Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Cubs 7, Pirates 6: Clint Hurdle's Bizarre Bullpen Management Costs Pirates

PITTSBURGH - AUGUST 04:  Garrett Jones #46 of the Pittsburgh Pirates is congratulated by manager Clint Hurdle #13 after scoring against the Chicago Cubs in the fourth inning during the game on August 4, 2011 at PNC Park in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

Clint Hurdle cost the Pirates the game tonight. James McDonald had allowed three homers by the end of the fourth inning but still managed to last seven full innings for the first time this season and leave the game with a lead, thanks to his own miraculous bases-clearing double in the Pirates' six-run fourth. The Bucs were up 6-4 at that point.

And then, the eighth. Dan McCutchen came on to pitch and allowed the first three batters to reach on two singles and a hit by pitch. (I was listening to the game on the radio, and it sounded like the hit by pitch was really, really close.) So, to recap, it's 6-4 Pirates, and the Cubs have the bases loaded with no outs in the eighth. So who does Hurdle turn to? Why, Jason Grilli, of course. This is a tailor-made situation for Joel Hanrahan - it's about as high-leverage as it gets. And not only does Hurdle not bring in Hanrahan, he brings in ... well, again, recent Lehigh Valley IronPigs setup man Jason Grilli.

Grilli allows a single, and then Hurdle brings in Joe Beimel to face Carlos Pena, which I suppose is defensible in order to get the lefty-lefty matchup, although Beimel in any kind of high-leverage situation scares the bejesus out of me. Of course Pena walks to tie the game. And then Hurdle brings in Jose Veras, who allows a sacrifice fly to give the Cubs the lead but gets the next two batters to end the inning.

The Pirates don't score in the bottom of the inning, and then Hanrahan comes in in the ninth with the Pirates behind.

That's just awful. The decision to go to Grilli is terrible, and I don't understand how any manager could make it. The Cubs completed the sweep. The first three losses were on the players, but this one was all Hurdle. He seems to do so many things well, but his bullpen usage recently has flagrantly lacked common sense, and I can't believe he can't see it.

Comment 213 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Grilli move was beyond awful, and D. Mccutchen should have at least been pulled after the 1st or 2nd baserunner.

That JMac triple would have been a great story…

by Adam Reynolds on Aug 4, 2011 10:22 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Re: JMac

Yeah, you know how we’ve been hoping and praying for a big inning to break the offense out of its slump? Well, that inning (particularly JMac’s big hit) was it. And Hurdle went and blew it, so that it winds up not meaning anything, and doesn’t build any momentum for us. Just makes me want to scream.

Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.

ARE YOU F#$%ING KIDDING ME!!!! ADAMS!!! JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST YOU HAD 24 SQUARE FEET AND YOU MISSED IT ALL!! - OlenWhitaker

Certified Grabbo Lover, though only by accident.

I love lots of guys. - leaflover4ever

by wg1of5 on Aug 4, 2011 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Inexplicable

Every day brings a new head scratcher. What the hell is the point of having a guy like Hanrahan if you aren’t going to use him with the game on the line? This is how many games now he’s been sitting in the bullpen while the barn door flies open and the horses run off?

"Throw strikes, but don't give him anything good to hit."

by RichieHebner on Aug 5, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Charlie, as to the HBP, my jaw literally dropped when the ump called it. It was actually too close to call based on the TV replay. I didn’t see any argument from Hurdle or Doumit so I assume it clipped the jersey but they didn’t show us any view on the AGH cam so no way to know for sure.
That being said, I disagree that we should’ve brought in Hanrahan to replace DCutch. He may be our best reliever but I don’t think he’d be able to put his best stuff out there for 2 innings, and it would’ve been much worse if we’d lost the game in the 9th because Hanrahan tired out. However, I do think Hurdle’s an idiot for not replacing DCutch with Veras, who’s clearly the 2nd-best reliever in the pen. We all know Veras has been prone to occasional blowups but he has some excellent stuff and would have been a much better move than using Grilli.

by Akshay R on Aug 4, 2011 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Walk said he saw it on the AGH cam and couldn’t tell if it hit or not. He said the ump must have heard something.

You can always put someone else in in the ninth. Getting out of the jam in the eighth is way more difficult than pitching a scoreless ninth with the bases empty.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Aug 4, 2011 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

But yeah, anyone would be better than Grilli there.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Aug 4, 2011 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I would have been fine with any of them in the ninth, with nobody on base.

"Throw strikes, but don't give him anything good to hit."

by RichieHebner on Aug 5, 2011 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

not to mention...

the heart of their order was up in the 8th as well so whatever reliever that would have been used in the 9th (still don’t understand why it couldn’t be Hanrahan) would have had to face the bottom of the order.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

You don't understand

The closer must pitch the 9th and the 9th must be pitched by the closer.

Thus it is written and thus it shall be!

by maguro on Aug 5, 2011 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Except on the road

Where your closer can ONLY be on the mound for a save opportunity.

Which means you may lose the game in extra innings because you put your long reliever (who likely is your worst) out there in a tie game.

by From France on Aug 5, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

it would’ve been much worse if we’d lost the game in the 9th because Hanrahan tired out.

I guess this is the kind of thinking that causes managers to not put their best pitchers in. When people will see the light, I don’t know. But really, can you guys not see that it was not likely to ever get into a more critical situation in the game than this?

by BurgherKing on Aug 4, 2011 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now I’m not saying we should always stick with our worse pitchers to save the big guys. If this was 2 outs, bases loaded then obviously we go with the Hammer. However, since it’s no outs I don’t think using him there would be the best move, and instead think Veras should’ve gone in over Grilli, who simply isn’t good enough to use in that situation.

by Akshay R on Aug 4, 2011 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tire him out, though? If he gets tired at all, it’s due to the weight he’s probably gained from being inactive the last week and a half. Pathetic.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 4, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Than let him pitch and get this mythical four outs

Then bring in Veras! I couldn’t agree more with Charlie and this loss almost made me sick to my stomach. Why wouldn’t you use your best reliever to put out the fire? Who fucking knows?

by dack2001 on Aug 4, 2011 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's no such thing

as a “fireman” any more.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Firefighter?

Fireperson? :-)

"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway

by SubLime on Aug 5, 2011 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Worse...

the PC “First Responder.”

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

there is no way that pitch hit him.

his jersey didn’t even move.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 4, 2011 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

There is no way

McKenry made the tag. Lugo’s uniform didn’t even move.

(Never never never never never give up.)

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

The guy who said that is dead, you know.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

SSS

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

how bout this...

the ball didnt even change directions.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 5, 2011 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I say you go get Hammer and let him get us out of the jam. I would much rather bring in Veras up 2 in the ninth than Hammer down 2 in the ninth. If Veras blows the lead, ay least Hammer was used in the best situation the inning before, but I think you have to be willing to let other guys “close” on occasion when you really need your best guy to get you out of a jam.

by Brakeman8 on Aug 4, 2011 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Bases loaded with the number 3-4-5 hitters coming up in the top of the 8th inning is about the most high-leverage situation imaginable. Bring in Hammer, and worry about the ninth when you get there.

Hurdle, you’re dead to me.

by DG Lewis on Aug 4, 2011 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t understand why McCutchen started the inning instead of Veras. Is Dan McCutchen really his 8th inning guy now?

by maguro on Aug 4, 2011 10:26 PM EDT reply actions  

he's not been too bad though for most of the year

if Hurdle has lost some confidence in Veras, I could see going with DCutch.

by BurgherKing on Aug 4, 2011 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

he's pitching way above his peripherals...

in fact coming into the game he has a -.1WAR. He’s done a decent job but he’s gotten pretty lucky too. He shouldn’t be a high leverage guy.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 4, 2011 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

dcutch

bringing in dcutch wasnt a bad idea, veras has been hit or miss recently. although he has semed to get his stuff back from the first half where he was pretty automatic.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 4, 2011 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Guys, I think I have it

The slide started when that yelling pirates girl showed up.

I move that we strike that photo from the archives and ban it from being posted here forthwith.

Can I get that seconded?

by BlindSquirrel on Aug 4, 2011 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

/signed

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 4, 2011 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boo! Hiss!

Not a good “Means” test to blame misfortune on a little girl who didn’t give up on her team.

by Central*Scrutinizer on Aug 5, 2011 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

love the yelling pirates girl

the slide started on a play at the plate in atlanta… I mean, isn’t that the first lesson of recent pirates history 101?

by Captain Easychord on Aug 4, 2011 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, isn't this the girl that cheered for 19 straight innings?

Give her a medal or a statue or something. That’s dedication!

by Superstar25 on Aug 5, 2011 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Beimel vs Watson

I said in the gamethread if he was gonna bring in a reliever, bring in Watson. I looked up the numbers and Beimel has been better against LHH this year than Watson. I suppose the pressure also makes a case for Beimel over Watson. Oh well.

by BurgherKing on Aug 4, 2011 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

i agree with charlie

you bring in your most automatic guy after you yank dcutch. thats hammer. i can live with a loss if hammer gives up a run or two or we have to bring in someone else to close it out….but not like this….

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 4, 2011 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hurdle said Watson and Resop were not available tonigh.

So to me the no brainer move is Veras or have Hammer go two innings.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 4, 2011 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hanrahan

has been better against LHB than Beimel, and better against RHB than anyone except arguably Veras. I think I put their lines up the other day.

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still support Resop in the setup role.

by thecheeseisblue on Aug 4, 2011 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Hurdle wanted to avoid him potentially losing the game 2 nights in a row, which was probably the right move. What was not the right move was bringing in Grilli to replace DCutch when Veras (or Hanrahan) were still available in the pen.

by Akshay R on Aug 4, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope you are being sarcastic

Assigning “roles” that are rigidly adhered to is the reason we are losing some of these games.

by dack2001 on Aug 4, 2011 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Rigidly assigned roles are antiquated and stupid, but yet we still use them. Hurdle is not going to change that.

by thecheeseisblue on Aug 4, 2011 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is just frustrating and it only goes to prove what many including my self have said since this started

the bucs cant seem to put together a complete game. when we need hits we cant get them, when we need lights out pitching we cant get it, when we need sure fielding we cant get that. this sucks but it was good to see the guys try and take matters into their own hands only to have the pen/hurdle take it away.

and ffs hurdle stop managing scared or we will never win another game.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 4, 2011 10:34 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m not superstitious, and don’t believe in any of that craziness. However, I’ve only gone to 1 pirates game this year, the 2nd one against Baltimore where we came in 2 games under .500 and riding a bad losing streak. We won that game handily and were in first place a month later.
2 weeks ago I was deciding on a game to go to with the family and we settled on tomorrow’s Free shirt friday game. I would really, really love for the same thing to happen again.

by Akshay R on Aug 4, 2011 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Totally agree

Once upon a time, managers routinely used their closers in situations like this. The most important situations aren’t always in the 9th, the color men would always say. Now, the fashion is that you have a 7th inning guy and an 8th inning guy and then, the mightiest of them all: the 9th inning guy and he must only be used in the 9th or MAYBE to get the last out in the 8th.

You know, I was hoping this would be the year that they don’t have the 10 game losing streak that completely destroys the season. God damn this is so depressing.

by Aphthakid on Aug 4, 2011 10:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Can bill james please visit the bucco clubhouse and at least present the concept of the relief ace to clint… I mean at least to see hurdles reaction

by TheLizardKing on Aug 4, 2011 11:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Can bill james please visit the bucco clubhouse and at least present the concept of the relief ace to clint… I mean at least to see hurdles reaction

by TheLizardKing on Aug 4, 2011 11:10 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Random thoughts before I take five tranquilizers to try to sleep...

Believe it or not, up until the last two weeks I was ok with Hurdle. Sure, he left Maholm in to blow a 7 run lead at Citifield (christ, I was there for that game), and who could forget the suicide squeeze with Cutch up and Snyder on third. But if I have learned one thing watching baseball this long, it is that all managers cost their team games every year. They are all various shades of stupid. At least Hurdle actually has had streaks this year where he has adjusted to situations, rode the hot hand, and had things work out.

But his handling of Hanrahan lately is beyond my capacity to understand, or forgive. Let’s not forget that, theoretically at least, Hurdle has a boss, and if NH doesn’t correct Hurdle’s medication, he should be held responsible.

by nycbucsfan on Aug 4, 2011 11:26 PM EDT reply actions  

from jen langosch...
LangoschMLB Jenifer Langosch
Hurdle will never pitch Hanrahan for 2 innings, so that argument won’t work. He was willing to bring him in for 4-out save, if it got there.

this really makes no sense to me… say hanrahan comes in and in less than 10 pitches gets a DP and a third out… why not bring him back for a second inning then? I mean, a 4 out save could entail just as many pitches in the 8th inning…

by Captain Easychord on Aug 4, 2011 11:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Ok – he’d have a better idea of Hanrahan’s limits than I do. But jeez, he doesn’t need to finish the game. It’s not, like, a rule. Just have him pitch the eighth, then bring in someone else for the ninth.

by Charlie Wilmoth on Aug 5, 2011 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

this is true

and I agree 100% … but at the same time, sending him out with the bases loaded in the 8th shouldn’t categorically exclude him from pitching the ninth… say he gets a one pitch triple play… is hurdle really going to say, “well we can only send him in for a four out save… we can’t have him pitch two innings?” that’s the same kind of reflexive, thoughtless thinking that leads to only bringing your closer in to “save” a game in the ninth to begin with…

by Captain Easychord on Aug 5, 2011 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well now you’re getting into a baseball problem, not a Hurdle problem. It would be nice to use your best reliever in the highest leverage situation, but closers get disgruntled if somebody else gets their glory stat. And saves pay the bill. If you rack em up, and are an established closer, you’re going to make way more money than a shut down guy without glory stats.

You can’t fault the manager all that much because he has to play his players how he does to keep them happy. You can’t fault the player because he’s got to do what he can do to make the most money. It’s just that saves are such an established glory stat, it makes it almost impossible to use your bullpen in the most effective manner.

by thecheeseisblue on Aug 5, 2011 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly and one can add the effect of the blown-save stat

An established closer would never ever be happy if he were brought in with the bases loaded and only a two-run lead even with two outs. Too easy for a bloop single to result in a blown save making his own personal stats look worse.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who made Hanrahan a closer?

Oh, that’s right. It was us!

If coming into a hot spot in the 8th is such an unreasonable burden, perhaps he’d like to go back to his usage pattern with the Nats…

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 8:46 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Didn't mean to imply anything about Hanrahan's views one way or the other

It is just my opinion that the reason that modern-day closer usage evolved the way it did is because the top closers themselves demanded to be used in such a fashion as to maximize the saves they get and minimize blown saves given their primary goal.

It seems obvious to me that the old style of using your best reliever in the most difficult situations in close games was a better approach if the primary goal was team wins. The current approach seems designed to simply maximize the saves your closer gets instead of maximizing team wins. I am the first to admit that I could be overlooking something though.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Winning keeps players happy

except for the selfish a-holes, and who cares if they walk in FA. These guys aren’t 5 year olds, Hurdle is in charge and should tell them he’s going to use them in whichever way provides the highest chance of victory.

by Mr. E on Aug 5, 2011 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just don't understand this

So what if Hurdle didn’t want to use Hanrahan in the eighth, or didn’t want to put him in with men on base for whatever reason? That has nothing to do with his decision to keep Veras out until the game was tied and the bases were loaded with no outs. I mean, even if Veras isn’t Johnny Venters, he’s clearly the second or third best reliever on the team (with Resop). Why don’t you have your set-up guy pitch the eighth inning before the game is blown?

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Aug 5, 2011 6:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

He probably didn't want to use him since

as with Resop, Veras had pitched in four of the last five games. He couldn’t use Hanrahan either since it wasn’t the ninth inning yet, hence the D Cutch, Grilli, Beimel sequence.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hurdle will never pitch Hanrahan for 2 innings,

Yes. Because, God forbid, a strapping, 29-year-old man in probably the athletic peak of his life, having what may be the best season of his career, should not be able to pitch consecutive innings

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Let's say

it’s the last game of the season, we have a 6-4 lead and need six outs to clinch a playoff spot. You think Hammer might find it in him to go two innings? Think Hurdle might send him out in the eighth? Really, I’m not so sure anymore, but let’s say yes.

OK, move that up to the next-to-last game of the season. We need a win to stay in the race. Lose and we’re out. Same situation. Do you think Hurdle would bring Hammer in for the eighth and ninth? Maybe.

Now let’s walk it all the way up to the Phillies game on Sunday … and the game last night …

See where I’m going with this? All these “rules” can be broken at any time if the parties involved feel the emergency warrants it.

I think we have an emergency right now.

Apparently, CH thinks we don’t. And if not, I’d like to see his definition of any emergency.

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Hanrahan comes in in the 8th,

the terrorists win.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

We lost ten in a row, so five more losses to win three of our last ten. Wait.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

meth is pretty

It’s the people who get ugly.

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

silver linings.

morale victories are what we’re after now

"It's a great day for hockey" - Badger Bob

by StripesForLife on Aug 5, 2011 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lost in all of this bullpen excitement is our two "big bats": Pedro got a single, and Doumit got two singles

On defense, Pedro had an error and missed a ball to his left that he should have had, he just flopped. Doumit had a passed ball through his legs.

These two “big bats” are in reality the weak link on offense and defense. But now its back to 2010, when these guys are on the field, long long losing streaks, while hoping for Pedro and Doumit to “heat up”.

Jay-Hay and The Fort would have made the difference in a close game. Is it too late to trade Paulie/Veras/Lee/Jones for prospects?

by BucsFaninCA on Aug 5, 2011 12:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I thought you went away

Didn’t you see all of the comments/recs from the community members who don’t want you?

by Central*Scrutinizer on Aug 5, 2011 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought you promised not to be a crybaby and not whine anymore…

by BucsFaninCA on Aug 5, 2011 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Man, that response wasn’t fast at all. We should replace you with the Ciriaco of blog-commenters.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

These two "big bats" are in reality the weak link on offense and defense.

Remind me again: How many errors has Doumit made since he came off the DL?

Doumit got two singles

He had two hits? Well, Christ, better burn him at the stake, then.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

cant

gotta wait for them to pull Overbay off the charred post first.

by white angus on Aug 5, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Allow me to deride you like I did in the game thread:

You call Doumit and Pedro automatic outs, when Harrison has a lower OBP than both of them.

Also — interesting that having Doumit and Pedro on the field is directly responsible for the higher frequency of home runs hit by the other team. I’m sure if Harrison started at third, that blast to Pena would have been a weak ground out.

Also — both of your ‘goats’ got hits. One has a full year of major league playing time and that’s it.

I know it’s pointless arguing with you, but logic that basic needs to be pointed out or I just feel like I’m doing readers of this blog a disservice. We don’t all think like this guy, folks.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

when asked to compare Fort and Doumits offensive stats yesterday such as OBP, SLG, OPS+, K:BB, BucFaninCA had no reply other to wait and see the results.

Thats what she said! - Michael Gary Scott

by C Shint on Aug 5, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

oh my God

don’t you ever get tired of saying the same stuff over and over and over?

by Garrett122 on Aug 5, 2011 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Do you ever get tired of the Pirates losing?

Didn’t you like it when they were winning with different players?

by BucsFaninCA on Aug 5, 2011 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

say it with me

correlation does not imply causation . . .

correlation does not imply causation . . .

correlation does not imply causation . . .

by Garrett122 on Aug 5, 2011 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

to many

syllables and stuffs. i just like op is delusional.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 5, 2011 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

So if he posts that, will it be because you told him to do it?

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 8:50 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions   3 recs

rec.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Every man wasting his life away

in Angola prison down here ate white bread as a youth. If only our society would have the collective moral will to ban white bread, we could save future generations from such a sorrowful end.

"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway

by SubLime on Aug 5, 2011 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

get left and right mixed up a lot do you

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 5, 2011 1:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Meanwhile

Jones is hitting the ball on the screws again.

"Throw strikes, but don't give him anything good to hit."

by RichieHebner on Aug 5, 2011 12:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Just had the discussion about Hanrahan usage after the Sunday Philly loss

see the “Clint Hurdle Muzzles Joel Hanrahan” fanshot. Lots of additional good points about RP usage in high leverage situations. Tonight demonstrated that Hurdle is too stubborn to change his ways. Looked to me that he only put in Hanrahan as a cover his ass measure.

by Central*Scrutinizer on Aug 5, 2011 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Which, if he did, lowered him down even more in my opinion.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Speed

I am about to go absolutely crazy if more people continue to insist that our lack of speed now is what is losing us games. Most ridiculous thought ever. Our pitching won us games the entire year and now has gone cold and that is the main reason why we are losing games now. The pitching will hopefully heat back up along with a couple of bats and maybe we can reel off 4 or 5 straight to get back over .500 and inch our way back into playoff contention maybe (BIG maybe). But please do not ask for Fryer, D’Arnaud, Harrison back because they have speed that puts pressure on the other pitchers because our runs per average during this losing streak is the same as it has been all season. We won with pitching before and we will win with pitching again.

by nagihcimwolves50 on Aug 5, 2011 12:35 AM EDT reply actions  

General point in favor of a push button bullpen

If you did try to use your best guy at critical moment, you might have him warm up several times but never get into the game as other pitchers got into and out of jams. I think assigned roles is the best way to make sure that good innings are not left in the bullpen.

by sanny manguillen on Aug 5, 2011 1:09 AM EDT reply actions  

And invent a new stat

Everytime we use A. Cutch like that and he produces, he gets a “Keep.” If he doesn’t, he gets a “Blown Keep.”

by Central*Scrutinizer on Aug 5, 2011 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

by matskralc on Aug 5, 2011 7:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So what you're saying...

…is that the Pirates should start the worst players possible, in order to save their best players for some predetermined time later in the game that may or may not actually happen, and if a situation arises in the game earlier than the predetermined time for those players, they should pick from an assortment of lesser options rather than using the best players in order to have them available later in case the same situation arises again?

Count me in. I can’t possibly imagine how a starting line up that includes Ciriaco, Wood, Paul, Diaz, Jones and McKenry is going to perform, but just think of the awesome pinch-hitters we’ll have available!

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Just when I praise the guy....

….Hurdle pulls a bone-head stunt like this. Put in Hanrahan. End of story. 2 games below .500. I’m startin’ to get nervous. This should have been a “W” tonight, there’s no excuse for it. Time for this team to win or wallow in August. Whaddaya say, Buccos?

by dougalmac on Aug 5, 2011 1:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Criticism is off-base

I think this blaming of the manager and the bullpen is really missing the point. This is the same bullpen management we’ve seen all season whle we were winning.

This is a problem with the offense. We’ve scored in 1 inning in the last 2 games, and half the runs were driven in by the pitcher. That was Rodrigo Lopez pitching today. We needed to blow them out of this game.

McCutchen has given us good innings all season, Beimel threw four strikes to Pena according to the gamecast, and when Hanrahan did come in, he allowed a hit to the bottom of their lineup. Who’s to say he wouldn’t have had the same result as what we threw out there. Its not like he’s really been thrown into a bases loaded no out situation before.

Hindsight is 20-20.

by ballparkfranks on Aug 5, 2011 1:59 AM EDT reply actions  

hindsight is 20/20

but the sole reason none of this worked (bullpen management) is because our supposed 8th inning guy has been less then reliable.Hiis stats say otherwise but anyone who was watch the games knows that when veras comes in you can usually tell which veras is on the mound, good one or bad one. Hurdle lost faith in veras thus danimal coming it. If veras was more reliable this game is over because he comes in and doesn’t allow a runner into scoring position. You can put the loss on hurdle, you can put the loss on the bats going silent since the 4th, you can put the loss on jmac for giving up four. That’s the point of team sport, its a team loss, and as has been the norm recently the bucs continue to struggle to put together a complete game.

" Lord Stanley, scratch thier names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Aug 5, 2011 3:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

but 20/20 vision is perfect

plus it used to be a really good show with Barbwa Wahwah

by white angus on Aug 5, 2011 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not hindsight. I’ve been complaining about this type of bullpen management for 15 years. It’s just amazing that managers keep making the same mistakes game after game, season after season. There’s nothing “special” about the ninth inning. Use your best fireman when there is an actual fire — not with a three-run lead in the ninth inning.

by bolton on Aug 5, 2011 3:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

We may have only scored in one inning, but it still counts as six runs all the same.

This isn’t on the offense. It’s on the guy who when the game was on the line elected to bring in our fifth-best right-handed reliever.

We ripped Jim Tracy a new asshole when he pulled this same stunt with Marty McLeary back in the day. Yeah, Hurdle’s a nice old duffer instead of a self-serving crapweasel like Tracy, but fair is fair.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 8:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Wreck Specs!

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

to be fair

Hurdle tried to stop us from scoring six runs in an inning by letting the pitcher bat with the bases loaded and two outs. If McDonald had made an out, as was reasonable to expect, then we would have had the top of the order up the next inning and would’ve scored a run then too.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Aug 5, 2011 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

WHY DO YOU HATE J-MAC?

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

finding a way to lose

wow. as i said yesterday i went down to the game today. that 4 run deficit seemed large then we put up a 6 spot, and can’t add to it!?!? but then again we shouldnt have to.

But that 8th was brutal! when i saw “Grilled Cheese” coming out i was pissed. i wanted the Hammer, this was a MUST win IMO. we needed this. i am really concerned right now. this team seems to be falling apart. we lost a game this series in every way possible. lack of offense, bad starting pitching, defense, bad bullpen, bad managing. it has been brutal.

also, at the game the ump looked like he was calling some balls that were way outside strikes. especially later in the game. anyone confirm or deny?

by bbautista24 on Aug 5, 2011 7:29 AM EDT reply actions  

also

i said in a different thread that i thought it would be karsten who would be the stopper for this team right now. he goes tonight, lets hope he can pitch us back into the win column.

by bbautista24 on Aug 5, 2011 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

How much intangibles did Overbay provide?

Cause this streak right now seems strange. We all know Overbay sucked on the field, but what was he like in the clubhouse? Wasn’t he the one who called a players only meeting after the sweep to Cleveland? I thought it was him and Hanny.

by Epsy on Aug 5, 2011 8:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Intangibles...

…do not exist. They are a mythical beast, much like the unicorn, that are purely figments of irrational peoples’ imaginations.

David Eckstein was not good at baseball, yet he continued to draw paychecks because some people, such as Joe Morgan, felt he was “gritty” and “full of heart.”

Derek Jeter is not a “great leader”, as some would argue, unless one measures greatness by being on a roster that had a payroll some 33% than the next closest team.

Lyle Overbay brought a gigantic black hole both offensively and defensively to the Pirates. Nothing more.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can you touch

a black hole?

Seems intangible to me.

I could be wrong.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm forcing myself to keep from...

…from making any disgusting sexual comments in response to your question.

I believe I just burst a blood vessel in my brain, and I probably should go home from work now.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sick Day!

…want me to forge you a “Doctor’s Note?”

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Disclosure:

I am not a doctor.

Also – I admire your restraint, sir. Not everyone has that ability.

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha. I thought for sure because Lebron endorsed him the Broncos would IMMEDIATELY name Tebow their starter.

"Hockey is the only tribe I belong to." -Jack Falla
Twitter Facebook Tumblr

by AlexStitch on Aug 5, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Saw a good one on twitter yesterday (but cannot recall who posted it first, and can't be arsed to look it up right now):

“There hasn’t been this much interest in a white Bronco since 1994.”

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

That’s beautiful.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

love it, recd

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

David Eckstein was not good at baseball…

Per Fangraphs WAR, David Eckstein was above replacement level in every season of his career, and averaged about 1.9 WAR per season. That’s not a Hall of Fame career, but he wasn’t just some slappy with an oversized reputation for intangibles, either.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Are you serious?

I didn’t bother to check the numbers, but if those are right, then I stand corrected about his baseball ability. I guess I just have a intense, and apparently irrational, dislike of Mr. Eckstein.

This dislike is rapidly transferring itself to Darwin Barney. The mere mention of his name this past series drove me nuts; he looks like Ryan Braun and hits like Derek Jeter (at least against the Pirates), and he is climbing my list of least-liked players, which also includes Ryan Braun and Derek Jeter.

I think I have a problem.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

he looks like Ryan Braun

Ohhhh yeah.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Serious as a heart attack.

Eckstein never had much power at all, but it’s hard to be totally useless when you put up a .344 career OBP as a middle infielder. He also added some sneaky baserunning value – 123 SB at a 73.2% success rate..

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

it’s hard to be totally useless when you put up a .344 career OBP as a middle infielder.

Yeah, but is sure is easy to draw walks (and hard to strike out much) when you’re barely taller than a

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, this stat surprised me when I looked it up. Thing is he was heralded as “a winner” despite his mediocre stats, which annoys the hell out of anyone who prefers quantitative analysis over ‘gut feelings’

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was just looking at his page the other day

Didn’t he come with like a 5 WAR season once, too? My mind boggled when I saw it.

by matskralc on Aug 5, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

By Fangraphs WAR, his high was 4.4 in 2002; B-R has the same season at 4.5. He hit .293/.363/.388 as a SS that year, which ain’t bad. He also hit near the top of the lineup and played pretty much every day, so he ended up with 152 games played and 702 PA.

Led the league in sac bunts and tied for the league in HBPs.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Use of Hanrahan

We all may agree with what the “right” decision was here…to bring in Hammer with the bases loaded and try to strike a few guys out and get out of it. But just because we all agree doesn’t mean it’s ever going to happen.

There’s not a manager in baseball that I can think of that would have brought in his closer in that situation. Right or wrong, it’s not happening because of the way bullpens are used. To say that Hurdle messed that up isn’t wrong, but it’s also not really relevant, because nobody would get it right. Even the Bill James employing Red Sox abandoned the whole “closer by committee” or “floating roles” bullpen.

I’m not arguing that Hurdle is a master of bullpen usage, nor am I condoning the use of Grilli last night. I’m simply saying that getting worked up about this is as useful as tilting at windmills.

(apologies if others made this point above…I didn’t read all the comments here)

by mak_DC on Aug 5, 2011 8:16 AM EDT reply actions  

i agree

but i feel like this team is desperate for a win and hanrahan may have been able to get us out of that inning. it would have been a big win and left a chance to go 4-3 on the homestand. we need to stop this losing streak.

by bbautista24 on Aug 5, 2011 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've seen the Yankees bring in Rivera in situations like the one Hurdle faced last night

Maybe that is just in the playoffs though, since I never watch their games otherwise.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's the point I tried to make above.

You can throw out all the rules if the situation is important enough. See my last-game-of-the-season scenario.

I think last night’s situation was important enough, and Hurdle didn’t.

We disagree.

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but

Why bring in McCutchen in the first place? That was his first mistake. McCutchen, despite his low ERA, is not all that good. He doesn’t belong in the 8th inning with a 2 run lead. Veras should have started the inning, or at least come into the game once the first 2 batters reached. And bringing Jason Fucking Grilli into a bases loaded no out situation like that is inexcusable. I mean, really, how can anyone defend that?

by maguro on Aug 5, 2011 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Coming into the game McCutchen hand negative WAR. He K’s 5/9, walked like 3.8/9, had a BABIP of .53, a strand rate over 85% and HR/FB % of 6%. McCutchen does not have the type of stuff to suggests those numbers are sustainable. Text book case of a pitcher getting lucky with random variation.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Even the Bill James employing Red Sox abandoned the whole "closer by committee" or "floating roles" bullpen.

The Red Sox went without a set closer that year because they didn’t have a lights-out reliever to use as a Jamesian “Relief Ace”. Totally different situation.

by Vlad on Aug 5, 2011 8:59 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

First, let me say I agree. Hurdle did nothing that any other manager in baseball would have done.

But by the same token, forty years ago there was not a manager in baseball who would have saved his best relief pitcher for the ninth inning of games with a lead of three runs or fewer. Strategy changes.

Unfortunately, Hurdle is not the guy to change it.

by DG Lewis on Aug 5, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Saves are bad

And you can spin it away way you want, I cannot see how Saves have made the game better.

by From France on Aug 5, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you mean "would have done" or "wouldn't have done"?

If the latter, which is what I think you mean – you may be right that few or maybe none would have brought in their closer in that spot. But I doubt that many would have gone with their 4th or 5th best RH option either.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, would have

In 1971, no manager in baseball would have left his best reliever sitting in the bullpen in the eighth inning with a two-run lead, the bases loaded, and the number 3-4-5 hitters up. As BobDH discusses in his fanpost, forty years ago relief pitchers came in to “put out fires”, not “close out games”.

Since then, some manager decided that he should save his best relief pitcher for the ninth inning, and that became Conventional Wisdom. But forty years ago, Conventional Wisdom was to use your best reliever in the highest-pressure situation. CW changes when some manager decides to go against it and has success.

by DG Lewis on Aug 5, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

All right thanks for the clarification

Makes sense; I didn’t realize the first sentence was also referring to how the situation would have been handled 40 years ago. I think you could even make that 20 years ago and still be correct in your assessment.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Idea for Macdonald

When u throw a “flat FB with no movement” expect it to leave the park……….

by Raiders3604 on Aug 5, 2011 8:52 AM EDT reply actions  

if there's a silver lining to all this

its that Hurdle has given an absolute tutorial on just how much misusing a closer by only allowing him the last few outs can hurt the team. It came into the national media’s reporting last week, and since then its kept getting worse. I think hurdle’s just been hoping its been bad luck (which its been) but its refused to go away and give him a break, which is funny to watch.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 9:18 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m not going to call in to the Fan like some people have, crying about how that’s it for this season, because I think this is the worst stretch for this club so far, for many reasons. I’m not going to be one of the fans that starts saying “Well that’s it, it was fun while it lasted this year,” but we need a really big game to get this turned around, and when that happens, I think we can still make something happen.

"Hockey is the only tribe I belong to." -Jack Falla
Twitter Facebook Tumblr

by AlexStitch on Aug 5, 2011 9:44 AM EDT reply actions  

This is all I will say about this game

For what it’s worth, I was sitting in section 131, and I didn’t think that Blarney got hit with that pitch. That being said, just, wow. Very frustrated with last night.

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.
Twitter: @shanecglass

by glass0941 on Aug 5, 2011 11:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Isn't all of this hindsight?

Yes, the Pirates lost in EXCRUCIATING fashion last night and for the 5th straight game, it was “a game they had to win.” To be completely fair, though, why would Hurdle have been so uncertain about his relievers that he would have gone to Hammer for a 6 out save? There have been 3 games lost in the 8th innings over the recent 5 game crotch-punch. All were horrible and painful and hard to believe. After each one, people said that it was a situation that called for Hanrahan to come in the game early. Personally, I think Hurdle made the right call in all 3 games, and it blew up in his face in all 3 games.

Coming into the game against the Phillies, Jose Veras had a 3.38 ERA. He had a BA against of of .192 and an OPS agaisnt of .604 and had struck out more than a batter per inning. He was 20-24 in hold situations. He had allowed just 3 HRs in 48 innings (the last 2 coming in the 9th inning of a blowout over the Padres back on May 4). After allowing the double to Howard, he got picked up by Brandon Wood whose nice play at short made it 2 outs with a runner on 1st and a 2 run lead for the 6 hitter who came into that game with a .703 OPS. Honestly, what are the odds that Veras gets out of that unscathed? 95%? Well, he didn’t. What about that situation should have told Hurdle to go to Hanrahan early?

Let’s look at Wednesday’s crappy loss. Charlie Morton had been fantastic through 7 innings. However, he was at 94 pitches and in his previous inning he had given up a 4 pitch walk and then a ROCKET to Soriano that was hit right to Pedro at 3B. It’s understandable that Hurdle might think he was tiring. He went to Chris Resop. Resop had also been very good this year. He had a 3.26 ERA entering the game. He had a .221 BAA, a .670 OPS against and was striking out 10.7/9 innings. He was facing Starlin Castro who came into the game with 6 HR in 984 career PA’s. He just isn’t much of a threat to go deep. He hit Resop’s 6th pitch about 420 ft. Raise your hand if you really saw that coming.

Even last nights game wasn’t awful. McCutchen came into the game with a 2.25 ERA and a 1.217 WHIP. Opponents were hitting .237 with a .679 OPS against him. With a 2 run lead, it would make plenty of sense to have him start the 8th, wouldn’t it? As he started to allow baserunners, when would you have pulled him? After Reed Johnson hit a pop up that happened to land in no man’s land? When Castro hit a soft liner to CF off the end of the bat? You had to expect Barney would bunt, so maybe Hurdle just wanted to give his pen more time to warm up rather than bringing them in to face a sac bunt. After he hit Barney (I still haven’t seen anything that made me think he actually did, though). Hurdle went to Grilli. If you’re going to pick on a call this would be it. BUT, with Pena, on deck, isn’t it possible that Hurdle was going to go to a lefty against him and didn’t want to waste Veras, Resop or Hanrahan just to pitch to one batter? Grilli didn’t really screw anything up either. He also allowed a soft liner that was about 6 inches away from being the 1st out of the inning. Going to Beimel makes sense because of Pena’s crazy platoon splits too. We didn’t get any luck there either as the 3rd ball was right on the corner and could have been strike 3.

I’m not trying to say that Hurdle made all the right moves. Clearly, all 3 failed miserably and because of it, the Pirates are 54-56 instead of 57-53 (and still the toast of the town instead of the same old Buccos crap). However, I can’t agree that there have been a lot of situations that clearly called for Hammer. Maybe Joel gets out of it, or maybe he blows it like he did against the Astros a couple weeks back. Truth be told. If Ibanez HR dies at the track, if Castro hits a soft liner like he always does instead of a rare bomb and if McCuthchen’s inning went-pop out to Walker, soft liner hit 5 ft farther right at Cutch, HBP, soft liner hit 6 inches farther and Cutch makes a sliding catch, nobody would have questioned the moves. I know it’s a lot of hypotheticals, but I don’t think it’s that much different than assuming that Hanrahan works out of a bases loaded-no out jam unscathed…

by KentuckyPirate on Aug 5, 2011 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Isn’t all of this hindsight?

Actually, none of it is. The people arguing against the decision have been arguing for a long time, and are not basing it on this game. Even if Hurdle’s moves had worked, I’d be arguing against it, because it was the wrong move that got away. Hopefully, having the fact that the moves were bad in the first place hammers the idiocy of it into Hurdle, leading him to make smarter moves in the future.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep,

you nailed it. Pretty much been saying it all season. I remember Charlie calling out Hurdle when Watson and Crotta were brought up and thrown right into high leverage situations. It was something along the line of well it worked out this time but moves like this will catch up with Hurdle eventually. And buy they have been.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

unless its a blowout, every single play in a pennant race is a high leverage situation

and this isnt 2010, when every other game was a blowout.

every single guy in the pen is paid to pitch, doesnt matter if its a 1 run lead or a 6 run advantage.

by white angus on Aug 5, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

but if you bring your worse relievers into the higher leverage situations that they cannot handle (because they arent that good), the fact that they all get paid doesnt do anyone any good.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually the leverage can vary quite a bit play to play

Clearly all 27 outs are needed, but that doesn’t mean that they all have equal importance. If a team has a 6 run lead, a reliever can pitch quite poorly and yet the team will probably win anyway. In a 1 run lead this is not the case, so the latter situation is higher leverage and thus more important.

Fangraphs maintains a stat called “leverage index” that quantifies how important a specific play is in terms of winning the game. You already acknowledge there is a difference between “blowout” and “not blowout,” and extension of that ideas allows for more nuanced results in between.

An LI of 1.0 is average, and PAs in a blowout will be near 0. The LI for Hanrahan’s usage last night was 0.7 (less than average) while it was over 4 in some of those 8th inning PAs (where each PA had the equivalence of 4 average PAs).

Yes they are all paid to pitch, and they should all be capable of pitching in any situation. However, if the goal is to win, the best ones should come in during the highest leverage situations.

by mickeyg13 on Aug 5, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Couldn't disagree with you more...

there all paid to hit too so why not bat your worse hitter leadoff…oh wait, sometimes we do. Nevermind.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't read the wall of text, just the title

But hindsight doesn’t protect against not going to one of two available high leverage relievers until the game has already been tied.

And, quite frankly, people are too quick to use hindsight as a counter-argument. We’re not arguing the results — we’re arguing the execution, which has hell-all to do with hindsight.

Thank you Ned Colletti.

by ryebr3ad on Aug 5, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not blaming him for going to Resop or Veras

Especially not the Resop game. He could do far worse than go to Resop and Veras in the eighth inning and Hanrahan in the ninth.

And last night he did do far worse. That’s what I’m blaming him for.

(The problem with McCutchen’s WHIP and ERA is that, especially for relievers, those can have a big luck component. As we saw last night; if you let people put the bat on the ball, some of those balls will fall in for hits.)

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Aug 5, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's fair

My only concern is that I think Hurdle didn’t look at the 8th inning last night (at least entering the 8th) as an especially high leverage situation. With a 2 run lead and Reed Johnson, Starlin Castro and Darwin Barney due up (3 decent hitters, but hardly a murderers row) I think Hurdle looked at it as a situation where he could get away with McCutchen starting the inning instead of Veras or Resop. They still have 9 more games before they get an off day and I think he’s trying to find spots to use relievers other than those two. Last night was an important spot, but one where he had a little wiggle room and he thought McCutchen could make it through the inning without giving up 2 runs. Regardless of how “lucky” he’s been so far this year, I think it’s a fairly safe bet. So did most of the posters on the board last night. While people initially suggested it would be Resop or Veras in the 8th, nobody was surprised or upset when it was McCutchen. There was even a post saying “I like McCutchen here.” The team has 7 guys in the bullpen. All 7 of them have to be options to get outs. All of them. If you want to argue that he should have gone with somebody other than Grilli in the toughest spot, that’s fair and I’m not sure I disagree with that but if you’re going to go with a lefty vs Pena (and given his splits, I think you have to make that move) I can understand not going to Resop or Veras for one guy. Personally, I would have gone Veras, Beimel then Resop instead of Grilli, Beimel then Veras, but I don’t think it’s a Cardinal Sin as many on here have suggested.

by KentuckyPirate on Aug 5, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Hurdle looked at it as a situation where he could get away with McCutchen starting the inning instead of Veras or Resop

I was OK with DCutch to start the eighth. Putting the first two guys on should have been it, and loading the bases should certainly have been it. The finagling with Grilli and Beimel really pissed me off.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

on a different note

anyone else want to see Pedro hauled off to AAA, now that there’s very little of meaning left in the season?

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

or maybe his .400 BABIP in AAA

is actually a mirage… and giving him a full year will help him figure out his issues as well as learn to recognize pitches better?

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought he actually played reasonably well

last night at least. I also thought that was a tough error charged against him.

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.
Twitter: @shanecglass

by glass0941 on Aug 5, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't remember the error...

can you refresh my memory? What inning, what happened?

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

6th inning

A-ram had a low, hard hit ball down the third base line that kind of hand cuffed Pedro. He didn’t exactly show great range getting to the ball (he was moving laterally to his right) but he did knock it down and make a strong throw to first that was late.

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.
Twitter: @shanecglass

by glass0941 on Aug 5, 2011 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

i m not that concerned with his ability in the field

the bat, though, is a different story.

Since his recall, 46PA, 17K. I just dont buy that he’s going to be able to keep this up and be successful.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

No.

Nothing left to prove there, IMO

Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Aug 5, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope...

I think he’s been looking pretty good lately. He’s had several games where the approach as been solid and he’s been hitting the ball the other way. That’s really all I’m concerned with because I know the results will come if he maintains his approach. I thought he was brought back too soon but he’s looked decent this series. I guess that’s the difference between the Braves and Phillies pitching vs the Cubs (even though we are losing to all of them).

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually, if the season has little meaning, keeping him in MLB would be the wise thing.

Service time + there’s definitely things for him to improve— whether that can be done in AAA or not is a diff question,

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why wasn't D Lee in the lineup last night?

Just curious.

"Hockey is the only tribe I belong to." -Jack Falla
Twitter Facebook Tumblr

by AlexStitch on Aug 5, 2011 12:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Hit by pitch Wednesday night

Bruised right hand. Given night off to rest.

Worked out OK, since GL played 1B against the righty Lopez.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some of this lefty-righty nonsense really baffles me

Beimel? Grilli? Shit, I don’t think that two aging, middling relievers are going to be ANY more effective than a proven, lights-out reliever just by virtue of having the same hand as the batter. Call me a heretic, but I just don’t think it makes THAT much of a difference.

by rennais94 on Aug 5, 2011 12:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Last time I checked

(earlier this week), Hammer’s splits vs. LHBs were better than Beimel’s.

Just sayin’.

by bucdaddy on Aug 5, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

All of the L/R nonsense bothers me

With the exception of a few guys who are clearly incapable of managing against otherhanders (Jones comes immediately to mind), the obsession is overdone. Occasionally, you’ll want a lefty to face another team’s Jones, but as often as not, it is just wastage of arms, and can often kill you in an extra inning game. One thing not commented on was the clever replacing of Jones for a righty pinch hitter in what I think was the 6th inning on Meals nignt. I counted four or five subsequent at bats where a hit or a sacrifice fly by Jones would have made all the difference in the world, several of them against righties. Instead, he just sat on the bench and watched a parade of futile swings in key situations.

"Throw strikes, but don't give him anything good to hit."

by RichieHebner on Aug 5, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I'm in the minority here!

 I don’t get the animosity and second guessing Hurdle here. Isn’t it a MLB pitchers job to get outs? Why is everyone overlooking the fact that Grilli didn’t do his job and instead blamining his boss (Hurdle) for having the audacity to believe he could do it? I don’t fault the decision at all, Grilli simply didn’t get it done! Grilli & Beimel cost us this game not Hurdle!

Sure you can play the bad management argument for not using your best reliever in that situation, but I’m sure that Hurdle felt getting out of the inning with Grilli & Beimel with lead intact was very possible, as did I when they were called upon, I mean that is what they get paid for right?

Bottom line is nothing is going right for us right now, which is a stark contrast to the first half of the year when we caught more breaks than we probably deserved. Seems like a market correction to me. Hopefully they will right the ship tonight and play some solid ball the rest of the way.

by TucsonBuc on Aug 5, 2011 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Isn’t it a MLB pitchers job to get outs? Why is everyone overlooking the fact that Grilli didn’t do his job and instead blamining his boss (Hurdle) for having the audacity to believe he could do it?

By that token, should we blame Hurdle if he believes that Pedro Ciriaco is a better clean-up hitter than Derrek Lee/Ryan Ludwick/Neil Walker/Andrew McCutchen and plugs him into the four-hole tonight? I mean, isn’t it a MLB hitter’s job to get hits, and if Ciriaco fails to do so, then should we just say that he didn’t do his job?

Grilli and Beimel had no business being in the game at that moment, not with Hanrahan sitting in the bullpen wasting away from lack of use over the course of the past week. You use your biggest weapon at the moment when it will do the most damage, not when the Conventional Wisdom playbook says is the right time to put it to use, because if your first wave of weapons fails, the opportunity to properly leverage your biggest weapon will be lost.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I get the sentiment...

just not the reaction. By the same logic we can blame Huntington for not supplying the bullpren with lights out stoppers. My point was simply if they come in and do the job, everyone is happy and this dicussion doesn’t happen. Also, correct me if Im wrong (and Im sure you will) but Hanrahan hasn’t exactly been at his best when coming into a game before the 9th this year. So who knows if the result would’ve been any different. However I get the “if your gonna go down, fire your best weapons” theory. I am just as upset with the sub-par performance of D-Cutch, Grilli & Beimel as much as Hurdle’s decision to call on them. That’s all I’m saying.

by TucsonBuc on Aug 5, 2011 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

By the same logic we can blame Huntington for not supplying the bullpren with lights out stoppers

Well to be fair I think the team has nearly four them except one is on the deal. That leaves three relievers more than capable of handling high leverage innings and Hurdle didn’t use any of them until the game was tied.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough
I am just as upset with the sub-par performance of D-Cutch, Grilli & Beimel as much as Hurdle’s decision to call on them.

I understand this, but if all you take to a gunfight is a pointy-ended stick (while leaving your Glock at home), don’t be surprised if you are the one with the hole in your chest at the end of the battle.

Beimel and Grilli are what they are; in Grilli’s case, a borderline MLBer, and Beimel has been injured and is in the twilight of his average career. They should not be used in a high-leverage situation regardless of LOOGY/righty-lefty matchup crap.

As for Hanrahan, he has the following splits this year:
Save Situations: .197/.223/.265
Non-Save Situations: .233/.281/.300

There is a difference, but it is pretty much negligible, except for sample size (twice as many PA in save situations than non-save situations). I just think it is poor management to keep him out of the game because it is not a “traditional” save situation; there was no point in the game last night that was more critical, and Joel was keeping a chair warm in the pen while four inferior options blew the game.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

“This” particular instance probably made a case for using Hanrahan. However, I don’t believe that Hurdle’s decision not to cost us the game. The performance of those stated above that pitched the 8th cost us the game. What we are really lacking is a healthy Evan Meek and things would be much different. I am not a Veras fan, but I agree Hanny or even resop may have been a better choice last night.

by TucsonBuc on Aug 5, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was upset BEFORE the lead was blown...
My point was simply if they come in and do the job, everyone is happy and this dicussion doesn’t happen.

This is not a 20/20 hindsight issue for me…I was pretty upset that they didn’t use Hanrahan before the lead was even blown (I think I might have even been yelling at my TV). Had say Veras gotten out of it, I would still have maintained that it was the wrong decision, even if it happened to work out.

by mickeyg13 on Aug 5, 2011 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hurdle felt getting out of the inning with Grilli & Beimel with lead intact was very possible

Bases loaded, no outs, 2 run lead for Grilli; bases loaded no outs, 1 run lead for Beimel. If he thought Grilli and Beimel were likelier to get out of that inning with the lead than Hanrahan (or at least Veras or Resop), he needs a reality check.

I mean that is what they get paid for right?

Yeah, and Hurdle gets paid to decide when to put them in, among other things.

Bottom line is nothing is going right for us right now

This is very true, but it would certainly help if the people involved made the best decisions they could and give the team the best chance to win.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't necessarily disagree

I just think there has to be some player accountability. I don’t feel it’s fair to put it all on the manager all of the time. Our player’s executing is what got us to 6 games over .500 conversely, the lack of execution is what has brought on this losing streak. The manager’s BP usage, game strategy, and decisions (whether we agree with them or not) have been consistent in both cases. That is the point I am trying to make here.

by TucsonBuc on Aug 5, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes, of course, players are accountable. And you can usually see that in the contracts or the roles— there’s a reason a guy like Grilli didnt have a ML role till now, and a reason Beimel got a minor league deal (although a 1.75M contract for making the bigs). And yes, there’s some merit to the argument that GMs need to build better teams etc.

Given what he has though, Hurdle’s job is to put the current team in the best position to win, and he failed, imo.

The manager’s BP usage, game strategy, and decisions (whether we agree with them or not) have been consistent in both cases.

Consistently bad. If you want to use that argument, then the players that blew up are consistent too. They blow the game every time Hurdle asks them to pitch with the game on the line.

by BurgherKing on Aug 5, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.... but you made my point

if we hold player’s accountable, they shouldn’t be on the roster. A manager can only use the tools he is given. If you use the best tool everytime, that too will wear out and be just as bad as the rest of them. Point is, we need more tools! Or maybe we have too many “tools” I dont know anymore.

by TucsonBuc on Aug 5, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

You have a good point...

but I disagree, Resop and Veras have done a good job this year. Regardless, If you line up your bullpen from best to worst Hanrahan, Resop, Veras are your first 3 by a healthy margin. Beimel, Grilli and McCutchen are towards the bottom. Selecting your three worst pitchers to face the “heart” of the Cubs order in the 8th (when the game was clearly in the balance) was a mistake. It what world is having your worst pitcher face the opposing teams best hitters, by design mind you, constitute the correct use of tools. Again, I disagree, Hurdle had all the tools he needed last night and he failed to use them. As a result the Bucs lost. Don’t you find it ironic t hat both Veras and Hanrahan pitched last night and faced 6 batters and recorded 6 outs. That’s about as shut down as it gets. If those guys pitch when it matters the Pirates win. Hurdle is just as responsbile as the players for last night’s L but probably more so since he put them in a position to fail.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man I'm still pissed about the game...

I can’t believe I’m still getting fired out nearly 24 hrs later about the game last night. I guess that’s a good thing…right?

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Point is, we need more tools! Or maybe we have too many "tools"

No, we need more weapons. The roster already has plenty of useless tools.

by Bishop1973 on Aug 5, 2011 4:09 PM EDT reply actions  

With roster limits a team has to rely on every member of it’s bullpen. Both Veras and Resop have thrown a TON this year. Meek being out almost all season has been a huge loss. Make note: none of on this blog know the intricacies of the squad: how’s a certain pitcher feeling that day ? who’s throwing well on the side that day ? how’s a pitcher’s confidence ? what are the pitcher/batter match ups ? My point is there are a lot of factors involved, way beyond “throw your best guy out there”. And the bottom line: when the manager makes a move and it works, he’s a genius; when it doesn’t, he’s an idiot.


"Pitch me outside, I will hit .400. Pitch me inside, and you will not find the ball." - Roberto Clemente

by michaelbro8 on Aug 5, 2011 6:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Both Veras and Resop have thrown a TON this year.

Veras: 51.2 IP
Resop: 50.2 IP
Hanrahan: 49 IP
McCutchen: 60 IP
avg IP of top 20 ML pitchers: 47.85 IP

The only guy that is significantly above average is McCutchen who was the guy brought in to work the 8th.

how’s a certain pitcher feeling that day ?

Veras and Hanrahan both pitched after the lead was blown. They faced 6 batters and got 6 outs. I’d say they were feeling fine. Hanrahan, Resop and Veras are our best RP’s and only Resop wasn’t available. For the record, McCutchen, Watson and Beimel are the three worst and both McCutchen and Beimel were used before Veras and Hanrahan (though I do understand using Beimel against Pena once Hurdle made the decision to go with Grilli.

how’s a pitcher’s confidence ?

I have a hard time believing that Gilli is more confident than Hanrahan.
And the bottom line: when the manager makes a move and it works, he’s a genius; when it doesn’t, he’s an idiot.

Disagree. Many of us have been complaining about the way Hurdle uses Hanrahan for while. Like I stated above some of us also stated we didn’t like the way Crotta, Leroux and Watson were all thrown into high leverage situations right away though I believe all of them were initially successful.

#FreeJoelHanrahan!
#AndAlltheBuntsAreStillBad!

by Slick1 on Aug 5, 2011 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both Resop and Veras had pitched 4 of the last 5 games

so I can see an argument that they were unavailable and Hurdle indicated that for Resop though not for Veras. Hanrahan, on the other hand, had only pitched 2.1 innings and thrown 36 pitches in the last 8 games before last night. That stretch featured 4 close losses in which he did not appear all of which were lost in the 8th inning or later. It strikes me as very unlikely that he couldn’t have pitched effectively for 2 innings under those circumstances.

Hurdle’s argument against that plan , I suppose, is that he wouldn’t be available to save tonight’s game if he had had to pitch two innings yesterday. It seems to me though, that the Pirate’s had reached a point where they needed to worry about the present game and let tomorrow (today now) take care of itself. I think it was Leo Durocher who said “Don’t worry about saving a pitcher for tomorrow for tomorrow it may rain”.

In another thread someone mentioned that it has been reported that Hurdle asked Hanrahan if he wanted to go into the game in the 8th and he declined. To me that story seems a little hard to believe. I would think that a young man in Hanrahan’s position would want the ball given how clear it was that the team needed him then.

by WestCoastBuc on Aug 5, 2011 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's more

It’s not the pitcher’s choice to decide whether or not to pitch that night. If Hurdle calls down to the bullpen and tells Hanrahan he’s coming in, that’s that – he comes in and pitches when the manager tells him to.

by maguro on Aug 5, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mlb_photo_1367_small
Fixing the Pirate offense: Plate Discipline

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who'd of "Plunked" it? Shades of Jason Kendall
Small
Runs . . . Any way you can get them
Pirates_1908_small
gamethread vs cubs 5/26/12
Smiling_small
A little background on the offense
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 47: Cubs @ Pirates
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 46: Cubs @ Pirates
Small
A cheerful look at our offseason additions
Small
Pedro's Defensive Contributions
A_red_spider_web_on_a_black_background_0071-0911-1622-1329_smu_small
A couple guys that could help the Buccos offense
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
The Pirates Pitchers Have Adopted Their Own Sign: The FU!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas