Five Young Pirates Who Could Make An Impact Next Year
This year saw the emergence of Pedro Alvarez, Neil Walker, Jose Tabata and James McDonald as young players who made an impact for the Bucs for the first time. This year will bring an entirely new crop of youngsters. Here are the five I think are most likely to make an impact in the big leagues. It didn't matter to me whether these players fit the MLB criteria to be rookies, only that they were relatively young and hadn't had a regular role with the Pirates before.
1. and 2. Bryan Morris and Rudy Owens. Morris and Owens occupy the top two spots in part because the Pirates' rotation could be a revolving door next year if Charlie Morton and Brad Lincoln don't step up, but Morris and Owens are also obviously good prospects in their own right. Morris has greater upside and I'm sure the Pirates like him better, given their preference for pitchers with good stuff, but I'm convinced Owens could pitch in the majors right now without embarrassing himself. Justin Wilson and Jeff Locke could also conceivably appear in the Pirates' rotation next year, but the Bucs will probably bring those two along a little bit more slowly. In any case, I hope that when the revolving door starts moving, it will be guys like Morris and Owens coming through, and not someone like Joe Martinez.
3. Diego Moreno. Why not? Moreno pitched mostly at Class A+ last year, but if there's any player type that can move up a couple levels without losing much effectiveness, it's relievers with great numbers and stuff. Look at Francisco Rodriguez's career, for example - in 2001 he was pitching in Class A+, but in 2002 he flew through the minors and ended the year making big-league hitters look foolish. It's not that I think Moreno is anywhere near as good as Rodriguez, just that with lights-out relievers there's often very little need to make them wait the better part of a year for each promotion. Moreno probably won't make the team out of Spring Training, but I wouldn't be shocked at all if he forced the Pirates' hand by June.
4. Chase D'Arnaud. D'Arnaud didn't have the best year in Altoona, but some of that might have been due to his recovery from pneumonia, and all he really lost compared to 2009 was a couple dozen points of batting average. On top of that, the Pirates' infield could be in flux next year. Ronny Cedeno doesn't have a hammerlock on the shortstop position, and the next two guys on the depth chart (Pedro Ciriaco and Argenis Diaz) are glove-first types who can't hit. The Pirates' second and third basemen, Neil Walker and Pedro Alvarez, are obvious big-leaguers, but neither of them can really field their positions. D'Arnaud needs to focus on returning to his 2009 form before working about the big leagues, clearly, but there could be a nice opportunity for him if he gets off to a good start and Cedeno struggles. Then again, it's also possible that shortstop could go to Jordy Mercer in that scenario - the Pirates evidently like Mercer's defense a bit better now, and they've sent Mercer to play in the Arizona Fall League. In any case, the Pirates have about a billion middle infield options, none of them ideal.
5. John Bowker. Bowker is older than any of the others on this list and has yet to prove he can hit in the majors, but he played a lot for the Pirates at the tail end of the season, and his minor-league numbers suggest he deserves another shot. He's also out of options, which could work in his favor - someone like Alex Presley arguably deserves the playing time more, but since Presley has options left, the Pirates can send him to AAA while they work out what to do with Bowker, Jeff Clement, Steve Pearce and Brandon Moss. Pearce seems like the best option of the four, particularly given that he can platoon with Garrett Jones, but the Pirates have shown so little interest in him over the years that I'm guessing Bowker and perhaps Clement will get the most playing time of the four.
146 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Moskos
Moskos will make his debut next year though a lack of LRP at major. If Morris and Owens ,and even Moreno are the candidates, why not Moskos who also had a good year at 2A?
If they were going to promote a LHRP from AA to the majors...
…I’d think that Watson might be more likely than Moskos at this point.
Moskos is a perfect example
Of why you shouldn’t normally jump guys from AA to MLB.
by MarkInDallas on Oct 27, 2010 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions
I think Morton makes a bid difference next year.
Stuff is too nasty to have a 9 ERA. I don’t see any reason he can’t be a #3-#5 starter.
i completely agree
he pitched well for Pitt in 09, and since this is a stat based blog, his BABIP was way above league average this past season. he also pitched much better once Snyder became his catcher and that the coaches would not let him shake off the catchers signs.
I completely disagree
You don’t get hit as hard as Morton did last year and not have some serious problems. He MAY have the tools to be a good major league pitcher but he never exhibited them last year. I understand the fascination with the movement on Morton’s pitches but simply put, the kind of movement he is getting is not swing and miss movement. The movement is side to side with little to no sink, he can’t control the location and similarly his fastball sits at 92-93 and he gets shelled. Am I missing something? That is not a good pitcher and I don’t care how many times Pirates brass and the team announcers talk about his stuff. Its just not good enough and Morton isn’t smart or tough enough to survive without unhittable stuff.
by dack2001 on Oct 26, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Part of it for Morton
Is confidence. The other part is execution/control. Everyone Agrees that he has good stuff. It’s just whether he can command it or not and how long it will take to gain that command if he ever does.
IMO, he’s treading on that fine line of becoming an Oliver Perez, or Ian Snell. Snell blamed the organization and he was eventually demoted in Seattle. Perez as well was demoted by the NYM.
I think pitchers can be slightly older and still be okay provided he still has good stuff. Maybe he’s going to have to be a Relief type pitcher idk yet.
dack, you may be right about Morton not being tough/smart enough
but he DID pitch well for the pirates in 2009. this you cannot argue with. 2010, however, you are correct.
by white angus on Oct 26, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
He had a 4.55 ERA, and actually had a worse K rate and a worse walk rate than his 2010 numbers. You can argue that Morton did not pitch “well” in 2009, because to me below league average is not pitching “well”. He just wasn’t terrible, like he was last season.
yet you take away that one start against the cubs where he gave up 10 runs in 1 innings
and the only pirate pitcher with better numbers was ohlendorf.
I know you don’t get mulligans in baseball, but Morton’s ERA without the one horrific inning in Chicago two years ago was 4.02. I’m not a huge fan of ERA (FIP is a much better stat), but Morton was pretty productive two years ago. He was certainly a reasonable 4-5. I don’t see why he can’t get back to that, if not better. Not that he pitched well last season, but it was the most unlucky stretch I’ve ever seen from a pitcher.
by Suffering Buc on Oct 26, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions
it was the most unlucky stretch I’ve ever seen from a pitcher
It was not. League averages and being unlucky or lucky hold only when the pitcher is league average. Morton was getting hit hard. Every ball was smoked, including the outs. He was not league average and using his xFIP is not good defense. Now, the version that came back later in the year was better, but that version was also the one that seemed like a #4 upside.
by BurgherKing on Oct 26, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
“It was not.” First off, maybe he has only watched lucky pitchers like Roger Clemens and such. Second, he was incredibly unlucky.
“League averages and being unlucky or lucky hold only when the pitcher is league average.”
Luck has nothing to do with how good you are. I could go out there for 1 inning throwing 79mph and get very lucky and have 3 warning track fly balls caught and post a 0.00 career ERA. Although I think what you meant here was that xFip and advanced stats that “adjust” numbers are only accurate for pitchers with major league stuff. Clearly you will disagree, but Morton has major league stuff.
“Morton was getting hit hard.” Sometimes.
“Every ball was smoked, including the outs. " This is just the brain (memory) tricking you into remembering what you want to remember.
so wrong
First off, maybe he has only watched lucky pitchers like Roger Clemens and such
Whats it matter who he watched? Solid argument to start off!
Second, he was incredibly unlucky.
what was he unlucky with? HR/FB? If you keep serving up meatballs, they are going to disappear. This was discussed much here at the time, if thats what you mean.
Luck has nothing to do with how good you are. I could go out there for 1 inning throwing 79mph and get very lucky and have 3 warning track fly balls caught and post a 0.00 career ERA.
In a world where you assume everyone else knows nothing about sample sizes, you can make some sort of a point. In general, if you went out there 5 times, you’d likely be bombed. Plus, that’s what I m talking about. If you keep pitching, balls are gonna go out of the ground at more than the usual rate, coz you aren’t an average pitcher. You wont keep getting lucky. I dont even know what you’re trying to prove here.
Although I think what you meant here was that xFip and advanced stats that "adjust" numbers are only accurate for pitchers with major league stuff.
Yes, with a caveat- "with major league stuff implies that he will throw said major league stuff. He will occasionally not have it, but most of the time, he will. My contention is that he was not throwing major league stuff.
Clearly you will disagree, but Morton has major league stuff.
Random assumption. Incorrect. I do believe he has major league stuff. Also, he didnt have it through the first demotion.
“Morton was getting hit hard." Sometimes.
Hard to make that argument with a LD rate approaching van Benschoten- Bullington territory. There’s no better analysis on this, so I dont know how to take some subjectivity out of here, but it seems to me your entire “argument” is predicated on optimism from his 2009 performance. I am yet to see anything that can argue away his 2010 performance, esp the first half
by BurgherKing on Oct 27, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
“it was the most unlucky stretch I’ve ever seen from a pitcher”
- Suffering Buc
“No he wasn’t”
“Whats it matter who he watched? Solid argument to start off!”
