Pirates Acquire Sean Gallagher
At least it didn't cost a prospect this time, as the Pirates acquired Gallagher for cash. I liked Gallagher coming through the minors because he posted good numbers and was pretty young for his levels - he pitched very well at Class AA as a 20-year-old, which isn't easy to do. He hasn't progressed much since then, and has consistently struggled in the majors. He's only 24, and he can start, so he does have value, but he's a little bit like Dana Eveland in that the most interesting things about him have to do with the way he played many years ago. He was a key component in the Rich Harden trade a couple of years back, which means that the A's thought pretty highly of him then. He throws a fastball that's generally around 90-93 MPH, plus a curve, slider and change.
Here's a pretty good article on Gallagher's stuff. The author thinks that if Gallagher might have more success if he stops throwing his slider and concentrates on his curveball as his breaking pitch. It does appear that he's changed a lot since he got his start in the big leagues - he came up as a fastball/curve guy, but then began throwing more and more sliders and changeups, with no success. He's young enough that he might have some upside if he changes his approach.
The Pirates will have to remove a player from the 25-man roster to make way for Gallagher - Justin Thomas might be the one who goes.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sorry if this is obvious...
waiver claim?
by ryebr3ad on Jul 7, 2010 6:25 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
No
A trade for cash, which I guess is the same on our end as fans since they don’t give up any players. The Pirates would have had the first priority on waivers, but apparently other teams were at least semi-interested in trading for him.
i like this move alot
i guess ive never seen the guy play in person, at least not that i remember, but i have always thought pretty highly of him. i think this could finally be the no-risk move that pays off for us in a big way.
Here is a more informative article on Gallagher's background.....
by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 7, 2010 8:03 PM EDT reply actions
More informative than what? You’re free to say what you like here, within reason, but you seem like you go out of your way to insult people sometimes.
by Charlie Wilmoth on Jul 7, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions
A little thin-skinned, huh, Charlie?
“More informative”, meaning, more information for people to make their own judgments on Gallagher as a prospect. FanGraphs prides itself on that……
If one article is fine, two is better.
Relax……
by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 8, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
A little thin-skinned, huh, Charlie?
Uh, no. You have a history of being really abrasive. And “more informative” does not mean the same thing as “additional information.”
by Charlie Wilmoth on Jul 8, 2010 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















