Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

Juan Rivera: Setting The Market For Garrett Jones?

According to MLBTR, the Dodgers have agreed to a one-year deal with Juan Rivera for $4.5M.

Except for hitting right-handed and being three years older, Rivera is very similar to Garrett Jones. They're both 1B/OF types who are best suited to a platoon/part-time role. They both have moderate power and weak on-base skills. Rivera's career OPS+ is 104. Jones' is 108, inflated of course by his fluke 2009 season. I think the estimate for Jones' arbitration salary was something like $2.4M. Obviously, as a free agent, Rivera figured to get more. Still, it's surprising he'd get that much, especially considering that his OPS+ has reached triple digits only twice in the last five years.

I'm still seeing speculation that the Pirates will non-tender Jones. I think that's unlikely, but then I didn't think they'd dump Ronny Cedeno. This does show that Jones is a good deal at $2.4M.  We can also recall a certain disastrous signing of a platoon corner OF for 2 yrs/$4M. Non-tendering Jones would be a hard move to defend.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Completely agree

I’d argue that his inflated ‘09 numbers are balanced out by his overexposed ’10 numbers. There is no responsible management that has him facing lefties in over 1/3 of his PAs – even in his "you can’t sit this guy" 2009, fewer than 30% of his PAs came against lefties.

Last year, with Hurdle using him sensibly, Jones saw lefties in just 15% of his PAs, for a wRC+ of… 107. Obviously there will be season-to-season variation, and he could well decline at any timeª, but I think that’s a reasonable mark for his true talent level, when platooned properly.

ª he’ll turn 31 in the middle of next season. Given his build – big but not fat, decently athletic – I’d be surprised to see him (significantly) decline in ‘12, but I wouldn’t be surprised thereafter. I don’t foresee a collapse in ’12 or ’13, but of course you never know.

by JRoth95 on Nov 3, 2011 9:46 AM EDT reply actions  

For the reasons you state—i.e., Jones is pretty athletic and shouldn’t be seeing much LH pitching—he’s a very good bet to post a higher OPS than Rivera.

You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.

by WTM on Nov 3, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we don’t find a first baseman, Joens may be seeing a bunch of LH pitching.

by Thunder on Nov 3, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jones…obviously…too long a night makes a poor typist.

by Thunder on Nov 3, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Jones sees a bunch of LH pitching while Matt Hague sits in AAA, I’m going to have to start wondering exactly what Hague did to Neal Huntington. (My guess: this.)

Not that I think Hague is going to be a world-beater, but you’d have to figure he’d be better as a bench bat/RH platoon 1B than Jones would be against LH pitching.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 3, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think so, too

Even in his 2009, Jones was still pretty bad against LHPs. He’s been Ciriaco-like since.

by JRoth95 on Nov 3, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was concerned you were Rick Rolling us, which probably still merits being kept in AAA.

"When I put on my uniform, I feel I am the proudest man on earth."
-Roberto

by blackjackfishtaco on Nov 3, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

NH has heaving breasts?

And Hague was staring at them?

I think that’s the real story here.

by mocasdad on Nov 3, 2011 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bob Nutting with his no undershirt or top buttons, he’s practically begging for you to stare at his cleavage.

by Mr. E on Nov 3, 2011 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disasterous?

In this day of salaries, no signing of a player for 2 years at $2 million per could be considered disasterous. Diaz was bad, but he actually helped win us some games and helped keep Jones off the field against lefties. I think his results were way off what we should have expected, but disasterous?

I hope we do keep Jones, but only for one more season, unless he really improves. Funny how we are expecting the Dodgers to slash payroll, then they overpay for a guy like Rivera.

by ballparkfranks on Nov 3, 2011 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

This IS Ned Colletti we are talking about.

by Thunder on Nov 3, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn’t financially disastrous, but, yeah, his performance on the field was horrific. Overbay helped us win some games, too, and he was certainly a disaster.

You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.

by WTM on Nov 3, 2011 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good Post;;

It will be interesting to see what the Pirates do with Jones… I don’t see to much decline in Jones in 2012… Plus, I think the guy is a work horse…. takes is off season work outs pretty seriously….

I mean how many games has he sat out due to injury in the past 3 seasons?? I think one of the voluntary sits was that the guy ate a sandwich to fast and choked on it or something strange like that…..

Jones is durable, a fan favorite, can play o.k first base/right field, and provides for some excitement w/ the bat now and again…. Throw the dude a bone and give him a pay day…

by JSteelers86 on Nov 3, 2011 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Jones and a PTBNL to LA for Loney

this way Jones can platoon w/ Rivera while the Pirates have their first real 1Bman, who can still play, since ALaRoche

by white angus on Nov 3, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Should we pay this to a bench player?

I don’t disagree that Jones is worth the 3-4 million he’ll probably receive in arbitration. Clearly, and a bit surprisingly, he has been a pretty consistent source of decent power for the team the past few years.

My question is whether his playing time is trending downwards or staying at ‘11 level, not factoring in injuries. I imagine the Pirates will want to give an outfield of Presley, Cutch, and Tabby a chance. I also think they likely don’t want Jones to be the starting 1B. So, where does he fit in? At 3-4 million on a small-market team, we’d better have a clear plan to get him at-bats. There’s just no reason (Unless I’m missing something?) to pay that much to a guy we only want to give 300 plate appearances to.

by jlk9697 on Nov 3, 2011 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Where are you getting the $3-4MM figure?

GFJ is not going to get that. As WTM points out, it’ll prolly be in the $2.4 MM range.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 3, 2011 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I also thought the point of this..

was to compare what Rivera got to what Jones may get. Rivera got 4.5 because he was a free agent, I was just taking it down .5-1.5 million as an arbitration number.

Where does the 2.4 million come from? Is it that crazy to think the Pirates offer 2 and Jones counters with 4? They settle on 3.

by jlk9697 on Nov 3, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

His 2011 salary

was $455,500.

He’s not going to jump to $3-4 MM any time soon via arb.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Nov 3, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just call it a hunch…but if Jones is expecting $4M…that would increase chances he gets non-tendered. I can’t imagine that Neal has Jones’ internal value that high. $2M…maybe.

by Thunder on Nov 3, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

well

if Jones is going to ask for 4M in his arb hearing, he’s going to lose. That’s not going to get him non-tendered though (or shouldn’t)

by BurgherKing on Nov 3, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

I don’t feel like searching for it, but I’m pretty sure MLBTR estimated $2.4M.

Well, Tim discusses the MLBTR estimates here. It was 2.4. No way he’s getting 4.

You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.

by WTM on Nov 3, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think of it as the starter (Presley) making $2.5m and the bench guy (Jones) making the minimum and there you go. We need Jones as insurance for OF/1B and right now he’s the starter at first.

He could also be trade bait come July if everyone is healthy and productive and we add a 1B by then.

by Mr. E on Nov 3, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

good

point jlk9697…. but I still think we have to do it… Its important to have somewhat of a decent bench players…. and it helps that he can hit the long ball from time to time. Sometimes you have to pay a bit extra, but when Tabatta goes down for 50th injury of his career (knock on wood), you don’t want a completely incompetent player out there.

by JSteelers86 on Nov 3, 2011 11:39 AM EDT reply actions  

he isnt going to get 3-4M in arb

there’s little to no chance of this happening.

by BurgherKing on Nov 3, 2011 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder if “we weren’t even willing to give our starting SS $3m” will fly as an argument….

maybe not.

by insane_sanity on Nov 3, 2011 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

there’s little to no chance of this happening.

Like, none whatsoever.

by Superstar25 on Nov 3, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

so

the question is will any other team pay 3-4 million??

by JSteelers86 on Nov 3, 2011 11:43 AM EDT reply actions  

for Jones?

does it matter? He cannot declare FA, if the Pirates offer him arb. I mean, some random GM with a mancrush (Colletti, Sabean, Hendry/Reagins from the ex-list) might do it, but its irrelevant. All the FO has to do is judge how much the arb process will award him, and I’d expect that number to be below 2M

by BurgherKing on Nov 3, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

got it...

I am kind of a new fan and I get confused as to how all this stuff works.

by JSteelers86 on Nov 3, 2011 11:49 AM EDT reply actions  

first year arb = 40% of your true free agent value
2nd year = 60
3rd year = 80%

Jones is a super two so I’m not sure which direction that sways the chart but if you put his true value at $5m then 40% would be $2m for 2012, $3m for 2013, and $4m for 2014. That chart also isn’t an exact science either, just a guideline of past precedent.

by Mr. E on Nov 3, 2011 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

IIRC

There was a study done (Hardball Times? FG?) last winter looking at Super Twos. I think that the conclusion was that Super Twos go through a progression like: 30%, 50%, 65%, 80% – that is, their Super Two award is NOT what they would have gotten in a normal 1st arbitration, and that there are knock-on effects, but they fade.

by JRoth95 on Nov 4, 2011 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

So, if we assume that Rivera is a comparable...

which was the premise of the original post, 40% of $4.5M is $1.8M. And 30% is $1.35M.

by Thunder on Nov 4, 2011 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

we can hope they see it that way

by Mr. E on Nov 5, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

how this affects Jones's arb award

I could be way off base here, but I think arb-eligible players are supposed to get less than comparable free-agent players. So this means that Jones could expect well less than $4.5 M in arb. $2.4 M doesn’t seem unreasonable and isn’t a bad price for a bench bat, if that’s where Jones ends up — he’d presumably still get a fair number of ABs, and it’d be nice to have someone competent on the bench.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 3, 2011 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, they are...

3-4 million is still less than 4.5 million, no?

by jlk9697 on Nov 3, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's supposed to be a lot less, at least at the beginning

The numbers that come to mind are 40-60-80 percent for first-second-third year eligible players, but I’m not sure if that’s official or just some kind of rule of thumb that the Fangraphs folk made up. Then 40 percent of $4.5 million would be $1.8 million.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Nov 3, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Def. rule of thumb

based on observations. Doesn’t strictly hold, especially for high end guys (e.g., Fielder in the past, Cutch next year, probably), but for the likes of Jones, it’s pretty reliable.

NH will offer $1.9, GFJ will ask $2.4, GFJ will win. Or he’ll sign the night before, or he’ll be non-tendered, because his “internal valuation” is $2.35M, and NH won’t go above it.

by JRoth95 on Nov 3, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope Garrett Jones is back for one more year.

I think he can still be a useful player against righties, while getting most of his PT in RF. I suppose if we don’t keep him, Lefty McThump will be happy to sign a new deal.

パトリック

by patthatt on Nov 3, 2011 6:44 PM EDT reply actions  

i agree

when jones gets hot, he is up there with the best hitters in the league. when he’s hot.

by theatrain on Nov 3, 2011 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

So...

what is the verdict??? TO SALE THE JONES OR KEEP THE JONES?

by JSteelers86 on Nov 3, 2011 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

consensus seems to be

keep him at the right price, which shouldnt be hard, since this is his first time eligible for arbitration.

by titanlord91 on Nov 4, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Can we discuss Josh Harrison?
Small
middle of the pack ISO
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 45: Cubs @ Pirates
Small
I can't be the only Pirates fan that wants Huntington to trade for Kevin Youklis.
Small
Analyzing why Huntington's drafts have left us weak in hitting.
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 44: Mets @ Pirates
Small
Take a page out of Maddens book.
Small
My thoughts from the Tuesday Night Mets Game
Bloody_mary_small
Bucs / Mets o'flow.
Pirates_small
Cole v. Bauer v. Bundy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas