Kyle Stark Interview, Part II
This is the second part of my interview with Pirates farm director Kyle Stark. Here's Part I.
What about the jumble of infielders you're going have [at Indianapolis]? How do you juggle the playing time there?
I think, again, part of it is making sure we have depth covered for the big-league team. We can't have four prospect infielders on the dirt there. So there will be a little bit of a balance with that. So I'm assuming it'll be dependent on how the big-league team shakes out, and who ends up filling some of those bench roles. Some of those young players - somewhat young players - that are still in camp may win those roles, and that will impact it as well. If Steve Pearce wins the utility corner job or Pedro Ciriaco wins a utility middle job or something, that's obviously going to impact how Indy's roster comes together.
But at the end of the day, you know, Josh Harrison has done things to earn a promotion. Now, we've talked with Josh - is that in April? Is that in May? We'll see where that is. Matt Hague has done some things to earn a promotion to Indy. We'll see how it plays out. Chase D'Arnaud, we're still very excited about what he can do, and would like to challenge him to move [up]. Jordy Mercer put together another solid year. We need to challenge him to take a step forward and distinguish himself, you know, some thing there. I think some of it is, maybe, May, it will be a little bit clearer in terms of what we'd like it to be, than April.
Are there players with out clauses, or is that ...
No, we typically - there's a guy or two, but typically we try to stay away from those early in the year, just because we worked hard to get them here and be depth and protection for us. Now, of those, the [Garrett] Atkins, [Andy] Marte, [Josh] Fields group - yeah, there's going to be varying interest on both sides, not just ours but on their side as well, in terms of staying in Indy if they don't make the club, so we'll see ...
Is that why May is more of an indicator?
It may [be]. And again, it'll depend on how the big-league teams shakes out.
What about Mercer and his defense? How do you evaluate him defensively?
Fundamentally sound, has played a very solid shortstop in his time with us and has made the transition to second and third flawlessly as well. He's a bigger, more physical player, so it's maybe not prototypical, but he's fundamentally sound and does a lot of things right. At the end of the day, he catches the ball and throws it across pretty accurately, so he's a guy that we think has the ability to play shortstop in the big leagues.
How do you evaluate minor-league defense in general? Is it all scouting, or is there a statistical component to it as well?
We do a statistical component.
What is that, in general terms?
Well, I mean, it's trying to take all the advances that the sabermetric community has done at the big-league level and trying to apply it in the minor leagues as well.
So you're keeping your own data, or ...
There's some of that, as some of the video and technology [that is used at] the big-league level starts to happen in the minor leagues, we take advantage of some of that as well. Not so much just on the defensive side, but some of the Pitch F/X-type technologies happening, more and more minor-league teams are starting to employ some of that.
Is that something you're doing here at Pirate City, or something you contract from elsewhere, or ...
Yeah, I mean, we've got it at, I think it's three of our stops. And with video, in terms of positioning, our own charted information, there's defense F/X stuff that continues to be out there and guys start to wrap their heads around ... we try to use that in the minor leagues as much as possible, not just with our players, but with other teams' players as well on the scouting side. At the end of the day, the further you get from the big leagues, the more scouts have an impact in evaluating things, especially defense.
What is expected from pitchers' velocity at this point in camp, and what exactly do you have them working on in terms of getting both their fastballs and their offspeed stuff ready for the minor-league season?
Velocity is, it depends on the guy. Some guys come in and progressively build velocity through camp, some guys come in about where they're probably going to be. Their progression may be more [about] maintaining that velocity every fifth day or throughout a start. So it's very dependent on the individual. We've got some guys - you know, Hunter Strickland was throwing 94 the other day, and that's his first real start of the Spring. So it's dependent on the guy.
What are they focusing on? Again, upper levels, it's getting ready for the season, lower levels, it's still very much finding deliveries, routines, those types of things, where really where guys are at is making sure that they're getting their delivery in sync, getting a feel for their pitches, and then starting to develop a plan on what they're trying to work on this year.
What about [Zack] Von Rosenberg, specifically? I saw him pitch yesterday - is that about where his velocity's going to be for the season, or is it hopefully going to inch a little bit higher?
Sounds like you're hoping it's going to inch a little higher [laughs].
Well, it seemed like it was around 86 to 89, which seems a little bit low.
Yeah, no, it will. He pitched last year pretty much 88 to 92 most of the summer, and he's a guy that will inch forward as we go.
That's something he was doing last year also, right? He had a lower velocity in Spring Training?
Yes. And in fact it was actually lower in the Spring last year - it was more 84 to 86 early, and things progressed.
I heard a rumor [at Pirate City] yesterday that you're moving [Duke Welker] back to starting. That can't be right, is it?
That'd be a rumor [laughs]. Now, I do think Duke is ready to take some steps forward. I know it's been a long grind for him. But he made some progress last year. Last year in the summer, he was reaching the upper 90s. I saw him hit 99 a half-dozen times in one day, with good life. The consistency with strikes continues to be a work in progress, but I think he made some strides in the second half of last year, and he's come into camp well, throwing the ball over the plate, and the stuff has been pretty good.
If you draft a guy in June, and he doesn't end up playing in the minor leagues that year but he ends up signing before the deadline, what do you have him doing here in Bradenton?
It depends on the guy, but typically [unintelligible] we get to instructionally, and with all our new players we have them down here for a full five weeks to indoctrinate them into us and what we're about ...
What does that involve?
It's getting a feel for what our philosophies are, the big picture in terms of how we develop players, each fundamental area, getting a foundation on the physical side, on the mental side, the personal side. It's ... even just in terms of the day, how we work, what we go through. Guys were joking that we start early work before sunup down here, in terms of getting guys out on the field and getting some work done. It's just getting them used to the culture that exists here, so that way when they come into Spring Training, it's not culture shock. Days are pretty similar. I know a lot of organizations, an instructional day and a Spring Training day are very different, goals are very different. We kind of feel like we're in development mode all the time. This isn't about just getting guys ready for the season. This is about helping guys take strides forward, so with those guys down here it's, much like everybody else, tailored to the individual, but it's about continuing to move their career forward, setting a specific goal for the season, where they need to make strides, and then get them ready for the season.
In terms of the young Latin players who are here for the first time, can you talk through some of those players and what you hope to see them doing this year?
Typically, we tell those players that this is about getting acclimated - acclimated to baseball over here, because the way the game's played, professionalism, expectations, those types of things, are different here, so getting acclimated to that. Getting acclimated to the culture, cultural differences. And then also getting acclimated to learn English. And obviously, we do significant work with that before a player gets here, but it's really continuing to try to move things forward. And then typically those players are going to be down here, so we tell them hey, it's not like you're competing to make the club. Your focus is basically trying to learn as much as you can every single day.
What about, for example, Willy Garcia, or Yhonathan Barrios, what might we expect for them in terms of an assignment?
GCL. Barrios [is] a little bit different, potentially, because he was here last year, but he was hurt all year. But for the most part, for the first year, guys are going to be down here, Spring Training extended and then the GCL.
Can you talk a little about your career path and any advice you might give people who might want to get into jobs on the baseball side?
My two cents for people who want to get into professional baseball is two things. One is, you've got to figure out a way to distinguish yourself, because everybody and their brother wants in, and there's some extremely talented people. I mean the days of how this resume is different [are] kind of over, just in terms of all the different skill sets people have.
So figuring out some way to distinguish yourself. And that could be education, that could be being bilingual, that could be even ... it used to be, "Well hey, I've done some research on the sabermetric side." Well, everybody's done some research on the sabermetric side now. It's just continuing to be creative and finding a way to distinguish yourself.
The second thing is, getting to know somebody, having a relationship, so it's not just a resume coming across. It's key, and it's a challenge, obviously, because there's no easy way to do that, and typically, people in the game, last thing they're wanting to do is go around and meet a bunch of people who want to get in. But some way to have a contact or relationship, whatever else.
I was fortunate that, right place, right time, right organization, because I was exposed to a ton of things in Cleveland. Things worked out. And my background was diversified enough, based on education, based on coaching, that it appealed to them. But it's going to be different for every organization. And the other thing I'd say [is that] it's hard to get in, but if there's any way you can get in with the right organization ... I'm guessing my career path would be completely different if I had started with somebody else, just because some organizations are very open to what is thrown at people, what opportunities are given. Cleveland was that way, we are that way, so you get a lot of responsibility thrown at you and you get exposure to a lot of different things. But again, at the end of the day, that's an ideal. The first step is getting in.
39 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is the kinda stuff
you just don’t get from many other places.
Thanks again, Charlie.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 20, 2011 2:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Is it just me, or is the content-to-verbiage ratio lower with Stark than with anybody we’ve seen since Littlefield?
Seems to be an awful lot of emphasis on using AAA as a taxi squad. That reminds me of Littlefield, too—the idea that a washed-up veteran provides you with some kind of assurance of decent performance that a prospect can’t provide. The attitude probably goes a ways to explaining Huntington’s apparent fixation with having a veteran bench. I’m not sure their learning curve is where it needs to be. Yeah, Brian Bixler sucked when they had to call on him, but was there any meaningful difference between him and Luis Rivas, or Bobby Crosby, or Ramon Vazquez? I don’t see why it’s better to have Garrett Atkins stashed at Indianapolis than Matt Hague.
You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.
You've hit on two issues, I think
One, it’s really hard to get your first 100 AB as bench depth and be effective. Two, a long stretch of playing like that leads to a loss of timing on offense and defense. My sense is that a lot of clubs prefer not to use young players in a taxi squad role. My answer would be, if you think Matt Hague has a future in the majors, you want him playing when he comes up. Like every rule, though, it needs to be broken.
Viva Clemente!
Yeah, I’m concerned with having a vet sitting at Indy, as well. Especially if he isn’t terribly happy about the situation. Say a Fields, or Atkins, or Marte, ends up in Indy and isn’t happy about it. It could do more harm than good, due to attitude or bad mouthing the organization. Not saying that any of these guys necessarily would do that, but it is possible.
Thunder -
I don’t think that’s what WTM is saying at all – that vets sitting in Indy is a bad thing.
I believe he means it’s a bad thing they’re sitting – or on the bench at all – in Pittsburgh.
“Say a Fields, or Atkins, or Marte, ends up in Indy and isn’t happy about it. "
All three of these guys are NRI’s. For the Pirates. If they don’t make the big team, any unhappiness about that can only be traced to their inability to make the roster of a team that lost 105 games last season.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 20, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I read that to mean
why have Atkins at all. Anywhere.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Mar 20, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Correct
I really don’t see the point. The guy was never much good. He had 1-2 good years that were inflated into more than that by Coors, and 1-2 mediocre or poor years that looked OK due to Coors. And now he’s 31 and coming off two horrific seasons, and stinking it up in ST. He’s cooked.
Meanwhile, it’s true that it’s HARDER for a guy like Hague to succeed in the majors as a bench player, but other guys have done it. If you wait until you have regular time for him in the majors, you’ll never call him up because he doesn’t have the kind of ceiling where he projects as a regular. It’s a catch-22 — he’s not good enough to start, but if he can’t start he can’t come up. But either way he has more ceiling than Atkins at this point, so why not give him the chance (if the need arises) even though his odds of succeeding are a little lower this way. Atkins’ odds of success at this stage are close to non-existent.
You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.
right now, Hague is not even a prospect.
hes not in anyone’s top 20 lists, much less top 10s. if atkins is in Indy and so is marte and fields, then so be it.
if it were 3 years ago, and atkins was in Indy while pearce were stuck in Altoona, then yes that would be a problem
Hague's a prospect...
he’s may not be a top 20 but he’s a top 30. He has more upside than Atkins does at this point. If Hague were to start in AA it wouldn’t be the worst thing to ever happen but it wouldn’t be the right decision. To have him start in AA because Atkins or Fields needs a spot in Indy would be a case of roster mismanagement IMO. Then again I don’t think much of Atkings or Fields at this point in their careers.
I think the basic discussion...
is…why have a nearly 30 year old (whether it be Atkins, Fields, Marte or someone else like Veras) sitting unhappily in Indianapolis when we have younger players likely able to play at that level. If it’s truly player development that we are looking for…then the young guys need to play at the best possible level for their development. And storing a bunch (or even some) of NRI’s at Indy does not accomplish that.
by Thunder on Mar 20, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
then the young guys need to play at the best possible level for their development. And storing a bunch (or even some) of NRI’s at Indy does not accomplish that.
First of all, excellent interview Charlie!!!
Secondly, whether we like it or not, the purpose of EVERY AAA team in baseball is to be a placeholder for the major league team AND a place for development. That’s why Indy’s record doesn’t mean anything. When you get down to it, the only reason that there is a minor leagues to begin in is in the service of the major league team.
I look at Indy as basically an extension of the 25-man roster. For instance, while it may be nice to see last year’s Altoona rotation come up to Indy in full, we know the Brian Burress’s & Daniel McCutchen’s of the world will be in the mix, as well.
I agree with Angus on this, that if a top prospect is coming up through the ranks and were held down a level (like his Pearce analogy), that would be a problem. The Pirates aren’t exactly brimming with a lot of top tier 1st & 3rd base prospects. So having an Atkins or Fields or Marte getting the lion’s share of starts in Indy to keep them fresh for the Pirates is okay with me.
But certainly, when a Pedro Alvarez is moving up through the ranks, you bump off whoever you have playing at 3rd base in each minor league level, so that nobody’s holding him back.
see, this is what im saying... thanks impliedi
hague is NOT a real prospect. hes just not. however, i need to say that he needs to make HIMSELF a prospect. he had a nice season in 2010. he helped the altoona team to a championship. thats awesome. but did he make himself into a 1B prospect for the big league club???? hell no. not yet, anyway.
IMO, curry is more of a prospect than Hague, and i LIKE hague. hell, lakind is a better prospect.
by white angus on Mar 20, 2011 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Well just have to disagree...
on Hague’s prospect status. IMO there is still a better chance for Hague to have a breakout season than Atkins. And I’m sorry but Hague is more of a prospect than Curry. Curry was a late round pick as a senior. There’s not much to see there. Lakind has a ton of upside so yes he is a prospect and I won’t dispute he’s likely a better prospect than Hague.
yep
i was about to post the same thing…
by BurgherKing on Mar 21, 2011 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
And I’m sorry but Hague is more of a prospect than Curry.
Not sure I can agree with that. As far as draft pedigree goes, there isn’t that much difference between a ninth-round college senior and a sixteenth-round college senior, and in any event Hague’s been a pro long enough now that draft pedigree isn’t a huge consideration for him.
Of the two, Curry is the one with the better chance of developing into a starting-caliber MLB player. It’s not a great chance, but it’s better than Hague’s, given his age and relative lack of power.
No problem...
I just don’t think much of Curry and I forgot Hague was a senior too to be honest. I think Hague has power that we haven’t seen yet but that’s more from my having watched him a lot at Ok St so there may be personal bias there. I don’t see a lot of power in Curry and I see a sub par defender who has struggled in the past keeping weight off. I basically see a lesser version of Hague. Hope I’m wrong. All that said I get your point (and Angus’).
just remember that Owens, Duke and Presley were all late, late picks in the draft
i have a good feeling about Curry. just because i say hes a better prospect doesnt make him a “prospect”
To have him start in AA because Atkins or Fields needs a spot in Indy would be a case of roster mismanagement IMO.
I gotta disagree with you on this one, Slick, for 2 reasons. One, suppose Lyle Overbay gets hurt early in the season. There has to be someone to turn to in Indy for that period of that. The Pirates are what matters, not whether a mid-level prospect is in AAA or AA. The 2nd reason is that Hague can get the at-bats in AA, just as well as he can get them at AAA. It’s interesting that in WTM’s own analysis on his site he talks about Hague probably being a bench player for the Pirates at this stage. But would I rather have Atkins (or a Jeff Clement!!!) filling in a starting role for the Pirates in the short-term, than having to rely on a Hague (at this point.)
However, if you’re looking at Hague being your starting 1st baseman with the Bucs next year, it’s a different story.
Although, I don’t imagine that it’s going to be too much of a problem, because from the sound of it, Atkins doesn’t have much chance to make this team and he’s got an out-clause, which I imagine he’ll exercise before going to Indy.
I’d like to see Steve Pearce make the Pirates team, but it’s the same thing again. If Pearce doesn’t make the team, I’d rather see him starting at 1B waiting to go back to the Bucs, than give those ABs to Hague.
There's room for both...
they can both play 1st and DH. Pearce will also see time at 3rd. Again, I don’t see a problem with having Hague in Indy other than wanting to keep Atkins there.
Well if Overbay gets hurt...
There’s Jones, Bowker, Pearce and Marte. I believe there’s plenty of 1B depth. If Jones has to fill in you bring up Pressley. I don’t see a problem. I get your point but I personally don’t have any use for Garett Atkins in Pittsburgh or Indy. As far as Hague goes, I don’t know if he can be a starting 1B, doesn’t look like it, but stashing him away in AA at his age is one way to make sure it won’t happen.
"He has more upside than Atkins does at this point"
THIS.
Hague is a old-ish, sure, but the Easter League as a whole is a lot older than it was and his numbers last year (age 24 season) were solid, with lotsa walks, very few Ks, a little (albeit not enough) pop…
Atkins hasn’t even had a passable year away from Coors since 2007. He was a one year phenomenon. NH MUST realize this. Marte at least has a chance of being somewhat productive at some point. His BB rate has steadily improved since 2007, so that’s something. He murdered AAA in his age 25 season (2009), so between the three NRI’s he seems like the hands-down choice.
Given the questions created by his injuries, I’d be just fine with Fields getting playing time at Indy, at least for a couple months. If the old power he flashed for the Royals late last year is back, you’ve got something.
by tobynotjason on Mar 20, 2011 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
The word was “stashed,” not “sitting.” As in, “waiting until needed in the majors.”
You're entitled to your own opinions. You're not entitled to your own facts.

by 



















