Bob Nutting And Knowing How Long To Wait
Short of announcing he was going to sell the team or commit seppuku, there probably isn't an interview Bob Nutting could give that wouldn't infuriate a lot of Pirates fans. But for whatever it's worth, I think he comes off really well in this one, although some fans might think all the stuff about how much he hates losing pours it on a little thick. I liked Nutting's explanation of the difference between patience -- which Nutting claims not to have -- and "realistic expectation":
Patience is not a virtue in baseball. Realistic expectation is very different than patience ...
I'll use the Dominican academy as an example. Relentless approach is the only way that was going to work. I took several trips down (in 2007), and Frank and I agreed we needed to build the best academy, and we got that done very quickly. There was no patience. But in the real world we are dealing with 16-, 17-year-old players. Letting them develop, that takes patience. But were we getting the flow of talent into our system before the academy? No, so there was no patience in building the academy. That had to be built, built the right way, and that flow had to start happening right away.
This is a real and crucial distinction, particularly where the last few years have been concerned. I'm not sure if Nutting said something like this in 2008 or 2009, but I think I would have been pretty happy to hear him say something like that then.
Ultimately, though, we're approaching a point where the distinction between "patience" and "realistic expectation" matters less than it used to, because the Pirates' management team has now had four years to remake the organization. Four years isn't enough time to completely fix the situation Neal Huntington inherited, but we should be reaching a point where there's a bright light at the end of the tunnel. I'm not sure it's there yet, but I'll watch with interest to see how the 2012 season unfolds, especially at the minor-league level. If there isn't a lot of really exciting stuff happening there this year, any further time Huntington gets will cease to fall into the category of "reasonable expectation," and will instead become "patience."
100 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ditto.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 8:16 AM EST up reply actions
Nauseating
To read about Nutting talking about how competitive he is and how its just tough to have dinner with him after losses. Give me a break.
Love FC comment that Nutting has an “intense commitment to winning” whatever the hell that means. Last I looked we are projected to have the lowest payroll in the majors according to baseball reference. Sorry that doesn’t say “intense commitment to winning”.
I’m disappointed that a McCutchen contract extension wasn’t asked but I’m guessing their were restrictions on what could be asked.
Yes, yes!
Let’s throw ridiculous amounts of money around on players that won’t help win this year!
THAT’LL SHOW THE FANS WE MEAN BUSINESS!
.
.

________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 8:21 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed.
Best thing management can do right now is lock up Cutch. That will start to hush the critics.
by psudynasty1017 on Feb 19, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
Best thing? How about putting a winning product on the field?
You know something that this management team or ownership has yet to do?
And how, exactly,
do you propose to make that happen? If you could?
Seriously.
And NO, you cannot say “sell the team,” because that’s not going to happen.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
I know.
I didn’t wanna muddy it for JCB, and have it be something he can go off on instead of answering the question.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
I'd hire Smizik and NuttingHostage to GM the team.
You gotta aim high to fail so big. - Trace Beaulieu
by IAPiratesFan on Feb 19, 2012 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
Using your extreme logic
I guess it was a waste to spend money on Barmes, Barajas, Bedard, McLouth and trading for AJ since we aren’t going to win anything with them either other than clinching the 20th straight consecutive losing season.
That has nothing to do
with what I wrote.
Try again.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
I don't remember saying to spend ridicuous amount of money either
But you implied it in your answer.
Answer the question. How would YOU do it?
.
And by stating that the Pirates were projected to have the lowest payroll in MLB (actually, it’s next-to-last, behind SEA, but…), you say that they need to spend money.
Sorry that doesn’t say "intense commitment to winning".Your words.
You also might wanna see Tom Singer’s piece this morning. I quote in part:
Please, everyone, stop harping on the Pirates’ "low payroll." It has run its course as an interesting topic. We get it: the Bucs aren’t on a level paying field with the Yankees and Cardinals of the baseball world.
So, to repeat: How would YOU do it?
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Again did I say spend like the Yanks?
Geez, I’d be okay if we could get to the level of the Brewers payroll.
HOW WOULD YOU DO IT?
