Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Kyle Stark: Tim Alderson Not Assured Minor-League Rotation Job

This bit from the Kyle Stark interview should have gone in Part I, but I totally missed the end of his answer as I was hunting around for another question to ask, and when I listened to the recording, it turned out to be pretty provocative. So I got in touch and followed up. Here's the entire exchange. Part II will go up on Sunday-ish as planned.

What's going on with Tim Alderson mechanically, where is his velocity right now and what are you working on with him?

Tim is ... The bigger picture is, he's in the process of finding himself, and is going through part of these guys' career as they ascend up to the big leagues is figuring out becoming a professional, and that's figuring out what's important for them, who's important for them, how they're going to work through things. And so Tim's in the process of doing that. He's taken ownership of this, and so there's some things he feels strongly about that he's going through, there's some things that we continue to offer our two cents and help guide him through this. But the body's in shape. He's trying to figure out whether he can get back to what he was in high school. His body's different than it was then, so I don't know that that's possible, so he's trying to find something that will work for him now. So he continues to work through that. The velocity is not where it was in high school. It's better than it was to finish [last season]. But it's also early in the Spring - he's had one outing, and we'll see, over the next three weeks, where it ends up at.

You probably can't say where he'll be assigned yet, can you?

No, not at this point. I think some of it will depend on role, and some of it will depend on level.

[Are] you implying he might be used in a bullpen role?

He’s competing for a starting rotation slot. We’ll see how it shakes out. Obviously, if he does not earn one of those spots, then he would shift to the bullpen.

Comment 68 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

That seems kind of

a roundabout way of saying the guy isn’t sure he wants to play baseball, or what he wants to do, exactly. In short: head case, and I don’t mean that in a mental-illness kind of way, just as a guy who’s maybe got too many issues he thinks about too much.

Or maybe I’m overthinking this …

by bucdaddy on Mar 18, 2011 11:22 AM EDT reply actions  

I didn't take it that way

I think it’s an exceedingly kind way of saying, “Tim prefers to work through this his way. We’re cool with that, but now we’re basically going to say ‘prove it’.” And if he does, he’ll be in the rotation. If not, he can take his HS coach and his own ideas about getting better, and go to the pen until he does prove it.

If I want to be a little more positive and take Stark at face value, I think he’s saying Alderson (any player, really) has to be confident to be successful. He’s finding his own way to that confidence.

by azibuck on Mar 18, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

ive read what Alderson had to say on other sites...

hes admitted that he needs lots of work, that he wasnt open minded to change in the past. admitting it is the first step.

by white angus on Mar 18, 2011 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

I’ve just been poisoned by hearing about too many Snell/Duffy types.

by bucdaddy on Mar 19, 2011 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

The first step

is admitting you have a problem.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 19, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I read that as...

doesn’t sound like Tim completely trusts the organization to get him back on track. Didn’t we read something about him going back to his old HS coach to help him find his old mechanics? I could be misremembering. Anyway it’s clear to me that Tim has told the Bucs to stop messing with his mechanics and that he is going back to what he remembers. They are letting him do it but they really aren’t behind it. I get that Stark thinks that becoming a proffesional means the player should trust the organization and it doesn’t appear that Alderson does. I also read that Alderson is trying to figure out how much he is willing to endure. If he gets knocked around this year like last year will he hang it up? Reading between the lines I think that’s a possibility.

So if he was throwing around 84-87 last year and he was at 91-94 out of HS; can we assume he is somewhere between 88-91 now? If that’s the case he may still carve out a career if he’s still a GB specialist. He may not be an ace but he could still be useful.

by Slick1 on Mar 18, 2011 11:45 AM EDT reply actions  

If I remove the "politically correct", I read

He doesn’t want to listen to our advises any more, and he’s trying thing on his own now on.
We try to be nice with him and help him by letting him do his stuff, but if he can’t be close to decent when the season starts, he becomes an organizational guy (bullpen and/or promotion/demotion at will).

by From France on Mar 18, 2011 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

impossible to say from this interview

But it sounds like alderson doesn’t care about baseball.

by Kosstic518 on Mar 18, 2011 12:04 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Good for the FO

If he doesn’t perform, which he hasn’t, and he doesn’t trust our developmental staff, which apparently he doesn’t……..then he shouldn’t get a spot over someone who has performed and does trust our staff.

No schollies here….

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Mar 18, 2011 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

IIRC, Alderson is the one that wanted to go through the “long toss” program that the Pirates seem not to support. I suspect that is one of the things Stark was referring to, as far as things Alderson feels strongly about.

by Thunder on Mar 18, 2011 2:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Not arguing the point...

but an article about Alderson came out a while back…indicating that he preferred the long toss routine…but the team did not. Maybe the team is coming around to that way of thinking?

by Thunder on Mar 19, 2011 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everyone does “long toss”. Most teams do it from 120 feet max, which is what I assume McDonald was doing. The Alderson article was about a more extreme long tossing program. I don’t know the exact distance he would have done, but some guys go to 300+ feet.

by ElDuce on Mar 20, 2011 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

This one is on Stark and his staff

They had their shot with Alderson and Alderson got worse. Had Alderson stuck with the program the Pirates gave him, he’d be in much the same place with the Pirates that he’s in now. Alderson had nothing to loose at the point when he made the decision to go back to his high school coach to rediscover what ha worked for him in the past.

To his credit, Stark has admitted he’s willing to be proven wrong by Alderson.

s.zielinski

by steve_z on Mar 18, 2011 6:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Alderson

Not a very encouraging report on a guy that seemed to have top notch game before he got to the Bucco organization from Giants.
What happens here?
Is it that these guys aren’t as good as we thought, or is it that they climb downwards after they get to this organization?
I guess that’s the million dollar question.

by HonzaBednarik on Mar 18, 2011 6:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Alderson was on a downward trend at the time of the trade

Which is why we were able to acquire him for two months of an injured Freddy Sanchez.

by maguro on Mar 18, 2011 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you figure that when Sanchez has been there for two months and last season?

by HonzaBednarik on Mar 18, 2011 9:05 PM EDT reply actions  

He signed a new contract before last season.

by maguro on Mar 18, 2011 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, its the truth

and the giants were actually looking externally before signing Freddy for 2010

by white angus on Mar 19, 2011 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Long toss

There has been lots of discussion regarding alderson and his resuming the “longer” long toss program. Charlie- did this every come up in the context of either alderson or the organizations thoughts on the long toss debate in general?

by Bucsfan1978 on Mar 18, 2011 9:07 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Interesting comments this morning

from a old school former pirate from the 50’s.

I attended a baseball meeting for my son as he’s moving up in league. I had never heard of this gentlemen in the past and was surprised he had almost 300 career homeruns, but his son ministers the church where the meeting was held and my conversation with him was candid and informative.

I am not saying his name as some of the childish types who lash out if something is said against the brass here might voice some crap toward him.

He was very harsh on this organization, he called huntington a no knowledge yuppie who knows nothing about what makes a baseball player great or a baseball team win. He was very harsh on this organizations pampering their draftee’s and not allowing the players play the way they’ve played their whole life. These kids are drafted because they are succeeded in their way yet these clowns handcuff them as soon as they get them into camp. He feels they will screw up every kid eventually coming through this system.

This guy was gruff and had that gangster look, definitely old school as they say but he told of stories in his day where guys stayed healthy by throwing alot of pitches every game and usually 10 months a year. He was critical on the pitch counts and was upset about the pirates going too far with them this year. How’s a guy supposed to grow as a pitcher when he throws 4 or 5 innings only? He felt the guys get hurt because the arm is not getting enough consistent reps to build muscle and memory.

He said alot more but I just cant remember it all.

Please dont start the bad mouthing toward me as I am the messenger here but found it quite interesting. This guy lived it and had success and is very opinionated.

by jackiegleason on Mar 19, 2011 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Not too difficult to figure out who you are talking about…and he is a Pittsburgh native.

by Thunder on Mar 19, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

His point regarding the FO and building a winning team is spot on

I would start by getting rid of Ronny Cedeno and Chaz Morton. You lose 100 games when you have 4 or 5 reclamation projects on one team, last year we had 6 or 7. The key to the reclamation project is to take a look at the player and determine fairly quickly whether there is potential to be league average and above or not. Giving Cedeno 750 at bats and Morton 30 odd starts of 5-6ERA is silly. It was clear after 30 games that Cedeno game is flawed beyond repair and that Morton’s stuff is not good enough, like Kip Wells "stuff " wasn’t good enough for sustained success as a starter and Wells’ stuff was better than Chaz. The problem is that Huntington’s judgment was flawed and now he is wedded to these flawed acquisitions in the face of all evidence. The FO should have brought in a Hardy who could be a 5 win upgrade over Cedeno. They should have signed an established starter for 6 or 7 million and Morton should be in the bullpen trying to salvage a career. These guys are committing baseball malpractice with this roster. However, the saving grace is that Huntington will be fired after this year with another 100 losses. Doing 1/3 of your job well (drafting) does not excuse the collapse of the major league team.

by dack2001 on Mar 19, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would start by getting rid of Ronny Cedeno

Okay, and replace him with………………………….?

You mention Hardy. They tried. They didn’t get him. So, now…………………………………….?

They should have signed an established starter for 6 or 7 million

Like………………………………….?

Instead of griping, howzabout providing some alternatives/solutions/ideas?

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 19, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Instead of griping, howzabout providing some alternatives/solutions/ideas?

surely, you’ve seen enough to know thts not gonna happen!

by BurgherKing on Mar 19, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I know...

But with all of the bitching / sniping / griping / name calling / attacking that’s been going on for the last month or so (I attribute it to Winter), I just didn’t want to get heavy with the snark.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 19, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

5 win upgrade?

The thing is, I agree that they should’ve been able to get Hardy, but when you say Hardy could be a five-win upgrade, you really hurt your credibility. To be a five-win upgrade, Hardy would have to return to his 2008 form and Cedeno would have to backslide further.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Mar 19, 2011 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep.

Only two ’50s Pirates with “almost 300” HR, and the other one died back in ’88.

by Vlad on Mar 20, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to be a jerk...

but I hate these “I know a guy who says” type of posts. I also hate “don’t start bad mouthing.” You obviously find merit in these comments or you either wouldn’t have posted them or would have framed it differently. If you post anything here, expect someone to criticize it.

by BarryJT on Mar 19, 2011 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Do I think there are childish people who attack anyone who has bad to say on brass?

I surely see the type.

The arguing and attacks cheapen this otherwise high quality baseball site.

Everyone has an opinion, this team has not been run great like some try to argue. That is my opinion and the numbers surely suggest my opinion is probably much closer to the truth with regards to the major league club.

There has been a trend of many prospects or players failing in this organization, he put the blame on management’s babying them. Is he right? I dont know but I place much respect on his thoughts knowing he lived that life.

I dont mind if someone criticizes an opinion but be civilized about it, that’s where I am coming from.

by jackiegleason on Mar 19, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

So your opinion is that because that rebuilding team has bad numbers, what management is doing is a failure? Rebuilding teams usually suck. The Pirates’ W-L record last year is not a valid a measure of their progress as an organization.

Name one prospect who has failed under NH’s watch. He’s failed to turn around a bunch of other team’s failed prospects, but that’s a different argument, more about his trade strategies than his developmental acumen.

Throwing Morton out there every fifth day to get hammered certainly wasn’t babying him.

But my complaint isn’t about you criticism of NH, it’s about the weasly way you couched your argument.

by BarryJT on Mar 19, 2011 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying huntington babied anyone

I give huntington credit for good drafts and a good start to international signings, so your rant of me unfairly targeting huntington about building the minor league system is way off.

This is the childish responses I speak of, making up garbage even though I have consistently mentioned Huntington has done a good job with building the minors.

Barry, try thinking at some point in the future

by jackiegleason on Mar 19, 2011 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

?!?

You said, “There has been a trend of many prospects or players failing in this organization.” I reasonably give you that there has been numerous players fail under NH’s watch, but clarified I think most of those were already failed prospects before they got here.

I obliquely criticized the quality of Huntington’s trade record.

I disagreed that Thomas is right that the Pirates baby players and run Morton out as a sample.

I never said anything about you “targeting huntington about building the minor league system,” which I think is different than saying prospect have failed.

I never insulted you (except perhaps using the word “weasly”).

How is any of my response to you childish?

Finally, just how am I not thinking about the future?

by BarryJT on Mar 19, 2011 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barry, try thinking at some point in the future

yeah, Barry. this way at least one of you is thinking…. oh wait, you already are.
my bad.

by white angus on Mar 19, 2011 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is the childish responses I speak of


Barry, try thinking at some point in the future

indeed?

by BlindSquirrel on Mar 20, 2011 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I'm sorry
Everyone has an opinion, this team has not been run great like some try to argue. That is my opinion and the numbers surely suggest my opinion is probably much closer to the truth with regards to the major league club.

So, it’s your opinion that your opinion of the Pirates is nearly wholly true and, because you’re nearly wholly right about the Pirates, you are entitled to label as childish some of those who think differently. It really helps when you support your opinion by drawing upon the Adult wisdom of Frank Thomas, who thoughtfully and maturely called “huntington a no knowledge yuppie who knows nothing about what makes a baseball player great or a baseball team win,” according to you. Who could argue with Thomas’ subtle but insightful reasoning?

s.zielinski

by steve_z on Mar 19, 2011 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

the childish is when the name calling takes place

I haven’t said that anyone’s opinion is gods word. I state my opinion of huntington’s job performance as far as the handling of the major league club is partially backed up by the shear numbers in just about every aspect of the team. Like wins and losses, fielding indicators, run differentual, pitching and hitting rankings.

I never said anyones opinions on huntington were thoughtful, I stated they were very opinionated.

I trust his knowledge in this area much more than a couch potato though, when you live that life, you will have much more knowledge than the average arm chair fan.

In your line of work, I am sure you are more knowledgable than the average consumer.

I’ve sold an array of measurement products for 20 years, I have lived that life and my advice and thoughts in that arena should be respected and trusted more than an arm chair talker.

by jackiegleason on Mar 19, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Your crusty old retired ballplayer friend’s option is duly noted.

Let us know when you have a conversation with someone who actually knows something about running a modern MLB franchise, like Billy Beane or Jon Daniels.

by maguro on Mar 19, 2011 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's kind of interesting...

…to look back on the Mystery Ballplayer’s opinion of Branch Rickey. As well as pretty much every other front office guy he ever worked under.

His entry at the SABR Bio Project has some good details.

by Vlad on Mar 20, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just left from daniels territory

his philosophy’s on players are 180 degrees off huntington’s and his predecessor’s in Texas before him.

He’s made mistakes but has built a winner and he’s one who has publically stated the weaknesses of sabermetrics. Hart, his predecessor swore by them and built a team very much like this current pirate team.

I doubt I ever have the pleasure to meet him.

I;m sure you are twice the baseball man intellectually and physically as the old crusty retired player.

I can picture your couch already

by jackiegleason on Mar 19, 2011 5:59 PM EDT reply actions  

hmm
I;m sure you are twice the baseball man intellectually and physically as the old crusty retired player.

Physically, maybe not. Intellectually, quite likely…

by BurgherKing on Mar 19, 2011 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never claimed to be a "baseball man"

But my point is that Frank Thomas is an expert in playing baseball, not in running an MLB franchise. They’re two different things. You’re trying the “Appeal to Authority” method of arguing, but your authority isn’t even an expert in the subject at hand, which is managing a franchise, not playing the game at a high level.

Again, it’s fine for Thomas to hold whatever opinions he wants to about Huntington, I just don’t assign his views any particular weight because he used to be a player.

by maguro on Mar 19, 2011 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don’t assign his views any particular weight because he used to be a player.

…whose playing career ended before the Reserve Clause did.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 19, 2011 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

And had a much more difficult time...

reaching the majors. When Thomas played, there were 16 teams for most of his career…times 25 players…400 players in the majors. Now…there are 30 teams…750 opportunities to make a 25 man roster. The man played 16 seasons. He does have an idea what players need to do to be prepared, because he went through it. He may not be an expert about “putting a team together”…and there was no claim of that, in what was related. I’m sure he knows the qualities of a good team however.

Funny…the seasons that NH was assistant GM (2002-2004) and special assistant to the GM (2006-7)…the Indians had losing records 4 of the 5 seasons. So, he doesn’t have a wealth of knowledge about how to put a good team together to fall back on either.

by Thunder on Mar 19, 2011 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thomas was present for some historically bad Pirates baseball, so he doesn’t have a wealth of knowledge of how to put a good team together either.

I’m sure what constitutes proper training and development regimes, which seems to me to be what Thomas’ comments were about, has changed considerably in the past 60 years. I think at this point, his opinions on the matter may be no better informed than ordinary fans.

by BarryJT on Mar 19, 2011 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Neal has been around for some historically bad Indians and Pirates teams…so it seems he doesn’t know any better than Thomas does.

by Thunder on Mar 19, 2011 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Training methods and "keeping in shape" certainly have changed since 1956...

AMERICA’S TOP BALLPLAYERS SMOKE CAMELS

HANK BAUER
TED KLUSZEWSKI
BOB LEMON
JOHNNY LOGAN
HARVEY KUENN
RICHIE ASHBURN
WARREN SPAHN
JACKIE JENSEN
WHITEY LOCKMAN
TOMMY BYRNE
RED SCHOENDIENST
YOGI BERRA
BOB GRIM
ENOS SLAUGHTER
JOE COLLINS
BILLY PIERCE
EARLY WYNN
JERRY COLEMAN
HARVEY HADDIX
BILLY HOEFT.

And Teddy Ballgame, Stan the Man and Joltin’ Joe preferred Chesterfields:

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 20, 2011 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hart, his predecessor swore by them…

Hart didn’t swear by anything but his three martini lunch and his golf clubs.

by Vlad on Mar 20, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alderson pitched today

Started the AA level game. I’m not there, but got a report from a friend. Said almost all of his fastballs were 87 or 88. There were a couple 89s and a couple 86s. In terms of results he did fine the first two innings, then hit a pitch limit in the third and was done. I guess this was his first game of the spring.

by ElDuce on Mar 19, 2011 9:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Hitting 89 in his first start sounds promising. With all things considered and the fact that he was sitting in the mid-80’s last year. Hope the kid can turn it around and get back on track.

by pskell02 on Mar 19, 2011 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

this may be one of the rare cases where a player outgrew his arm

you know how prospects have projectable bodies? looks like alderson’s may have betrayed him.

by white angus on Mar 19, 2011 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey

Hey Fellas, let’s get real here.
The Pirates traded Sanchez straight up for Alderson in the summer of 09
He resigned with them before the 10 season.
It doesn’t matter what happened behind closed doors, he’s been with them since July 09.
What’s so bad about that?

by HonzaBednarik on Mar 20, 2011 12:11 AM EDT reply actions  

It's not "bad"

But the Pirates only controlled Sanchez’s rights through the end of the 09 season when he was traded. This is a fact. I’m not sure I understand why it’s relevant to the Pirates that he resigned with SF. Would you view the trade more favorably if Freddy had signed somewhere else in the 09 offseason?

by maguro on Mar 20, 2011 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Technically they controlled his rights for 2010 as well. They had an option for $8 million or so. At the time of the trade it still looked like a serious possibility that the option would vest with 600 plate appearances. Sanchez ended up only getting up to the plate 107 times in the final 64 games of the season and didn’t even make it to 500 PAs. They still could have picked that up if they wanted to, though.

by ElDuce on Mar 20, 2011 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

In order to cure, you must first understand

by Mr. E on Mar 20, 2011 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

The comment about additional pitching to improve muscle memory and avoid injury is absurd

Just about everyone in the field will tell you that pitching is an inherently unnatural motion and that it is not healthy for your arm to pitch. Some players have famously pitched through pain and thick and thin, but pitching MORE to avoid injury is something I don’t think ANY sports doctor would recommend. I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.

by Justin Mos on Mar 25, 2011 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mlb_photo_1367_small
Fixing the Pirate offense: Plate Discipline

Recent FanPosts

A_red_spider_web_on_a_black_background_0071-0911-1622-1329_smu_small
A couple guys that could help the Buccos offense
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
The Pirates Pitchers Have Adopted Their Own Sign: The FU!
Bloody_mary_small
Buccos / Flubs o'flow, Friday
Small
Breaking down this horrible offense.
Small
Time to clean house...
Dancing_the_night_away_small
Spending the weekend in Pittsburgh - Any recommendations?
Small
Can we discuss Josh Harrison?
Small
middle of the pack ISO
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 45: Cubs @ Pirates

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas