Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yankees Deny Rumors That Team Is For Sale

Rod Barajas, Pirates Agree To Terms

The Pirates have agreed to terms with catcher Rod Barajas to a one-year deal worth $4 million, plus a $3.5 million option on 2012 with no buyout. Kudos to the Bucs for getting in there and acting aggressively to, you know, fix the fact that they had no catcher, particularly given that the free-agent market was weak. I was never in favor of picking up Ryan Doumit's option, but I did hope they'd find a way to bring them back, simply because the catching situation without him was so dire. Barajas is a big downgrade from Doumit in terms of hitting ability - he's only cleared a .300 OBP twice in his career - but he's an upgrade in terms of Staying Healthy So Mike McKenry Isn't In The Lineup All The Time. Barajas is also a better defender than Doumit, and he has good power for a catcher.

The 2013 option on his services is nice, too, in that it will give the Pirates some flexibility next year if they need it. I don't expect they'll exercise it, since Barajas is old (and therefore reasonably likely to decline in 2012) and since they apparently don't like exercising options. But it's nice to have around.

Comment 197 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'll say it again here

Actually, is this evidence that an FA with choices might sign with us after all? I mean, the guy wasn’t highly sought-after or whatever, but I can’t believe that we were his only (potential) suitors, nor that this represents an overpay.

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

I mean, the guy wasn’t highly sought-after or whatever, but I can’t believe that we were his only (potential) suitors, nor that this represents an overpay.

The Dodgers were reportedly interested in bringing him back. Of course, it was just announced that the Dodgers aren’t allowed to bid on FAs until the sale is official, and he may not have wanted to wait that long.

He’s not all that good a catcher, but this is a much less bad resolution than some of the other possibilities, given the position in which we placed ourselves.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, clearly

This isn’t the kind of guy who could write his own ticket. But at this price, he’d be a desirable backup for any team that needed one, so the market was bigger than for a typical low grade FA.

I don’t recall; was Church considered a market rate signing? Aside from the concussions, he didn’t seem to be a hug collapse risk or otherwise have red flags (in contrast to Cosby, who was still coasting off his rookie year).

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Church

I distinctly remember a fangraphs article that said the Church signing was great for the value.

by BurgherKing on Nov 10, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The annoying thing about Ryan Church

is the ONLY time in his entire career that he was a useless player was his time as a Pirate. From ‘05-’08, he average 355 PA’s a year with a .277/.352/.468 line. In ‘09, his power dipped but he still posted a reasonable 93 OPS+ in 399 PA’s with two teams (89 OPS+ for the Mets, 98 for the Braves). His walk and strikeout numbers were decent.

Then he came to Pittsburgh and posted a hideous .182/.240/.312 line (59 OPS+). After being dealt to Arizona he turned back into a productive player and put up a 118 OPS+ for the D-Backs in an admittedly small sample size. He wasn’t ever really a great player but for some reason he was only a bad player for the Pirates.

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Although

the likelihood of starting for the Pirates – even if potentially only half of a platoon if Doumit is offered arb and accepts – could make them more attractive than being a backup somewhere else. Even mediocre catchers have egos.

by DG Lewis on Nov 10, 2011 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm satisfied in the sense of "it could have been worse"

Although catcher was perhaps a tight spot they found themselves in that wasn’t of their own making.

Picking up either Doumit’s or Snyder’s options would’ve been bad business. If they didn’t want to give up a draft pick in the event they could’ve convinced Ramon Hernandez to sign with them, Barajas was the only other option that wasn’t completely terrible other than offering Doumit arbitration.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m satisfied in the sense of “it could have been worse”

Agree. Not a good outcome, but less bad than some of the other alternatives.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Did you see a realistic, better alternative?

Serious question. There’s been some chatter about trading for a catcher, but I haven’t heard any realistic guesses at names (on both sides).

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

no catcher is worth giving up Starling Marte for

a bonafide starting pitcher on the other hand……..

by BadAndy on Nov 10, 2011 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not THAT high on Arencibia

Yeah, he has power but the on base skills are lousy, he strikes out 4x as much as he walks, he’s not great defensively and he’s only young-ish as opposed to young. I’m not sure I’d be willing to part with Marte alone to get Arencibia, let alone Marte as a package.

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

you make valid points

but it would take AT LEAST marte just to get a glimpse of Arencibia…

just sayin

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

That's why

I would look elsewhere for catching help. Considering that we now have a passable catching option for 2012, I think that by this time next year we will have a much better idea of what kind of player Tony Sanchez really is. Just think about dealing Marte+Player X for Arencibia only to have Tony Sanchez put up a .315/.415/.450 line in Indy…

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

okayyyyyy

how about %$#@ the catcher spot and do it for Adam Lind?

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s been sub-replacement-level for a couple of years now, so I certainly wouldn’t deal Marte for him. In fact, Lind would be a pretty strong non-tender candidate right now if not for the fact that Toronto signed him to a deal that bought out all his arb years.

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

ARE YOU F#$%ING KIDDING ME!!!! ADAMS!!! JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST YOU HAD 24 SQUARE FEET AND YOU MISSED IT ALL!! - OlenWhitaker

Certified Grabbo Lover, though only by accident.

Total Internet Points: 9001

by wg1of5 on Nov 10, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

how is Lind "sub replacement level"???

sure, he has some issues the last 2 seasons, but seriously????

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Fangraphs grades him out as...

….-.8 WAR in 2010 and .5 WAR for 2011 which comes out to -.3 the past two seasons.

BBRE has him at -.4 for 2010 and .7 for 2011 for a total of .3

Basically if you want to find the mean between the two (and that’s usually a good idea when looking at WAR), he’s exactly replacement level who can also hurt you a good bit of the time

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

2009

3.7 according to Fangraphs, 3.3 according to BBREF

Go back to 2007 & 2008 thought and you get this:

Fangraphs .4 and .1
BBREF: .2 and .6

The guy had 1 spectacular year bounded an either side by two incredibly medicore-to-bad years.

4 out of the past 5 seasons he’s put up less than 1 WAR no matter who’s calculations you use.

Bottom line, Lind is not very good. 2009 was a fluke.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

too many spelling errors to list there

Ugh. Apologies.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

still better than what we have now

they also compare him to Kubel, who i wouldnt mind on 1B either

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

but dont be surprised if Lind turns it back around

he would be similar to Laroche in the burgh. slumps on occasion, got some thunder in the wood. XBH would be better that what we have seen here in the last few seasons.

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd be surprised

What would you base your belief that he’d turn it around here upon other than hope and that 1 season that looks increasingly like a mirage?

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

im not looking for him to be a superstar, raybin

just saying he has shown good stick in the past, and hes not too old, and his contract is definately workable

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Loney a LOT more than Lind

Loney gets a bad rap and much of it is undeserved.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

He's shown good stick 1 season in the past

Look if he were a free agent and the Bucs took a flyer on him, that’s one thing.

But to give up assets for him a trade is quite another, particularly when, if you’re gonna give up assets, they can go to someone far more likely to be useful

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

and he felt apart

once that guy stopped giving him signals

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Sub-300 OBPs and indifferent defense will do that.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Nov 10, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i understand

hes also better than what we have

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Is he?

He’s a not horrible bench option, but you can find guys like that without giving up assets. Keep in mind Lind’s name came up in a discussion about moving Marte. Marte for Lind would be a really, really, really terrible move.

by Superstar25 on Nov 11, 2011 3:21 AM EST up reply actions  

thats youre opinion

but to be frank, Lind would be our best 1Bman by far and at a position of need. Marte may never add up to anything in the show.

anyway, i would think the Jays would want pitching

by white angus on Nov 11, 2011 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure if the Pirates offered Marte for Lind, there would be a lot of high-fiving going on in the Jays’ GM office.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Nov 11, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd argue

someone may get much more action than a high-five for that kind of deal

just sayin’….

by insane_sanity on Nov 11, 2011 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree

Garrett Jones was worth 0.9 fWAR last year. Lee was worth 1.4. Bring either of those guys back and Lind definitely isn’t their best 1Bman. Hell, Matt Hague’s MLEs translate to roughly a .262/.318/.379 line which is close to LInd’s .251/.295/.439.

