Pirates "Pushing" to Make Freddy Sanchez Deal
Possibly to the Rockies or Giants, but the Post-Gazette makes it sound like they're holding a little auction here.
Despite the way this article sounds, there's really no reason for the Bucs to get desperate here. Sanchez is potentially under contract for 2010 at a reasonable price, he's playing very well, there's no one ready to replace him.
Of course, those first two reasons are also good reasons to trade him. As a 31-year-old second baseman with a not-insignificant injury history, Sanchez isn't a great bet to keep this up for too long. And as a guy who doesn't walk a lot, his value is highly dependent upon his batting average. Thankfully, he's very good at hitting for average, but he won't always bat .316 the way he is now. It's entirely possible that his value will never be higher.
I know that hunting for guys who play specific positions hasn't been part of the front office's M.O. so far, but if the Bucs trade Sanchez, I'd look for them to seek a young second baseman in return. The Pirates don't currently have anyone besides Sanchez who I'd want to see playing every day. Ramon Vazquez has inspired no confidence this year, Delwyn Young is a brutal fielder, and Brian Bixler and Luis Cruz have shown no indication they can hit big-league pitching. Further down the depth chart, Shelby Ford and Jim Negrych are having disappointing seasons, and Negrych is as bad or worse at fielding than Young.
As always, I have to admire Neal Huntington's willingness to do incredibly unpopular things. If he times this right, he might get rid of Sanchez just before Sanchez is scheduled to appear as the Pirates' lone representative at the All-Star Game.
0 recs |
123 comments
|
Comments
Oh, Good
It’s easier to get a good deal when you look desperate, right?
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 3:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Freddy for Ian Stewart.
Sounds good to me.
by phil79 on Jul 9, 2009 3:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heck yeah. If I were NH, I’d make that deal in a heartbeat, although it sounds like the Rockies are more willing to move Garrett Atkins than they are Stewart. You could convert Stewart or LaRoche (Andy) into a 2B.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Andy LaRoche Is Not Going To Be A Second Baseman
In this life, or the next.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is kind of funny how people seem to think life is like Ken Griffey Jr Baseball for SNES and you can just move guys to different positions seamlessly all willy-nilly.
Mike Lavalliere in centerfield FTW
by TravisDW on Jul 9, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand....
the argument that we don’t have any bona fide replacements for Freddy or Jack in the organization right now. What I don’t understand is the people who argue that we are rebuilding, but at the same time are worried about what we are going to put out there to replace them.
Honestly, for the rest of this season, who cares? The more important point that I think Charlie touched on, is that they will probably never have more value than they have today. Make the best deal possible and let’s continue the process. Obviously, we don’t give either of them away, but if we can get what NH & Co. think is a reasonable return, it’s time to pull the trigger.
by dtoddwin on Jul 9, 2009 3:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I can think of a couple of reasons
1. If a young player comes up before he is ready, and ends up with 35 hits in 200 AB with 72Ks, and a SLG ~ BA, it probably does nothing good for him. Although probably extended playing time is good, he’ll adjust etc etc. I know there are both sides to it, but having a player get taken apart by ML pitchers is prolly not good for him. Better Vazquez (shudder) at 2nd everyday than have someone torn apart. But then, we need to be fairly confident Bixler/Cruz will be ready for the big leagues in 2010 (ok maybe 2011)
2. I don’t know what having a horrendous team making 1.4 errors a game will do for signing draft picks etc.
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know if you’re serious or joking about Bixler/Crux being ready for the bigs in 2010, but I hope you’re joking. Bixler is as good as done with the Pirates and has no future with the team. Cruz, I don’t think he has a future with the Pirates, either, although I’ll give him a better chance than Bixler. These guys are stopgaps at best, and (shudder) maybe they play the 2nd half of the season with the big club, but they are not serious options to be the everyday SS/2B in 2010 or any other year.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mostly hoping against hope, like with the Pirates :)
So if we are to have a contending team in 2011/12, what does the MI look like?
Shelby Ford surely needs at least 2 more years, even if he has a great 2010, just to see if he can sustain.
Brian Friday/Jim Negrych- not likely, given that they are hardly making a big impression in AA, although they might be the next best hopes
D’Arnaud- doing well in High A, hope he makes some rapid strides
Mercer- average at High A.
So if neither of Bixler / Cruz is gonna make it, they have to come from trades. Paints a pretty sad picture of the farm system.
I hope 2011- Alvarez- corner infield, Tabata, McCutchen, Milledge/Hernandez- OF (someone I m missing in OF?), maybe we could trade Maholm for solid prospects close to ML ready, maybe next year- dunno!
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. NH knows how bad our MI situation is in the farm system, whether it be guys that are significantly underperforming in Double or Triple-A or a situation where the more promising players are still 3-4 years from being ready. I think we will see some middle infield prospects that are close to major league ready come our way in these upcoming trades. We HAVE to get some MI prospects back. We don’t have a choice. If not, you’re right, we don’t have anybody ready to step in and play MI at the big league level. It would get ugly.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather see ugly big-league play now...
…than take an OK MIF prospect instead of a good non-MIF prospect.
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Imagine me screaming “talent!” (or “prospects!”) in this video instead of “developers.” That’s how strongly I feel about that issue.
The cadence doesn’t match, but whatever.
by CptnAwesome on Jul 9, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
2B Replacement
I think i’d rather see DY and his inevitable 1.5 errors/game take over at 2B and see what he can do with the bat over an extended amount of time, than see Vazquez take over with his phone booth like range, and no stick.
by los angeles bucco of anaheim on Jul 9, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Has the term
“Six of one, half dozen of the other” ever applied better?
by vanslyke on Jul 9, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For me, it'd depend...
…on whether we’re trying to shop Maholm/Duke or not. If so, run out the best D you can until the trade’s made, to maximize the value of the pitchers.
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that Maholm/Duke
would be well suited for McLouth like deals next year. We could use them to fill in the development gaps for all of our new prospects because we have control (Duke) and reasonable contracts (Maholm).
by vanslyke on Jul 9, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For the right deal, trading anybody can be a good idea. But I’m not hot on letting Duke go. Pitchers can take longer to develop than other players. I think Duke still has more upside than downside.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duke has a little bit of upside, but since he is a soft-tosser there is not very much margin for error. If his ERA didn’t correct itself to around 4.25 by the end of the year, I’d be surprised. Sure, he could settle in as a Ted Lilly or even Mark Buehrle type, but there’s probably a better probability of going the other way with a pitcher of his type.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
He might even get good with it!
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't read all of the comments yet, but
It seems to me that keeping Jack and, to a lesser but still important extent, Freddy, would be a good idea in as much their defense really improves the pitching staff. I’ve been a fan of the moves over the last year and don’t harbor any ideas of false or premature gradeur, but I have been of the opinion that the team can be respectable sooner than most regulars on this board. For that happen, however, the team needs to maintain stellar middle infield defense.
If it were up to me, unless I was blown away, I’d be looking to keep Jack and Freddy and even extent them for a year for the right price.
If we dump Adam, Jack & Freddy, what will our payroll project to for 2010? I’m in a quiet minority about the value of signing some decent free agents. But that is a different story.
Good day.
by Uncle Nate on Jul 9, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freddy could go soon
According to Pompeani on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/KDPomp
by thecheeseisblue on Jul 9, 2009 3:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else
already angry at what the “experts” and the yinzers are going to say about this deal? (if it happens)
by Green_Wave on Jul 9, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You should read the P-G Blog
They’re already apoplectic without knowing who we’d even be getting in return.
by biggyv on Jul 9, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'M NEVER SETTING FOOT IN PNC PARK AGAIN1!!1
…buys all-you-can-eat seats for SkyBlast 2009 and Garrett Jones Bobblehead night…
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just read a trade proposal
One reader suggested a Freddy for Braun trade because the Brewers GM doesn’t like Braun right now.
Ugh, seriously?
"Everybody panic! If you have a small child, use it as a shield! They love tender meat."
by BattlinBucs on Jul 9, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!!!
Take tht trade without a second thought!
The Brewers GM (Doug Melvin?) would be fired v v quickly!!!
Did the proposal also say the Brewers would take on both salaries?
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hahahahaha!
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Another salary dump! I’m done with this team! Especially if they don’t sign that Sando kid.
by thecheeseisblue on Jul 9, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he's only 16!!!!!
Why would you spend money on a 16 year-old when we could have signed Bobby Abreu and won 71 games instead of 68!!!!!
by biggyv on Jul 9, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly I don't know what they're doing
If they trade with San Francisco it better be for Tim Lincecum or I’m done with this team. And from Colorado it better be Matt Holliday. Because Freddy is THAT GOOD!
by thecheeseisblue on Jul 9, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Holiday plays for the A’s
"Baseball is better than football. Think about it, eighty degrees, a cold beer and a short-sleeve shirt is better than 30 degrees, a hip flask and six layers of clothes under a lap blanket. Take your pick: suntan or frostbite. " - Thomas Boswell
by Ketcham Bruce on Jul 9, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ha…it looks like cheese guy doesn’t follow baseball all that closely.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
(it’s a joke)
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think you did.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jul 9, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re onto something.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, no.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 9, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
That was indeed part of the joke.
by thecheeseisblue on Jul 9, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think NH needs to buy low
Send Freddy to the Blue Jays for Roy Halladay, and sign Halladay to long term contract quick!
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe they could sweeten the pot
and throw Jose Bautista back in the mix….
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahaha
if we drafted him then traded for him twice i might die laughing.
by johnnycuff on Jul 9, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Middle Infielders Available
It seems there aren’t many AAA level (or above) ‘high ceiling’ middle infielders available for the Bucs to acquire, unless we can sweet talk Braves or Brewers into giving us an Escobar or talk the Angels into giving us Wood. Considering that we have some decent prospects at in Single A, would you rather get:
1) low ceiling middle IF prospects, close to ML ready (a la Eric Young), or
2) best prospects available that are close to ML ready, regardless of position, or
3) the best prospects possible, regardless of position and level, and let it sort itself out as they become ML ready
and for an idea completely out of left field, is there any possibility that if Milledge and Tabata continue to progress through the end of this season, that G. Hernandez could be converted into a SS/2B next year? He seems to have the athleticism/arm for it, but i’m not sure how easy of a transition that is. He would have an average to above average bat for a SS/2B, but it’s below average for a corner outfielder, and we seem to have centerfield pretty well nailed down.
by los angeles bucco of anaheim on Jul 9, 2009 4:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Would love Brandon Wood
But Reagins ain’t selling him — he’s thinking that Yankees will get Chone Figgins to play OF when he becomes a free agent this winter, and he needs Wood as the regular 3B next year.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 9, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We Will Give you Howie Kendrick
For Freddy Straight up.. Freddy is my neighbor and im an Angels fan… You know what that means right? Free tickets whenever the f*** i want!! But in all seriousness.. We will Trade you Brandon Wood for freddy now and we will move him to 3rd when figgy leaves. Howie can play second maybe or we will sign someone. We just want Freddy.
Nick Adenhart.
by WillGoAngels27 on Jul 10, 2009 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look, I don’t know if this is a salary dump or an actual move that NH feels can make the team better, but I do know one thing: If we have a middle infield tandem of Bixler/Cruz in the second half, I seriously don’t know if I can watch this team from here on out. There really would be no point in watching. It would be torture and we’d easily lose 100+ games.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On the positive side
our players won’t break their toes celebrating all those pesky wins! (lol @ Ryan Dempster)
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 9, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Somehow, I think you’ll manage.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's quite right
Watching the game yday was terrible, but wth, I m pretty sure I’ll watch most of them. And probly even go to PNC park with $9 I don’t have and send the economy further into a tailspin!
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I’m definitely on board with the full rebuilding mode as opposed to the half-assed rebuilding mode we’ve had the past decade, and I’ve liked/loved the deals they’ve made so far this season, I do have to wonder why NH seems to be in such a hurry to deal these guys. Is it because he genuinely feels he’ll not get any better deals if he waits? I’m not saying there’s anything shady going on it just seems kind of….. odd
by TravisDW on Jul 9, 2009 4:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Worried about Freddy's back?
Trying to tank for Harper?
Who knows?
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
could it be
that some NL exec who wants Freddy says, in effect, “they’re desperate to trade him” to the Pittsburgh press to drive the price down?
by dirtyfrank on Jul 9, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, maybe.
But Dejan’s a decent enough writer that he’d probably check with the FO anyway.
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bob P twittering
but Dejan isnt. I go with Dejan…..
by vanslyke on Jul 9, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bob P Is A World Class Yutz
He’ll say anything that he heard from anybody for any reason.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we should...
tank for Harper. I would do it if I were NH.
by joegonzo on Jul 9, 2009 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All the tanking in the world isn’t going to get last place overall anyway. I’m pretty sure the Nats have that locked up, what with their under .300 win% at this point. It would take some seriously bad play for the Pirates to lose that much the rest of the way. Unfortunately they spoiled their chances with a +.500 June.
by Schide on Jul 9, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Harper
Is going to go for a ridiculous price. I know that he’s this year’s Can’t Miss Prospect, but a lot of those Can’t Miss Prospects end up being a miss. I find it very hard to justify paying the kind of money that he and Scott Boras are going to demand.
And Harper has been quite up front about what his baseball dreams are. He wants to play for the Yankees. It almost seems like there’s no point in drafting him if you’re not the Yankees. He’s just gonna do everything he can to end up in pinstripes anyway.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the midst of all this trade talk, there was some good news down on the farm today...
Doumit has finally broken out. He went 2-for-4 today for Indy. At Altoona, Pedro went 2-for-3 with no K’s and a walk. Gorkys Hernandez hit his second HR with the Curve.
Oh, does anybody know why the Pirates are keeping Lastings Milledge down in Bradenton this long? DK reported that he was going to be reporting to Triple-A last Sunday.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I imagine
they’re just being cautious with his finger… no need to rush him, since we’re not going anywhere anyway…
I'm droppin' flava, my behavior is hereditary--but my technique is very necessary.
by phillybucco on Jul 9, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s true, but I would still like him to get to the big team so he can get some at-bats and see what he looks like. If his finger is still bothering him, then keep him down there. But I just find it weird that DK reported that, but he, in fact, didn’t report to Indianapolis. DK has very reliable sources. Maybe there was a setback that DK wasn’t aware of? Anyway, I was just curious. Good to see Doumit get some hits.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know why we are so concerned
as to who will play 2nd base for Freddy when he leaves. I don’t care who plays 2nd base till 2011 at the earliest.
By then I would hope we would do one of the following
Move Andy to 2nd (My personal favorite)
Find someone in the farm system who can pose decently at a 2B
Trade for a Major League ready or near ready 2B… but I don’t think we need a 2nd baseman back for Freddy. We have plenty of other pieces to trade to get that 2nd baseman if Andy or whoever doesn’t workout. I say we get the best pieces possible.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 9, 2009 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Andy is about AVG fielder at 3B, what is the optimistic result of a move to 2B? Minus 10 runs at best?
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
-10 sounds about right.
Give or take, of course.
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t Freddy a 3B? He moved to 2B OK.
And “Scrap Iron” Phil Garner went from being the regular 3B to 2B when the PBC acquired “Mad Dog” Bill Madlock. That worked out ok, too — PBC only won WS out of it.
I have absolutely no idea whether Andy LaRoche can play 2B and no opinion. (I vote the PBC try to acquire Sean Rodriguez from the LAA for Grabow and Moskas.)
But some 3B do fine at 2B.
by WstCstBucco on Jul 9, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freddy was a better third-baseman than Andy is.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Freddy also played shortstop as well, so it is natural that he would be at least decent up the middle.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Per UZR...
…Freddy went from a double-digit plus defender at 3B to averageish at 2B.
So, yeah, like I said: Moving from 3B to 2B is good for about -10 runs, depending on the guy.
by Vlad on Jul 9, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm in the....
trade Freddy camp, but isn’t he rated very high this year defensively?
by dtoddwin on Jul 10, 2009 4:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not all that high.
UZR says +5.2/150 this year and +4.2/150 for his career at 2B, which is solid, valuable play, but nothing exceptional. Among starters, that puts him sixth, right between Dustin Pedroia and Clint Barmes.
It’s also about 10 runs below his standard at 3B, as I noted earlier (+17.9/150 for his career).
by Vlad on Jul 13, 2009 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I m not sure about the "other pieces"
What do we have if we trade Freddy?
Adam LaRoche and Jack Wilson. Ok Doumit, too.
I m not totally sure we could get 2 ML ready-ish MI prospects through those. One, maybe, 2 is stretching it!
After that, we start trading away the pitchers. And I don’t know how much room we have there- lose good starting pitching, and it’ll take forever to get close to contending again.
by BurgherKing on Jul 9, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What good starting pitching do we have to trade away?
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
John Perrotto:
…The Rockies are said to be willing to part with relief prospect Casey Weathers, their first-round draft pick in 2007, who will miss the entire season after undergoing Tommy John surgery on his elbow in March. Weather, 24, was 2-1 with two saves and a 3.05 ERA in 44 games with Class AA Tulsa last season.
Another name that has reportedly has been brought up in trade talks is Rockies outfielder Carlos Gonzalez. The 23-year-old left-handed hitter is batting .224 with one homer, five RBIs in five steals in 23 games for Colorado. He began the season with Colorado Springs and had a .339 batting average with 10 homers, 59 RBIs and six steals in 48 games.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A lot of Tommy John guys come back better than before they got hurt.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. I also like the upside on Gonzalez, although he has bounced around even more than Milledge. He has a lot of tools, but also comes with baggage.
I’m torn on putting most of our eggs in the talented but troubled OF basket…
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m also a little concerned with the age of all these guys: Morton, Milledge, Gonzalez, Weathers are all 24+ and haven’t put it all together yet. I’m just worried that window could close on all of them before they do.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jul 9, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Point taken, although Gonzalez won’t be 24 until October 17.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oops. My mistake.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jul 9, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that enough for Sanchez?
If EYJ is in the mix, I’d be inclined to say yes.
by biggyv on Jul 9, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I sort of agree as well. Gonzalez would be the key to the deal from here based on talent, even though he would be ANOTHER OUTFIELDER!!!!!
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so concerned about Gonzalez being an OF
The Bucs need to accumulate talent at this stage. They can work out the other stuff once they’re in a position to contend.
by biggyv on Jul 9, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. I was just doing Yinzer-ese.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They also mention EY Jr. as the third piece.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’ll see what happens. I know the Pirates are very high on Eric Young, but let’s not forget that the Rockies aren’t the only team interested. According to DK, there are as many as six or seven teams inquiring about Freddy. Whoever is willing to give up the most or proposes the best deal in NH’s mind is the team that will win out.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
EY
Any reports on his defense. I think it’s safe to say he wouldn’t be the hitter Freddy is, although he brings a lot more speed. Does he have a good glove?
by mak_DC on Jul 9, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His fielding average in the minors...
if it were identical in the majors…would be near the bottom for 2B.
by Thunder on Jul 9, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what little I read . . .
His defense is a concern.
by biggyv on Jul 9, 2009 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speed and OBP are his calling cards. He is not known for good defense.
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dejan...in his chat...
stated that tomorrow’s callup is NOT Doumit. Short of a trade…I am now pretty sure that the callup is Luis Cruz. He DNP in the Indy game this afternoon. It’s the only 40 man roster move other than bringing up a pitcher…that makes ANY sense at all…because we know it won’t be Bixler.
by Thunder on Jul 9, 2009 5:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
According to the Indy Indians Blog
Cruz will be the callup.
by Morty on Jul 9, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Avoid the Giants like the Plague
Jonathan Sanchez is a bum and he’s the name I keep hearing from them in the Freddy rumors.
But the Rockies are a little more interesting. Weathers is a guy I would like to get, but not as the key piece in the trade, just because he’s a question mark.
I have always been a fan of Carlos Gonzalez ever since he was in the Futures Game as a Diamondback. But he is with his third organization right now, we’d be his fourth, a guy with that much potential and skill must have some issues to bounce around like that.
But I really dont care, he’s a good player… BUT DO WE NEED ANOTHER TOP OUTFIELD PROSPECT? Thats literally all we have.
fee fie foh fum. i think i smell the scent of a placenta.
by omar moreno on Jul 9, 2009 6:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I think NH wants more than just Jonathan Sanchez in return from the Giants, if he even wants Sanchez at all. If NH wanted Jonathan Sanchez, I think Freddy would be a Giant by now.
by mspirate on Jul 9, 2009 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right about gonzalez having issues...
but I’ve read that same sentiment expressed about a couple of bouncy players lately and it isn’t necessarily true. The bucs were Jason Bay’s 4th team in four years.
by mocasdad on Jul 9, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...he's a bum...
he just has a no hitter through 8 innings tonight. One baserunner on an error by the 3B in the top of the 8th. Ten strikeouts, 99 pitches through 8 innings.
by Thunder on Jul 11, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is the Padres
a blind-man could no hit the Padres with his off-hand every 10th game.
True Blue Jazz
Bucco Ball
I'm on Twitter
RIP Nick Adenhart. 4/9/09
by UtesFan89 on Jul 11, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought that was something
that only happened with the Pirates offense.
by Thunder on Jul 11, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hanrahan
Complete off topic subject – but it is interesting that ESPN’s box score has Joel Hanrahan getting the win for the Nats today: http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=290505120
Did the Bucs lend him back for a day?
by EStreet on Jul 9, 2009 8:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah, thanks! That was confusing the heck out of me. That makes it kind of a neat box score – how many guys pick an official win while on another team?
by EStreet on Jul 9, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
gonzalez or giants prospects
I really like gonzalez, but there must be a legitimate reason as to why he is bouncing around like a hot potato. I think S.F. is in the perfect postion to be had, they are close to contention and looking for that one player to bring them into the playoffs. Freddy will never turn out to be that player, but if they think he will we might get some quality playerS in return. I know Neal is not looking for the one GREAT player from a deal like this, but if he can get two or even possibly three players with above major league average potential it would be a good deal. Lets face it Freddy is a great guy/player, but he is inconsistent, a below average fielder (RANGE!) and prone to injury. I like the guy, but just because a guy is likable it does not make the team better (A.K.A. Mr. Wilson)! I do not think anyone on the pirates deserves to be on the all-star team, so you can not really say you are trading an all-star. If anyone should have made the team it would be Mr. Duke who has resurrected his career! Our system is completely depleted and we are very limited at M.I.; we will not win in the immediate future thus we need to suffer short-term consequences for long-term achievement. I would have never believed in this philosophy and never did under incompetent regimes. The biggest issue is that when we do break through and begin to win the pressure must be kept on management (ownership) to retain all these young players. These horrible seasons endured by the fans must be rewarded by ownership when victory is within reach and winning can become a trademark! If non fans should turn on the pirates and look to another “proud franchise”!
by Pilgrim34 on Jul 9, 2009 10:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What kinda haul do you think we could get from SF
especially if we threw in LaRoche. To be honest I don’t think MI is as pressing need as some people make it out to be. We’ve got Friday, Ford, and Negrych who maybe be able to fill in soon or Bixler as someone stated earlier (I think, it may have been in another post)
Honestly, I still think we try and make LaRoche move to 2nd. If he stays at 3rd and even if he moves into 15 HR territory, his bat is average at best at 3rd. Even if he plays below average defense at 2nd, if hes hitting .290 + with good pop I’d take it. I also think this is imperative because I personally want to keep Alvarez at 3rd, where his bat will play very well. Fill in those two pieces with a premium bat at 1b (I address this possibility in a second) and a superb fielder at SS (Jack for now, and maybe D’Arnaud can do that in a few years) and our potential outfield (Milledge, Tabata, and McCutchen). Mix all that in with Sanchez at catcher and even if he isn’t that great offensively, I think you have a decent defensive team with a solid offensive potential.
I’m still new to this whole, following the behind the scenes, minor leagues, prospects, projections, trades etc. thing so I really have no clue how on target or off base I am.. BUT
I’d be all for trying to trade Freddy, Adam, and (gasp) Gorkys Hernandez for a package like
Madison Bumgarner
Angel Villalona
Tim Alderson (or more likely, if we get the two above, someone like Henry Sosa or Kevin Puctas or some other interesting arm)
I throw in Hernandez because
1. I don’t think hes all that great of a prospect. I think hes a tad overrated
2. Which is good if we are trying to trade him
3. The Giants, from my digging have one decent young outfielder, who is already in SF. Other than that they are T-H-I-N.
What they are not thin in are pitching prospects and arms. With Lincecum and Cain not necessarily getting any younger and being a few years from getting hope from guys like Bumgarner
Villalona
Alderson
The Giants should be playing for now and trading away their young guys. Also, Hernandez is closer to the majors than any of the guys we get back.
That gives us a young core of pitching prospects that will hopefully hit the majors around the time guys like Tabata, Sanchez, and D’Arnaud. Milledge and McCutchen should be peaking.
Can you imagine a 2012(13?) opening day roster with something along the lines of
1st – McCutchen CF
2nd – Milledge LF
3rd – Tabata RF
4th – Alvarez 3B
5th – Villalona 1B
6th – Andy LaRoche 2B
7th – Sanchez C
8th – D’Arnaud – SS
Rotation
1st – Bumgardner
2nd – Locke
3rd – Duke (I like Duke, I say we keep him around, haha)
4th – Lincoln
5th – Morris
Ah, my crazy dreams!
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 9, 2009 11:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You are crazy
if you think the Giants will give up Bumgarner. 1) You can never have enough pitching and 2) He’s likely their best prospect. If Bumgarner got dealt for anyone outside a star that is MLB established and in his mid 20’s and I was a Giants fan, I would be pissed.
by Green_Wave on Jul 9, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why Is The Idea Of Moving Andy To Second So Popular This Week?
Andy LaRoche is a barely passable third-baseman, which means he’s likely to be a bad second-baseman.
by Androgen Jar Jimmy on Jul 9, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not even close to reality. Honestly, Carlos Gonzalez in Colorado is a bit more valuable in my view than any piece we can realistically get from San Francisco (which doesn’t include Villalona and especially Bumgarner).
by Gorkys n' Beans on Jul 9, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wanting Alvarez to stick at third...
…isn’t enough to make it so.
by Vlad on Jul 10, 2009 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
We may not be able to get Bumgarner, but the Giants are desperate. I think they would be willing to give up one of their top prospects for both Freddy and Adam. They need to win, now.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 9, 2009 11:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
better get what we need!!!!
if we are to trade away our lone all-star then we better get something that we need. we now have way too much depth at the outfield and catcher positions. aside from alvarez we have nothing promising in the infield and we still need more pitching. as someone said in an earlier post ‘you can never have too much pitching.’ if sanchez and laroche go, which i think they should, then huntington needs to address some of our real needs, im all in favor of taking the best available player in a trade, which was the case in the morgan deal, that mite be one of the best trades the pirates have made this decade, but we really need to address our issuses or else 2011-2012-2013, our so called promise land year, will look just like the last 17 years, a few good players with no team around them just waiting to be traded to a contender. I’ll be very disappointed if we dont address our real needs when it comes time to trade away our better players.
by buccosfan on Jul 10, 2009 4:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bumgarner
will in NO WAY be moved for anyone, let alone Freddy Sanchez. Villalona is asking alot as well for a 31 year old with a probable 8 million dollar option next year.
Look, Sanchez definitely helps the Giants out, more so I think than the Rockies, and the fact that they play in the same division could help out his trade value with this “auction” idea. However, to think that the Giants, with a top ten farm system (BA #5) will part with any of their top 5 prospects for Freddy, that’s insane. Maybe if we include LaRoche and eat alot of salary between the two we can get more of a full package you’re looking for. McLouth couldn’t haul Schafer, Yunel, Hanson or Heyward, do you really think Sanchez will attract similar guys?
by jlk9697 on Jul 10, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Like I said
I think it would have to include Sanchez, Adam Laroche and.. I think one of our outfielder prospects.
I honestly don’t think adding those three parts is that crazy. The Giants are old in the outfield (with the exception of Nick Schierholtz) and don’t exactly have any up and coming impact prospects out there either. Since obviously we are deepest in the outfield (McCutchen, Milledge, Moss (this will enrage some people, but hes still 25 and isn’t completely terrible), Tabata, Hernandez, Grossman, Freeman etc.) I think its only smart to take a chance and trade away one of those guys if it actually interests the Giants.
I honestly think Hernandez seems like the best bet because he seems like the odd man out right now.
I think hes overrated (which is good if we are trying to trade him), a slightly slower McCutchen with a lower contact rate and power. We have Milledge and Tabata, with guys like Grossman, Freeman, Quincy Latimore to step in and provide depth.
Maybe that will be enough to get Bumgardner and some throw in’s or a package like Alderson and Villalona or Alderson, Henry Sosa, and Nick Noonan.
I would love to see any of those three in return, and if SF values the addition of Hernandez to the trade enough, I don’t think its outside the realm of possibility.
Unfortunately I don’t think NH will have the guts to move a guy he traded for about a month ago.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 10, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That won't even be enough
to get Bumgarner. You don’t trade a guy that is considered to be at least a top ten if not a top five prospect in all of baseball. Especially a pitcher.
by Green_Wave on Jul 10, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
First, obviously common sense would agree
but we have to hope SF has moved past that into desperation mode.
Second, if we can’t get Bumgardner I still think their is alot to like in the SF farm system.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 10, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently, the Royals didn’t get that message.
by mspirate on Jul 11, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From Minneaopolis
Probable cost: For an All-Star 2B, the Pirates can command high-level prospects or current major leaguers. But teams appear to be bristling at paying Sanchez $8 million for next season, so that drives his trade value down a notch. Pure speculation: The Twins could offer Delmon Young and a prospect, although that would require them to play Carlos Gomez every day. They could part with one of their six starting pitchers (six, if you count Anthony Swarzak), or they could package some of their top prospects, including Ben Revere and/or Jeff Manship.
The point is, the Pirates aren’t giving Sanchez away. Moves like these have to hurt somewhere, which is why the Twins have been so reluctant to make them in the past.
Odds this trade happens: 20-to-1. (I remember having much lower odds during my 2007 Trade Target series. I think in Year 5 on this beat, reality is setting in.)
by God Loves on Jul 10, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















