Five Questions: St. Louis Cardinals
The Pirates' next series begins tonight in St. Louis, so I caught up with Dan Moore, who writes about the Cardinals and St. Louis sports for Viva El Birdos and SB Nation St. Louis, to ask him five questions (six, actually) about the Bucs' next opponents.
First, the obvious question. What's Albert Pujols' status, and will the Cardinals be able to retain him?
It's hard to say; Pujols's self-imposed Spring Training deadline for contract negotiations has held so far, and there's no public sign of either side backing down on its terms. But the Cardinals are a risk-averse team, and I just can't see them not retaining Pujols. I don't know what that would look like.
Did Jaime Garcia's excellent season in 2010 catch you off-guard, and does his brilliant first start of 2011 yesterday make you think he can repeat it?
It was definitely a surprise, for a number of reasons. It seemed unlikely that a Tony La Russa/Dave Duncan team would rely on a 23-year-old starter in their rotation, especially one who was about 40 innings removed from elbow surgery; then it seemed unlikely that he would be able to keep up his impossibly hot start; and it seems unlikely even now that he'll be able to repeat it in 2011.
He's an excellent pitcher, and I think he might be able to make up for not repeating that 2.70 ERA, value-wise, by taking more than 28 starts. As for yesterday's shutout, what made me happiest about it is that I won't have to hear about Garcia's terrible Spring Training numbers anymore.
When do you think Matt Holliday will be back after his appendectomy, and what do you expect out of replacements Allen Craig and Jon Jay? Did you agree with the Cards' decision to spend $8 million on Lance Berkman when they already had totally functional players like Craig and Jay available to potentially take those at-bats?
Jay and Craig are almost creepily ideal as platoon partners; Craig is a converted infielder who can't really run or throw but hits extremely well as a right-hander, and Jay is a left-handed center fielder who doesn't have the stereotypical corner-bat profile. One of them's a neat freak played by Tony Randall, while the other is a sloppy sportswriter who looks strikingly like Jack Klugman, and each of them has a secretary named Kennedy. They would have been completely adequate in right field, but they're even better as bench anchors. Craig can even stand at third base, when they let him.
That's what I liked about the Berkman deal. It's a risk of $8 million, but it's not really a tactical risk; the Cardinals aren't relying on him to make 140 starts and take to the outfield immediately so that Nick Stavinoha doesn't have to play there all summer, they're just taking a shot that he'll be an outstanding hitter again and get one more year out of his knees. With Jay and Craig on the bench they've got a high floor in the outfield, and Berkman raises the team's performance ceiling as much as any of the other players available at that point in the offseason.
The Cardinals are showing a lot of faith in Kyle Lohse, who is back in their rotation. Do you feel that faith is justified after his recent struggles, and can we learn anything from his strong Spring Training this year?
I'm not sure it's faith so much as the Cardinals being forced to take Pascal's wager; whether Lohse is recovered or not, they have to use him, so they might as well pretend to believe he's recovered. This just wasn't a very flexible rotation, even before Adam Wainwright went down. The Cardinals had to pay market price for Jake Westbrook to find enough innings, and they've always got Chris Carpenter, another expensive, injury-prone starter, to worry about.
As for Lohse himself, that he's healthy is itself a feat after he went down with an injury that primarily targets motocross riders. I don't want to make a claim based on his Spring Training the day after Jaime Garcia's shutout, but if nothing else he's unlikely to be as bad as he was last year.
What do you expect of top prospect Shelby Miller this season?
Last year he made 24 starts and was allowed to throw just 104 innings, so we'll probably see more of the same in 2011. My only expectations are that the Cardinals slowly increase the number of innings he's allowed to pitch and Miller does tantalizing things at high-A for most of the year. (In low-A last season he struck out 140 batters against just 33 walks.)
Is there any indication, at this point, that the Cards will trade Colby Rasmus?
