Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bill Stewart Dead From Apparent Heart Attack

BP's Top 20 Pirates Prospects

Here it is:

 

Five-Star Prospects
1. James Taillon, RHP
2. Stetson Allie, RHP
Four-Star Prospects
3. Luis Heredia, LHP
4. Tony Sanchez, C
Three-Star Prospects
5. Rudy Owens, LHP
6. Bryan Morris, RHP
7. Starling Marte, OF
8. Jeff Locke, LHP
9. Diego Moreno, RHP
Two-Star Prospects
10. Colton Cain, LHP
11. Zack Von Rosenberg, RHP

 

And 12-20:

 

12. Mel Rojas, Jr., OF
13. Zack Dodson, LHP
14. Alex Presley, OF
15. Gorkys Hernandez, OF
16. Chase D'Arnaud, SS
17. Andrew Lambo, OF
18. Nick Kingham, RHP
19. Josh Harrison, INF
20. Quincy Latimore, OF

 

So, the three teenage pitchers acquired at the end of the draft signing period are the top three prospects in the system according to Kevin Goldstein.  Let's compare his list to the Community Prospect List we voted upon here at BD back in September (conveniently also a Top 20 if you include Honorable Mention players):

 

 

1.  Jameson Taillon
2.  Tony Sanchez
3.  Bryan Morris
4.  Rudy Owens
5.  Stetson Allie
6.  Starling Marte
7.  Jeff Locke
8.  Luis Heredia
9.  Andrew Lambo
10.  Zach von Rosenberg
11.  Colton Cain
12.  Justin Wilson
13.  Chase d'Arnaud
14.  Exicardo Cayonez
15.  Mel Rojas

Honorable Mentions: Jarek Cunningham, Brock Holt, Gorkys Hernandez, Diego Moreno, Evan Chambers

 

It looks like we prefer performance to projection, at least compared to BP.  Certainly a couple of big differences; we're higher on Lambo and Cayonez (who doesn't make BP's top 20), whereas Goldstein is higher on Moreno and Dodson (who doesn't make BD's top 20, and never really entered the discussion as I recall).

 

 


This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’s a decent list. I was mildly surprised to see Lambo ranked outside the top 12, but he’s a one-tool guy whose tool may not be that special. I also think Marte should be outside the top-10, but I’ve never seen him play and can’t really judge. In any case, prospect lists are pretty irrelevant. It will all get sorted out on the field.

by bolton on Nov 8, 2010 10:14 AM EST reply actions  

justin wilson isnt on the prospects list at all?

and Lambo still has potential. i most prospect pickers dont even know whom is in a teams farm system except the glamour ones, like New York, Boston, Hanshin. >:P

by white angus on Nov 8, 2010 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

nah, Goldstein generally know what he's doing

It’s possible he forgot about WIlson, or maybe he just doesn’t think very highly of him.

Redeemed.

by escroll on Nov 8, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

He just forgot about Wilson? That’s hard to believe.

by Adam Reynolds on Nov 8, 2010 10:54 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

KG just mentioned on twitter

that WIlson was number 21. He said he’ll post more info in the article’s comments soon. Stay tuned.

Redeemed.

by escroll on Nov 8, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Goldstein knows the prospects, he probably knows the top 200 MILB players and prospects. He discussed how he does research once on Rocco’s show. I think he values potential vs. performance generally which can lead to variation.

Time will tell.

Yinzers uber alles

by BostonBuc on Nov 8, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Wilson is considered a reliever by most scouts,

and considering that he doesn’t project as a back-of-the-bullpen type of arm, he’s basically being ranked as a middle-reliever.

Considering the dime-a-dozen nature of those types of prospects, if the scouts which KG have talked to profile him as such, I have no problem seeing him outside the top-20.

by getwonkafied on Nov 8, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that BD posters severely overrate Lambo

If he hadn’t made a BA Top 100 list and wasn’t 6’3" would anyone even bother separating him from Alex Presley?

Sure the upside is there but he’s still a guy with 800 AA at bats with an OPS of under .750.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Nov 8, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

If he hadn’t made a BA Top 100 list and wasn’t 6’3" would anyone even bother separating him from Alex Presley?

In a world where his past performance did not merit inclusion on BA’s Top 100 list and physical stature were unimportant, his status would not be as high as it is. That is not, however, the world in which we live.

Sure the upside is there but he’s still a guy with 800 AA at bats with an OPS of under .750.

Repeat after me: Age-relative-to-level is important when assessing prospects. After all, at the end of last year Tabata had 683 AA at bats with an OPS under .750, too (.732, to be precise).

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course age relative to level is important but I don’t see anyone rushing to put Josh Harrison or Robbie Grossman in our top ten lists either…I just happen to believe that in this case the alchemical mix doesn’t add up around here and apparently neither does Goldstein.

Tabata was even younger relative to level and had other tools that were rated highly, Lambo is a power bat prospect with a lower walk rate than Jose posted which is already lower than you’d like.

There are extenuating circumstances in Lambo’s case and he’s definitely a player that I like to have in our system but I can’t put him in my top ten prospects.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Nov 8, 2010 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t see anyone rushing to put Josh Harrison or Robbie Grossman in our top ten lists either

Neither Harrison nor Grossman has ever had a season as good as Lambo’s 2007 or 2008.

Tabata was even younger relative to level and had other tools that were rated highly, Lambo is a power bat prospect with a lower walk rate than Jose posted which is already lower than you’d like.

Which is why Tabata’s rating last year was higher than Lambo’s current rating. A lot of people had Tabata in the team’s top 5 before the start of the year.

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

They were terrible, we all know that, but that isn’t my point at all.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Nov 8, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Not really a surprise,

but Alderson fell completely off the charts.

Pirates, Vikings, Hokies. I'm used to heartbreak. At least I have the Penguins....

"When I put on my uniform, I feel I am the proudest man on earth."
-The Great One

by blackjackfishtaco on Nov 8, 2010 11:40 AM EST reply actions  

If anything...

…I’m surprised that Alderson merited a mention of any sort.

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Alderson

Maybe he can find his mechanics. He shouldn’t be on any list.

But he’s still a young guy and obviously did something right his first few years in the minors.

But last year’s mess is hard to forget.

by Bernie6 on Nov 8, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

same thing was said about bryan morris

i’ll harp on alderson to succeed until he becomes an ex-pirate

by white angus on Nov 8, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think Morris...

…was ever throwing in the low 80s.

I mean, other than freshman year of high school, or whatever.

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

my point is that morris came back from not only surgery, but a supposed bad attitude and poor performance

alderson should not be written off, especially at his young age. he was drafted and thought of highly before this past season

by white angus on Nov 8, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Alderson could have a 2011 season

that’s similar to Bryan Morris in 2010

Odds are completely against him though

by BadAndy on Nov 8, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

no one thought Morris could do it either

and the only one who can set those odd are Tim Alderson

by white angus on Nov 8, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a lot easier...

…to overcome TJ (something like a 97% success rate), a bad attitude, and one bad season than it is a total lack of major league stuff.

Alderson has a non-zero chance of making it back to where he was, but I certainly wouldn’t put any money on it at this point.

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

At Flor this past year

  Alderson is a big kid…he literally looked like he was lobbing the ball…I know I mentioned it here, it looked like he was throwing change ups…you dont expect a bigger kid like that to throw that soft…we were laughing because the catcher throwing it back had more zip on his throws.

  I’d love to see him strike gold or something but he had absolutely nothing…when SF traded him, it was known he lost alot prior to the deal…but what happened this past year?

by Dan Jenkins on Nov 8, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Dan

I don’t get it. His early statistics and scouting reports looked like he was going to be a solid MLB starter. It probably would be a #4. But still he’d have a spot.

I know he’s a big guy with complex mechanics. But there has to be something else going on.

by Bernie6 on Nov 8, 2010 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

most of the year

i expected it would turn out that he was injured and probably requiring surgery. I dont know what this is, now

by BurgherKing on Nov 8, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

But...

Alderson is still only 21 years old….

Should he be off of the prospects list? Sure.

Give up on him? Not yet.

by impliedi on Nov 9, 2010 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus....

Alderson has a lifetime minor league slugging percentage of .560, plus an OPS of .846!!!! (That’s what having 3 of your 5 minor league hits being HRs will do for you!!)

Can he play another position??? (just kidding)

by impliedi on Nov 9, 2010 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps

the Giants rushed him? Moved up to AA at age 20. You figure that on a normal schedule, Alderson would probably just now be making a move to AA, so I don’t think it was that big of a deal that he went back to A ball last year.

by impliedi on Nov 9, 2010 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

its not that he went back to A ball

its the extreme circumstances surrounding it. He was actually holding his own in AA, till it all fell apart…

by BurgherKing on Nov 9, 2010 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

The decline in stuff ...

is the problem.

Yes, he’s still young. But he’s not going anywhere throwing his heat at 84 mph.

by Bernie6 on Nov 9, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

After reading the BP article

One might quible about some players or their position but overall I don’t have a problem with it. The one thing that I do agree with is that they are still at least 5 yrs away IF they keep drafting a priority. When I read that new mgmt’s goal was to build through the draft I think all of us knew based on teams like the Rays and Marlins that it would take 10 yrs. After looking at BP’s list from ‘08 I actually cringed. Although I knew what it was, seeing it again just blows my mind. How could anybody with one ounce of brains let the system fall to that state, just think what it would look like if they didn’t draft AMac. If future mgmt ever starts down that path again fans should tear down PNC Park.

by oldfrothingslosh on Nov 8, 2010 2:52 PM EST reply actions  

It really does make you vomit ...

looking through the DL years and the top prospect lists.

by Bernie6 on Nov 8, 2010 3:39 PM EST reply actions  

The funny thing is, in some of them, Goldstein rated about the same number of five-, four-, three- and two-star guys.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Nov 8, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That's one of the reasons...

…I’m not as big on Goldstein’s work as I am on that of some other prospect guys.

by Vlad on Nov 8, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

found this one from 2007

source

Excellent Prospects
1. Andrew McCutchen, cf
Very Good Prospects
2. Brad Lincoln, rhp
3. Brent Lillibridge, ss
Good Prospects
4. Neil Walker, c
Average Prospects
5. Todd Redmond, rhp
6. Brian Bixler, ss
7. Josh Sharpless, rhp
8. Mike Felix, lhp
9. John Van Benschoten, rhp
10. Justin Vaclavik, rhp

i suppose lillibridge is the only real quibble i have here, assuming he had to include the rest just to make it to 10. things get real ugly after walker.

by johnnycuff on Nov 8, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I just hope in 5 yrs were not looking at the 2010 prospect list and wanting to vomit.

(although there are a lot of legitimate picks that no one can fault the Pirates for choosing)

by oldfrothingslosh on Nov 8, 2010 6:22 PM EST reply actions  

Allie a 5 star?

I am surprised that he is ranked that high; BP must put a big emphasis on a player’s ceiling, no matter how likely it is that the player reach his potential. They describe him as a kid who “suddenly started throwing strikes late in the spring.” That doesn’t sound like a 5 star prospect to me.

by Pghfan987 on Nov 9, 2010 4:54 PM EST reply actions  

You're also undervaluing his athleticism.

He carried a second/third round grade as a position player, though it’s been obvious for a while that he’d end up on the mound.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2010 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I like Allie, of course

I just think the 4 star description fits him much better. I think he ends up being a great power arm in the bullpen, perhaps becoming Hanrahan’s replacement.

by Pghfan987 on Nov 10, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

he may end up in the bullpen, yes

but 100mph is 100mph. if you could throw triple digits, you too would be a 5star prospect

by white angus on Nov 10, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

All depends on how you value a prospect...

if you value ceiling over floor than Allie is a no brainer 5 star prospect. I personally feel that ceiling should be given more importance when evaluating prospects simply because you win with stars. All that said, I fail to see how Justin Wilson should be any lower than #11 given the velocity and movement on his fastball. He walked a lot of people last year but a lot of that came towards the end of the season so fatigue could have been a factor. Anyway, I agree with Goldstein’s ranking of the top 3 but I hate that Wilson’s not in the top 20. I’m generally not a big fan of Goldstein.

by Slick1 on Nov 10, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

given the velocity and movement on his fastball

My guess is that Goldstein isn’t crediting him with as much velocity and movement as you are (whether that’s right or wrong). Opinions seem to differ greatly as to the quality of his stuff.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough...

I remember reading reports of him touching 94 mph late in the year with terrific movement (though he’s always had the movement IIRC).

by Slick1 on Nov 10, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I could have watched Wilson at Altoona

 Saw him in Flor…nothing stood out at the time but I wasn’t really following him…

 There’s no denying his numbers though.

 For most part, I watched Owens,Morris, and Loche pitch in Altoona…my opinions on the 3 differ from most…I feel Owens is the best of the 3, he’s a true pitcher. I was somewhat disappointed watching Morris, I expected more I guess after that A ball streak…I will say his fastball was 89-90 when I watched, maybe he hit 94 a game or so but it wasn’t at any of the games I saw…

by Dan Jenkins on Nov 10, 2010 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

Dan

Is that with or without the stadium gun between 2 to 3 mph slow?

by Bernie6 on Nov 10, 2010 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

Bernie, not sure if it's slow

  Owens was 89-92 in his games, Loche was 89-90 in his games.

  Owens is so smooth that his pitch doesn’t look as “fast”…but he threw just as hard as Morris when I saw them pitch.

  Loche isn’t as smooth as Owens but is more polished than Morris too.

  I was excited the first time I was to see Morris pitch, he was disappointing but I prob had my expectations a little too high. I’m still hoping he becomes the productive MLB pitcher that many expect.

by Dan Jenkins on Nov 10, 2010 4:45 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Are they a prospect.
Small
Why I think the Bucs are playoff bound
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 42: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Hitting Coach???
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
I Admit that I Was Wrong About the A.J. Burnett Trade
Small
not Adam Lind
Small
Adam Lind
Smiling_small
Why is Merrero still considered a first rounder?
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 41: Pirates @ Tigers
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Game Score Game 40: Pirates @ Tigers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas