SB Nation Pittsburgh Editor's Pick
Jason Kendall's "albatross" gives a sobering view on free agency
When the name Jason Kendall pops up, a large amount of Pirates fans first reaction is "albatross contract". A large amount of those left would probably think "gruesome injury". While that probably gets rid of the majority of fans, some of those who remain might have a thought similar to, "good player who got injured and unfortunately couldn't live up to his amazing early career after getting hurt". After the jump, I'm going to look into the player Kendall was, and show how his reputation in Pittsburgh relative to his performance shows why signing a player to a "fair market" deal in Pittsburgh, and especially "overpaying" for said player, is a dangerous thought.
First things first, let's discuss Kendall's performance before the fateful contract was signed. Most people here realize Kendall was good, but I'm not sure most here appreciate exactly how good. In his age 23-27 seasons, B-R has as his most similar player by season Mickey Cochrane in every one of those years (a hall of famer for those here who haven't heard of him). In his age 23-26 seasons, his OBP over 2211 PA was .408. His lowest ISO in any of those seasons was .140. In his age 23-26 seasons, he was worth 20 fWAR and 19.1 bWAR. To put that in perspective, fWAR had Yogi Berra at 18.5 WAR in his age 23-26 seasons and bWAR had it at 15.9. He was on a hall of fame pace and even the red flag he had for health, (he only played 78 games in 1999, while putting up 4.1 WAR in them, a better pace than MVP winner Chipper Jones) could be viewed as minor compared to his amazing skill level, as he had proved that he could put together all-star caliber seasons even without a full compliment of games. Outside of the fact that he played the position of catcher, he's the exact kind of player that any team that wants to compete would love to have.
Now, some people here are possibly going, "I knew that he was amazing, but the thing is that we complain about the contract being an albatross because it crippled us and he didn't provide nearly enough value to justify the contract he was given DURING it". The whole point of this post is to point out that what Jason Kendall did provide during the length of his contract was around what fangraphs calls FAIR value.
Now, many of you might be like "wait, did this nobody just say that the Kendall contract was FAIR??!!" Some might even be questioning my sanity now. I'm here to tell you that by fWAR, he provided 52.4 million dollars in value. By bWAR he provided fairly similar value, albeit slightly lower, and according to bWARs numbers he was paid approximately 58.635 million dollars over that time period. He provided 1 fWAR per 2.93 million he was paid. By bWAR it was 1 WAR per 3.07 million, even it out and you got a 1 WAR per 3 million dollar guy, hardly even in the market back then what would be called a horrible deal. I also should probably mention that he provided well over half the WAR of the 6 year contract in the 3 years he spent with the Pirates.
The thing was, he provided very good on base skills, (in the first 5 years of the "albatross" contract he had an OBP of .371, though his slugging I think was very close) and what was considered average catching skills. Those skills were enough to make him a commodity that was paid fair value, even if the amount he was paid seemed absurd to many of the fans at the time and maybe even more now, it was in retrospect a deal that looks much better than most big money contracts that you see nowadays.
So, if you've read through all of this, you might be wondering what this has to do with the free agent market, and the answer is simple, if we pay market price for an elite free agent and get merely "market level performance", history shows us that a lot of fans will consider it a bad deal. If the Pirates are going to spend money on a player, that player darn well better perform above and beyond the level of his contract, in short, we must underpay for him to be truly appreciated. Those people who want to spend a boatload of cash on a free agent superstar should realize this, and maybe rethink their positions. As Jason Kendall has shown, you can live up to your contract by market terms, and still be unappreciated and thought of badly despite being possibly the best catcher the Pirates have ever had.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I tend to agree.
Interesting point you make, that we can get what we pay for and still be disappointed in it.
Justin
The conclusion I draw from your very interesting post is that medium to small market/revenue stream teams simply can’t afford to offer “albatross contracts” to their star players, regardless of what fan graphs thinks is fair value; or whether fans understand and agree with that evaluation of a player’s worth.
The bottom line is the bottom line. Baseball’s efforts to date to level the playing field for financially weaker teams don’t seem to have stopped the migration of superstars to the big market/high revenue teams or cushioned the financial impact on lower revenue teams of offering high-value hometown favorites expensive, long-term contracts the teams just can’t afford.
It will be interesting to see how much Joe Mauer’s contract affects the Twins’ ability to build a competitive team around him. On a selfish note, I’m hoping Albert Pujols squeezes every last dime out of the Cardinals. We’ll find out how competitive they are when their other high-priced talent starts to migrate.
Lino Donoso
by Lino Donoso on Nov 9, 2011 10:35 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
great point
it will be interesting to see how the tulowitzki, mauer, werth, theoretical pujols, etc, contracts affect the mid/small market teams going forward. All those deals have the potential to be disasters for the teams that do them, even if the players remain somewhat productive.
People keep clamoring for the pirates (and other teams) to lock up their young talent or homegrown superstars, but the reality is even if you do that, you’re taking a substantial risk, and unless the contract proves to be a good bargain, it can still hurt your team in the long run. That’s just how the economics of baseball work as it is…
the Mauer deal may already be a disaster for the Twins.
many of their top MLB talent will not be back next year, their payroll could be slashed considerably and the brand new facility may have dwindling crowds in the next couple of seasons.
An interesting point
But I would rais a couple of issues. First of all, I think it is at least debatable whether or not Kendall’s contract was, in fact, fair market value (when looked at retroactively). When Kendall signed his extension in the fall of 2000, he was the 2nd highest paid catcher in baseball behind Mike Piazza. However, during his remaining four years as a Pirate, he was only the 6th most valuable catcher (bWAR). It’s not glaring but it’s at least arguable.
I think the bigger issue, though, and the reason that people were so disappointed with Kendall’s contract is that he instantly disappointed. Kendall’s first season after signing his new deal saw his OPS drop by nearly 200 points. The following year showed a disturbing dip in power and the second lowest OPS of his career (at the time) by 67 points! At this point, fans were already angry. Kendall, who if not for his ankle injury, would have been an All-Star 4 times in his first 5 years, was rewarded with the richest contract in franchise history and promptly turned into a lousy baseball player. While he did rebound pretty well in ‘03-’04, I think by that time the dye had been cast and people were determined to hate that contract.
I don't care for Fangraphs's "analysis"
Last year they had an article about how the Werth deal wasn’t that big of an overpay. If their formula shows that Kendall was paid fair market value over the course of that deal, then that’s just further proof that their analysis is shoddy.
Actually, gorillagogo, fangraphs might have major issues predicting the future at times
but baseball analysis of the past is pretty clean cut. In terms of offensive performance, Kendall right about lived up to the contract in terms of wOBA and WAR, and that’s with WAR considering him to be an around average catcher defensively, so it’s not a UZR heavy WAR. it’s not Kendall’s fault that he was judged as the “2nd highest paid catcher”. He should be judged by his performance to pay compared to your average free agent at any position. By that standard, his performance was consummate with his pay. The issue is that people see power as a huge deal and he stopped providing it, and also they can’t seem to comprehend that if Kendall were to perform to the level of “expectations” for him, the contract would have been a steal. KentuckyPirate also brings up the point that I considered pointing out that his weak start upon signing the contract also made him look bad, it wasn’t until the 2nd year of the contract, (the 3rd year after signing the extension) that he finally starting performing at an all-star caliber level again. What I think this analysis shows is that fans analysis doesn’t always look at things logically. If he had had a standard decline as opposed to tanking and then immediately going back to all-star caliber play many probably would have thought more favorably of him.
you must be omitting his years in Oakland
3.6 total bWAR, $35M.
I don’t care what Fangraphs says, if you recall back to the early 2000s Kendall’s contract was widely seen around the league as one of the worst deals in baseball. If it was such a fair market value contract, the Pirates would have had a much easier time trading him. Instead they had to take on a few overpriced contracts for Redman and Rhodes plus send cash to Oakland just to unload Kendall’s deal.
he had just come off a 4.7 WAR and 5.0 WAR season in Pittsburgh before he was traded to Oakland.
In retrospect, Oakland looked like it was fleecing us SOOOO hard on that deal, which when it is early 2000s Billy Beane against Dave Littlefield, should come as no surprise. The fact that Kendall immediately collapsed beyond what was easily forseeable doesn’t make the deal at the time to trade him for what we did any less stupid.
I agree: Kendall's contract was fair
Had Kendall not injured his hand, he may have had a realistic chance of making the Hall of Fame. All he would have needed to do was to continue to produce as he had.
But….
s.zielinski
If he continued to produce as he had, the contract wouldn't have been fair
Kendall would’ve been getting ripped off.

by 


















