Jeff Karstens 2011 month-by-month
Mr. E made an observation on Jeff Karstens on a thread earlier (that Hurdle was cautious with him after the 4th inning after being inserted into the starting rotation), which got me started looking a lot at Jeff Karstens last year broken up month-by-month.
*Fangraphs and BBRef differed slightly in some places I looked, namely in BABIP. Anytime there was a conflict, I went with BBRef.
Jeff Karstens 2011 season: 9-9, 3.38 ERA, 1.207 WHIP, 161.2 IP, 113 ERA+, 5.3 K/9, 1.8 BB/9, .721 OPS against, .278 BABIP bWAR = 3.0
His first 3 appearances of the year, as well as an extra-inning game in May, were relief gigs. We'll take the 7.2 IP he totaled out of the bullpen and subract them from 161.2 for 154 IP in his 26 starts. That's good for 5.923 IP/start in 2011 for Karstens. I'll leave his relief appearances in for rate stats (mainly because I'm lazy).
April: 2-1, 3.57 ERA, 1.368 WHIP, 5.667 IP/start, 7.1 K/9, 2.8 BB/9, .762 OPS against, .318 BABIP
Karstens struck out 5 of the 14 batters he faced (weirdly walking 3) in his 3rd relief appearance. His K/9 and BB/9 are both higher than his season averages because of this. He got shelled (5 ER, 8 H in 4.1 IP) in his first start. He still walked just one guy in each of his 3 starts, which sets the pace for his success in 2011.
May: 1-2, 3.58 ERA, 1.229 WHIP, 5.133 IP/start, 7.2 K/9, 1.3 BB/9, .834 OPS against, .288 BABIP
Karstens has started not walking anybody. His K/9 are still high. He gave up 7 homeruns this month (his highest total for any month) and his OPS against reflects that.
June: 3-0, 1.52 ERA, .823 WHIP, 6.889 IP/start, 3.3 K/9, 1.5 BB/9, .579 OPS against, .169 BABIP
Here was the fun month to watch. Karstens went exactly 7 innings in 4 of his 6 starts and 6.2 in the other two (mad consistency). He gave up 6 homeruns, but 3 of them were in one game against Boston (on my birthday). The 3 HR and 3 BB he gave up in this game are both season highs (he matched 3 BB in a relief appearance in April as well as a start in July). He still won that game and was just on fire all month long. That BABIP is crazy lucky (and contributed to that .579 OPS against) and he compounded that with not walking guys to put together a very good month. This is ironically (or tellingly) his worst K rate as well.
July: 2-1, 2.06 ERA, 1.086 WHIP, 7.000 IP/start, 3.6 K/9, 1.5 BB/9, .604 OPS against, .265 BABIP
The traditional numbers were better in June, but I think July was his best month as a pitcher. He walked 3 again (giving up 3 runs) in Atlanta. but also tossed a complete game shutout in Houston (using just 83 pitches when they still had Hunter Pence and Michael Bourn). This was also Pittsburgh's crest of the season; they were 48-43 after that Houston game and in 1st place in the NL Central. The K's are low again, but I'm impressed that his BABIP has come back to Earth without his OPS against swelling linearly (about 100 points higher BABIP, OPS against up only 35).
August: 1-3, 7.46 ERA, 1.737 WHIP, 5.067 IP/start, 7.8 K/9, 2.1 BB/9, .892 OPS against, .402 BABIP
Everything comes crashing down for both Karstens and the Pirates. Karstens had his worst outing against San Diego (the only game I got to go to PNC for this year) during the Bucs' 8-game losing streak that took them out of contention. Karstens only walked 6 batters all month, but his rates are high because he just didn't make it very deep in games this month (less than 4 IP in 2 of his 5 starts). This is, however, his highest K rate of the year (interesting again). All of that luck in the BABIP and OPS that he'd experienced came back to the mean.
September: 0-1, 4.35 ERA, 1.425 WHIP, 5.167 IP/start, 4.4 K/9, 2.6 BB/9, .745 OPS against, .297 BABIP
Only 2 starts in September: one against St. Louis as they were streaking into the playoffs and the other a 1-0 pitchers' duel loss to Arizona where MVP 3rd runner-up Justin Upton hit a solo shot off of Karstens in the 6th. This sample size is too small to really infer anything; even in the view of month-by-month, 2 games is just not enough data.
Conclusions
Jeff Karstens had a very solid 2011. His success stems from nearly elimnating walks: he walked 29 total batters in his starts all season, 6 of those being intentional (all to lefties). Increases in his K rate corresponding with decreases in overall performance suggest that his role is as a pitch-to-contact pitcher; crucial as his fastball averaged only 88.9 MPH last year... the additions of Barmes and Barajas should help him. Over the past 3 years, he's increased his GB rate by 7.7% (38.5%-46.2%) while decreasing his FB rate by 9% (45.5%-36.5%). Curiously, 14 of 16 would-be basestealers succeeded against Karstens in 2011; I have no idea how much of that is his fault.
As I was looking at all of these numbers, I was curious as to whether or not Karstens got lucky with his matchups. I do not think this is the case. He beat Houston twice to begin July, but this was when they still had a MLB lineup with Pence and Bourn; he drew Cincy followed by @Atlanta and @Philly the rest of that month. For every time he beats up on the Disastros or Tribe, he has a matchup against St. Louis or Milwaukee or Boston. Somehow, he only got one start against the Scrubs: a day game in late May at Wrigly (though he did get a win in relief against them in his first appearance of the year).
I believe that this level of performance is sustainable. Improvements in GB/FB rate is likely and that consistent level of control is impressive. Karstens' 2011 reminds me of a poor man's version of Cliff Lee's 2008 where he just stopped walking people. I'm not crazy enough to project Karstens to become Cliff Lee, but 2008 was Lee's age 29 season while 2011 was Karstens age 28 season. Karstens will have to seriously cut down on the homeruns, but he's certainly on his way with the BB rate. Hey, if Morton's Operation: Roy Hallady comes around and Karstens becomes Cliff Lee 2.0, that's an incredibly cheap and effective top of the rotation and Ray Searage deserves a medal or Nobel Prize or something.
Baes
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He just got tired down the stretch
I remember reading something that mentioned he was hard core conditioning this offseason to increase his endurance.
I expect big things from Karstens this year – the guy has learned how to pitch
He’ll be interesting guy to watch. I’m skeptical of a repeat, but it’s possible if he keeps the walks at a microscopic level. My fear is that some of the solo home runs he allowed in 2011 become two-or-three run homers in 2012. Anyway, I like the way he attacks hitters with his less-than-stellar stuff. I wish the pitchers with better stuff had Karstens’ attitude.
If Kip Wells
had Karstens’ guts, he’d still be starting somewhere.
I’ve always been a Karstens believer, but my cautious side won’t let me project anything more than a rough repeat of 2011. But the idea that he could actually advance from there – better conditioning + 31 starts, maybe minus some HRs – gives me shivers. Not that he’d be a 5 WAR guy or anything crazy, but the idea of getting 3+ fWAR from a guy that many didn’t want to see paid $1M in 2011… that would be so awesome.
Pitch Count matters
OPS against through 1-25, 25-50, 50-75 pithes are .780, .503, .910, respectively. Another relative stats: Times Facing in Game, OPS against are .726, .668, .824 for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd times he faces the opponent in one game. I think they have to be better playing him for the right time length, not too short and not too long, and Karstens will be good.
Not a starter?
If you’re proposing he throw not to far over 50 pitches an outing, he’s not a starter; that makes him a swingman. Are those numbers just from 2011, or are they averaging in other years, too?
I'm expecting Karstens to revert to his xFIP of the last two years, around low 4.XXs.
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
Thanks so much for that analysis, Baes
Very informative….. and very value-adding. Your article increases my confidence in Karstens and gives my perception of the starting rotation a little positive bump. The Pirates’ 2012 fortunes will ride on the shoulders of the pitching staff (especially the rotation), one way or the other.
Thanks!!
I assumed Karstens’ 2011 was a blip or a mirage. There was so much commotion over Morton’s delivery/approach change that Karstens got a little swept under the rug. I really think that he could be a perfectly serviceable 3rd/4th starter; possibly better if he can build on his success and improve some things (mainly the homeruns, maybe his stamina).
Karstens will have a very solid 2012
He can continue the pattern of no walks, and given his improving ground ball ratios (good job, Baes) and the addition of a good defensive SS in Barmes, he can post another solid ERA. Bill James projects Karstens ticking up his strikeout rate just a bit in 2012, as he did the prior four seasons (4.03 per 9 IP, to 4.33 to 5.28 to 5.32).
Further, he gave up 22 HR’s in his 162 IP despite the low fly ball rate. If his HR/flyball percentage drops to league average (10% or thereabouts), then his HR totals drops, and his ERA drops.
A few more K’s, low walk totals, lower fly balls in general, lower HR/FB rate = solid ERA.
Number that jumped out at me
His performance suffered as his K rates rose; is that coincidence? I remember reading a lot about how Matt Garza was a different pitcher with the Cubs below average defense behind him than he was with Tampa’s excellent defenders; how he was trying to strike everyone out. He was actually leading/around the lead in the NL in K’s until he got hurt. Is there some actual metric to measure this phenomenon? Or just a “more K’s because of more strikes which leads to more hits which leads to worse numbers” generalization?
Well, IIRC Garza relied on hist slider much more and was more effective in DIPS with the Cubs compared to Tampa
I think the idea of playing in Tampa with that defense and then switching to Wrigley with the Cubs D might have been part of the reason he did worse as his K rate rose, and that if his K rate didn’t rise he might have done even worse.
I expect
karstans to fall to earth and pitch like he did the last two months of last year, he will be in the bull pen by june.
"please buy the team mr. cuban"

by 




