None at all. Rasmus and Tony La Russa are both making noises about having made up. Rasmus looked especially good over the first series, but even if that weren't the case I can't see it happening. La Russa has pushed a few stars out of St. Louis in his day, but it's worth noting that those players he's appeared to dislike—Scott Rolen, J.D. Drew—were also either expensive or about to get expensive. Rasmus is just too cheap and too good for a team built like the Cardinals are to give him up, regardless of how little LaRussa likes him.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the Cards may be in trouble this year. Not “trouble” like us or the ’Stros, trouble like “not first place” trouble.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
i agree, plus the potential for a "disaster" is brewing there.
i believe pujols truly does want to be the highest paid player in baseball, which i hope st louis ponies up to table. this, with the contract to holiday, handcuff the cardinals for many years.
GO CARDS!!!
>:P
Weird year for the division
Okay, I know it’s waaaay to early for speculation, but think about the NL central for a second . . .
Cincinnati is good. That’s for sure. And Milwaukee should be solid again. But after that I think things open up a little bit.
The Cards should be good. But who knows how Holliday comes back from surgery, who knows how the back of their rotation holds up?
The Cubs have shown that their lineup is no more fearsome than ours, and Houston is going to have a brutal year.
If I was placing bets I’d still expect us to finish 5th, but . . . if a few things swing our way and some bad luck befalls our opponents, I could see us hanging around and scrapping for 3rd place this year. Which, although statistically mostly irrelevant, would be a huge boost to the fan base (and the players, most likely.)
One Question for Everybody
With Holliday out and Pujols having a lifetime batting average of .374 with 51 doubles and 45 HRS against the Bucs, how many times do we walk him in the series?
we should walk him every time
unless there’s two outs and no one on*
*does not apply to Hanrahan, who has Albert’s number.
Unless there's two outs and no one on
in a game the Cards trail by one.
in a game the Cards trail byonetwo.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Apr 4, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
We're gonna be in a game where we lead by 5?
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Apr 4, 2011 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah, hell.
Just walk him every time and cut his career 1.156 OPS agains us down to 1.000.
Winnar!
dingdingding!
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Apr 4, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
won't work
walk him every time and he’ll have an OBP of 1.000 and a SLG of 0/0 = undefined. To resolve that, you have to take the limit as the number of intentional walks approaches infinity, which means the OBP still goes to 1.000 but the SLG stays at .698, for a total OPS of 1.698… what I’m saying is, walking him every time would actually be worse than what he’s done. Marginally.
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Apr 4, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry to be pedantic, but indeterminate means an infinite number of solutions. i.e. All Numbers instead of Not a Number
just kidding
well kinda…
i threw that in there, coz Java will scream NotANumber to 0.0 divided by 0.0 :-)
ahh
that makes sense. I wondered if I was missing the joke. I haven’t programmed java in years so the reference went right over my head
with getaway day Wednesday
It’s very essential that Charlie Morton gets a good enough quality start for the win tonight.
for what its worth in a 162 game season
i dont think we’ll have a better opportunity to take 2 of 3 from the cards!
"and each of them has a secretary named Kennedy"
Well, Lincoln did, which is where this yin/yang line comes from, but Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln.
Good catch
But even so, I like this guy’s funny. Of course, the odds of me spending time at the SB site of another NLC team are close to nil, but still….
I had to look up Pascal's Wager
and while I’m no philosopher, it might be useful to apply Pascal’s Wager to Pirates fans as well, in a similar context to the way that Dan Moore used it above:
Whether or not the 2011 Pirates are a good team or not, the players on the roster are all we have at the moment, so we might as well pretend they’re a good team.
Shelby Miller:
Last year he made 24 starts and was allowed to throw just 104 innings
Is this about what we should expect for Taillon this year? And Wow:
In low-A last season he struck out 140 batters against just 33 walks
I really like Shelby Miller. Not to bring up the whole Sanchez thing again but man would it be nice to have Miller in the org with Taillon following right behind him! Oh well.

by 




