Lind really isn’t good. He had one good season surrounded by 4 pretty bad ones. He’s not their best offseason option, wouldn’t be their best player at the position “by far” anyway, and is certainly not worth giving up anything of value.

Marte may never add up to anything in the show.

So? The “prospects don’t always work out” caveat always applies and we all know it. Point is, Marte is WAY more valuable than Lind right now and even if he doesn’t work out in the end, it would be a dumb move to trade him now for a bad hitter.

by Superstar25 on Nov 11, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

berkman came back and performed

im just sayin dont be surprised if Lind plays better in the near future

by white angus on Nov 11, 2011 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

How are they at all comparable?

Berkman had 12 above average seasons with the bat, was slightly below average at 34, and had a monster year at 35. Lind has had one above average year with the bat and has been average at best every other year.

by Superstar25 on Nov 11, 2011 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

actually

this means they really SHOULD offer doumit arbitration. Doumit will see that the Pirates have already picked up another catcher, and, seeing limited playing time, be MORE likely to decline, thus getting us a draft pick.

That’s just my opinion, though. And worse comes to worse, he does accept, we actually have another decent catching platoon going into next season, and McKenry can be optioned to AAA for insurance.

by titanlord91 on Nov 10, 2011 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

i like it.

considering the alternatives, this is the best possible outcome for the catcher position, aside from a trade. It would be a fresh sight to see a catcher stay healthy and in the lineup.
Although, i still would have liked to have Doumit’s bat back.

Good to see the Pirates be aggressive and get their guy.

by bbautista24 on Nov 10, 2011 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

i'll admit

that i don’t terribly care one way or another. My guess is that this spells the end of JJ in a Pirates uniform, and I’d not have minded seeing him get a shot this year. Overal, though, C is a fairly important position and it’s OK that they’ve made a move to get a decent guy at about market rate.

by BurgherKing on Nov 10, 2011 1:16 PM EST reply actions  

Meh

Yeah, I’m pretty much the same. Better than what we had but not really worth getting all that excited over.

by Aphthakid on Nov 10, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

It sure feels like 2005 to me.

by Tim Wiliams on Nov 10, 2011 1:18 PM EST reply actions  

I have a hard time complaining about this a whole lot

Would’ve rather had Hernandez, but he costs a pick and I can see the argument against the Bucs sacrificing that, at least for him.

For now, I’ll focus on the postiive: the Bucs moved quickly to fill a hole and did so by landing the 2nd best free agent catcher on the market. I realize that says a lot more about the free agent pool at catcher this year than it does Barajas, but still.

In 461.1 innings behind the plate last year, Doumit had a 24% success rate in catching guys stealing (13 out of 54) and allowed 4 passed balls.

In 733.1 innings behind the plate last year, Barajas had a 25% success rate in throwing out base stealers (20 out of 80) and allowed 3 passed balls.

Barajas isn’t a defensive dynamo or anything, but his stats are better (if a tiny bit) despite catching over 250 more innings. It tells me he’s more dependable over the long haul. As a rough comparison, the last time Doumit caught over 700 innings (790.1 in 2010), he allowed 9 passed balls and threw out only 12% of runners (11 out of 90)

Honestly, if it were up to me, I would’ve taken the bit of a defensive downgrade with the huge upgrade in the bat Doumit provides by at least offering him arbitration and keeping him or a year if he accepts or taking the sandwich pick if he declines….but then again, it’s not my money.

All that aside, this is quite literally the best the Bucs could do on the free agent market. It’ll get Pagnozzi off the roster and keep McKenry on the bench 95 games a year (if all goes well) and that is not to be regretted.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

Barajas can't be that bad

If you have been on this site for very long you should know by now that Ryan Doumit is the worst defensive catcher of all time. If it’s printed here, it MUST be true. lol

by Brakeman8 on Nov 10, 2011 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought we had weeded out

or banned alla them?

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 10, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

They died out with the end of summer

Rest assured, they’ll return come spring, and we’ll have to get out the ban hammer weed killer again.

by JRoth95 on Nov 11, 2011 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Kills bugs dead...

