bad luck we’ve had since Nyjer was traded – I think we will.
Jones is a natural first baseman, and while he probably won’t be as good as Adam in the field, he might produce the same number of extra base hits and steal a few bases. If and when he starts taking walks, his OBP could be quite a bit less umimpressive.
If Adam goes, move Jones to first, let Moss split time in right with Pearce. If one of those three guys goes cold, shuffle them. Milledge, McCutchen, Moss/Pearce wouldn’t be a bad outfield.
by Scully on Jul 6, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Arm
Saying that Garrett Jones doesn’t have a great arm is like saying that Kazakhstan doesn’t have a great Air Force.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 6, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because it made me wonder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Kazakhstan#Air_and_Air_Defense_Forces
It’s actually better than I had expected.
by Vlad on Jul 6, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jones is no way in our long plans, he is a back up MLBer at best
by PensRock1 on Jul 6, 2009 3:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, it seems as though Moss isn’t in the long term plans, either, since he’s already being platooned (and really only playing about once every three days) in the outfield. The Pirates look as if they have already made their mind up about Moss. So I guess it really doesn’t matter who plays between Jones and Moss. Lord, we could argue this forever.
by mspirate on Jul 6, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
An argument
or debate, if you prefer, implies that I have at least a 0.000005% chance of changing your mind about anything. Since I don’t, “we” do not have arguments. “You” have a soapbox, and when “you” are done pontificating, “you” take “your” soapbox and go home. So “I” will waste my time in other pursuits than trying to get “you” to see logic and common sense.
by bucdaddy on Jul 7, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow..that was cool. Could you do that again?
by mspirate on Jul 7, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
include me out.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 7, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