Simple question, dude.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
i think we got a good shot now, i'm excited.
though i would be looking to upgrade 1st base. i have no doubt nh is working on that very thing. i like how nh thinks outside the box. when one door slams in his face, like oswalt. he gets creative and fills a need.
by karreemofwheat on Feb 19, 2012 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
in the words of that famous scout, lone watie;
endeavor to persevere.
by karreemofwheat on Feb 19, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
A good line but
not quite up there with “Dyin’ ain’t much of a livin’”
ding ding ding we have a winner
to the josey wales reference
by karreemofwheat on Feb 19, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions
I love that line!
everytime someone at work is bitching and moaning about something that I don’t care about, I let finish and when they are done, I just tell them to “endeavor to persevere”.
It generally works.
"Don Mossi was the complete five-tool ugly player. He could run ugly, hit ugly, throw ugly, field ugly and ugly for power.
So, you're not going to answer the question?
by Superstar25 on Feb 19, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
What's the point?
To argue with someone that takes what I say to such crazy extremes?
I think I made myself pretty clear by alluding to the Brewers payroll mark on where I think the Pirates payroll should be around. I do like what NH is doing in spending in the draft/ifa is the right way to go but the jury is out if they picked the right players (Pedro? Tony S and overslot prep pitchers instead of Miller, Turner, Wheeler?, Allie ahead of AJ Cole?).
On the major league level I like what NH has done on the pitching front while we wait for the pitchers to come up from the minors but the hitting part is awful. Numerous bad FA signings and players acquired by trade have flopped horribly (save for Tabata and half a season of G Jones) which plays into the point on how badly this organization needs to sign Cutch long term.
NH has done okay as GM building up the franchise from the wreckage of DL but unless he starts hitting on his top picks (becoming All-Stars type of players) and uncovering gems like Friedman does in Tampa or develops his own Mulder, Hudson, Zito like Beane did I have a hard time seeing us turning it around without a signifcant investment on the major league product from Nutting. And if I was Nutting I would spend that money on hitting instead of pitching on the market.
his tops picks also deserve a chance to come up through the minors, do they not??
im gonna say this again for the billionth time; the average time spent in the minor leagues before they “STICK” with the MLB club is 5+ seasons. For the top picks, its 3-4 seasons. The only pick that even falls into this category was Pedro and the consensus from pretty much everyone is that he was RUSHED.
Crazy extremes? What crazy extremes? The Yankees comparison? Because he never said that, that was you. The quote was:
We get it: the Bucs aren’t on a level paying field with the Yankees and Cardinals of the baseball world.NOT that the Pirates need to spend like the Yankees.
Not to put words in another person’s mouth, but I think people are objecting to your assertion that the low payroll shows a lack of commitment to winning. Low payroll is a function of market size and attendance and there really isn’t a whole lot Nutting could do spending-wise without losing money, and it has been discussed ad nauseum why taking a loss in anticipation of winning more and making more money doesn’t happen.
Who would have played short the past two seasons?
A broken down Jack Wilson?
NH got what he could for some pretty modest trade chips. I think you can only rate the Bay trade as an outright failure.
I say that because
Joe Kerrigan was fired not long after and IIRC there was a rumoured problem between the two.
I thought Gorzo was getting better again.
by BlindSquirrel on Feb 19, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions
I thought NH made the Sanchez trade for Alderson,
but I’ve killed a lot of brain cells since then.
I'm in the "evaluate trades at the time they are made" camp...
So, at the time, I thought it was a fair trade.
Quoting you
is going to crazy extremes, eh?
Man, that’s crazy.
See, you could answer the question, after all. At least a little bit.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Actually,
if they REALLY meant business, they would have a payroll of 25 X whatever the minimum salary is and never, ever toss $13 million at an A.J. Burnett in the unlikely hope he can add to the bottom line, rather than subtract from it. Lots of other things, like building the Dominican Academy and spending $17 million on draft picks fall into the same category.
Maximize income, minimize expenses. I believe that’s what most businesses try to do.
… There was some point I was trying to make, but I forget what it was.
best question - albeit longwinded:
Q: You mentioned effort. What effort should the Pirates’ owner make publicly to hold himself accountable for the continuation of this losing-seasons streak under your direct watch?
Nutting doesn’t really answer it. Moreover he shovels the “accountability” onto NH.