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 11, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Looking at his splits...

…Barajas is reasonably effective against lefties at the plate if nothing else.

.264/.337/.473/119 wRC+ against southpaws as opposed to .214/.265/.409/83 wRC+ against righties.

So there’s that.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

but

Snyder/doumit’s injury history means you might end up just like last year. If anything, barajas has been a workhorse, and with snyder’s back problems, might outhit snyder too

by titanlord91 on Nov 10, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Still don't think this enough to solidify the catcher position.

They should still be after a guy like Shoppach, for depth purposes.

by element1286 on Nov 10, 2011 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

why does everyone write off Jaramillo?

McKenry didn’t hit for crap last year, .222, and I can’t recall him throwing out too many
runners.

by pineapplepete on Nov 10, 2011 1:43 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I find it interesting that nobody in this thread has mentioned Tony Sanchez.

by bolton on Nov 10, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

he should be at AAA, would you like us to discuss his horrible offense last year?

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Nov 10, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't surprise me...

…if he spends April and May at AA and perhaps even into July.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont think so

cabrera should be at AA this season. I couldnt imagine them splitting time, and i would expect they want to see both get full playing time

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Nov 10, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Is he more deserving than Fryer?

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

do you mean

Sanchez and Fryer at AAA? If thats the case then Im certainly giving Sanchez every opportunity to start.

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Nov 10, 2011 11:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I should have clarified. Sanchez clearly gets put where ever they feel he is best fit for. Moving him to AAA so Cabrera can get PT doesn’t make sense since Fryer is just as good of a prospect or better and also needs PT.

by Mr. E on Nov 11, 2011 1:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope not

Cabrera and Paulino both deserve promotions to AA and Sanchez has already gotten a decent amount of time there. Time for him to go to AAA.

by NotGuilty on Nov 10, 2011 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

That's because...

we don’t believe in miracles. A guy that struggled in AA last season isn’t going to magically become a worthwhile starter in the major leagues over the winter with no AFL or winter ball.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

But nobody’s saying: “Well, Barajas is OK for 2012, and then we have Sanchez for 2013.”

Amazing how perceptions change so quickly. This time last year, people told me I was on drugs for suggesting that Sanchez projects as a .240-.250 hitter in the majors. Are we already starting to give up on the No. 4 overall pick in the 2009 draft?

by bolton on Nov 10, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

It was already said in one of the other threads

I think it kind of goes without saying. Part of what’s nice about this contract is that, barring collapse, we can move him or get rid of him at any time, or keep him all the way through ‘13 if necessary. When Sanchez comes up, it will be because he’s ready, not because we have a hole.

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

“I think it kind of goes without saying. "

We have four threads devoted to Rod Barajas. Nothing goes without saying at BucsDugout :)

by bolton on Nov 10, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   3 recs

im certainly not. i fully expect sanchez to be on our roster in 2013. whether he has the offense to truly help us plus his defense is another thing

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Nov 10, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

i fully expect sanchez to be on our roster in 2013

He’ll be eligible for the R5 at the end of 2012, so he’d better be on the 40-man by then, or we’re in trouble.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

He'll be on the 40 man or traded by this time next year

Don’t think there’s any question about that.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

i meant on the 25 man. At least by mid season 2013 worst case

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Nov 10, 2011 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Tony Sanchez will be in Pitt in 2013

Hehad a tough year but remember he got his face busted up. That is not an easy thing to
get over. Ths guy caught a 26 inning game at BC, refused to come out. That tells me he will be back, and if not, that’s what the option on Barajas is all about.

by pineapplepete on Nov 10, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd rather have Jaramillo as backup too...

…but the fact is, he’s probably not in their plans anymore.

The smart money right now is on Barajas/McKenry in Pittsburgh and Fryer/Somebody(Pagnozzi?) in Indy

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

why does everyone write off Jaramillo?

Because he isn’t particularly good.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

OK McKenry

hey anyone who hits .222 doesn’t deserve spelling respect.

by pineapplepete on Nov 10, 2011 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

He hit better than .222...

…but I would’ve liked to see Andruw McCutcheon’s average up higher than it was this season

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

and McKendry is?

Not right now, though since he’s younger, there’s a modestly better chance of him becoming good in the future. He also has an option remaining, which makes for a more flexible (and therefore better) roster.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Younger, but not young..

McKenry’s 27 at the start of 2012
Jaramillo turned 29 last month.

Not that big of a difference. I think in this case, you keep whoever you think the better player is. Upside is probably gone on both fronts.

by jlk9697 on Nov 10, 2011 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

depends on

how they see the catching situations playing out at AAA/AA/A+

Fryer/Pagnozzi seem headed for AAA, but Wyatt Toregas was also brought back on a minor league deal, so he’ll be in there somewhere. Tony Sanchez seems likely headed to AA, but Carlos Paulino and Cabrera have earned promotions to AA as well.

If they think they need more catching depth (always a good thing), they could use Barajas/Jaramillo in the majors, McKenry/Fryer/Pagnozzi in AAA, and Sanchez/Toregas/Paulino/Cabrera in AA and A+.

by titanlord91 on Nov 10, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Fryer is working on multiple positions too, so you almost have to scratch his name off that list

Im not sure Pagz will even be with the organization, im almost positive JJ is done. Sanchez just might start off in Indy… d’Arnaud started off there after a miserable 2010 in altoona.

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

If fryer is in AAA, you can be sure we’ll keep at least 2 other catchers there.

by titanlord91 on Nov 10, 2011 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

So

either Sanchez or Fort/Fryer/Toregas

looks fine to me

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Neither is Barajas but they are willing to pay 4 mm. It’s not like his addition is going to make the team competitive. Why not stick with McHenry and Fryer/Jaramillo and save the cash. 2012 is a lost cause.

by Quahog on Nov 10, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Neither is Barajas but they are willing to pay 4 mm. It’s not like his addition is going to make the team competitive. Why not stick with McHenry and Fryer/Jaramillo and save the cash.

Because there’s value in attempting to put a legitimate MLB team on the field, and a team starting one of our legion of backups isn’t doing that. You need to at least make a modicum of effort to win some games.

by Vlad on Nov 11, 2011 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 11, 2011 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Barajas has averaged 84 starts a season over the last 6 seasons. That’s a lot of time we will be seeing catchers with a .600 OPS.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

Is that because he's been hurt, or because he's been the backup?

Serious question, I don’t know the answer. (And obviously having your starter be a guy who played 84 games/season because he wasn’t as good as the competition isn’t ideal.)

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 10, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

When he was with the Mets

he was brought in to be the #3, essentially, but injuries and readiness issues pushed him forward. But the Mets gave Thole almost equal time, so….

I don’t think anyone has treated him as their preseason #1 recently, but I could be wrong about that.

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

does anyone know if the Pirates at least approached Doumit with a similar offer?

he might have taken it as an insult, but the Pirates should have at least made Doumit an offer

by gonfalon on Nov 10, 2011 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

Jerry Crasnick has had several tweets about Doumit today...

He has supposedly received several offers and expects to sign one by the end of the month. Evidently being looked at by multiple AL teams as a combo C/corner OF/DH. It won’t be this weekend though, because he’s getting married.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

thanks!

and best wishes to Ryan, this weekend and thereafter

by gonfalon on Nov 10, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think Barajas is a BAD signing...

I just won’t be expecting as much as some here probably will. I expect a low batting average and OBP (.230/.275), maybe double digits in HR (10-12), and starting about half the games. And his CS numbers will probably be around 25%, unless our staff suddenly learns how to hold baserunners this winter.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 2:20 PM EST reply actions  

This.

I’m not thrilled by the signing, but it sure beats having to use the McKenry/JJ/Pagnozzi dream team all year at catcher. Now, let’s all pray to the baseball gods that Barajas doesn’t suffer a major injury this year…

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

ARE YOU F#$%ING KIDDING ME!!!! ADAMS!!! JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST YOU HAD 24 SQUARE FEET AND YOU MISSED IT ALL!! - OlenWhitaker

Certified Grabbo Lover, though only by accident.

