Should Clint Hurdle Be Manager Of The Year?
MLB Trade Rumors indicates that Clint Hurdle is "probably the favorite to win the NL Manager of the Year." If the Pirates finish the year with a winning record, I'd say that will almost certainly happen, and I'll probably be fully behind it.
There is danger in overreacting to a half-season's worth of games. A lot of my recent posts here have sounded really cheery, and that makes sense, given that these last couple weeks have been very kind to Pirates fans. But there's always the chance that the Pirates will have a rough month, and then all of this will look silly.
For that reason, I want to reserve the right to be annoyed with Hurdle later. His tactical game is, at times, really bad, and my immediate impression of him when I saw him speak at PirateFest was really, viscerally negative. I was definitely in the minority in feeling that way. But I saw him as being a grandstand-er who knew how to sound emphatic and leader-like in front of an audience but never said anything halfway serious about baseball.
But at this point, I have to give him some credit. A lot of it, actually. While the Pirates have run their way into too many outs on the bases and bunted way too much, and while I sometimes disagree with his use of pitchers like Tim Wood in high-leverage situations, Hurdle has helped the Pirates win games by mostly pulling his starters at the right times, and he's done a good job cycling through relievers in the middle innings (sometimes letting a guy like Daniel McCutchen pitch for long periods, sometimes using a large number of guys to get through a couple of frames, usually with good results).
He has also supported his players by arguing with umpires on dubious calls (which most managers do, but which the Bucs' last manager didn't) and by sticking up for them in the press (as he did with Andrew McCutchen when McCutchen was an All-Star snub). The effects of these things are, admittedly, just about impossible to quantify, but perhaps it's no accident that the Pirates have, by and large, looked motivated all season long. I thought John Russell got a bad rap a lot of the time, but I can certainly see how a team managed by him might go on a losing streak and then really start tanking. Under Hurdle, there have been occasional lapses of attention and hustle, but Hurdle has generally responded by benching the offenders, after which those lapses have stopped being problems.
The rotation has been a lot better this year, and Ray Searage deserves a lot of credit for that. But the defense has been at least as big a factor in the Pirates' improvement, despite the fact that a lot of the guys out there playing defense are the same ones who were out there last year. Andrew McCutchen's defensive improvement has been important in the defense as a whole getting better, and that's probably partly due to McCutchen simply getting better with age. But I think it's likely that at least some of the defense's improvement is also due to the players just being more alert and motivated, and I think Hurdle probably deserves some credit for that. We're simply seeing a lot fewer silly mistakes than we've seen in the past.
If the season ended today, I think it's probably true that Hurdle would be the Manager of the Year. And I think he would deserve it.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hurdle Willing To Speak His Mind
Yes, Clint Hurdle should be the Manager of the Year if the Bucs can produce a winning record this season. I forget where I saw this, but one of the local writers noticed one of the major differences between Hurdle and John Russell, is that Hurdle is more candid. The writer said Russell seemed to be afraid to speak his mind, as if he was concerned about how others would react. Honesty is always best in the workplace, and I think the players have responded in a positive way to Hurdle’s leadership.
Accountability seems to be a real factor in the clubhouse in 2011.
If nothing else
he is decisive. I don’t agree with much of his in-game management, but he seems to be convinced in his ideas, and acts on them. If he is, as I assume, as candid with his players as he is with the press, the players must appreciate that. I was iffy on this hire, but he seems to be keeping the players focused and in line.
Do we give some credit to NH and FC for this selection as well? Everyone seemed pretty upset when someone else didn’t get the job (Wedge maybe, I can’t remember), maybe they had it right all along.
One of the biggest things I see...
at least in the media I can see, is that Hurdle ALWAYS seems to have the players backs. When they make a glaring mistake (like Cutch’s hustle lapse), it gets taken care of right away. Hurdle doesn’t spend all his time throwing players under the bus (Tracy), or being a zombie in the dugout (Russell).
It appears that accountability is not just a word in the dictionary, or in a press release, this season.
Also, if there was an award for pitching coaches, Searage would be at the top of the list. Improving the team ERA by a run and a half can’t be totally attributed to trading Zach Duke.
Funny you should mention it
but my reaction to Hurdle’s performance at PirateFest was less than enthusiastic as well. I felt like he stepped into a great situation, for several reasons—-his personality following Russell’s, his manner and aphorisms being red meat to a Pittsburgh fan base, minimal expectations, and reasonable expectation for significant improvement over a 3 year period. Conversely, Russell was in a no-win situation from the start—-terrible team that was clearly going to be blown up, no short-term relief in sight, a five year (optimistically) rebuild. I’m sure it wasn’t designed this way, but I always felt the hire of Russell at that time was a stroke of Machiavellian genius by the FO. In a way, he was the perfect guy for the disaster that was quite likely to follow. I agree with your points about both men. Hurdle’s probably manager of the year (or Gibson, I guess) at this point, but in two years when the honeymoon is over and some of the in-game moves cost runs or games at crunch time, we’ll see where things are. More than anything, I give Hurdle credit for being smart enough to recognize and grab the opportunity here. Think he regrets the Mets position?
I do like the fact....
….that Hurdle seems to honor accountability as well. See, his benchings of McCutchen and Cedeno and Overbay.
And yet, he has his players’ backs as has been said. It’s a good mix and I think that’s part of the reason that this team clearly plays for him.
Santa Roberto Clemente
Ora Pro Nobis
@ChristianTappe
IF
the bucs are three to 5 games over 500 with a month or less left i would say yeah he deserves it.but
MLB Trade Rumors indicates that Clint Hurdle is “probably the favorite to win the NL Manager of the Year.” If the Pirates finish the year with a winning record, I’d say that will almost certainly happen, and I’ll probably be fully behind it.
no jinx no jinx no jinx
" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
Hands down yes.
Worst team of all of baseball last year. They could finish 5 games under 500 and still deserve it. He has done more for the pirates in almost 20 years in 6 months basically. The guy stands his ground.
by Joey Mooney on Jul 5, 2011 1:52 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Seaage is a big reason, but
Under Hurdle, there have been occasional lapses of attention and hustle, but Hurdle has generally responded by benching the offenders, after which those lapses have stopped being problems.
This cannot be understated.
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
+10000000...
Right on the head here, ctf2
One complaint I would like to make about the article is the way that Hurdle is being backhandedly criticized. Not the criticism, but how it relates to what others, like myself, have said of this FO.
FO has made some poor decisions along with some good ones. Until this year, this FO has had a team that has gotten progressively worse. They are now winning, due to a variety of factors. When the FO was criticized, often enough the general attitude around here was to preach caution against the criticisms, and to try and show how the decisions were correct, despite any on-field results.
In contrast, Hurdle has thus far had nothing but success here. Just like the FO, it has been from a variety of factors. The team is not just improved, but competing, with essentially the same players. Yet when Hurdle is praised, too often there are cries of how he has nothing to do with it, or how he bunts in the wrong situations, or whatever. Personally, I think that is a twofaced way of looking at things. In the big picture, Hurdle’s management has been a resounding success. It gets under my skin to hear criticisms of little things from people who defend a FO for getting the big things wrong.
The only way he loses is if Arizona makes the playoffs,
and Pittsburgh doesn’t. Then it will probably go to Gibson.
if cleveland is still in the picture, manny acta will get AL manager o' the year
they do have 2 manager of the years, right? or do they just combine AL and NL???
Hurdle would deserve Manager of the Year
just for having this team above .500 at the break with his anticipated roster. But having them in spite of the prolonged absences of Alvarez, Pearce, Snyder, Doumit, Ohlendorf and Tabata qualifies him for manager of the year, in my book.
The bunting and pen management...
…make it a strict no from me. I think over the course of a season he costs us 2 to 4 games.
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Jul 5, 2011 4:07 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
You underestimate how bad most managers are
For instance, did you notice Houston bunting the 8-hole hitter with guys on first and second and no one out, then letting the pitcher hit? That sort of thing happens regularly across the league.
Noticed?
I’m still laughing about it! You make a good point though. I think Hurdle is less bad than most managers from a strategical standpoint. Actually the bunts are really the only thing that drives me crazy. For the most part I think he does a good job with the pitching staff and usually does not make the same mistake twice…usually. Again, I cannot undersell just how much I hate all the damn bunts!
#AllTheBuntsAreBad!
that
might have been the single most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen… I mean, if it was earlier in the game, and you really have little faith in Corporan’s hitting ability, I could see doing it, but at that point, it would have been quite OK to take Myers out for a PH
I think over the course of a season he costs us 2 to 4 games
well; no Manager (or person) is perfect. If he cost the Bucs 2-4 games, but all his positives GAINED the team 10-15 wins, would’nt that count for something ? The next Manager that makes every game-situation decision correctly will be the first ever.
There’s another aspect about Hurdle that rarely gets mentioned: from the start of this season, this team is having fun. And not at the detriment of fundamentals or concentration, but when the time calls for it, you see the guys pulling for each other and genuinely getting along. And trust me, this is NOT A Given, even amongst other winning teams. But it does help win games.
"Pitch me outside, I will hit .400. Pitch me inside, and you will not find the ball." - Roberto Clemente
even with that
not saying i agree here, but even if i WERE to concede he costs the club 2-4 games…guess what, they are still at 500 which is a far cry from years past
just sayin
" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jul 5, 2011 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions
agree on the bunts, disagree on the bullpen management
for all the reasons Charlie listed above. I love the short leash in high-leverage situations. And he never leaves the starters in too long. The 2-4 games seem a bit much too for a few bunts. I assume in neutral context runs all the bunts account for less than one win.
And judging from the distance I’d say Hurdle is doing a great job developing the young players. I shudder when I think of the 2006 fiasco with Tracy when he tried to mold the young players along the player types he had with the Dodgers before.
Hurdle is way better tactically than Russell, except for the occasional bunting.
Bullpen management now vs. last season is night and day. Plus he platoons guys like Jones. Plus the motivational aspect.
Obviously, Hurdle is a hugely successful hire, IMO.
by Adam Reynolds on Jul 5, 2011 4:27 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I'm kind of holding back...
from going all in on this one. Not ready to call it hugely successul yet but I’m definitely leaning that way. There has been a lot more to like than not. And the bunts, while extremely frustrating, are minor in comparison to Hurdle’s intangible strengths. He seems to be one hell of a motiviator and he is doing a good job developing young talent. That last one is the most important thing for me. Anyway, the Pedro situation and the bunts are two things that are holding me back a bit. It’s more of guarded optimism than anything.
#AllTheBuntsAreBad!
Pirates bunting ...
Pirates bunted quite a bit more the first month of the season. Now, the bunts are generally in situations where the bunt makes sense (pitcher hitting, late game where 1 run can mean the difference).
The occasional difference of opinion as to the adviseability of a bunt in a particular circumstance is far outweighed by Hurdle’s management of the pen, his early hook on pitchers (starters OR relievers) who are struggling, and his fearless use of rookies in key situations (Watson and Moskos out of the pen, Presley batting leadoff, etc.).
he'd be without any doubt...
…If we make the world series.
"It's magic, it's tragic, it's a loss, it's a win"
this is in our future me thinks
" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jul 5, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I doubt anyone will be around
to enjoy the 3007 WS
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 5, 2011 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
way to
just blow up the buzz
" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jul 5, 2011 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions
See, if you were smart,
you could have replied, “Yeah, smartarse, but what about 2107?”
#MissedOpportunity
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jul 5, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions
nah i shoulda done this
i see what you did there!
" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009
by oldtimehockey09 on Jul 5, 2011 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Will anybody be around for the 2107 WS?
by StripesForLife on Jul 5, 2011 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Who cares if he is an A-Hole or a D-Bag.
Just keep on winning.
Motivation
I agree that Hurdle has gotten the players attention and motivated them. They are more alert and interested than last year.
I think this effort starts with a lot of his batting and base running strategies. Steal a base, bunt a man over, be aggressive on the base paths. This puts a bit more pressure on the other teams defense. Does anyone know if opposing teams made more errors this year rushing plays?
I thought John Russell got a bad rap a lot of the time
This is not the first time I have heard this opinion about John Russel and I could not disagree more. Never looked to me like JR was a real motivator… don’t even get me started about the ridiculous line ups last year. Come on!
Line-ups this year.
Tonight, Diaz is batting 3rd…
So onto my love rocket, climb, Inside tank of fuel is not fuel, but love.
There's more to being a manager than being an in-game strategist...
I used to get very upset when managers would make sabermetrically incorrect strategy decisions. While I do think they deserve to be blamed when they err in such matters, I need to keep reminding myself that there are a lot of other factors in their jobs that I am not qualified to evaluate. It’s unfortunate that these responsibilities cannot be split between two people, but that is the reality of baseball today. I wish that Clint Hurdle would memorize “The Book” and act accordingly, but I can’t say he’s a bad manager because he doesn’t. Frankly nowadays I feel I have very little idea how good any manager is…
MOY First Half 2011: Hurdle
MOY Full Year 2011: TBD. Weren’t the D’Backs pretty terrible last year also? We’ll see what happens. Both Hurdle and Gibson are strong contenders at this point. By the way, w/o checking, who were the MOYs last year and why were they selected?
The local Comic (Virginian-Pilot) published an AP piece on Davey Johnson’s efforts to put the right pieces in the right places in the Oriole’s lineup. Hurdle played for Johnson on The Tides twenty-some years ago and a local sports-talker who is a huge Hurdle fan sez he learned a lot from Johnson and Whitey Herzog. I agree with the points made above re: accountability and the quick hook. I’m guessing that Hurdle may have more input into roster management than JR had.
Lino Donoso
Oops! Right pieces in the Nationals lineup
He already did that with the O’s.
Lino Donoso
i really like Hurdle and what he has brung to the table, but Searage has helped this team more than Clint has, and thats not an insult...
i mentioned this last year in another blog about teams that do complete rebuildings from the basement up: they hire a manager, usually a first timer, as a sacrificial lamb. they stick around for a few years and take a shitload of punishment in the meantime. once the team starts to bring along “core” type players he is relieved of duty and replaced with a more respected game time captain… this happened this season with Hurdle and also Manny Acta.
once the Cubs start rebuilding their MLB squad, Quade will be let go and a “name” guy will take his place. Dusty Baker replaced Mackanin/Narron once the team had their core.
cito gaston’s return to toronto. and of course, famously, Leyland replaces Trammell right when the team is turning the corner.
of course this theory is shot to shit by piniella failing badly with the young devil rays. the rays finally becoming respectable in maddon’s second season.
initially i have said that “name” managers, such as larussa and torre, only go into situations where they know they can win right away. i can throw Leyland into this group as well because of his quitting the Marlins, yet that situation was a clusterfuk that no one should have to go through.
so i think Hurdle is doing a great job at being a spokesman for the pirates team. we can always second guess his gametime management, which is understandable. but because his personality is such a stark contrast to JR, he appears to care more about the team than Russell, which is complete BS. If Hurdle were here in 2010, the team still would have been the worst team in baseball.
I've usually liked Hurdle's bullpen management, but I think he cost us both games against the Nats
I love how he puts Hanrahan out in the top of the 9th when we’re tied or down a run – put the best man out there in a high leverage situation, even if it’s not a save opportunity. Too many managers throws out their 5th or 6th best reliever in a tie game in the 9th.
But, on Friday vs Washington Tim Wood was out there in a tied bottom of the 9th, not even close to the strike zone on fastballs. Then on Saturday Resop was lifted for Watson when Ankiel PH, and Watson was left in the face three straight righties, two of whom reached. I would have rather had Resop face one lefty than Watson three righties.
by Brian Cartwright on Jul 6, 2011 2:20 AM EDT reply actions

by 

