Pouring it on thick
Yeah, he was pouring it on a bit thickly – like he was going out of his way to prove he cares. I can see why he would because the local media relentlessly questions it. This can lead to bad decisions like signing off on the Morris trade. In a backward kind of way though the Morris trade was a good one for the organization because I think it was a major factor in Littlefield’s firing. I think he had enough information to make that decision before the trade but if it was the straw that broke the camel’s back then it was a good thing.
With regard to NH five years IS enough time to be able to make a fair assessment of whether a plan is working and I think that the Pirates need to take a very hard look at where the organization stands at year end and decide if NH deserves another year.
"Don Mossi was the complete five-tool ugly player. He could run ugly, hit ugly, throw ugly, field ugly and ugly for power.
Disagree
I would give more time than one more year. At least let the youngest kids in his first draft class or two hit 25/26 before we haul out pitchforks.
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Feb 19, 2012 11:07 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I believe that
we are going to see some guys step forward this year and it won’t be a subject we will have to debate. I WANT NH to succeed. Whether he is retained or not he will always be the guy who set the Pirates on the right track and helped wipe away the stench of DL. At any rate I wont be hauling out any pitchforks in October. I think though if there is a lack of progress in the system, it is fair to debate whether we need a change.
"Don Mossi was the complete five-tool ugly player. He could run ugly, hit ugly, throw ugly, field ugly and ugly for power.
so if the pirates don't break the streak
he will ‘sale the team’ is what I’am getting out of this.
"please buy the team mr. cuban"
shopping corria
is what I’M hearing, not much interest.
"please buy the team mr. cuban"
I'd trade him for close to nothing and pay most of his salary
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Feb 19, 2012 3:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Why?
If you’re paying the salary anyway and getting almost nothing back, wouldn’t it make more sense just to keep him? I mean, him at that price is more valuable than nothing at that price
If you’re paying the salary anyway and getting almost nothing back, wouldn’t it make more sense just to keep him?
No, because if we get rid of him, we can use the roster spot on a different, better player.
Fair enough
But eating $4 million to open up an extra bench slot and only (likely) see a marginal improvement doesn’t seem worth it to me. Also, I’m of the minority opinion that Correia might be somewhat useful this year, so I’d rather keep him around.
We’re already spending the $4M whether or not Correia is on the roster. The cost of the marginal improvement is only the ML minimum for the player who’s brought in instead of Correia.
Pirates RHPs per 2012 ZiPS
Name: ERA (ERA+)
Hanrahan: 3.17 (122)
LEAGUE AVERAGE RP (108)
Grilli: 3.61 (107)
Meek: 3.65 (106)
Resop: 3.81 (101)
Leroux: 4.30 (90)
Cruz: 4.50 (86)
Igarashi: 4.53 (85)
McCutchen: 4.53 (85)
Wood: 4.91 (79)
Dubee: 4.96 (78)
Correia: 5.00 (77)
Link.
SPs’ numbers do tend to improve somewhat when moved to the pen, so you could probably bump him up the list a bit (exactly how far I’m not sure – I can’t get the Starter/Reliever conversion tool to work right in my version of Excel). He still isn’t going to project to be any good there, though, I don’t think.
He goes through waivers, right?
Does he clear them?
I don’t love him clogging up the 25-man (depending on Morton, I wouldn’t weep to see him come north with the club, but I think he’s eminently expendable), but if we can get him to Indy, that’s fine.
I guess my feeling is that, if he’s a true-talent replacement-level player who’s already in house, then there’s no rush to get rid of him. The guys behind him in the minors (Locke, Wilson) don’t appear to be pushing him aside in the immediate future; the NRIs coming to camp don’t look like locks to be replacement level, let alone clear upgrades; and I think that Lincoln won’t be obstructed by him. In those circumstances, I don’t ditch him just for the sake of getting rid of him. I don’t think he’ll trick anyone into giving up a real prospect for him, but we may as well wait to see if his value goes up a bit, rather than fire sale him (which is how I read Kosstic’s comment – “close to nothing”).
I reserve the right to flip-flop on this comment based on ST outcomes – Martis and/or Lincoln could change my mind, and I definitely don’t think NH should be afraid of eating Correia’s salary.
I'm pretty sure that he wouldn't have to accept an assignment to Indy
if he cleared waivers. As I understand it a player with his ML service time could opt for FA and we would still have to pay him. It would be better if we could trade him for next to nothing instead of ending up with absolutely nothiing.
by WestCoastBuc on Feb 19, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
HEY!
He’s an All-Star thankyouverymuch!
by BlindSquirrel on Feb 19, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
He goes through waivers, right?
Does he clear them?
You’d have to think so. If he gets claimed, a team gets his terrible contract as part of the package.
I guess my feeling is that, if he’s a true-talent replacement-level player who’s already in house, then there’s no rush to get rid of him.
Any competent team has a virtually infinite number of replacement-level players right at their fingertips. That’s the whole idea behind replacement level: the best player you could be reasonably expected to round up on about twelve hours’ notice, for nothing more than a small cash payment.
Keeping Correia on the roster likely puts him in the bullpen at the expense of McCutchen, given the other relievers’ option situations. Are you willing to downgrade the quality of the pen simply to have Correia on hand?
There’s also the fact that McCutchen is already, what, 27? He was a very useful reliever last year, which was his first in relief. Is this a good time to effectively put his career on hold?
Occupy MLB! Down with Seligula!
replacement level
Fangraphs has Correia at replacement level last year, but has McCutchen below replacement. Correia’s FIP was worse, so presumably this accounts for some reliever adjustment, but except ERA the other stats don’t make the comparison look much better for DCutch.
FWIW, I think Correia is a little above replacement level — fWAR focuses on the stat that makes him look worst.
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 20, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
A valid point.
I brought it up because I know that there are a lot of people here who don’t see D’Cutch as a replacement-level talent.
If you go by bWAR (and yes, I prefer fWAR, but there are people on here of the opposite opinion, and it’s a valid position), both guys were above replacement level last year, albeit by only about half a win in both cases.
But my point is
that, when you promote a theoretical replacement level player, he becomes what he actually is, which is (roughly) 50% likely to be below replacement. It’s sort of a quantum physics thing: a freely available AAA SP is worth 0.0 WAR until you observe him in an MLB environment, at which point he is revealed as something that is usually not, actually, 0.0 WAR. Could be better, of course, but just as likely to be worse, unless your’e talking about a real prospect. I’m happy to cut Correia to make room for Locke or McPherson the day that we think they’re really ready.
I like Dan McCutchen, but I’ve noted what Zane notes below: his 2011 was visibly worse, per fWAR, than Correia’s. And, given his age, there’s no reason to expect further improvement. So I’m not clear on what the upside is supposed to be in cutting KC to keep NoRelation.
But my point is that, when you promote a theoretical replacement level player, he becomes what he actually is, which is (roughly) 50% likely to be below replacement. It’s sort of a quantum physics thing: a freely available AAA SP is worth 0.0 WAR until you observe him in an MLB environment, at which point he is revealed as something that is usually not, actually, 0.0 WAR.
That’s true, but the same thing applies equally to Correia. Just because he happened to fall exactly on replacement level last year doesn’t provide any insurance that he won’t be one of the 50% of replacement-level talents that end up below it this year.
Same sources that told you Burnett was gonna fall through,
right?
RIGHT?
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
Let's Be Just Like Bob Nutting!
This is great. If I understand Bob correctly, he has no patience and is trying make moves in order to achieve realistic expectations. What those expectations are makes no difference. The point is that fours years is not nearly enough to do this. We need to wait. I am going to do the same thing. I perfectly understand that time is needed for this process, and so I am not going to watch. I am going to boycott and withhold support. As the losing season unfolds I will see if we lose 90 or 100, and if we can beat out Houston at the bottom. But that’s pretty much it. It is my “relentless approach” to understanding the need AS A FAN to stay the fuck away from these people and their team. Great example, Bob.
"But that’s pretty much it. It is my "relentless approach" to understanding the need AS A FAN to stay the fuck away from these people and their team"
…can you extend that to BucsDugout, as well?
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 19, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yep its total BS
But there’s enough suckers out there to buy what Nutting is selling. Plus if you love the Pirates and like being outside to watch games its tough to give up especially at a park like PNC.
I have to count myself as one of those suckers since I’ll be going to Bradenton for a few games this spring.
to bob nutting
what ever
"please buy the team mr. cuban"
Sweetleb, JCBucs & Yepitstony
I’m going to try and engage you respectfully because I’m really curious to hear your response to the following questions:
Can one or all of you tell me exactly what you are so pissed off about other than the fact that the Pirates are not as good as all of us would like them to be? Please don’t bring up 20 years of losing. Let’s focus the discussion on the current regime.
Are you convinced that Nutting is receiving a ton of revenue that he is pocketing? If so, can you give me an estimate of the amount?
Are you convinced that he should be spending money out of his own pocket to improve the team? If so, how much?
Are you convinced that another owner would be willing to come into THIS MARKET and fund losses out of his own pocket until the Pirates returned to being a contender. How many years of losses should he be willing to absorb and what is the amount of dollar losses he should absorb?
Are you convinced that the current regime is committed to building through the draft and player development?
Please point out any other areas where you feel ownership could improve. Please furnish specifics.
Thank you.
"Don Mossi was the complete five-tool ugly player. He could run ugly, hit ugly, throw ugly, field ugly and ugly for power.
by Pagliaroni on Feb 19, 2012 8:43 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Consider me not surprised that this comment went unanswered
by theatrain on Feb 20, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well...
thanks to Charlie, Sweetleb is going to have a REAL difficult time answering.
Yepitstony responds
Bob says he’s not patient and disappointed. Me too. The interview doesn’t suggest he’s doing anything affirmative. Me too. So I’m staying the fuck away until the team performs competitively on the major league level. If I were convinced that the team on the field is improved and breaking the cycle of trading every good player for two unproven ones, I’d engage. But there is simply nothing here for a fan to cheer about, or even hope for in the next few seasons.
Yes, I am convinced that Nutting pockets a very significant portion of the profit sharing, and further think this is not disputed by anyone. Bob and the management refuse to reveal the actual amount to the fans, so you know that I cannot give an estimate. This alone allows us to question his dedication. I don’t mind if a businessman makes a buck, but I do mind if he hides the ball (so to speak) and gives a bunch of insulting platitudes in interviews. And yes, he should be spending money out of his own pocket, if he has confidence in his own ability to lead the team forward. And yes, I think there are some super rich folks that would do better, and it doesn’t have to be be Mark Cuban. I will admit, however, that I don’t know if the farm system is improved. It is way too speculative to believe that the Dominican academy will improve the major league product. Finally… yes, I do think that this site has those inside the Pirate organization that write to protect their interests there. Because the belief that there is no level of incompetence too low to run an organization into the ground otherwise makes no sense. Boycott the Bucs.
Yes, I am convinced that Nutting pockets a very significant portion of the profit sharing, and further think this is not disputed by anyone.
Actually, it’s disputed by everybody who’s ever looked at any of the facts, including the Union, which has explicitly said that the Pirates are in compliance with their obligations for spending their revenue sharing. You can and will believe what you want, but there isn’t a shred of evidence to support you.
Bob and the management refuse to reveal the actual amount to the fans, so you know that I cannot give an estimate.
Distributions to ownership were revealed in the documents leaked to Deadspin. Those documents showed the distributions had been limited, mostly just in one year, and amounted to no more than a small fraction of the amount of revenue sharing the team is receiving. Dejan Kovacevic has also confirmed with the other partners (yes, contrary to what most of the team’s birther-type critics like to think, the Nuttings have partners) that in the years he asked them about no money was distributed to the team’s owners.
Occupy MLB! Down with Seligula!
So I’m staying the fuck away until the team performs competitively on the major league level.
That is, of course, your prerogative.
Yes, I am convinced that Nutting pockets a very significant portion of the profit sharing, and further think this is not disputed by anyone
Depends what you mean by “significant”, I guess. The leaked books don’t seem to support that statement as I’d tend to interpret it.
And yes, he should be spending money out of his own pocket, if he has confidence in his own ability to lead the team forward.
Spending more money than you take in, on spec, isn’t a great way to run a team. Look how it ended for Howard Baldwin.
Finally… yes, I do think that this site has those inside the Pirate organization that write to protect their interests there
I’m not sure exactly what you mean by this. Can you elaborate?
I’m happy to state, for the record, that I have no formal or informal role of any kind with the organization. I work in the marketing department of a real estate company, and help run the site in my free time because I like baseball and like reading and writing and talking about it.
Similarly, I’ve met Charlie, Dave Todd, and WTM in person at the annual get-together, and can confirm that none of them are secretly Neal Huntington in a mask. Same goes for a fair number of the regular posters: bucdaddy, cocktailsfor2, lfhlaw, etc. I do know of one member of the front office who posted on the site… One time. In 2007. (See here.)
Okay, lets go bullet to bullet here
Can one or all of you tell me exactly what you are so pissed off about other than the fact that the Pirates are not as good as all of us would like them to be? Please don’t bring up 20 years of losing. Let’s focus the discussion on the current regime.
Besides the losing, the absolute lie by ownership saying that their payroll should be with the Reds and Brewers (which is what Nutting said 2 years ago to Dejan in PG, Brewers close to a 100 million dollar payroll now) of the world, to the continued talk of the FO hinting to reporters that its possible if a trade offer knocks us off we could trade McCutchen (FC said this to either Erie or Altoona paper that I read again last week) and the ridiculous Q/A like in the Trib from Nutting who tries to convey to us that he gets upset after every loss to a point where he’s tough to eat with at dinner. Now let’s think about this for a second; even the good baseball teams lose over 60 or 70 games a year in a 162 game season. This is not like college football where one game you are out. I don’t know of any rational person who gets upset about every loss in baseball so either he’s a fricking idiot that knows nothing about baseball or he’s trying to fake his caring to the naive fans out there. Either way I find it offensive and insulting to a point that I have very little respect for him as owner of the Pirates.
Other things that tick me off is the arrogance of NH who I don’t think is qualified to be a major league GM let alone one who has the enormous task of building a winning club on a budget that the Pirates have. I admit I don’t like the man, I don’t like to hear him speak in interviews, I don’t think I’ve liked any of his free agent moves (Barajas is okay) and really don’t think he’s all that important in the grand scheme of things. I believe he will be sacrificed by the Pirates if we have a bad season this year and personally don’t think it will be that much of a loss (well I guess if we hired Littlefield, okay never mind) once he is gone.
Also talk of dynasties, championships, best management team in baseball, among other ridiculous comments just angers me even more. I’ll be honest I don’t really want to hear from any of them until they put a winning team on the field. I think that’s where I’m at with the Pirates FO and until there’s a winning season I believe they deserve all the ridicule they get.
I
Are you convinced that Nutting is receiving a ton of revenue that he is pocketing? If so, can you give me an estimate of the amount?
I believe Nutting has found the dirty secret in sports just like Donald Sterling of the Clippers did. Running a bare bones operation in terms of payroll with a lack of long term obligations to star players can be very lucrative. I don’t think he’s pocketing any money but I don’t think he has any intention of every spending the dollars above and beyond to put a winner on the field. I don’t give him any credit for building any Dominican Academy because I expect that from baseball organization just like I expect a franchise to sign its draft picks (although I give him credit for the Josh Bell signing but again its a lot cheaper to sign a HS guy than go out and buy a decent 1B, SS or LF to help the lineup on the major league field.
Are you convinced that he should be spending money out of his own pocket to improve the team? If so, how much?
I believe the way the Pirates are run isn’t conducive to building a winner on the field and compete with other franchises who will go out and spend the money in order to win games. I think the way the Reds and Brewers do business in similar markets like the Pirates shows how far away they are from building a winner (although I do acknowledge neither of those have won a championship but again they have had winning seasons in the past few yrs)
Are you convinced that another owner would be willing to come into THIS MARKET and fund losses out of his own pocket until the Pirates returned to being a contender. How many years of losses should he be willing to absorb and what is the amount of dollar losses he should absorb?
That’s easy. Ron Burkle and Mario. I believe Burkle saw this franchise as an undervalued asset when he offered to buy it in 2010. I believe he would have taken the franchise to where the Brewers operate and would make an effort to rid this sad ERA of losing baseball immediately. Also he would have built his own television network combining the Pens and Pirates which would have helped this franchise considerably (yes I understand it would not be as lucrative as YES or NESN but it would put us in a better position that our ROOT deal is) Also PR wise the ownership will be much more trusted than the Nuttings ever could be.
Are you convinced that the current regime is committed to building through the draft and player development?
Oh I do. Still its a lot cheaper to spend money on the draft that go get a a good 1B, SS or OF. I will say the way the franchise is run it is the only way to go. Still whether the right people are being taken by the top decision makers is up to debate.
Please point out any other areas where you feel ownership could improve. Please furnish specifics.
Be willingly to spend the money to compete in the Central. I’ll even grant you that its tough for us to get a big time free agent to come here due to our lack of winning for 2 decades. Therefore its up to this ownership to show me that they are committed to building a championship ball club by going out and signing Cutch to a long term deal. They do that maybe I’ll start to have a different opinion of this ownership. But until then I’ll continue to root for the Pirates but be very cynical toward the ownership’s operation.
the absolute lie by ownership saying that their payroll should be with the Reds and Brewers (which is what Nutting said 2 years ago to Dejan in PG, Brewers close to a 100 million dollar payroll now) of the world
This market should be able to sustain a payroll of that level at some point, but right now, the team’s revenue stream isn’t large enough to support it. Last year, the Pirates sold 1.94 million tickets, in a significant bounce up from 2010. Last year, the Reds sold 2.21 million, and the Brewers sold 3.07 million. Not to mention the fact that our average ticket prices are significantly lower than theirs. Or that our media rights are worth less.
the continued talk of the FO hinting to reporters that its possible if a trade offer knocks us off we could trade McCutchen (FC said this to either Erie or Altoona paper that I read again last week)
If another team offers us enough for Cutch, we SHOULD be willing to trade him. The price should be very high, of course, because he’s a very good player, but even for the best player in the world you’d eventually get to the point where not making a deal would be stupid.
I don’t know of any rational person who gets upset about every loss in baseball so either he’s a fricking idiot that knows nothing about baseball or he’s trying to fake his caring to the naive fans out there.
I have no trouble believing that’s true. Glenn Hall was a Hall-of-Fame goalie with an 18-year NHL career, but he still threw up in the locker room before every game, because he was worried that he’d lose. Some people are just wired that way.
Nutting still might be lying about it, of course, or gilding the lily a bit. But it’s not inherently implausible.
I don’t give him any credit for building any Dominican Academy because I expect that from baseball organization…
All organizations have some kind of Dominican academy, but our new one is a whole lot nicer than the old one. The old one was, to be blunt, a piece of shit. The weight room, for example, was a one-hour motorcycle ride away from the field. Maybe we should have been doing that kind of thing for years before Nutting took over… but we weren’t.
Similarly, I think it’s worth noting that the Pirates are currently the only MLB team that bothers to provide its Dominican signees with a formal education. They get four hours of classes a day, and last year, had thirteen players earn their high school degrees (link). That’s more than just the bare minimum, and it’s something we didn’t do until Nutting took over.
I don’t think he’s a saint, or anything like that, but a lot of things are being done very differently now than they were five years ago.
I think the way the Reds and Brewers do business in similar markets like the Pirates shows how far away they are from building a winner (although I do acknowledge neither of those have won a championship but again they have had winning seasons in the past few yrs)
If you go back and check, the Brewers actually built their team almost the same way that we’re trying to build ours. Their payroll was fairly low until they developed (through good scouting and drafting) a critical mass of young talent like Fielder, Braun, Weeks, and Gallardo, at which point they opened the wallet to fill in the holes.
We may or may not be doing a good job of executing that plan, but it’s the same strategy.
Ron Burkle and Mario. I believe Burkle saw this franchise as an undervalued asset when he offered to buy it in 2010. I believe he would have taken the franchise to where the Brewers operate and would make an effort to rid this sad ERA of losing baseball immediately.
The Pens’ ownership made virtually no capital investment in the team until they had acquired their core talent through the draft. If they followed a similar strategy with the Pirates (as seems likely), they would have done the same things that the current front office is doing.
Also he would have built his own television network combining the Pens and Pirates which would have helped this franchise considerably (yes I understand it would not be as lucrative as YES or NESN but it would put us in a better position that our ROOT deal is)
A fair point.
I will say the way the franchise is run it is the only way to go. Still whether the right people are being taken by the top decision makers is up to debate.
Very true.
Therefore its up to this ownership to show me that they are committed to building a championship ball club by going out and signing Cutch to a long term deal. They do that maybe I’ll start to have a different opinion of this ownership.
We’ll have to see how it shakes out. My current understanding is that Cutch is not yet willing to sign a long-term deal that would cover any of his free agent years (and who could blame him for that, as many losses as he’s seen?). If the team shows further signs of progress this year, maybe he’ll change his mind.
by Vlad on Feb 21, 2012 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Every thread is being overrun by these people now. I’m going to have to start banning if this continues. If you hate Bob Nutting, great, but please don’t turn every thread into a rant or a specious argument.
by Charlie Wilmoth on Feb 19, 2012 9:32 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
In all fairness, Charlie...
The theme of this particular thread is Bob Nutting, and his recent Q & A with Rob Rossi/The Trib. If there’s one thread the ranters should be able to rant on, it’s this one.
Personally, I don’t see what they’re getting so worked up about, before the entire team even reports to ST. I could see their angst, if this was Memorial Day, and the Pirates were 20-35, and battling the Astros for last place in the NLCD. But that’s hardly the case. We’re still 2 weeks from the first Grapefruit League game. I think we should all see what happens, before resorting to Chicken Little “The Sky is Falling!” diatribes.
But, if they want to rant about Bob Nutting, then stand there and take the heat from the BD regulars for their ranting, I say let them. As long as they contain themselves to threads about Bob Nutting, or to fanposts of their own creation, they should be free to speak their minds.
Anarchy isn’t a good thing. And the inmates can’t run the asylum, so to speak. But too much moderation can be equally as bad. If they’re not personally attacking posters, or swearing excessively, then merely having a different opinion hardly seems like a bannable offense, to me.
by Midnight Moose on Feb 20, 2012 1:08 AM EST up reply actions
There's a difference
…between a rant (which usually has some facts in it somewhere) and repeatedly saying “sale the team” and meaning it.
We all know that Nutting isn’t going to sell the Pirates -he has even been quoted as saying he plans on handing the team down to his children – and so that, I think, is part of the “specious argument” that Charlie is talking about.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 20, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions
You know Bob Nutting isn't selling.
And I know it. And Charlie knows it. I’d even go as far as saying that 95% of the BD posters know it.
But that doesn’t mean that some of more newer/irregular posters know it.
As far as I’m concerened, C42, we should educate those who are new to this forum. And part of that education process shouldn’t include browbeating, belittling, or threatening them with bannings.
If you look a few posts above this one, I think Pagliaroni did it quite well. He was respectful, and didn’t bring himself down to anyone else’s level. He asked real,pertinent , pointed questions, designed to make the “ranters” think, and do a little research, before they could respond.
And they chose to not respond, at all. (Of course Sweetleb didn’t really have a choice.)
And the point is, Pagliaroni’s post put a pretty effective end to the back-and-forth, at least on this thread.
And we can do what Pagliaroni, as well, my friend. I know it gets frustrating. It seems like no sooner do you get one to “see the light”, that another rube comes along spewing the same nonsense at the first one, all over again. Neverending.
But you can’t give in to your frustrations, and pull yourself down to their level. Just keep rising above, and educate them, one at a time.
by Midnight Moose on Feb 20, 2012 8:35 PM EST up reply actions
All well and good, sir,
but sweetleb, huntingteacher and JCBucs are not “new” here. Click on their profiles…
As Charlie says, there’s a difference. I will always give a noob the benefit of the doubt… or at least 90% of the time.
Frex, vlad and JRoth have gone at it hammer and tongs so many times that I don’t even know how to calculate it.
They offer opinions, facts, citations, etc. They do not blindly throw out asinine, indefensible comments.
I appreciate what you’re saying.
I also know that this is teh interwebs, and that’s how things go.
________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.
by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 20, 2012 9:14 PM EST up reply actions
Point taken.
If they refuse to learn, then all you say is “Screw ’em!” Education is a two-way street, I suppose. The pupil needs to be willing to be educated.
by Midnight Moose on Feb 20, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
Worst part of Nutting/Connelly’s argument is that “they won’t blame the market [size]” for their plight. That is either just plain stupid or just playing lock step/yes man with the economics of major league baseball. The Pirates will never be a championship team year in and year out like the Penguins or Steelers could be, they’ll be a small window here and there, luck will play into it as will competent GM’ing and increased dollars for free agents. Yes, you rarely get what you pay for with higher priced free agents, but you often get more than what you’d get otherwise. And in an age without a salary cap, WAR doesn’t matter. Oh well, go Bucs.

by 

