Total Internet Points: 9001

by wg1of5 on Nov 10, 2011 2:29 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Activate....FRYERBOT

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

“Barajas is one of the top power-hitting catchers in the game. His 50 homers over the last two years are third-most by a major league catcher over that span”

by rinsana11 on Nov 10, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I assume that by two years, you mean three. And also, he’s sixth, not third (behind Napoli, McCann, Olivo, Martinez, and Posada). Furthermore, Barajas’ .275 OBP over that same time period is a bit underwhelming.

So yeah, still not thrilled. I’m not mad either, though; given the options available, Barajas isn’t that bad of a grab. But he’s certainly no star.

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

ARE YOU F#$%ING KIDDING ME!!!! ADAMS!!! JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST YOU HAD 24 SQUARE FEET AND YOU MISSED IT ALL!! - OlenWhitaker

Certified Grabbo Lover, though only by accident.

Total Internet Points: 9001

by wg1of5 on Nov 10, 2011 7:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't have to be a star, baby,

to be in my show…

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 10, 2011 7:45 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Whoa!

Never expected to see a reference to Marilyn McCoo here…

Should’ve figured it’d be you, cocktails! :)

by Chileburger on Nov 10, 2011 8:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I am a veritable font

for semi-obscure pop tunes.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 10, 2011 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm always optimistic about all my teams during the off-season

So I’m going with .235/.305/.375 on Barajas with 16 HR & a CS at 26% over the course of 95 games

Mmm, Kool Aid.

Jose Tabata is the truth

The following is a list of everything Darren McFadden is bad at: 1) Giving birth. End of list.

by Raybin on Nov 10, 2011 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

It wouldn't be out of the question

to think that the Pirates will still offer arbitration to Doumit would it? I don’t think he accepts (giving the Bucs a comp pick) but even if he does, that gives us a combo similar to last season only slightly cheaper. We also would be able to stash McKenry in Indy in case of injury because he still has an option left. Did I miss something?

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

That's why

I was surprised so many people above seemed to think that this signing meant Doumit wouldn’t or couldn’t be offered arbitration.

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Fewer doubles than HRs last couple of years - bizarre

Must be really slow on the basepaths. Hope they don’t bat him 8th and clog up the bases in front of our top of the lineup guys.

by Central*Scrutinizer on Nov 10, 2011 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

I have a feeling

He will hit 7th just in front of whatever light hitting SS we wind up acquiring

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

if thats what happens

they should bat Lincoln 7th on the days he pitches and move Barajas and Light Hitting SS back a spot

by gorillagogo on Nov 10, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Better be just you

because without Lincoln, I don’t think we have 5 SPs.

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

My expectation

is that NH will (try to) bring in one legit SP, whether through FA or a trade, and then a handful of NRIs. In my book, that still leaves Lincoln almost certainly one of our 5 best SPs: Morton, Karstens, McDonald, New Guy, Lincoln, Correia, NRIs.

by JRoth95 on Nov 10, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

And Morton is relatively unlikely to be ready to be in the starting rotation in April.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

dont forget Locke and Owens

not to bash on Lincoln, but if hes in the rotation after Morton returns, ICK!!!!

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re not a Lincoln fan? I would love to see Lincoln, plus Owens or Wilson or Locke in there.

by CO_Bucs on Nov 10, 2011 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Why? Do have a bet we will lose more than 90 games?

Because none of the pitchers you have mentioned have ever shown anything at the major league level that would indicate they we could reasonably expect them to pitch a whole season at even a replacement level. Good prospects are fun to have but none of these guys are banging down the door at all.

by dack2001 on Nov 10, 2011 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Correia to rotation, Mccutchen or Watson as long-man until Morton returns

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

That .275 OBP

says he won’t be on base enough to matter

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Charlie

I think you have 2012 in there when you need to say 2013.

パトリック

by patthatt on Nov 10, 2011 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

Ryan Doumit is one of the reasons we are a bad team

we’re talking about a guy with a pitchers era of 4.88. Mckenry comes in and puts up a 3.75 and Barajas is at 4.23 for his career. when are people going to finally look past Doumit’s offense (which is overrated ,he could hit .250 as easily as hit .300), and start looking at his lack of defense as the real reason he needed to be gone.

by patient pirate on Nov 10, 2011 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

do give doumit a little credit, Searage may have helped in that department

plus karstens and maholm were having really good seasons, morton improved and mcdonald got better after a real slow start…

mckenry benefited from his staff as much they him.

by white angus on Nov 10, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

i give him credit for lowering thats runs avg from 5.39 to 5.36 ..thanks Ryan :)

by patient pirate on Nov 10, 2011 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

wouldnt be a big deal if Doumit’s wasnt so bad in ’11 compared to guys on the same team

by patient pirate on Nov 10, 2011 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

The real question is:

What’s his catcher’s xFIP? I mean, us saber guys need to know these things to make an arguement!

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.
Perspectives become reality.
Twitter: @shanecglass

by glass0941 on Nov 11, 2011 12:01 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If Doumit signs before we're able to offer arb

then the Pirates automatically get the supplementatl pick right?

I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm. ~~ Mike Tyson

by Cheap Beer on Nov 10, 2011 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

I think so

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 10, 2011 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

They would get the pick

and they don’t have to offer arbitration for a couple of weeks so its not like they are pressed for time.

In fact, now that I think about it, if Lee, Ludwick, Snyder and/or Doumit sign before the arbitration deadline, we could get picks for them too. I wouldn’t want to offer arbitration to Ludwick or Snyder so it would be great to get compensation picks because somebody else is DESPERATE for a mediocre outfielder…

by KentuckyPirate on Nov 10, 2011 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

ISO

Sure he walks less and strikes out more than Doumit, Barajas has a better ISO than Doumit. And more home runs is all I care about because heck, who doesn’t like the homer.

And holy god almighty, I just realized Doumit’s “best” seasons were supported in Pittsburgh by an anomalously high BABIP. I think I’m behind the times.

Barajas, while getting old, seems to be a model of consistency in his later years – 15 dingers, .285 OBP, and maybe a low .4 SLG.. Hell even a BABIP that never really changes.

If that get us to a low .700 OPS with some average defense and the ability to play around 100 games – $4M sounds good to me.

by CO_Bucs on Nov 10, 2011 5:41 PM EST reply actions  

it sure would be nice

To have a lh hitting catcher to platoon with him though (doesn’t have to be doumit). Jaramillo is a switch hitter, can he hit rhp? Can’t look up his minor league splits right now…

by titanlord91 on Nov 10, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

In the minors

JJ seemed to hit lefties better until 2008, when he started hitting righties better. Hitting just meaning BA

by CO_Bucs on Nov 10, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

at least being a switch hitter

maybe he could at least be passable against RHP. Also, this would give us more depth, putting McKenry at AAA.

by titanlord91 on Nov 11, 2011 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

“Barajas is one of the top power-hitting catchers in the game. His 50 homers over the last two years are third-most by a major league catcher over that span”- associated press article i just found

by rinsana11 on Nov 10, 2011 6:10 PM EST reply actions  

Vlad

Are you still sure that players don’t notice changes in a team’s situation

"I look back at the season they had last year," Barajas said. "They played great baseball for four months and weren’t quite able to finish it, but they were moving in the right direction. They showed a commitment last year at the trade deadline, trying to bring in players to make that run."

Viva Clemente!

by Roberto on Nov 10, 2011 6:11 PM EST reply actions  

Are you still sure that players don’t notice changes in a team’s situation

In this case at least, I stand corrected.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Roberto

If someone handed you a check for $4 million to just about finish off your career, you’d find pulling positives out of your arse quite easy.

パトリック

by patthatt on Nov 10, 2011 8:11 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Maybe if he was talking out of his ass I'd buy this

but he clearly references 1st place in July and the trade deadline. If he was just making shit up it wouldn’t have made as much sense.

by Mr. E on Nov 10, 2011 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Any veteran FA that signs with Pittsburgh, and has been true for basically 2 decades now,

signs first and foremost for the $, and not because he really wants to play there ahead of all other franchises. I’m keeping my fingers crossed that Barajas will try hard and stay healthy to give us at least 100 starts behind the dish. If we go out and get a 1B, 3B and an SP or two, then I might have confidence the club can win 75 games or so in 2012.

パトリック

by patthatt on Nov 11, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

sure, he isn't playing here for charity

But he has to at least have noticed what the Pirates were doing in order to be able to talk about it. Either that, or after signing he looked it up, which shows a commendable attention to detail.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 11, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

we’re still near the bottom of destinations but I don’t think were THE bottom anymore. Baby steps.

by Mr. E on Nov 11, 2011 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Status quo would have been Doumit for $6-7M and Cedeno for $3M. If they can get Barmes for $6-7M per year with Barajas at $4, that seems like a good trade-off, right?

by Adam Reynolds on Nov 10, 2011 6:44 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Feels like a push to me – probably comes down to how healthy you expect Doumit to be. Barmes over Cedeno would be an upgrade, but Cedeno was a one-year commitment and Barmes is going to get more than that, which reduces our flexibility going forward.

A push would be a relatively positive resolution, compared to where things were looking like they might end up for us at this time last week.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

But Doumit would’ve been a two-year commitment, whereas Barajas is a one-year commitment plus an option. So it seems to me like it’d be about a push on flexibility, too.

(IF we get Barmes for two years at $7M each.)

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 10, 2011 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

But Doumit would’ve been a two-year commitment

Not if they declined the option and offered him arb, which is what I’d been calling for.

If Adam meant picking up Doumit’s two options, then yeah, that’s closer to even.

by Vlad on Nov 10, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

If we did that, I was thinking that Doumit would decline arb and hit the market, which puts us back at status quo (assuming he signs before the arb deadline and we get the pick).

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 10, 2011 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Word is that Doumit’s only shopping for a one-year deal this offseason, and I’d expect him to get a decent arb award if we offered and he accepted.

by Vlad on Nov 11, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be a good trade-off if our catching prospects take some developmental advances.

by CO_Bucs on Nov 10, 2011 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Finally got a chance to check on the Pirates

Honestly I don’t think this is a bad move at all. I don’t think that Barajas is that much of a downgrade from Doumit when you add up his bat and his glove… He’s also a veteran with great experiences to share with our young pitching staff. Sure, we may have been able to get a better option via trade, but I think Barajas and McKenry are a fine replacement till Sanchez is ready for action. Bucs did fine with this one.

by Crusade on Nov 10, 2011 7:14 PM EST reply actions  

Veterans with great experience...

haven’t exactly been a significant positive influence on this team the last several years.

by Thunder on Nov 10, 2011 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

This...

….should guarantee that Ryan Doumit stays healthy all season and hits .285 with 26 HR and 85 RBI.

For someone else.

by Brakeman8 on Nov 10, 2011 9:34 PM EST reply actions  

To be clear

I’m Ok with this move as a one (or possibly two) year option while Sanchez develops. Let JJ or McKemry back up this year and hope that Sanchez is ready to step up at the end of this season or maybe the start of 2013 and move Barajas to the backup/mentor role.

by Brakeman8 on Nov 11, 2011 10:46 AM EST reply actions  

hell

I’d still go get Hernandez for another 1yr/$4.5m.

Yes, we’d have $8.5m tied up in catchers, but they could each save their legs this year while giving us 1.) experience behind the plate, and 2.) additional ML depth at the C position (McKenry in AAA just-in-case). I’d be happy not expecting Barajas/Hernandez to have to catch 120-130 games this season. We’d also have Barajas’ option to fall back on next year if Sanchez is looking like a back-up in 2013…it would buy him another year.

by insane_sanity on Nov 11, 2011 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as Rod and his power bat aren’t hitting clean up, I can live with this.

by King Oskar on Nov 11, 2011 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Can we discuss Josh Harrison?
Small
middle of the pack ISO
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 45: Cubs @ Pirates
Small
I can't be the only Pirates fan that wants Huntington to trade for Kevin Youklis.
Small
Analyzing why Huntington's drafts have left us weak in hitting.
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 44: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Take a page out of Maddens book.
Small
My thoughts from the Tuesday Night Mets Game
Bloody_mary_small
Bucs / Mets o'flow.
Pirates_small
Cole v. Bauer v. Bundy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas