Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lance Berkman Could Have Torn ACL

Kenshin Kawakami?

Per DK, there's a lot of talk about the Pirates trading for him.

B-R says he's arb-eligible after next year, but don't guys from NPB work differently? I'm going on the assumption that he's a FA after the completion of his 3/$23M contract. DK says he's owed $6.67M for '11. We could afford to eat all of that; it really comes down to what we're willing to trade vs. how much we'd want to pay.

His ERA+ was 107 in '09 and 76 in '10; xFIP says he was the same ~4.58 pitcher both years. Decent, not great K rate, too many walks, nice, low GB rate that should play OK with our IF. In some ways he's the kind of guy that we've talked about as a more-suitable alternative to Zach Duke: less pitch-to-contact without being so outstanding that he's unreachable. If we covered $5M of his salary, we'd be paying what we would have for Duke with excellent prospects of getting better results.

So, whom do you trade for him, and how much salary do you want ATL to eat?

Incidentally, I cannot believe that he's the second Kenshin Kawakami in MLB history. 135 years, 2 Jack Wilsons, 2 Kenshin Kawakamis.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If the Pirates were willing to eat the contract, I doubt they would have to give up anything. Atlanta would be probably be thrilled if someone offered to take half the contract.

by bolton on Dec 6, 2010 2:19 PM EST reply actions  

Good Thing Littlefield isnt the GM...

He would insist that the Braves did in fact get a prospect back in the deal

by goodtymes31 on Dec 6, 2010 2:19 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, DL ...

was generous in giving our prospects to other teams.

by Bernie6 on Dec 6, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Well

I’m pretty sure you’re not allowed to literally trade a player for nothing.

But the real question is whether you’d rather the Pirates pay more or less all of his contract in order to save sending even a nominal prospect, or if you make ATL pay most of his salary and send back, I dunno, Matt McSwain or Anthony Claggett (OK, the Braves wouldn’t pay much for either, but we have less chum in the system than we used to)?

by JRoth95 on Dec 6, 2010 2:29 PM EST reply actions  

Per MLBTR / Langosch:

Re: Kawakami’s salary:

The Pirates have shown some interest in Braves starter Kenshin Kawakami, reports MLB.com’s Jenifer Langosch. She estimates Kawakami would only cost the Pirates $1-2MM and no significant players, as the Braves are just looking to unload part of his $6.667MM salary.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Dec 6, 2010 2:57 PM EST reply actions  

At that price...

…I’d definitely be interested.

by Vlad on Dec 6, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously

Are the Braves that desperate to cut salary? And are they so certain that a 4.58 xFIP guy is worthless? I mean, if the cut the guy and use a replacement-level pitcher, that costs them $7.067M. If they trade him to us and we cover (split the diff) $1.5M, they pay $5.567M for that replacement-level pitcher.

I don’t think the Braves are looking for $1.9M NRIs and need payroll space to pursue them, do you?

Anyway, I’d absolutely pull the trigger on this. $1.5M and a PTBNL for a guy who could well be worth 2+ WAR? Easy call.

by JRoth95 on Dec 6, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

I don’t think that you can possibly pass on him at that price. Or even something close to that price.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Dec 6, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless we give someone who has absolutely no upside

sorta like Kris Watts or Claggett, and the Braves cover atleast $4.5million of his contract then I’m all for it, but I don’t think Atlanta would be willing to do that

by 2010 will be the year on Dec 6, 2010 3:14 PM EST reply actions  

There's only been one Kenshin Kawakami in MLB

At least in Baseball-Reference. If you saw 2 in Fangraphs, that is just them listing him separately as a major leaguer and a minor leaguer.

I do like Kawakami as the “veteran starter” pick-up since he’s healthy and will be cheap. Rather have him than Webb or Harden or someone like that.

by maguro on Dec 6, 2010 3:38 PM EST reply actions  

Fangraphs had a guy in 1975

Ah, but now I see that it’s a weird link to his AAA page, using his birthdate. Odd.

Is this a good place to complain that, when I type “Pedro Alvarez” into FG, it offers me Pedro Tavarez as well? They’re not even that close! Like, I could get it if it were Alvarez and Alvares. But you can’t realistically mistype “Ta” for “Al”.

by JRoth95 on Dec 6, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Pedro Tavarez's full name...

…is Pedro Albert Tavarez. PEDRO AL(bert ta)VAREZ.

Makes sense, if you think like a computer.

by Vlad on Dec 6, 2010 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait, really?

And how have I missed that?

by JRoth95 on Dec 6, 2010 5:43 PM EST up reply actions  

The Fangraphs page doesn't have his middle name listed.

But per B-R, it’s Alberto.

Of course, that still doesn’t explain why they wouldn’t display the middle name on the page, if they had it in the name database for the player search. Now my head hurts.

by Vlad on Dec 6, 2010 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

B-R says he’s arb-eligible after next year, but don’t guys from NPB work differently?

NPB guys sometimes ask for a clause that prohibits their team from offering them arbitration. I’m not sure whether Kawakami has one or not.

by Vlad on Dec 6, 2010 3:48 PM EST reply actions  

According to Cot's

Yes, Kawakami has a clause that would make him a free agent without a new deal after 2011.

by MarkInDallas on Dec 6, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

How bout a Kawakami for Doumit swap?

Seems like it could be mutually beneficial..

by jlk9697 on Dec 6, 2010 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

Not quite

In the swap Langosch outlines, we get Kawakami and Doumit for ~$6.6M, minus one worthless PTBNL. In your swap, we get Kawakami alone for $6.667M. We can still get some value for Doumit, and any value is a better deal than a swap would be.

by JRoth95 on Dec 6, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Not that someone like myself knows more, but I don't buy what Langosch is saying..

It just doesn’t make sense, Atlanta is willing to unload Kawakami to save 1-2 million and get nothing in return? If that is true, then count me in.

My thought with Kawakami for Doumit is that essentially we are just swapping salaries, only now using the 6 million or so in a much better way. Kawakami gets added to the rotation mix, and we can still go out and make a splash in FA.

Maybe Atlanta wouldn’t have interest in Doumit, but I’d bet they’d have some. Between RF/1B/ and C, Doumit could probably squeeze in 300 at bats or so for Atlanta. For a competitive team, having a useful player like Doumit around would seem to be a nice advantage.

by jlk9697 on Dec 6, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Doumit = Veteranosity!

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Dec 6, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Doug Mientkiewicz has Atlanta on the phone right now.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Dec 6, 2010 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

It just doesn’t make sense, Atlanta is willing to unload Kawakami to save 1-2 million and get nothing in return?

They don’t have a role or a roster spot for him with the big club, and don’t want to make a distinguished veteran cool his heels at AAA all year.

by Vlad on Dec 6, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

And a slightly better right fielder.

by MarkInDallas on Dec 7, 2010 2:45 AM EST up reply actions  

And a slightly better 1b

I’m assuming it’s Freeman’s job and the Braves will give him 550 at bats.

by Bernie6 on Dec 7, 2010 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

The deal that caught my attention...and is under radar

  S Marcum to Milwaukee…the guys a solid pitcher…he had his surgery and came back strong…I expect him to be even stronger this year…and cheap salary-wise w/ a couple more arb years of control.

  Milw gave up a darn good prospect in Lawrie but Marcum has the stuff and know how to be a very solid #2 behind Gallardo.

by Dan Jenkins on Dec 6, 2010 5:54 PM EST reply actions  

its not under the radar

but it hasnt been noticed that much because it was a fanshot, and the plethora of fanposts has relegated those…

by BurgherKing on Dec 6, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Lawrie

I was surprised the Brewers dealt him. I guess they like Weeks long term at 2b.

But Lawrie looks like a real hitter to me. If he can stay at MI, the Jays got a nice player.

by Bernie6 on Dec 6, 2010 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

For a SP like Marcum

  Lawrie’s a pretty decent price…you have Weeks who’s off a decent year…it’s tough to find a cheap top 2 SP…and FA prices for them are off the wall…and SP is the most important position on any team IMO.

 I like MIL’s end of this deal

by Dan Jenkins on Dec 6, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed...

I’ve read a couple of scouting reports on Lawrie and they are critical of his ability to stay at second. Both of them predicted a move to the OF. I think the Brewers did pretty well here.

by Slick1 on Dec 6, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Marcum

I like Marcum as well, and I would have made the deal if I were the Milwaukee GM.

But Marcum is a decent injury risk.

And Lawrie will probably be a BA top 15 prospect.

This will be a real interesting trade to follow.

by Bernie6 on Dec 6, 2010 9:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I really like this deal for the Brewers, which means personally I don’t like this deal at all.

by TNbucs on Dec 6, 2010 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

If he's healthy,

I would definitely sign on to acquiring Kenshin Kawakami.

I’d say we could save the Braves $2 million or so in salary.

by patthatt on Dec 6, 2010 7:49 PM EST reply actions  

Kawakami = Kuwata-san v2.0

An older Japanese pitcher well past his prime. We’ve got plenty of places to find pitchers that are capable of a 5.00 ERA.

by Thunder on Dec 6, 2010 10:39 PM EST reply actions  

That's not really fair.

Kawakami has at least had a year as a fairly successful pitcher in the majors. And like the post mentions, his peripherals in 2009 and 2010 are nearly identical. He was probably a bit lucky in ’09, and unlucky in ’10.

by biggyv on Dec 6, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Kawakami is a legit MLB back-end starter. Kuwata’s stint with the Bucs was more like an MLB fantasy camp.

by maguro on Dec 6, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

What part...

of being an older Japanese pitcher well past his prime…is not fair? I’m not saying he’d produce the same numbers…thank goodness. But…I’ll be surprised if his ERA is back down below 4.

by Thunder on Dec 7, 2010 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I love Kuwata on a personal level...

…but speaking realistically, he had already been done for several years by the time we signed him.

by Vlad on Dec 7, 2010 7:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I was just on a Braves site

to see what is being said by their fans regarding Kawakami. You wouldn’t believe some of the comments. “Maybe we can use Kawakami to acquire McCutchen” or “We should offer Lowe and Kawakami and get McCutchen and Alvarez back”. Unbelievable….

by Enchinga on Dec 7, 2010 1:44 PM EST reply actions  

Sounds like some of the trade proposals on here

Just kidding.

But there are some unrealistic trades proposed here.

by Bernie6 on Dec 7, 2010 2:03 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Are they a prospect.
Small
Why I think the Bucs are playoff bound
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 42: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Hitting Coach???
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
I Admit that I Was Wrong About the A.J. Burnett Trade
Small
not Adam Lind
Small
Adam Lind
Smiling_small
Why is Merrero still considered a first rounder?
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 41: Pirates @ Tigers
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Game Score Game 40: Pirates @ Tigers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas