New Pirates Blog "Pitt Plank" at ESPN.com, thoughts?
For those of us who read way too much online about the Pirates, you know that ESPN's "Sweet Spot Blog Network" has long been missing a Pirates Blog. No more. This season marks the addition of "PittPlank." I was instantly curious as I had been waiting for quite some time and was wondering who they got to write it. I didn't recognize the name of the blog, nor the writer from anywhere and was thrown for a loop, as I had expected someone from the existing online Pirates blog community to be brought aboard.
My initial reaction to reading the "about" section quoted below was confusion, and judging by the comments it appeared that others had negative reactions to reading that the author was a lifetime Tigers fan, about which he was very quick to defend himself in that same comments section. Additionally, it seemed as though he was a baseball fan who just said to himself "hey ESPN doesn't have a Pirates guy, that could be me."
I admittedly became a Pirates fan in 2008 and am by no means one who can claim decades of fandom. However, I was not writing about the team on ESPN. As Paul stated in the comments, he is not being paid. However, given the exposure of ESPN, he will now be the voice of Pirates news for a large amount of baseball fans who visit that site by default.
Paul is diehard baseball fan who spent his first 14 years in the greater Detroit area cheering on the Tigers before moving to Texas where he remained a fan from afar (really far. Living in Austin after graduating from the University of Texas (in 2005), Paul runs paulsporer.com and writes for RotoHardball.com. The Tigers are still his favorite team, so much so that he named his named his beagle Curtis after former Tiger star Curtis Granderson. No, he never considered changing the pup’s name even after Granderson’s trade to the Yankees.
Paul became interested in the Pirates when they finally changed front office regimes and has been following them closely since 2008. When he saw that ESPN’s SweetSpot network lacked Pirates representation he reached out to SS headmaster David Schoenfield and voila, Pitt Plank was born. Soon after, he called on long-time friend (via the Rotojunkie message board turned RJ Bullpen)John Franco to sign on as a contributor. He has a long history with the Pirates that you will no doubt learn about in his bio.
I suppose what really threw me was that I expected that the person chosen to fill this role would be someone who had followed the Pirates for a long time and was an authority on the subject, or a professional who could gather insight and provide opinions and information even if he had not closely followed the organization in the past. Writers are assigned to beats in cities all the time, and as we have seen with Langosch for example, get re-assigned or take different jobs all the time. Often, as is the case with Dejan, they fit both of these descriptions, and Paul appeared to be neither.
A deeper assessment of his writing, at his personal site and in the blog did provide what appears to be well thought out writing, though the Pirates stuff seems to lack depth and is more just reporting the obvious to date. I am curious to see if this changes once the season starts and there is real news, developments, and observations to be made.
I know Pirates fans have long felt shafted by ESPN for its lack of coverage, and for some of its personalities using the Pirates for the same lazy jokes that are made by many national writers. However as stated above, Paul seems so far to be better than that, so I will reserve judgement on him for the time being.
I will say that after my initial skepticism, I am cautiously optimistic overall as Paul seems to have it more or less together when it comes to baseball. I was wondering if anyone else had read his stuff, there and otherwise, or had thoughts, concerns, optimism etc.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rarely updated
but sometimes theyll throw a graph up that can be interesting. graphs are fun
by tbote123 on Jan 4, 2012 2:18 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Yeppers.
See FanGraphs.com. Like Pavlov’s Dogs, I start salivating when I type it in my browser….
You gotta aim high to fail so big. - Trace Beaulieu
by IAPiratesFan on Jan 5, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
The writing feels kind of dispassionate, which makes sense if the main writer isn’t a fan of the team. Maybe some people would enjoy an outside perspective?
On blogging about the Pirates, the more the merrier, as far as I’m concerned.
I'm all for "the more the merrier"
But (as I was commenting to my girlfriend last night) ESPN is the 800-lb. gorilla. They looked at guys gaining popularity (Simmons in the early 2000’s, Rick Reilly, even Brian Windhorst after the LeBron saga) and just bought them. Last night, I was watching NBA TV’s studio guys and realized that they pretty much crush ESPN’s guys. I know that they lose some guys due to possible character issues (HR, Kuselias) and even the Yankees don’t buy every popular free agent, but would it have been a reach for Shoenfield to google “Pirates blog,” choose the most popular, and put it on ESPN’s site? If it’s this site, Where’s Van Slyke, Rum Bunter… just take someone who already does the Pirates thing and give it ESPN’s massive satellite power.
Conversely, reading the blog is interesting to me. Sporer certainly shares Shoenfield’s (and Mark Simon’s as well as many of the SweetSpot guys) love of numbers and reliance upon them in most cases. I added it to my Pirates reading mainly because it provides a more objective view of some of the Pirates moves that aren’t tainted with years of suffering, overevaluation of organizational assets, or mistrust of management.
I added it to my Pirates reading mainly because it provides a more objective view of some of the Pirates moves that aren’t tainted with years of suffering, overevaluation of organizational assets, or mistrust of management.
I try okay! Is that not good enough for you? /sobs
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jan 4, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
would it have been a reach for Shoenfield to google "Pirates blog," choose the most popular, and put it on ESPN’s site?
It’s an affiliation partnership, more than a stamp of approval. By joining ESPN’s blog network, you’re entering into a business relationship with them on banner ads and things like that.
Most of the top Pirates blogs are either already affiliated with someone else, or doing better as an independent than they would in a partnership with ESPN under the terms of their standard agreement.
I can't speak for everyone else
But yeah, you pretty much hit the nail on the head.
http://www.whygavs.com
http://twitter.com/whygavs
Yeah. I honestly don’t think ESPN understands blogs very well. SB Nation does. And it’s not all that clear to me what those blogs get besides the ESPN name. With Bucs Dugout, I get a small stipend, partnerships with Yahoo and Sports Illustrated that really drive traffic, and pretty much the best platform there is.
I’m not trying to diss ESPN, but as a blogger, there are lots of arrangements that seem better than what they offer, and SB Nation’s is way better.
by Charlie Wilmoth on Jan 4, 2012 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
I wonder about this while listening to their podcasts
They make some really good ones. ESPN Radio hasn’t been too good in a while, but Berry and Ravitz’s fantasy stuff is decent (though sometimes annoying), Karabell’s Baseball Today is good regardless of what schmuck they dump on him, and I like Russillo’s NBA Today (I enjoy Simmons’ stuff, but it seems like he’s starting to take command of that production). That said, it seems like this new media (which is becoming more and more relevant as we continue developing into an on-demand entertainment society, especially with vehicles trending towards online streaming capabilities).
Again: ESPN is Kong. They were progressive in adopting the PTI-style of menu-thumbnails for SportsCenter and understand the news cycle better than pretty much every other news-related network. It seems illogical to me that they wouldn’t easily find a way to turn “stipend” into “job” without any skin off their back. Charlie could finally retire from his Chippendales career!!!
Yep
SB Nation has a sweet sweet platform. I’m pretty jealous to be honest. Love the work you do Charlie.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jan 4, 2012 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
Are you Serious?
…
…
…Yahoo. Serious.
…Gah.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jan 4, 2012 7:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
HALF a point?
That was the whole point of the reply….
(so disappointed)
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jan 4, 2012 9:08 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks, kareem.
Glad you’ve got my back, pal.
Heh.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jan 5, 2012 7:38 AM EST up reply actions
"'Yahoo Serious Film Festival'?"
“I know those words, but that sign makes no sense.”
by JRoth95 on Jan 5, 2012 3:42 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
too much of a stretch
let the funny happen, don’t force it!
by BlindSquirrel on Jan 5, 2012 6:56 PM EST up reply actions
Aw, c'mon....
you set it up….
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Jan 5, 2012 7:24 PM EST up reply actions

by 



