- Burgher King
You spoke for him is my point. If you can’t see this there is some sort of reading comprehension fail going on.
My whole argument is based off actually watching the games, and he was repeatedly unlucky. You are trying to use only stats to back up that he sucked, yet the stats like xFip are on my side as well. And what was he unlucky with? Using stats… how about a .370 babip or 18% HR/FB rate?
And yes, if I kept pitching, the odds would be on me getting hit more, but the point was I COULD get lucky. Small sample size is the whole point, and I’d say 10 starts is pretty darn small.
And you also just said his stuff was magically better his 2nd time up this year? Guess which month he posted his lowest xFip? If you said April you win. 3.97 > 3.99 (September).
April 38% strand rate .439 BABIP 35% HR/FB (35! 1/3 flyballs were leaving the park, but I’m sure that wasn’t unlucky or sss influenced at all)
Sept. 64% strand rate .330 BABIP 6.7% HR/FB
That’s called small sample size skewing his ERA early and people freaking out. Half a year back in AAA where he was just ok didn’t magically make his stuff better.
Let's start over
There’s unnecessary snark going on in this argument- if you want to keep it up, I can dish it out, but we can probably have a more direct discussion.
If you are going to refer to a comment made 2 posts up the thread, context helps- which is why instead of posting “This is horribly wrong”, it’s good to add your reasoning so that people aren’t confused by your use of pronouns. Also, that’s why nouns are used, so that in case of ambiguity, you use them, so regular people understand! Some writing fail going on…
My argument is based entirely off games watched. I know xFIP is in his favor. But, let me refute the obvious ones first-
1.
if I kept pitching, the odds would be on me getting hit more, but the point was I COULD get lucky
It’s irrelevant. The discussion was about people getting unlucky. I understand sample sizes perfectly well, thank you.
2.
Small sample size is the whole point, and I’d say 10 starts is pretty darn small.
For the most part, Morton was getting shelled, and the overwhelming majority on this side supported him being sent down. One of Charlie’s posts earlier in the year sums it up very nicely-
Plainly, Morton has great stuff, so much so that it’s become a cliche to even point that out. But his command (particularly of his breaking stuff) is bad, or at least intermittently bad, and he pitches horribly with men on base. In the past, I hadn’t wanted to send him with the minors, because of sample-size issues and because we needed to see him a few times before we even knew why to send him there. Now we know. Morton can work on those things in the minors, so it isn’t like the Pirates would just be banishing him there for no reason other than being awful.
3.
And you also just said his stuff was magically better his 2nd time up this year?
I didn’t. If you’re going to attribute something to someone, at least attribute correctly. I have no doubt Morton has the stuff to be a successful SP. I have doubts he can put it together in the major leagues. The argument goes as follows: Morton has good stuff. Now, when he gave up a few hits early in the year, he seemed to lose his composure, and perhaps his confidence in his stuff. Then he nibbled. When he did, and missed, he fell behind. Then he put his pitches down the middle. Those got whacked. Hence, the ERA.
When he came back, he had more confidence in his stuff perhaps. Perhaps something else. Either way, he was able to pitch better. That is, you know, the reason people get sent down. Not because their stuff “magically improves”, but because they need to work on a few things, perhaps get their confidence in their pitches back.
Now, to get to the core argument I was trying to make. The argument is that the HR/FB rate or the BABIP rate or the strand rate that you are citing holds true for league average pitchers. If you throw someone in there, who (for whatever reason) is not a league average pitcher, his ratios are not going to conform. That’s not bad luck. That’s bad pitching. (In my previous post(s), I already mentioned his HR/FB rate, and why I felt they didn;t hold)
Let me repeat here again: I think Charlie Morton has enough stuff to succeed in the bigs. The Apr-May version, in my opinion, was too mentally fragile to do it, and we’ll see if he can turn it around next year.
In his Apr-May starts, IIRC, Morton had something like a 25% LD rate. That gives his other stats some context. Sure, he may have been getting somewhat unlucky. But he was also getting hammered.
So he then went down to Indy, and his first 6 starts ended up with a 4.5 ERA and 23/13 K/BB (I cant find entire gamelogs for his minor leagues, so this is off comments in posts). Hardly exciting, but under control.
Here’s one of your comments about Morton from earlier this year:
Both homeruns were 90mph
meatballs.
I’m not sure if that’s because balls that get hit naturally read out slower or not though.
by Mr. E on May 28, 2010 2:14 PM PDT
The comment is SSS but that’s the general feeling. If you have good stuff but cannot use it, is it good stuff? Maybe when you are in the lower minors and have time to harness it, but at this point, I would say there’s a legit doubt about his ability to turn his stuff into a skill.
by BurgherKing on Oct 27, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I tried writing a response but it just turned into a lot of rambling. I think I understand your argument, I just disagree with it.
He was throwing ok at the start of the year imo, it just so happens that he’s not Sandy Koufax so he IS going to give up some hits and homers. He just got unlucky that there happened to be a blooper or an error or a BB before those hits and HRs. I also don’t like discussing the mental state of a guy I doubt anyone on this board has ever even met. FWIW, since I don’t even know what the stat means, his xFip is .7 runs lower in “High Leverage” situations for his career.
Anyways, I guess we will see next year.
Luck has nothing to do with how good you are. I could go out there for 1 inning throwing 79mph and get very lucky and have 3 warning track fly balls caught and post a 0.00 career ERA. Although I think what you meant here was that xFip and advanced stats that "adjust" numbers are only accurate for pitchers with major league stuff. Clearly you will disagree, but Morton has major league stuff.
The question isn’t whether Morton has major-league stuff, but whether he’s a major league quality pitcher, which are two different issues. I could (in theory) throw 93 and have major league stuff. But if I throw it belt-high every time, I wouldn’t be a major-league pitcher. My ERA would be higher than xFIP for a reason. Same with Joe Blow and Jon Van Benschoten.
Is Morton a major-league quality starter? Given his mental issues, I don’t know. Zach Duke’s ERA would be close to his xFIP going forward because Duke is an established big league starter. That’s what gives us the baseline. Same with Dan Haren and his “off” year this season. Morton isn’t established, so the xFIP might not be descriptive.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 27, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
his last starts
were much better after rosters were expanded.
I hope he can build on that.
by BlindSquirrel on Oct 26, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Sigh, "stuff"
He has never had an impressive K rate, in MiLB or MLB. I think his stuff is overrated on this forum, and we all know his control is not good enough.
Oliver Perez
Oliver Perez was a pitcher who I thought “wow, he has great stuff. If only he can learn to locate his pitches.” Morton’s stuff isn’t good enough to be an ace even IF he had good command, IMO.
But that’s if he drastically improves his command, and a #2 or #3 appears to be his ceiling even if his command MIRACULOUSLY improves his command. To me that is nothing to get excited about, and it certainly doesn’t warrant a rotation spot.
Long-term: getting to .500
.500 should not be a longterm goal to get excited about.
by BuccoBrigade on Oct 26, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I knew someone would say something like this
Why not? As long as we aren’t sacrificing any of our longer term goals, why can’t I get excited about a .500 season?
its not that you shouldnt get excited, its the fact that the teams “longterm” goal should not be to reach .500….that should be a shortterm goal, hopefully acheived in the next few seasons.
long term goals are more like make a sustained run at the playoffs/world series in the next 3-5 years.
I won't argue semantics
But to me long-term goals means anything past 2011. Obviously we all hope that the club breaks .500 and eventually wins a championship. I will be excited for both years.
I have no problem with .500 being a goal. Its just when its stated that .500 is a long term goal, i see that as being short sighted. .500 is definetly a benchmark that i would love to cross, but to me, a longterm goal is playoffs and sustained winning.
by BuccoBrigade on Oct 27, 2010 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions
an ideal scenario
would have the pirates finish in last place, but due to incredible parity in the league next season, they finish with 70 wins…
The Pirates...
shouldn’t be settling for a particular number of wins. Just win as many as you can every season. If anyone in management or the players are willing to settle for anything other than the best…I’d prefer that they end up on another team’s roster. I don’t want guys like Cutch…Pedro…Tabata and Walker to get comfortable with losing or being in last place.
He has never had an impressive K rate, in MiLB or MLB.
Morton, minors, career: 7.2 K/9
Rudy Owens, minors, career: 7.8 K/9
Guess that half a K makes all the difference in the world, huh?
Almost no one here is impressed with Owens’ stuff, and most people seem to gawk at Morton’s stuff. I think Owens’ higher K rate is very telling. When you combine that with Morton’s 4.2 MiLB walk rate vs. Owens’ 1.6 walk rate, yes, that makes a world of difference.
no one
or most people, at least, have not seen Owens’ stuff. We’ve seen Morton make ML hitters look silly. No one is trying to downplay Owens. They are just saying that they will wait till he shows it. In the absence of other info, people are assuming the FO knows what it sdoing, and will figure out the right time to bring up Owens.
And most people, rightly imo, think that there’s no point starting Owens’ clock because he’d be an upgrade over what we have right now. They think that he should be up when he’s learnt all he can learn in the minors.
Just to clarify
Owens should start this season in Indy because of his arbitration clock. I am not denying that obvious logic.
further
Owens should start in Indy because he needs to show he can handle the highest level of competition the minors have to offer. The clock is second to that.
The clock...
isn’t second to anything in the Pirates front office…other than the numbers on the paychecks.
as with any small market team
That’s under no position to contend at this team.
by BadAndy on Oct 26, 2010 6:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
that's fine by me
but i m sure the first thing they check when deciding on a prospect is how ready he is. Using the clock, as BadAndy says, is good sense.
The Giants will pay about 13M more for Tim Lincecum than if he’d come up 2 weeks later. Think they couldn’t have done more with that money in 2012?
Yeah...
and if the Giants would have waited until they were perfectly safe on Super Two status on Posey…they wouldn’t be in the World Series.
would the Giants have promoted Posey
if they went 57-105??? hmmmmm?
by white angus on Oct 26, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
as bernie6 said already
the waste was having Posey in Sept last year. Finally, when getting a player up makes a difference in a pennant race, it’s fine- we discuss this often enough, and I m pretty sure you know these caveats!
by BurgherKing on Oct 26, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually...
the Giants weren’t in the pennant race when Posey got called up. They were 2 games above .500.
That is a pennant race ...
for that early in the season.
We weren't talking about the stuff being impressive/not impressive.
We were talking about the K rate being impressive/not impressive. The K rate is what it is, regardless of what kind of pitcher is putting it up. Similarly, we weren’t talking about walk rates. You didn’t say that Morton’s control wasn’t impressive. You said that his K rate wasn’t.
So if Morton’s K rate isn’t “impressive”, then neither is Owens’s.
I've always seen Morton as a poor man's Kevin Brown
And Brown didn’t really start to have sustained success until his late twenties and the light didn’t really switch on until his early thirties.
Thats no guarantee that the light will ever go on for Morton, just that pitchers are fickle creatures.
http://bleedblackandgold.com/
by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Oct 26, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
clement also is out of options
and his knee surgery will affect his spring training. since the pirates may look outside the system for a 1B or RF, i believe clement’s time in Pitt has already come to a close
The complicating factor is the Rule 5 roster deadline.
All players on the 60-day DL have to come off it at that point. So the question is whether or not we want to burn a roster spot on him all winter, possibly at the cost of a guy like Adcock, McPherson, or Watson.
As such,
I would think that they’d leave him available for Rule 5, or leave him off the roster completely. I mean, who is gonna claim him not knowing how his surgery is gonna come out, and also knowing that his knees are bad already?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I suspect that he's going to get DFA'ed.
That’s probably what I’d do. It’s their call and not mine, though.
That's what I meant
by “leave him off completely.” Phrased badly, but in my defense I’m only on my first cuppa.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions
“Cuppa” typically refers to coffee. “First cuppa” would be taken to mean I ain’t completely awake just yet.
“Drink” typically refers to a cocktail.
At least in my purview.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Naw,
I’m just the same as any other normal human being.
…
…
…or AM I?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 27, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
i believe that too
Considering what we’ve seen hasn’t been great and you hate to lose your own players who possibly have more potential. Plus we’re going to have to shore up our bullpen next year.
best time to DFA him
is when his value is low. roll the dice neal.
I agree
I just don’t think Clement will ever be able to hit enough to overcome his K rate. Some sort of Jones/Pearce platoon would be nice, Hague could be a better player, I suppose Bowker could move there and I think he has a better chance of being a productive ML player than Clement. Then, of course, Pedro will inevitably move there.
Little interest in Pearce?
I would agree completely that most people at Bucs Dugout have completely forgotten about Steve Pearce, but I don’t see that as descriptive of management. The issue was that in 2008 and 2009 his performance was quite forgettable in AAA and in the majors. Were it not for his injuries last year, he would have gotten a significant amount of playing time based on performance. I would suggest that—assuming he’s recovered—that he’s likely to contribute more than any of the other position players mentioned. Of course, at 28, he doesn’t really qualify as young.
Viva Clemente!
“I would agree completely that most people at Bucs Dugout have completely forgotten about Steve Pearce, …”
I will disagree with your agreement. Pearce has been brought up quite frequently lately.
Just sayin’.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree with the disagreement of the agreement
I love me some Steve Pearce and I am not the only one around here by any means.
http://bleedblackandgold.com/
by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Oct 26, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with your agreement of the disagreement of the agreement.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Circle gets the square.
http://bleedblackandgold.com/
by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Oct 26, 2010 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Peter Marshall: It is the most abused and neglected part of your body— what is it?
Paul Lynde: Mine may be abused but it certainly isn’t neglected!
.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Oct 26, 2010 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
5 others just as likely
1. Brad Lincoln. He’s had a taste now, and is more likely to impact next season than any of the Altoona pitchers.
2. Charlie Morton. He’s got the stuff, and he’ll get the chance before the Altoona pitchers.
3. Steve Pearce. This depends on his recovery and whether the bucs find a better RH option, but he’s far more likely than a D’Arnaud.
4. Pedro Ciriaco. Midseason replacement for Cedeno if he doesn’t get it together.
5. Clement. More likely than Bowker, if they keep him on the 40-man roster. Moss will be gone, and LaRoche is iffy.
I think we are too quick to look at the shiny new minor leaguers, and forget that the ones that have had a taste and failed were once just as good of prospects. And I don’t see a reliever having an impact next season.
No if with Cedeno
Cedeno will never get it together and will never start for a team in the playoffs. I think we should start Ciraco for a season and keep Cedeno as our utility for a year.
Ciriaco’s 2010 AAA stats: .265/.281/.387, .667 OPS
Cedeno’s 2010 MLB stats: .256/.293/.382, .675 OPS
If Ciriaco can’t out-produce Cedeno’s bad MLB numbers against worst competition, what makes you think he’ll look anywhere near competent with the bat against MLB competition? Both are no-bat, solid glove players, and Cedeno has a marginally better bat. They’re both terrible options, people just want to see Ciriano because he wasn’t our starting SS last year.
www.stealingfirstbase.com
Minor quibble:
By rep, at least, Ciriaco is a significantly better defender than Cedeno. Cedeno has very good tools, but his inconsistency (as in the last week or two of the season) really hurts him there.
I don’t think it’s entirely out of the question that Ciriaco could outperform Cedeno as our SS, though Cedeno seems like the safer bet at this point.
agreed
Cedena may have better tools, but he has mental lapses frequently and a simple grounder becomes an error. It’s his concentration for some reason….showing either….disinterest or laziness….
Granted Cedeno has shown glimpses of power as he can hit for doubles, but does the hitting really make up for the errors?
Chris Resop
If we haven’t been tired about the No.5 starter competition this year and very possibly in next year, maybe give Resop a shot?
I still think Resop
is better at the back end to go along with Meek/Hanrahan which may give Neal a reason to shop Meek/Hanrahan to see what best deal is out there.
I don't think we should shop either player
Unless Neal gets a real outstanding offer for a major league ready player since we control both players i believe for a bit. At least Meek we do, not sure on hanrahan.
yeah, but whom would make the pirates an outstanding offer for a major league ready player...
for a reliever?
by white angus on Oct 26, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
for a reliever???
-1… dotel for mcdonald doesnt happen on a daily basis. lopez for bowker doesnt either… lol
Com'on white angus
light’en up,that was a perfect come back . I really did laugh out loud.
by oldfrothingslosh on Oct 26, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
i did too... i just dont like typing LOL
wait, i just did
by white angus on Oct 26, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions
the diamondbacks
are looking for relief pitchers..what do you think of Hanrahan for Reynolds..That average can’t stay under .200 again. If he can get back to his career average he will be fine. He is just entering his prime. He has some experience at first.. He is pretty affordable for the production..he has an $11,000,000 option with a 500k option after two years..hopefully by then Rendon is ready to start at 3b and move Pedro to 1b. That would be a nice left/right combo in your lineup..no need for two closers on a 60 win team.
I would go
1. Tabatalf
2. Walker2nd
3. Cutchcf
4. Pedro 3b
5. Reynolds 1b
6. Bowker RF
7. Snyder
8. Cedeno
by SHOOTFOR2010 on Oct 26, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Reynolds is a poor defender
and he isn’t even left handed to take advantage of the shorter right field fence. He had .9, 2.2, and .8 WAR seasons over the last three years. No thank you.
Really Looking Forward To A Full Season From That Guy

elvishasleft.com
bestweekever.tv
by Dan H on Oct 27, 2010 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Excellent
If the 2010 buccos season was the rock bottom for the FO in terms of wins and losses at the mlb level… then I would say this tabatalf picture is the rock top in terms of awesome photo-shopped pictures relating to the FO’s rebuilding plan, both past and present.
by DL Da Burghcast on Itunes on Oct 27, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm not sold on Resop as a starter
He’s only really been stretched out in that small sample size in AAA last year and his profile is an extreme fly ball pitcher with a decent fastball, below average curve and a fair changeup.
I don’t know if he really has the secondary stuff necessary to start at the big league level.
http://bleedblackandgold.com/
by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Oct 26, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
1. Morris
2. D’Arnaud
3. Moreno
4. Lambo
5. Lincoln
My list would be fairly similar. D’Arnaud would only be highly ranked because the incumbent shortstopping is not good. Owens could be solid as a rookie, but I don’t know about him making an impact this soon though.
I just think you're looking for any way to bump down Owens
Lambo this year? Seriously?
Owens could be similar to Lincoln. Lambo is the most likely Walker candidate because he has tools but some are down on him because of the minor league figures.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 26, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Owens could also be a solid mid-rotation starter.
Lambo hasn’t even lit the world on fire in AA. I highly doubt he even sees Pittsburgh next year. I’m not even sure he’ll start the season in Indy.
Lemme put it this way: if you picked Walker over Lincoln last year, you would have been right in retrospect, but it would still be the wrong decision at the time. And Walker put up similar numbers to Lambo this year…in AAA, not AA.
Lambo
skipped high A in 2008.
2011 will (probably) be the 3rd year in a row he starts in AA.
by BurgherKing on Oct 27, 2010 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I dunno
I hear Altoona is nice, what with that roller coaster and everything. Plus it’s so convenient to Ebensburg.
lol
“Dangit outfield! Get off that rollercoaster and do your drills!”
“Sorry coach”
by BlindSquirrel on Oct 27, 2010 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course, it doesn’t really matter now that Walker vs. Lincoln was wrong at the time. Those who hadn’t given up on Walker now look like they know their stuff.
Again, we’re talking about a guy with an average arsenal who may or may not have increased velocity this season (depending on what you read). He’s not Aroldis Chapman, but he will likely have to deal with a poor defense behind him (and possibly in front of him if we decide to gamble a lot of PT on the Doumit mess again).
In the long run, will Owens be better than Duke/Maholm/Morton/Karstens/Burres? Yes, but a 2011 impact seems a bit much to expect IMO.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 27, 2010 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I know Owens' "flaws"
of having an average fastball/curve with a well-above average change. I just don’t see how, even without a 95 mph fastball, you could possibly say Rudy Owens has less of a chance of making an impact next year than Andrew Lambo, who put up a .732 OPS in AA at a run-producing position.
To go back to the Lincoln v. Walker question, they may sorta look like they know their stuff, or that they took a stab at it and were rewarded. But even if we take your “of course Walker was the pick there” position, Walker had a pretty darned good 2nd half of 2009, good enough to get a cup of coffee in the bigs. Walker at the end of 2009 was WAY closer to the bigs than Lambo at the end of 2010.
I just don’t think it’s rational to not have Owens in your top 5 for this question. Owens projects as a solid mid-rotation starter for many years to come, and is arguably the most polished pitcher in the minor league system, from what I read. I fail to see how, barring injury, he won’t get a look in 2010. Meanwhile, I doubt we’ll see Lambo in a Pirate uniform until September (and even then, I still kinda doubt it.)
a well-above average change
I’m very curious to see this change in person. Opinions on it seem to vary very widely.
FWIW
I’ve only seen Owens pitch once, but Double-A hitters didn’t have a chance against his change that night. Small sample size, of course.
I’d argue picking Walker over Lincoln is a lot different than just not writing Walker off completely. Most here were skeptical of his major league future but not ready to give up. Almost none would have traded Brad Lincoln for a Neil Walker clone from another team.
I"ll admit that I was a skeptic ...
I saw little in his MIL numbers to suggest anything other than he could hit for some power.
I’m not sure how the Pirates could have handled Pearce better given the roster situation. You could argue they should have dealt Adam LaRoche and given him the first base spot on Opening Day 08, but LaRoche was a proven hitter after all. Then he (Pearce) stunk throughout the 2008 season and started 2009 in the minors. He hit mediocrely (.875 OPS) in 09 and then flubbed his 2009 major league shot.
Because of the major-league failure, he started 2010 in the minors. Once he hit for a .950+ OPS this time, he was basically given the starting 1B job but unfortunately got hurt soon after. If he stays healthy, he probably handles 1B the entire season as long as he keeps hitting well.
You can say the organization never showed interest in Pearce, but the only thing we could have realistically done better is give him the major league job to start 08 and deal LaRoche, who was coming off an average .803 OPS year.
They also could have given him the bulk of the playing time in RF instead of Nady in ‘08. It turned out to be very fortunate that they didn’t do that, but it would have made a lot of sense at the time.
by Charlie Wilmoth on Oct 26, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Minor thing, but...
when we first called him up this year we sat him for like the first week behind Clement. I’m pretty sure this through off his rhythm and it took him another week or so before he started hitting at all, dragging down his overall line for the season. So, 2 weeks of production wasted.
Yeah, that was a weird move
“You’re hitting great, kid. Now come up to the bigs and collect some splinters.”
That seemed to be standard operating procedure...
with young players…at least until Tabata and Alvarez came up. Everyone else that has been called up over the last several years got the bench treatment…except Cutch.
They also could have played Pearce at 1B from April until June, since Adam LaRoche’s bat never showed up in those months anyway. Then from July to September he would switch to the outfield.
The question with Peace that we’ll never be able to answer is whether he would have performed well if given the major-league shot in 2008, or would regression have happened no matter what his assignment out of 08 spring training. It’s possible he got discouraged in 08 and him being held back in Triple-A crippled his development. Maybe not.
It’s the same as with Alex Gordon. How much of his failure was due to how he was handled, compared to how much was his lack of ability? We’ll never know.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 26, 2010 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I tend to think Pearce changed his approach in 2010
2010 was the first time Pearce hit all my check list for success in AAA. Meaning, hit .300+, OBP of .370+ (with walk rate of 10%+ for power hitter), and K/AB rate of under 20%.
I don’t think he would have been ready in ’08. 2008 was not a good year for him in the minors let alone in MLB.
I hope he can come back strong and pick up where he left off because he was really looking good for a couple of weeks in MLB.
by MarkInDallas on Oct 27, 2010 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions
My question was whether the 08 demotion affected him mentally, and that caused his hitting to tank well below career norms.
From his perspective, he destroyed the minors (including Triple-A) in 07 but didn’t get a fair shot. Instead, he’s trapped behind mediocre players like Adam LaRoche and Xavier Nady, no matter how well he did.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 27, 2010 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions
My question was whether the 08 demotion affected him mentally, and that caused his hitting to tank well below career norms.
That was certainly my working theory at the time. He absolutely tore it up in spring training, and then expressed frustration in interviews after they decided to send him down.
I looked back at these archives, and I saw your post, where Huntington said they didn’t promote Pearcebecause his defense wasn’t good enough. That makes NH look bad, especially when he had zero problem with Ramon Vazquez at 2B/SS, Delwyn Young at 2B/3B, and Ryan Doumit playing 1B/OF.
by Adam Reynolds on Oct 27, 2010 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions
charlie..
what do you think of k-rods 1985 season in the stl organization..not bad for a 3 yr old..
by SHOOTFOR2010 on Oct 26, 2010 4:31 PM EDT reply actions
Maybe Pearce, Maybe Bowker,
The key is not to just hand it to somebody…there should be job competition and let the best man win…simple enough IMO.
Same w/ pitchers…I saw someone mention RESOP staying at relief, I personally give him the chance to start…if he doesn’t earn a spot, then back to relief but he deserves a shot.
BTW, when he started at AAA, supposedly he threw quite a bit of off speed stuff…if I remember correctly, it was just under 60% fastballs for the year there. One other thing, he had 2 separate periods in around 20 innings of relief work where his shoulder forced him not being available for several game stretches…
I watched Moreno pitch in florida…he’s not big but he’s got nasty stuff…not a stretch to see him by Sept if this wasn’t PGH.
The largest new contributor IMO is a batting coach who’s not a joke. G Jones stance back to 2009…I truly believe Bowker gets too fired up/ jumpy in the bigs, maybe too excited/geeked up but when he stays back…beautiful swing…but seeing him at PNC, he’s too far in front and opens up pulling alot foul down the line or weaker swings off the front foot…If he stays back (a coach should be able to help him w/ some mechanism), the kid’s got a heck of a cut.
I wouldn’t say there has to be “competition”, only that the front office needs to identify the guy with the best chance of lasting success. Spring training numbers just don’t mean anything (remember Craig Monroe’s great spring a couple years ago?), so handing the job to whoever played better in ST is a bad idea.
Resop and coaches
I’d also like to see Resop get the chance to start.
And I agree on the hitting coach. I think there are a couple of guys (Milledge/Bowker) who could take a big step forward with the right instruction.
Somebody on another blog
mentioned Nick Swisher. That was a name I haven’t thought about. Anybody have any thought’s on him?
by oldfrothingslosh on Oct 26, 2010 6:02 PM EDT reply actions
I like him as a player a lot
But he is going to be out of our price range.
Resop will NOT start
Period. Point blank. Lock it in.
by BadAndy on Oct 26, 2010 6:07 PM EDT via mobile reply actions

by 
















