Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Coonelly: Pirates Could Be Buyers At Deadline

From the Post-Gazette

Team president Frank Coonelly predicted that the July 31 trading deadline will be different for the Pirates this summer than the current management's first two, when many veterans were sent away in what the team described as an attempt to add quantity and quality to the minor-league system.

"I can't imagine any circumstances under which it would be anything like the first two July 31 dates. And it could be the reverse," Coonelly said, referring to the Pirates as potential buyers rather than sellers.

The Pirates have not been an in-season buyer since 1997, when acquiring shortstop Shawon Dunston, now a special assistant to San Francisco general manager Brian Sabean.

Well, other than Matt Morris, I guess that's true.

I was about to describe Coonelly's comment as ridiculous spin and move on with my life (really, does it make any sense for the Pirates to be buyers at the deadline?), but then again this administration has shown again and again that it's not adverse to trading youngsters for veterans as long as the deals are minor. One might think that their previous attempts to do so would make them wonder if this is the right thing to do. First there was Todd Redmond for Tyler Yates, and while that trade cost the Pirates nothing, they really didn't get back anything either. Then there was Jesse Chavez for Akinori Iwamura, which I'm sure the Bucs wish they hadn't done. And then there was Ron Uviedo for Dana Eveland, which of course the jury's still out on, but which doesn't look so hot so far. I'm certain the Bucs won't consider any prospects-for-vets deals more major than this one, but still, I wish they'd just stop this practice altogether. They fortunately aren't willing to trade any real prospects, so the veterans they've gotten so far are players no one should really want. 

Comment 79 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You know I've said this before...

but Coonelly needs to STFU! He says way to much for a President. He spent the majority of the interview saying that it wouldn’t be like the last two years which indicated to me that we will still trade people but it will not be a wholesale roster turnover. I read his comments about being buyers more a as a matter of fact statement like…you never know, if we are in this thing. You never know but monkeys might fly our of my ass too. Now you can be sure that if we trade a Duke or Doumit the media will be screaming and calling both he and NH liars. We have no intentions of being buyers so the fact he threw that out there is going to make him come off as disingenious. I personally don’t think he is but I do believe that is the general perception. Everytime these guys say something to appease the fans: we are not going to trade players (…like we have the last two years) and Nate McLouth is a core player, they just end up sounding stupid and deceiptful in the end. I would much rather have them say the plan is not to have a wholesale roster turnover at the deadline this year…or we are happy to sign Nate to this contract which gives him security and the team cost certainty. It’s a good deal for both parties going forward. End it there.

by Slick1 on Jun 11, 2010 2:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Rolen and Trades

I agree with them being buyers and I thought about before Coonelly mentioned it.
I really don’t care what he says. I think it is the right think to do, what they get and what they give are still the most important items to think about.
They have some position players and a couple of pitchers to move and if they want a prospect or two.

Everyone thought the Reds were crazy for bringing in Scot Rolen last year after the break, but it turned out to be a good move.
This team needs a couple more parts, Alvarez is definitely one.
The Pirates because of Alvarez, Tabata and Walker are going to have to either make trades or cut players, there could be possibilities of package deals.

by leadoff on Jun 11, 2010 2:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Terminology Problem?

Trading position players and pitchers for prospects is called “selling.” Though, within the Pirates organizational plan right now, I guess that’s technically buying, right? Coonelly should probably keep his mouth shut, because he can’t possibly mean trading away prospects for vets, can he?

Yes, the Pirates need parts, but with their payroll you grow 85% of those parts, and when they’re all performing at the same time, you go out and buy a complimentary piece or two.

I agree that getting a Rolen-type trade would be awesome, but the Reds got extremely lucky there.

Santa Roberto Clemente
Ora Pro Nobis

by CTapps on Jun 11, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

he can’t possibly mean trading away prospects for vets, can he?

That would be the opposite of trading vets for prospects I think.

Put on your dancin' shoes.

by PensFan024 on Jun 11, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buying

I said I was for buying, but I should have said I was for buying the draft picks we just took first, I would much rather see them sign at least their top 5 picks.

by leadoff on Jun 11, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

That seems a silly thing to say

for a team that will be 30 games under .500 by July 31.

Still … it’s not like there aren’t any holes in the lineup. I just don’t know what we have that anyone would take for a player who looks like a long-term fix.

by bucdaddy on Jun 11, 2010 2:14 PM EDT reply actions  

July 30??

Looks like they may be 30 under .500 by June 30.

by Thunder on Jun 11, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

as long as it nets a

Major league catcher im all for it.

by bucsreport on Jun 11, 2010 2:15 PM EDT reply actions  

They might need one if Doumit stays at 1st base, Carlin was doing okay at AAA.

by leadoff on Jun 11, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I cringed when he said that...

We all know the Smizik’s of the world are going to reference that quote to death if they trade one of their vets away. He has put them in a real no win situation now

by goodtymes31 on Jun 11, 2010 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I''ve been trying to think of any specific players he could be talking about...

..and really none come to mind in the Scott Rolen mode. A few crazy propositions just for the hell of it:

Peavy? He’s 29 and we can afford his contract, unlike most teams, but he has a full no-trade clause and doesn’t want to play for a team re-building.

Ibanez? He has struggled this year and Phils Nation advocates cutting him outright, which may indicate he could be had for very little. This would complete the outfield at least for the remainder of the season and maybe next year as well if Ibanez picked his production up.

Morales? He’s 27 and a great power hitter, but he’s out for the rest of the season and the Angel’s aren’t exactly in rebuilding mode I don’t believe? Maybe Garett Jones/Dotel would be something of interest to them? I don’t know if this would qualify as “buying”, but it would be pretty interesting IMO.

Someone on here suggested making a play at Jose Reyes. Seems wildly ridiculous, but it’s Omar we’re talking about. I’d think Neal would at least put in a call to see what the asking price is while Reyes stock is down. Maybe something like Owens, Maholm, Dotel, and Cedeno would intrigue a GM on the hotseat like Minaya?

by jlk9697 on Jun 11, 2010 3:15 PM EDT reply actions  

If I were to have a dream where the Pirates traded Jones and Dotel for Kendry, I’d immediately be able to make it a lucid dream because even my subconscious brain would realize I’m in a world not even approaching reality.

by CptnAwesome on Jun 11, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

That sounded mean, but I didn’t mean it to be. Sorry!

It’d be awesome to get Morales, but he’s way better than Jones and Dotel.

by CptnAwesome on Jun 11, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I suggested Reyes in another thread.

I saw his .250 average, saw his $11 million option for next year, and I remember reading last year that with the injury problems, the Mets were beginning to sour on him.

It’s very unlikely that he’s on the block, but it’s definitely a NH type trade candidate, as we would be buying super-low. I am not sure if the Mets would want to trade him, but after this season, I doubt they will pick up that option, and the Pirates can try to sign him for 3-5 years. We can definitely afford to add 20 million dollars to the payroll, so we could pay Reyes and still sign Cutch/Tabata/Alvarez/Lincoln/Jones/Walker to extensions.

by H2O on Jun 11, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why?

First off, Morales would be ok, he has great upside, but it takes alot more then Jones/Dotel for him.

Secondly, I don’t want Reyes or any other vet. They will come here and grow through the motions.

by psunate77 on Jun 11, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought about Peavy myself...

But that whole no trade clause screws us. Its just damn near impossible for a team like the Bucs to even get a washed out number one in a trade, let alone a number one in free agency. Just another reason that I have hope for this draft.

by Bucs Fever on Jun 12, 2010 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's conceivable

With the anticipated arrival soon of Alvarez, the foundation will be in place for the team they’ve been building for several years. Assuming Walker, Tabata and Pedro get the lion’s share of playing time for the remainder of next season, I could see this group really start to gel and become something special — along the lines of what Tampa has put together — as soon as next year.

But just as the Rays didn’t become a finished product until they traded away (what was thought to be) a premium piece to get Garza, I’m starting to think the Pirates would be wise to leverage some of their minor league talent in order to bring in an honest-to-goodness pitcher.

I can visualize Ohlendorf, Lincoln, Maholm and (all evidence to the contrary) even Morton as useful members of a decent pitching rotation. Unfortunately, there’s just no ace in that deck.

I’m not suggesting we can trade spare parts for a bona fide stopper. But you could maybe package some combination of Duke, Doumit, Milledge, Laroche and/or any minor leaguer not named Sanchez, Taillon or Marte and bring in someone who at least belongs on a Major League mound.

At that point, the ball is in the hands of ownership, which has said for years it would spend the money to sign a quality free agent when it made sense to do so.

Let your young core players get their feet wet this season, and next year it might make sense to bring in something resembling a top-of-the rotation pitcher. But the intermediate step might be dealing some of your other assets to add a No. 2 guy.

by bucfaninwa on Jun 11, 2010 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Some of this

The Garza for Young deal was really prospect for prospect, but it’s a good point. The Rays weren’t buyers or sellers necessarily, but they were changers.

Also, if I can overparse FC’s words,

“I can’t imagine any circumstances under which it would be anything like the first two July 31 dates. And it could be the reverse,” Coonelly said, referring to the Pirates as potential buyers rather than sellers.

If we trade 5 guys next week he can still say we won’t be sellers “at the deadline.”

I’ve been thinking about why we bothered to deal for Eveland, and the answer might be that a trade of one of our current starters might be coming sooner rather than later, and and Eveland is seen by the front office as a guy that can be plugged in to the rotation. Being lefthanded, and taking what is clearly my imagination further, Duke or Maholm are on the block.

I think the two pitchers are nearly identical, though at this point in this season Maholm is having a better year. But if GMs think like what the majority of commentors here, Maholm is worth a lot more, so I hope we trade him for a ML ready (or close) SS.

So, what contender wants to beat other contenders to the punch and trade for a lefty they have rights to through 2011 (Duke) or signed through 2012 (Maholm)?

by azibuck on Jun 11, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

MLB Ready SS

Although SS has been a black hole in our lineup for the past 10+ years, I wouldn’t demand an MLB ready SS, if demanding one. It’s not that what you said was a bad idea, but considering that the three most ready (and legit) SS prospects are Todd Frazier (Reds), Dee Gordon (Dodgers) and one of the Indians prospects Lonnie Chisenhall or Jason Donald.

Frazier is a good prospect, and the Reds probably won’t deal within the division, Gordon is the Dodgers’ #1 prospect, so they probably over-value him, and the Indians aren’t really buyers. So after those three, we’re left with Bobby Hill, Jose Hernandez, etc.

Reid Brignac could be an interesting option, but with the threat of Crawford leaving, the Rays might choose to move Zobrist back to RF, and Brignac to 2B.

by H2O on Jun 11, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Frazier

Agree with Vlad. He can’t play shortstop.

He also has been horrible at AAA with the bat. I think a recent tear has gotten him to the .220s and an OPS of .700.

He’s hit better at other levels. But I’m not sure he’ll hit enough to play a corner position or field well enough to play a middle infield position. Maybe second.

by Bernie6 on Jun 11, 2010 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brignac

is interesting. I doubt with the Rays having injury problems in the infield this year that he’s available.

But he would be an upgrade, I believe, over Cedeno.

I just doubt we have anything TB would want.

by Bernie6 on Jun 11, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could see them bringing in a SS or a SP if they could have control of him for a couple years.

Put on your dancin' shoes.

by PensFan024 on Jun 11, 2010 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

i could too Reyes or Hanley anyone? hahhahahaha

lol but seriously i could see them trying to get a starting SS that they can have control over for a couple years

by BigB2323 on Jun 11, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, it’s not like the Pirates have anything to sell anymore. They missed the boat on getting someone to give up a prospect for Zach Duke. I guess Maholm might bring back a live arm or two. That’s about it.

Trying to improve the 2010 team is the exact opposite of what the Pirates should be doing. If anything, they should be weakening the 2010 team even further, to solidify their claim to the #1 pick. Picking first instead of 2nd-5th is the difference between Bryce Harper and James Taillon, the difference between Stephen Strasburg and Tony Sanchez.

by Zeth on Jun 11, 2010 3:32 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Solidify?

We’re 6 games ahead (behind?) the Orioles in the race for Rendon. Gonna be tough to pull off.

Maybe that’s why we picked up Dane Eveland?

by maguro on Jun 11, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

good point

send him out there every 5th day…

the more i think about it, the more I want this blown up… lets get Rendon! We’d have an IF of Alvarez, Walker, SS and Rendon! Wow!

by BurgherKing on Jun 11, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Duke and Maholm

And get Lincoln just a bit more seasoning in Indy. Go with a rotation of:

Ohlendorf
Morton
Eveland
Burres
Karstens

That’ll work!!!! :)

by biggyv on Jun 11, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

+100000!

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jun 11, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Morton

If that’s the case, Morton needs to be immediately reinstated to the rotation.

by Bernie6 on Jun 11, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

How bad do you really think Eveland is???

Because I think he could easily put up Duke numbers…and since we’re talking about trading Duke or Maholm….

by Bucs Fever on Jun 12, 2010 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Eveland

His career stats say:

5.66 ERA, 1.73 WHP, 10.8 hits per 9, 6.0 K’s per 9. 4.7 walks per 9

I think six full or partial seasons in MLB say he’s really bad.

by Bernie6 on Jun 12, 2010 3:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alvarez + for Oswalt?

Seriously though, I completely agree with your take. If anyting, there will be minor deals done at the deadline.

The team could still probably afford to move Duke or Maholm for prospects and not adversely affect the team, and as with the past deals extremely improve the team in the long run.

by backtocali on Jun 11, 2010 4:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Oswalt for Alvarez

would be horrible IMO. Trading all of Alvarez’s best, elite, cheap years, for all of Oswalt’s worst, most expensive years.

by escroll on Jun 11, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm

Yeah, no need for the Pirates to pick up Oswalt, or move Alvarez.

The only teams willing to pick up Oswalt are large market teams, and if they are smart, not give up much for him. Although he is still producing, his contract is awful, and not worth giving up any top of the line prospects in exchange for him, unless the Astros agree to take on the bulk of the remaining salary.

by backtocali on Jun 11, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given that a onetime GM actually seriously advocated trading Strasburg for Oswalt, I can see where someone thinks it was serious!

In Phillips’s “defense”—I guess—he thought the Nats had a chance to win now. It’s still tremendously stupid, obviously.

by CptnAwesome on Jun 11, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

that was a brain fart

and there is no “defense” either… imagine strasburg landing with the astros to torture us for another 6 years!

by BurgherKing on Jun 11, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

rizzo is of course not Littlefield

but I wonder if we should try offering Duke, Maholm and Doumit for Strasburg! Oh and Laroche too

by BurgherKing on Jun 11, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt we could pull that on the Nats GM, BUT

Brian Sabean could probably hook us up with Buster Posey, Madison Bumgarner, and Angel Villalona. Villalona being NH’s prize of the trade, because in 20 years, when he’s out of jail, he could be a decent reclamation project.

by H2O on Jun 11, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Oswalt has 10/5 rights. He isn’t going anywhere he doesn’t want to go.

by Thunder on Jun 11, 2010 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is from the CBA:

Section 7(d)(4): Once a player has accumulated ten years of service time in the major leagues and five years with his current team, he may not be traded to Pittsburgh and may not be traded to any other team without his consent.

I’m pretty sure that’s what it said, anyway.

by WTM on Jun 11, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stephen Drew?

Arizona looking to make some moves i been reading and are willing to trade anyone but Justin Upton and Ian Kennedy as reported of MLB trade rumors…we did draft Stephen Drew back in the day didnt we?

by BigB2323 on Jun 11, 2010 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I was thinking about making a fanpost along these lines...

to speculate on whether it made any sense for the Pirates to be buyers this year or next year. Obviously, buying this year would no suddenly equal playoffs, but would be looking towards 2011-2012. My first thought had been ‘what if NH did something insane like trade for Cliff Lee?’ That was before I realized that Lee’s contract is up this year, not next year.

I thought through a couple other possibilities, including Prince Fielder, Jose Reyes, and a few others; all with the idea of going nuts and getting someone top-flight, not just a solid player or spare part.

Here’s the logic: Once Pedro comes up, the Bucs have two elite hitters, two maybe very good hitters, two competent supporting cast, and two black-ish holes. Swap in an elite guy, and suddenly that’s a pretty nice lineup. The pitching staff is a little more hairy, but certainly the rotation would look a lot different with a guy like Cliff Lee at the top.

The point is that there are finally a few elite players on the major league roster, and a number of nice complementary players. There isn’t much more elite talent at the top levels of the minors, but there are some possibly nice complimentary players; Morris and Owens come to mind immediately. Then instead of sitting around waiting for all these low-A arms to develop, use their value to get more elite players on the big league squad. If those guys could step into complimentary roles as soon as next year, contention could be closer that one might think.

by escroll on Jun 11, 2010 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

please note:

this is obviously very speculative. Actually executing this would be very risky, not to mention maybe not possible; the high-upside guys (Cain, ZVR, Black, Marte?) that are far from the majors may not be worth that much to other teams at this point. But it’s just a thought experiment; don’t flame me as if I’m saying ‘oh man let’s trade Duke, Dotel and Brandon Moss (He’s a prospect, right?) for Felix Hernandez, that would be awesome/totally work!’

by escroll on Jun 11, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looking forward, would you rather build with Doumit, Jones or Pearce at 1st base? I don’t see either of them being the answer in RF and think that they could be trading chips for that catcher/SS we have been waiting for.

I would expect to see Doumit improve offensively, once he gets rid of the catching gear and Jones has proven capable at 1st base.

Personally, I am intrigued by Pearce’s improved stick and run saving defense. Clement is back-up material only, at this point.

by BrianO' on Jun 11, 2010 4:33 PM EDT reply actions  

IMO

Doumit, even sans catching gear, is never more than a complimentary piece, esp. due to his injuries. In the long run he’s worth more to the team as a trade piece, thanks to his very good production as a catcher (relative to other catchers).

As for Jones or Pearce, I think neither have the stick for 1B unless Jones gets last year’s mojo back, so I wouldn’t view them as anything to build around. Either one could be ok there as long as a really good RF/LF bat could be found.

by escroll on Jun 11, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

An open letter to Frank Coonelly.

Dear Frank,

Shut up. Stop talking about dynasties and buying at the deadline. You’re giving ammunition to people who want to see you and Huntington fired.

Sincerely,
IAPiratesFan

by IAPiratesFan on Jun 11, 2010 4:44 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe he is just blowin

smoke up peoples arse. He is dealing with trades. If im a seller I dont want everyone to know.

by bucsreport on Jun 11, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good! Fire Coonelly and Huntington. And take Russell with you.

And force the Nuttings to sell. It’s the Pirates only hope. This farce has gone on long enough. I want my Buccos back!

by dougalmac on Jun 12, 2010 1:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think FC has drawn too much attentionwith this statement

But it is possible that along with another round of trades this year, the bucs try and add some replacements, ie SP’s, or possibly 3B and a C, or some low expense low risk MLB players to fill holes in the OF or at 1B, and deffinately a new SP.

I don’t know if it’s possible but I can think of a pair of 1B that could be had with a little to no trouble. Daric Barton (OAK) is a 27yo 1B that for all intents and purposes is holding 1B until Chris Carter comes up from AAA. While Barton’s not a great 1B, he’d be a solid 1B for a team that really doesn’t have a real 1B prospect. Another similar story is Gaby Sanchez in FLA. He’s probably a better hitter than Barton, and is sitting in front of BA’s #20 prospect Logan Morrison. Morrison has been injured a lot this year, but when he’s been healthy has very well in AAA.

Another guy I thought may be a worthy prospect would be Josh Reddick in BOS. He may be a stretch, but the right package could get him to PA. A couple other Minor leaguers that’d be worth a try are JP Arencibia C (TOR) and Allen Craig 1B/OF (STL). Both are clubbing in AAA, and are being heldup by sold MLB players ahead of them.

Just some thoughts about what FC was saying. Seriously doubt he meant buying marquee players. Not this year, it’d be a real waste of time.

by Pensburgh Pirates on Jun 11, 2010 5:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Trade Deadline

Unlike some of the other posters, I don’t most of the time get irritated by things the FO says. My usual response is “what do you want or expect them to say?”. But the idea that the Bucs are going to be buyers at the deadline is ludicrous. Who are we going to give up? Aki? Laroche?

by Batavia on Jun 11, 2010 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Presumably a prospect. Who that’d be I have no idea

by TravisDW on Jun 11, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doumit is the only obvious trade candidate if we successfully market him as a catcher.

All the other candidates either have little to no value (LaRoche, Duke, Donnelly, Iwamura) or we’d probably be better off keeping them (Maholm, for example, has been productive the last 3 years at just a bit less than a Buehrle-type rate. I doubt he’s worth near that on the market, though, so if we could get a few more years then he is more valuable on the Bucs. I’m not totally sold on the 2013 pitching depth.

by Adam Reynolds on Jun 11, 2010 6:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Basically all of the pitchers in full-season leagues right now.

by Adam Reynolds on Jun 12, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doumit, Duke, Maholm and RPs

Those are about the only thing I can see anyone inquiring about.

Realistically, Doumit and Maholm have modest value.

RPs just aren’t going to bring a huge return.

Keep with the rebuilding plan. Move Morris up to AAA when he’s ready.

But don’t do something dumb like trade for a Rolen.

by Bernie6 on Jun 11, 2010 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

OMG PEOPLE! LISTEN TO YOURSELVES! IT'S SICKENING!

One comment after another about making this move with that player blah-blah-blah. IT’S ABOUT RESULTS, PEOPLE. This crap is just more of the same lame-brain front office moves that amount to nothing. This team is still 15 games under .500 and we aren’t even close to the all-star break. The Pirates are dying again and it’s 18 straight losing seasons and counting. Fire Coonelly, Huntington, and Russell and run the Nuttings out of Pittsburgh on a rail. You want REAL change with the Pirates? What I just advocated MUST happen or nothing will change. I want my Buccos back. I cannot take one more minute of these current front office bozos and the brain damaged Nuttings. JESUS! People of Pittsburgh, STOP THE INSANITY! SAVE THE PIRATES!

by dougalmac on Jun 12, 2010 1:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Doug

You take over perhaps the worst minor league system ever.

You take over an MLB roster that is mediocre. You have a long rebuilding project.

NH and FC are three years into it. They have drafted well. They are signing more international players.

That’s the only way the team can compete long term. A silly move, trading a good prospect for a veteran, would only make you marginally better this year and cost you the future.

I don’t like the Nutting ownership that much myself. But the team is at least doing what a small market team needs to do.

by Bernie6 on Jun 12, 2010 3:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Whatever we do...

I hope we learn from Seattle. Everyone was jocking them for their moves (Figgins, Lee, etc) , and they have the same winning pct as us.

by OldHossRadbourn on Jun 12, 2010 12:24 PM EDT reply actions  

At least Lee wasn’t a bad move. Same can’t be said for Snell, Kotchman, Griffey’s corpse, Rob Johnson, Jack Wilson, the rest of the 3-5 starters, etc.

by Adam Reynolds on Jun 12, 2010 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is my recomendation for the entire Pirates Executive and Coaching Staff.

Hire a media relations adviser/coach and stick to a plan. Really all they got to do is look across the street at how the Steelers handle things and then you got the Penguins who have awesome media relations.

I don’t make too much of the comments that the Pirates front office make but seriously sometimes they come off as a fly-by-night operation.

by Seven_Patch on Jun 12, 2010 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

By media I mean both media and public.

by Seven_Patch on Jun 12, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

ABSURD, RIDICULOUS, NONSENCE

What on earth is he going to be a buyer of? This was just spouting off at the mouth. There is not much to sell and what little there is has little or no value. Maybe Dotel gets you a minor league prospect but Maholm, Duke and Doumit won’t yield anything.

by LuckyDom on Jun 12, 2010 3:16 PM EDT reply actions  

All three would yield a return to varying degrees...

with Maholm and Doumit being the most valuable. Each of those guys could net a nice package. Problem is I think they have more value to us than what they could bring back in a trade…same with Duke. I don’t see any of those three going anywhere unless some team gets desperate and blows us away with an offer.

by Slick1 on Jun 12, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the yield would be less than you think

Doumit is below average defensively and prone to injury. His bat is above average for a catcher but even packaged with Maholm, a number 3 starter in a competitive rotation, will not yield a top prospect. Duke has less value than Maholm. I just can’t see a contender giving much for any combination of these three. I do agree with you Slick that they will not go anywhere.

by LuckyDom on Jun 12, 2010 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

The whole Pirates team is a joke except for Andrew McClutchen. They dont even draft great players. This year they got a couple good ones. They need to follow the Detroit Tigers blueprints and draft power arms early and hope you hit on a good bat in the middle rounds like the Cardinals have with Albert Pujols. Pitching is what every team needs. Dont be afraid of what its going to cost to sign the kid. Rick Porcello, Andrew Miller, Jacob Turner all were examples. Miller was supposed to be the top pick as was Porcello but they had Boras as their agent. If they can get one decent player thru trade this year that will be a start. Maybe fans will see hope again. I lived in Pittsburgh up until a few months ago and its sad when you walk around Carson Street and all you see are Steeler Jerseys or Pens Jerseys. They have a beautiful ball park and they are just wasting it. Maybe the Pirates can coax the Tigers into giving up Brandon Inge. Or Ryan Rayburn even. Rayburn isnt that bad of a player he hasnt had consistent playing time this year and that takes you out of your groove. Those 2 would be an upgrade over what they have now.

by Snydt83 on Jun 13, 2010 6:30 AM EDT reply actions  

They need to draft power arms.. Did you see their draft this year? Like any of it?

by thecheeseisblue on Jun 13, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course I watched the draft. Yes they got a couple good pitching prospects but your missing my point I was trying to make. Dont be afraid to go and get the best player available no matter what the cost of signing him will be. Their first two picks should anchor their rotation for years to come. Their second round pick should have been a first rounder but like I said teams are afraid to draft guys because of signability concerns. The Yankees dont have any issues with anything. They dont really need anybody. They just draft guys because they have to then when its time for the trade deadline and crappy teams are trying to shed their highest paid players who are All Star quality they trade their prospects for them. I will give the Pirates 3 years to at least contend. They are young right now and if they can attract someone in free agency that can make an impact that would be great. But as of now they cant attract anyone to the game. When I lived there in Pittsburgh the past few years I was offered free tickets all the time because nobody wanted to go. Firing the manager ever other year doesnt help much either.

by Snydt83 on Jun 13, 2010 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Major League Ready Shortstop & Ace Starting Pitcher

Everyone who is suggesting a trade for a major league ready shortstop. There is a rumor going around that the Diamondbacks are willing to trade Stephen Drew and Dan Haren. Although they traded Conor Jackson who is batting below .250 and has 1 home run. He is still a pretty good hitter. His first 3 seasons he batted over .280. Last year he wasn’t healthy and has continued to struggle. But he still has potential. The point I’m trying to make is with the Alvarez promotion there isn’t too many top of the line prospects if none in our system anymore.

 So maybe we give up a couple of cheap prospects for a left handed hitting shortstop who is far and away Major League ready and far and away better then Cedeno and an ace pitcher to go along with potentially Ohlendorf, Lincoln and yes even Morton (his stuff is too good to give up on.) We’d have to give up alot but the problem is we don’t have alot. These are the type of players you trade for a Jason Bay or Freddy Sanchez. The lineup looks better with Tabata Walker McCutchen Alvarez Jones and Doumit. I think the only way Doumit will be traded is when Sanchez is ready which could be next year. I say that because Sanchez catches like a Molina and his bat is better than expected. With the hitters we have at the top we don’t need Sanchez to be effective with the bat immediately. The shortstop and first base are two positions of need.

I think if Steve Pearce comes back and lives up to his potential he could be the first baseman. He has the glove now we need the bat. If this happens the lineup should be Tabata Walker McCutchen Alvarez Jones Pearce Sanchez. The starting pitching is a concern. But, if Morton pitches like he should with his stuff; we have an ace to go along with Ohlendorf and Lincoln. Maybe Bryan Morris if he continues to progress. That could leave Duke or Maholm available. The rotation Morton Ohlendorf Lincoln Morris? Duke or Maholm? The bullpen will include Meek(closer) Hanrahan(8th inning) possibly wait for it Moskos(7th inning) Look at the numbers. Just like Morris if the progression continues it is possible. Like I always said he shouldn’t be punished for management looking for a quick and cheap sign. Plus a left handed 7th inning reliever. Pretty good. Plus if Maholm is on the team that will 6 (Maholm-03, Walker-04, McCutchen-05, Lincoln-06, Moskos-07 and Alvarez-08) Six first round picks making an impact on this team. Possibly 7 or 8 if Sanchez-09 and Taillon-10(if he gets signed) come through. When was the last time we said that if ever.

A bench that for sure will include Delwyn Young and possibly LaRoche and Milledge.(I don’t think management wants to give up on them.) There is plenty of talent starting to come up. Maybe I’m too optimistic, but I can’t give up on this franchise. The biggest miss is a coaching staff that can manage this young core of talent. If they continue to draft, develop and make good international signings year after year sooner or later there is going to be a winning baseball team in Pittsburgh even if Nutting(I’m still hopeful he’ll sell the team) is the owner.

by kirblu22 on Jun 16, 2010 2:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Meet & Greet with Joel Hanrahan
Smiling_small
Pedro Alvarez first in at-bats, Josh Harrison second in fWAR
Small
BD Community Top 30 Prospects
Small
Community Prospect #30

Recent FanPosts

Smiling_small
Did you know that Bryan Bullington was an All-Start last year?
Small
Point System Rankings
Towell_small
Color me skeptical, the sad story of Oswalt, Burnett and GFJ
Olz8s2gvbdn15zpl08hlumbr_500_small
Keith Law's Top 100 Prospects
Small
Best and Worst Free-Agent Signings In the Infield
Smiling_small
A look at some guys who didn't sign last year.
Small
Hopes for pitching
Small
Prospect Predictions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Authors

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas