Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Community Prospect #7


Well, after a fairly long delay, I give you the seventh poll in our series. You know the rules by now, so I don't think we need to go through them again. Clearly, Starling Marte was the winner of the poll for #6, so here is your list to this point:

 

1.  Jameson Taillon, RHP

2.  Tony Sanchez, C

3.  Bryan Morris, RHP

4.  Rudy Owens, LHP

5.  Stetson Allie, RHP

6.  Starling Marte, CF

 

Enjoy.

Poll
Number seven?
Luis Heredia
76 votes
Andrew Lambo
40 votes
Zach von Rosenberg
7 votes
Jeff Locke
133 votes
Chase d'Arnaud
1 votes
Justin Wilson
5 votes
Alex Presley
1 votes
Jarek Cunningham
0 votes
Gorkys Hernandez
1 votes
Josh Harrison
0 votes
Write-in (use comments)
0 votes

264 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’m expecting Locke to run away with this one. Early returns agree.

by Garrett122 on Sep 1, 2010 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You people are crazy.

Down to #7, and still nobody’s picking Heredia?

by Vlad on Sep 1, 2010 5:04 PM EDT reply actions  

i think it just depends what people are voting on

ceiling or likelihood… for someone like Heredia, who’s many years away, its a bit harder to vote for him ahead of Locke/Owens type guys who are already in AA performing… my next pick would be a tossup between Heredia/Lambo.

by BurgherKing on Sep 1, 2010 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t think Locke is a better prospect than Heredia?

by shayborg on Sep 1, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think when the major publications release their team prospect lists the consensus will be that Heredia is several notches above Locke, due almost entirely to ceiling.

Whether you agree with that rationale or not, it’s certainly hard to rank a sixteen-year-old who already throws 91-92 with the potential for three plus pitches below a pitcher who has already most likely reached his physical ceiling, a ceiling which appears to be a solid #4 type.

Locke is an excellent pitcher, and a prospect who has certainly regained some of his luster, but he’s not elite.

by getwonkafied on Sep 1, 2010 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was thinking about it a little further and you’re right that Heredia’s ceiling is much higher than Locke’s. I might still support Locke above Heredia but it’s much more debatable than I was implying.

by shayborg on Sep 1, 2010 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Solid #4 is Paul Maholm

I don’t agree at all that that is or even “appears to be” his ceiling. Heredia will get his credit once he proves something, Locke deserves it now.

by Mr. E on Sep 1, 2010 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Solid 4 used to be Paul Maholm. Now his Ks are down and walks are up.

by Adam Reynolds on Sep 1, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...

…before this year, Maholm was on the border of a #2 and a #3 by ERA and such.

People tend to overestimate the quality of pitchers occupying any given “slot”.

by Vlad on Sep 2, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Paul Maholm is an interesting comparison

As Maholm’s age 23 season split between AA and AAA is quite comparable to Locke’s season this year split between High-A and AA as a 22 year-old.

Maholm (With the majority of his innings coming at AA) -3.30 ERA, 7.4 K/9, 2.9BB/9
Locke (With the majority of innings at High-A)-3.24 ERA, 8.7 K/9, 1.6 BB/9

Locke obviously has the advantage in K/BB, but I think Maholm seems like a decent projection for Locke, and frankly, if Locke can provide 11 WAR over five seasons like Maholm has, I would be elated.

by getwonkafied on Sep 1, 2010 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

The K/BB difference is fairly sizeable

I’d say Locke probably projects to have a ceiling somewhat above Maholm’s, not saying he is a lock to get there though.

by Kosstic518 on Sep 1, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd take Heredia over Locke...

…and I’d take Locke over Owens or Morris. This list just looks totally bass-ackwards to me.

by Vlad on Sep 2, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

its only because...

locke/morris/owens are closer to helping the pirates out than heredia. i agree with you though. hes only 16 and tossing low 90s; imagine a growth spurt and natural strength increase and what he may be throwing in the future.

by white angus on Sep 2, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

My list

Taillon
Morris
Sanchez
Locke
Allie
Heredia
Owens
Marte
Wilson

Then it gets muddled

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Sep 2, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve been voting Heredia most every round since my list would be Heredia/Locke/Morris/Owens but I seem to be getting zero traction here.

http://bleedblackandgold.com/

by Say Hey Johnny Ray on Sep 2, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty much in line with you...

Callis likes to say that you win at the big league level with stars. As such I tend to favor ceiling in these rankings and nobody has more than the new guys: Taillon, Allie and Heredia. Floor is a consideration as well which is why I would place Sanchez over Heredia at this point. I think my top ten would look like this:

1) Taillon
2) Allie
3) Sanchez
4) Heredia
5) Morris
6) Marte
7) Owens
8) Locke
9) ZVR
10) Lambo

The injury hurt Marte IMO or he may have been ahead of Morris. Also, I could very easily flip-flop Locke and Owens and I wouldn’t be surprised to see Locke jump Morris next season. Right now though I still have to go with Morris’ stuff.

by Slick1 on Sep 2, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would drop Allie

in between morris and marte… not because of talent, i just hate having two “M’s” next to each other in a list.

by white angus on Sep 2, 2010 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh...

that’s why I have ZVR between Locke and Lambo! Must have missed the M&M.

by Slick1 on Sep 2, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have Heredia at 6 . . .

and I don’t think it’s that crazy. It’s a tough balance between more certainty versus a higher ceiling. Heredia’s risk- that is not only is he 16, but he’s also a pitcher and their rate of attrition is absurd- drops despite his potential being in the top 2 or 3 in the system.

Everything that guy just said is bullshit . . .thank you

by Scranton on Sep 1, 2010 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

The converse to this is Rudy Owens who I have at 9.

His lack of ceiling, in my book, lowers him despite performance and lower risk. Not that I am saying anyhting that everyone doesn’t know- it’s a balance of ceiling vs. floor- just saying I don’t think you can be too astonished that Heredia is lower.

Everything that guy just said is bullshit . . .thank you

by Scranton on Sep 1, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

1) Heredia's in second

I wouldn’t quite say “nobody” is picking him.

2) He’s a 16 year old who throws a 92 MPH fastball. That is reason to be excited about the possibilities with him and to temper your excitement. Realistically, it will take him 5+ years to reach the majors, if he reaches them at all. I find it hard to justify ranking him above Jeff Locke, a lefty with pretty good stuff with a K/BB ratio over 5. And Locke should at least sniff the majors by next year or 2012, 3 years before Heredia does in a best-case scenario.

by pittiful89 on Sep 2, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAxery40Odk
Is Heredia the pitcher at 0:45 ? There is too little information about this kid.

by taiwania on Sep 3, 2010 2:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Think so.

That’s definitely him (or his evil twin) in the interview at 1:04.

Good-lookin’ ball he threw there. Felt like it was still picking up steam when it hit the catcher’s glove.

by Vlad on Sep 3, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Upon further review...

…it has to be him.

The kid pitching is wearing #25, the same jersey number Heredia wore at his ceremonial contract signing.

by Vlad on Sep 3, 2010 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't believe Locke fell to 7

I know he gets no hype at all but I think you could make a decent argument for him at #4, if not #6 at the latest.

by Kosstic518 on Sep 1, 2010 7:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

He’s my clear cut 4.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Sep 2, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying they are wrong but...

…has anyone on this website seen Heredia throw one pitch? Not saying he won’t be great, and I hope that he will, but how can you deny Locke for him. Is Heredia’s ceiling higher? Potentially and probably. Do the risks associated with him lower his overall value to the franchise to a point where it is lower than Locke’s? I believe so.

by Kosstic518 on Sep 2, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly one pitch.

In fairness, it was a very good pitch.

by Vlad on Sep 3, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Colton Cain

I didn’t vote for Cain but I think he should be considered soon and should therefore be one of the options. Especially because many see him as comparable to ZVR.

by Cainyoudigit on Sep 1, 2010 7:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Good call.

I was racking my brains trying to find extra options to put on there, and that’s a pretty good one. I’ll try to remember to put him on the next poll.

Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

by wg1of5 on Sep 1, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cain, Miller, and maybe Grossman would be well ahead of the last 4 options in the poll. Probably Latimore too but maybe that’s just me.

by Adam Reynolds on Sep 1, 2010 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Q Lat?

Q? Are you serious…he and his k/bb ratio don’t sniff top 20 let alone top 10. It is no longer 2007, take a deep breath Littlefield and his farm system are gone.

by Drufan11 on Sep 1, 2010 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Q-Lat has some athleticism. I haven’t seen him since last year, but his numbers have ticked up in a tougher league. He’s got 20 home runs and 100 RBI. HR/RBI aren’t the best type of hitting stats by any means, but that’s one measure for the minor leaguers.

I like Latimore for at least a very good 3rd/4th outfielder on a contender, and I’d put him over Chambers or Cunningham who are in WV this year (or at least they were earlier this season, not sure about now).

by Adam Reynolds on Sep 1, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Until his plate discipline improves I don’t really consider him a prospect. Next year’s jump (if it happens) to AA will be a good predictor of his future viability. 132 k’s to 29 walks isn’t going to cut it in AA or higher.

FWIW Chambers has 112 k’s and 89 walks, I’ll take his power/speed/plate discipline over the likes of Q all day long.

by Drufan11 on Sep 2, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

They’re at different levels, though.

by Adam Reynolds on Sep 2, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok, last year at high a Q had 116 k’s and 23 walks

by Drufan11 on Sep 2, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

K/BB isn’t everything. Especially high walk/high K/low average against A-ball pitching (Chambers).

That’s at least as questionable as Latimore’s skillset with good defense/athleticism/power.

by Adam Reynolds on Sep 2, 2010 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, RBI is "one measure for the minor leaguers"

So is eye color, but I don’t see anybody using that as a criterion when ranking prospects.

by Vlad on Sep 2, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

right now

I wouldnt put Miller or Grossman ahead of anyone but Harrison, but I know a lot of people like Grossman a lot so he probably should be in the poll.

Latimore probably is fine off the list at this point… D’Arnaud’s stock sure has fallen, plus newer prospects…

by BurgherKing on Sep 1, 2010 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

it’s taken until the 7th vote for me to not pick the same as most other people. I chose Heredia but it was out of Locke and him.

by BlindSquirrel on Sep 1, 2010 8:27 PM EDT reply actions  

batting perfect so far

So far I have everyone on my list in that order.

by Cainyoudigit on Sep 1, 2010 8:34 PM EDT reply actions  

had Marte before Allie

but I think I m certainly rating based on some latent averaging between ceiling and likelihood…

by BurgherKing on Sep 1, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not regarded as particularly high-ceiling.

Pedestrian tools – more of a scrapper and a grinder and all that, by rep.

by Vlad on Sep 2, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Eh, I dunno.

That’s just the scouts’ line. Lots of guys have made a good career out of pedestrian tools. I mean, scouts hated Larry Bowa’s tools so much he had to lobby and wheedle his ass off to even get signed, and he moved right up the chain and had a nice long career in the bigs. So who really knows?

by Vlad on Sep 2, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

ya im hitting 1,000 to,

I like to think I can predict the prospect handbook of 2011

by Skipper22 on Sep 2, 2010 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Holt's ceiling was never to high

he wasnt really expected to be anything when we drafted him. If i recall right I heard the statement " organizational depth" in the same sentence as Holt. (I might be wrong) He has opened eyes at with all aspects of his game.

by Skipper22 on Sep 2, 2010 9:26 AM EDT reply actions  

9th round pick I believe

I hope they meant MI depth and not “organizational”

by Mr. E on Sep 2, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

He may not have been a top prospect but I never heard the org filler term thrown at him.

by Slick1 on Sep 2, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

By the way...

wg1og5, this is a pretty cool serious you are doing here. Thanks. Keeps things interesting when the news is slow.

by Slick1 on Sep 2, 2010 2:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Heh, thanks.

If you go back to the first few, though, you’ll see that I didn’t even start it. Some fellow named “Soldierjoe” did, so you have him to thank as well. Still, glad to see you and everyone else enjoy it.

Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

by wg1of5 on Sep 3, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds good.

It’s been nearly two days, so it’s about time anyway.

Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

by wg1of5 on Sep 3, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

figures that we quibble over where to put Locke

then he goes out and pitches his worst game of the year last night. sigh.

by white angus on Sep 3, 2010 8:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Can we discuss Josh Harrison?
Small
middle of the pack ISO
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 45: Cubs @ Pirates
Small
I can't be the only Pirates fan that wants Huntington to trade for Kevin Youklis.
Small
Analyzing why Huntington's drafts have left us weak in hitting.
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 44: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Take a page out of Maddens book.
Small
My thoughts from the Tuesday Night Mets Game
Bloody_mary_small
Bucs / Mets o'flow.
Pirates_small
Cole v. Bauer v. Bundy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas