Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Pedro Alvarez first in at-bats, Josh Harrison second in fWAR

As Tim Williams noted

As of the end of the 2011 season, only eight players from the entire 2008 draft class have produced a career 2.0 WAR or better, according to Baseball-Reference. That just shows that it’s too early to be expecting any team to have a player in the majors at this point, especially guys after the first round

Still, we keep expecting that our players will speed through the minors. Unlikely to happen. To make this a bit more concrete, here are the current outcomes for players drafted in the first ten rounds by NL Central teams. As the headline suggests, Pedro Alvarez has the most at-bats, and Josh Harrison (who was drafted by the Cubs) is second (to Brett Lawrie) in fWAR through 2011. Only 15 of the 67 draftees have had any playing time in the majors. There is also the interpretation question: Does ML playing time signal a good draft or a bad ML team? Based on fWAR, Milwaukee has had the best draft so far. Of course, with seven choices in the first three rounds, Milwaukee should have. Of course it's all due to Lawrie.

Here are the complete results

Round

#

Player

Position

School

IP/AB

fWAR

Level

Chicago

1

19

Andrew Cashner

RHP

Texas Christian

65

-0.2

MLB

1s

41

Ryan Flaherty

SS

Vanderbilt

0

NA

AAA

2

65

Aaron Shafer

RHP

Wichita State

0

NA

AA

3

97

Chris Carpenter

RHP

Kent State

9

-0.1

MLB

4

131

Matt Cerda

SS

HS

0

NA

A+

5

161

Justin Bristow

RHP

East Carolina

0

NA

A

6

191

Josh Harrison

2B

Cincinnati

195

0.9

MLB

7

221

Luis Flores

C

Oklahoma State

0

NA

AA

8

251

James Leverton

LHP

Texas Tech

0

NA

AA

9

281

Jay Jackson

RHP

Furman

0

NA

AAA

10

311

Alex Wilson

RHP

Texas A&M

0

NA

AAA

Cincinnati

1

7

Yonder Alonso

1B

Miami

117

0.5

MLB

3

84

Zach Stewart

RHP

Texas Tech

67

0.5

MLB

4

119

Tyler Cline

RHP

HS

0

NA

OOBB

5

149

Clayton Shunick

RHP

North Carolina State

0

NA

AA

6

179

Alex Buchholz

2B

Delaware

0

NA

A+

7

209

Pedro Villarreal

RHP

Howard JC

0

NA

AA

8

239

Cody Puckett

SS

Cal State

0

NA

AA

9

269

Dave Sappelt

OF

Coastal Carolina

118

0.3

MLB

10

299

Sean Conner

OF

Palm Beach CC

0

NA

OOBB

Houston

1

10

Jason Castro

C

Stanford

217

.2

MLB

1s

38

Jordan Lyles

RHP

HS

94

.3

MLB

2

56

Jay Austin

OF

HS

0

NA

A+

3

88

Chase Davidson

1B

HS

0

NA

A-

3s

109

Ross Seaton

RHP

HS

0

NA

AA

4

122

T.J. Steele

OF

Arizona

0

NA

AA

5

152

David Duncan

LHP

Georgia Tech

0

NA

OOBB

6

182

J.B. Shuck

OF

Ohio State

81

0.3

MLB

7

212

Jon Gaston

OF

Arizona

0

NA

AA

8

242

Brad Dydalewicz

LHP

HS

0

NA

A

9

272

Luis Cruz

LHP

HS

0

NA

A+

10

302

Jarred Holloway

LHP

JC

0

NA

OOBB

Milwaukee

1

16

Brett Lawrie

3B/C

HS

171

2.7

MLB

1s

32

Jake Odorizzi

RHP

HS

0

NA

AA

1s

35

Evan Frederickson

LHP

San Francisco

0

NA

A+

2

53

Seth Lintz

RHP

HS

0

NA

A

2

54

Cutter Dykstra

OF

HS

0

NA

A+

2

62

Cody Adams

RHP

Southern Illinois

0

NA

A

3

94

Logan Schafer

OF

Cal Poly

5

.1

MLB

4

128

Josh Romanski

LHP

San Diego

0

NA

AA

5

158

Maverick Lasker

RHP

HS

0

NA

A+

6

188

Jose Duran

SS

Texas A&M

0

NA

A

7

218

Trey Watten

RHP

Abilene Christian

0

NA

A+

8

248

Erik Komatsu

OF

Cal State Fullerton

0

NA

AA

9

278

Michael Bowman

RHP

VMI

0

NA

AA

10

308

Greg Miller

RHP

Seton Hall

0

NA

OOBB

Pittsburgh

1

2

Pedro Alvarez

3B

Vanderbilt

582

0.8

MLB

2

48

Tanner Scheppers

RHP

Fresno State

0

NA

AAA

3

79

Jordy Mercer

SS

Oklahoma State

0

NA

AAA

4

114

Chase d'Arnaud

SS

Pepperdine

143

-0.2

MLB

5

144

Justin Wilson

LHP

Fresno State

0

NA

AAA

6

174

Robbie Grossman

OF

HS

0

NA

A+

7

204

Benji Gonzalez

SS

HS

0

NA

A+

8

234

Jeremy Farrell

3B

Virginia

0

NA

AA

9

264

Matt Hague

3B

Oklahoma State

0

NA

AAA

10

294

Drew Gagnon

RHP

HS

0

NA

OOBB

St. Louis

1

13

Brett Wallace

1B

Arizona State

480

-0.3

MLB

1s

39

Lance Lynn

RHP

Mississippi

34

0.6

MLB

2

59

Shane Peterson

OF

Long Beach State

0

NA

AAA

3

91

Niko Vasquez

SS

HS

0

NA

AA

4

125

Scott Gorgen

RHP

UC Irvine

0

NA

AA

5

155

Jermaine Curtis

3B

UCLA

0

NA

AA

6

185

Eric Fornataro

RHP

CC

0

NA

A+

7

215

Anthony Ferrara

LHP

HS

0

NA

A

8

245

Ryan Kulik

LHP

Rowan

0

NA

AAA

9

275

Aaron Luna

OF

Rice

0

NA

AAA

10

305

Alex Castellanos

2B

Belmont Abbey

0

NA

AA

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Comment 41 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice article, Roberto

I thought the Pedro bashing had gone too far and was trying to think of a way to illustrate that it’s too early to judge this draft class; I think that comparing Pittsburgh directly to its divisional rivals is perfect.

by SuperBaes on Feb 5, 2012 11:04 PM EST reply actions  

I think that comparing Pittsburgh directly to its divisional rivals is perfect.

Comparing Pittsburgh to divisional rivals doesn’t account for draft position. The Pirates were picking in the #2 slot, compared to #7 for the Reds, #10 for the Astros, #13 for the Cardinals, #16 for the Brewers, and #19 for the Cubs. The gap in expected value between the #2 pick and the #19 pick is simply huge. Similarly, the comparison above doesn’t account for draft expenditure, where a cheap-ass team like Houston that won’t go above slot will have a lower expected return than a team that’s a little freer with the purse strings.

And of course, looking only at ML performance tilts the balance well against any team that went high-school heavy in their draft, since those players wouldn’t be expected to have made the majors by 2011. The Brewers, for example, accumulate no credit for Jake Odorizzi, even though he’s a top SP prospect.

by Vlad on Feb 6, 2012 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

But the point, I think

is to provide some sort of baseline understanding of what could be done. IOW, here’s a range of outcomes for teams that we’re all familiar with.

Also, since it includes where the players were drafted out of, there’s implicit information about strategy (e.g., Cinci and Chicago both avoided HS players almost completely) to round out the picture a bit.

by JRoth95 on Feb 6, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

fair point about draft position

But several of the other high-drafting teams don’t look much better than the Pirates. The Rays, drafting #1, haven’t had a single player made the majors; and though 3 of their top 5 picks were from high school, I don’t think any of them are top prospects unless you count Tim Beckham. I think they’d trade their 2008 draft for ours in a heartbeat, if only to get Robbie Grossman.

The Royals, drafting #3, made bank, with good ML performance from Hosmer so far, a couple top pitching prospects or former top pitching propsects in Lamb, Montgomery (supplemental), and Sample, and Giovatella also in the majors (where his performance has been somewhat d’Arnaudian, but I think his minor-league stats show more promise, plus he’s younger).

The Royals, drafting #4, had Matusz make the majors (BBRef actually likes him a little) and Kyle Hudson (meh). LJ Hoes and Bobby Bundy are still decent prospects, I guess. Wouldn’t really trade our draft for theirs, but then they’re the Orioles.

The Giants, drafting #5, have had four players in the majors, though the non-Posey ones haven’t played much there or produced much — and they were all college guys. Eric Surkamp is still a prospect I guess, Crawford and Gillaspie could produce though I wouldn’t lay money that they’ll outproduce Mercer and d’Arnaud.

The Marlins, drafting #6, went high-school heavy and have had one player hit the majors (second-rounder Brad Hand). I kind of don’t recognize any of the rest of the names, including first-rounder Kyle Skipworth.

So that’s two drafts I count as almost total whiffs, and only one that really looks to get much production past the first round. But this emphasizes how important it is to hit on your #1 pick. Especially if you’re trying to build through the draft, you need your Pedros to succeed.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

wait, Sample isn't a top prospect, I don't think

I was probably mixing him up with Tyler Skaggs. Some guys just sound like good prospects, don’t you know?

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

The Rays, drafting #1, haven’t had a single player made the majors; and though 3 of their top 5 picks were from high school, I don’t think any of them are top prospects unless you count Tim Beckham. I think they’d trade their 2008 draft for ours in a heartbeat, if only to get Robbie Grossman.

I haven’t given up on Beckham, but yeah, that’s pretty grim.

The Orioles, drafting #4, had Matusz make the majors (BBRef actually likes him a little) and Kyle Hudson (meh). LJ Hoes and Bobby Bundy are still decent prospects, I guess. Wouldn’t really trade our draft for theirs, but then they’re the Orioles.

The big name you missed there is Oliver Drake, who would’ve gone a lot higher than the 43rd round if he hadn’t been coming from the Naval Academy (and thus possibly tied up in a mandatory service requirement). Greg Miclat’s a decent MIF prospect: .371 OBP and a 50/3 SB/CS last year, mostly as a 23-year-old in AA. He was the final cut from my R5 preview. Xavier Avery hasn’t hit much, but he was known to be raw at the time of the draft, and scouts still like his tools. Ronnie Welty has decent tools and a little more performance than Avery. And I have a soft spot for Jason Gurka, who misses a lot of bats for a guy who doesn’t have much stuff (and who made Bryce Harper look stupid in one game last year).

The Giants, drafting #5, have had four players in the majors, though the non-Posey ones haven’t played much there or produced much — and they were all college guys. Eric Surkamp is still a prospect I guess, Crawford and Gillaspie could produce though I wouldn’t lay money that they’ll outproduce Mercer and d’Arnaud.

The Giants’ 2008 draft class also includes two other notable college arms: Scott Barnes, who got traded to the Indians, and Ryan Verdugo, who got dealt to the Royals.

The Marlins, drafting #6, went high-school heavy and have had one player hit the majors (second-rounder Brad Hand). I kind of don’t recognize any of the rest of the names, including first-rounder Kyle Skipworth.

Skipworth’s a catcher. Good raw power, but problems with the strike zone prevent him from making much use of it. In addition to Hand, the Marlins had Elih Villanueva make the majors – he’s a low-ceiling back-of-the-rotation SP type. Other than that, at this point their 2008 draft class is mostly RPs: Pete Andrelczyk, Dan Jennings, and Wade Korpi. Isaac Galloway has enough tools that he might make it as an OF if he learns the strike zone, which he probably won’t.

But this emphasizes how important it is to hit on your #1 pick.

Yes, exactly.

by Vlad on Feb 7, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

thanks for the comments/corrections

I was kind of trying to do the first ten rounds to be apples-to-apples with the post, but I also think I just didn’t scroll down far enough to see Villanueva. Also, I generally looked at some Sickels roundups for the teams in question, which meant I missed trade guys like Barnes and Verdugo.

There’s still hope for Beckham, but wouldn’t you say there’s a decent chance he gets outproduced by Mercer and/or d’Arnaud?

There’s obviously a fair amount of hometown bias here (also because I’ve heard of the Pirates’ “other” guys like Cunningham and Hague, and tend to dismiss “other” prospects for other teams as, well, “others”), but I still don’t think I’d trade the Pirates’ draft for the Orioles. What do you think? My sense is that at the moment these drafts break down pretty clearly into three tiers — KC/SF, Pit/Bal, and then TB/Fla with pretty big whiffs. Seem right to you?

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 7, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s still hope for Beckham, but wouldn’t you say there’s a decent chance he gets outproduced by Mercer and/or d’Arnaud?

It’s not impossible, but if you gave me my choice of any one of the three, it’d definitely be him.

My sense is that at the moment these drafts break down pretty clearly into three tiers — KC/SF, Pit/Bal, and then TB/Fla with pretty big whiffs. Seem right to you?

Broadly, yeah, I think that’s about right. You could make a case for four tiers, with us in the second and Baltimore in the third.

by Vlad on Feb 7, 2012 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

barnes

didnt the Giants trade him for Ryan Garko about the same time we got Alderson? That sucks!

by BurgherKing on Feb 7, 2012 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

He was in Korea last year.

Samsung Lions. Got released partway through the year, though.

Not sure whether he’s under contract anywhere for 2012 yet.

by Vlad on Feb 8, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Samsung eh?

You could say they “Amoled” him go…

rimshot

by white angus on Feb 8, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Perfect for ML stats as a comparison

Prospects, even now more than ever, are a massive asset for any team. But looking back on a draft as recent as 2008 can never be completely objective because all the principles haven’t played out their roles. In February 2012, the Brewers have a valuable piece in Odorizzi who may one day be their ace or be part of a package that brings them a superstar, but he hasn’t won a game in Milwaukee, yet. In that reasoning, they shouldn’t get credit for Lawrie’s 2.8 bWAR, but Marcum’s 3.3 bWAR because that’s what they turned Lawrie into.

As far as draft position and budget are concerned, they’re important for evaluating how teams are faring with the advantages/disadvantages they have (Zane Smith breaks down position better than I would have), but ultimately Pittsburgh’s competing against the rest of the NL Central. Tampa’s been amazing with what they’ve produced with their resources, but they still have to contend at the MLB level against New York, Boston, Toronto, and Baltimore.

by SuperBaes on Feb 6, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

nitpick

Odorizzi was part of the package for Greinke, so if you’re counting that way that’s how you count it. But that complicates things too much — part of the reason that the Pirates didn’t flip Pedro for Cliff Lee was that it would have been a completely insane thing to do given where the franchise was. But that shouldn’t affect our valuation of Justin Smoak — at least, the Pirates wouldn’t have got the value out of him that the Rangers did.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Two different sentences. I didn’t even think about Odorizzi being dealt; I was touching on him because Vlad said that the Brewers get no credit for him being a top SP prospect while making the case that Lawrie’s 2.8 bWAR didn’t count for anything in Milwaukee’s record.

by SuperBaes on Feb 7, 2012 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Great work.

Thanks for the extra effort.

Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?

http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained

by Kosstic518 on Feb 6, 2012 7:18 AM EST reply actions  

Well done.

Rec’d.

________________________________
Free your ass and your mind will follow.

by cocktailsfor2 on Feb 6, 2012 9:39 AM EST reply actions  

maybe?

He was pretty dominant in the minors for Texas and there was a lot of “He’s going to be the next closer or starter for the Rangers LOLPIrates” and then he got hurt. The Lone Star Ball guys are hoping he can make it in the pen.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

WHAT?

Tanner Scheppers has injury problems?!?!?! Who could possibly have seen that coming?

by KentuckyPirate on Feb 6, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Still would've loved to get him

But he really hasn’t dominated the minors.

Justin Wilson > Scheppers

by H2O on Feb 9, 2012 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

We won't mention that...

the Reds already used Alonso to get Mat Latos from the Padres…a pretty good pitcher.
Or that Cashner has already been used by the Cubs to get Rizzo from the Padres.
Or that the Brewers used Lawrie to get Marcum from the Blue Jays.
Or that Brett Wallace was used by the Cardinals to get Matt Holliday from the A’s.

Damned useful pieces, I’d say…and a lot more value than WAR gives them.

by Thunder on Feb 6, 2012 9:33 PM EST reply actions  

doesn't really seem relevant

If Huntington had drafted those guys, he wouldn’t have traded him for those players (nor should he have). We care about how good the players he could’ve drafted are, not who he could’ve traded them for.

Also, Alonso wasn’t even really the centerpiece of the Latos trade.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct me if I am wrong...

isn’t the idea for a team to get the best players possible, whether it be by draft or trade? If you can use a draftee to get you a better player for your team, isn’t that an intelligent use of resources?

by Thunder on Feb 6, 2012 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

think this over

Would it have been a good idea for the Pirates to have traded Pedro Alvarez and three minor leaguers for Cliff Lee in 2010? Why or why not?

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

If they thought they could keep Lee for a long time, the answer would be yes. Otherwise, no.

by Thunder on Feb 6, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

OK

Now, that takes out Holliday and probably Marcum as trade targets, because they’d be hard to keep; Latos cost two first-rounders, and Rizzo is as unproven as Pedro.

That’s why I think, when we’re evaluating NH’s draft decisions, we should consider the inherent value of the players rather than the value of the players we might’ve been able to trade them for, because right now, prospects and players early in their careers are more valuable to the Pirates than the Holidays, Lees, and even the Marcums of the world.

Also, the trade is a separate transaction than the draft. Suppose Yamaico Navarro turns out to be a good pickup — that doesn’t make Brooks Pounders a good draft pick, it means we were lucky to get Navarro for him.

Not actually affiliated with whygavs.

by WHYG Zane Smith on Feb 6, 2012 11:23 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think it's the same logic people use with Edwin Jackson

My effort to tie all current Bucs threads together!! It’s the answer to “Why has Edwin Jackson played on so many different teams?” His perceived value is there. I don’t think he’s the kind of guy to build a staff around and didn’t/don’t think it a good idea to sign him in Pittsburgh, but if he’d been acquired, part of the value of the contract would have to be considered whatever the Pirates would get for him in July.

Applying that to prospects: If Pittsburgh had somehow been able to acquire Montero last year, his value as a player was probably exceeded by his value as a trade piece. The Red Sox were always good at overhyping (and getting ridiculous value for) their prospects. While that may not be draft strategy, it’s certainly some measure of a GM’s ability.

by SuperBaes on Feb 7, 2012 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Look at who made those trades

and when they were made. The Brewers were in “must win absolutely freaking now!” mode because Prince was about to leave. They traded 6 years of Brett Lawrie for two of Shaun Marcum. In all likelihood, they are going to “lose” that trade in a really big way. However, it made sense given the state of the organization. When the Cards traded Wallace to Oakland, they were 1 game up in a hotly contested playoff race. They had to make a move to bring in a bat that could help right now. They made the deal because it made sense at the time. Even so, you could make a decent case that they gave up a lot just to get them an extra 2.6 WAR in 2009. The Reds are ALSO in win now mode (are you starting to see a pattern?) and dealt a good but incredibly blocked 1B prospect for a front line starting pitcher.

The only exception would be the Cubs. Chicago is not in “win now” mode but they also didn’t trade their prospect for an established big leaguer. The Cubs traded their prospect for a younger prospect. Trading Cashner for Rizzo was actually building for the future. It’s not entirely impossible for Cashner to produce more at the ML level this season than Rizzo does. Put another way, would you really be that excited if the Pirates had traded Pedro for Rizzo? Would you feel supremely confident that that trade would have made the Pirates better in 2012 and beyond?

How would it make sense for a team like the Pirates to trade their prospects for short-term ML players? Giving the trading teams credit for making deals for established big leaguers at this point unfairly rewards them (in an analysis like this one) for being closer to contending. Contending teams trade prospects and also-rans trade for prospects. That’s just how it has to work…

by KentuckyPirate on Feb 7, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

ahh yes you know the season is almost here

when the proverbail “we should have traded pedro when his value was high” comments start flying

" Lord Stanley, scratch their names on your fabled cup" Mike Lange june 12, 2009

by oldtimehockey09 on Feb 14, 2012 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd also suggest that Tim needs to do a little better research.

The second half of the quote saying it’s too early to expect teams to have a 2008 draftee in the majors.

There are only 4 teams that have NOT had a player from the 2008 draft in the majors yet. They are all in the American League. The Rays, Yankees, Twins and Mariners. And the Mariners have had 3 from the 2009 draft in the majors.

by Thunder on Feb 6, 2012 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

I may be misremembering things here, but wasn’t the statement that you can’t expect the high schoolers drafted in 2008 to be in the majors by now?

by pskell02 on Feb 6, 2012 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

If that's the case...

someone misquoted Tim at the top of this entry.

by Thunder on Feb 7, 2012 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Considering that the quote

referenced players’ WAR, I think it’s fair to infer that the quote was meant to suggest that it’s too early to expect a contributing ML player already from the 2008 draft. By setting the WAR standard to 2.0, it eliminates players who have only had a cup of coffee in the bigs or guys who have, to this point, been unproductive. In fact, in the article linked, Tim essentially says as much in the same paragraph a the quote above. Immediately before that he writes:

The assumption is that the Pirates should have at least one player from the 2008 draft performing at the major league level by now, if not more. But that assumption isn’t correct.

This shows that instead of merely having a guy put on a big league uniform at some point he is talking about guys who have actually performed for the ML club. As amended, the quote would read something like this:

As of the end of the 2011 season, only eight players from the entire 2008 draft class have produced a career 2.0 WAR or better, according to Baseball-Reference. That just shows that it’s too early to be expecting any team to have a player performing in the majors at this point, especially guys after the first round

by KentuckyPirate on Feb 7, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

What he said…and what he should have said…are two different things entirely.

by Thunder on Feb 7, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mlb_photo_1367_small
Fixing the Pirate offense: Plate Discipline

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who'd of "Plunked" it? Shades of Jason Kendall
Small
Runs . . . Any way you can get them
Pirates_1908_small
gamethread vs cubs 5/26/12
Smiling_small
A little background on the offense
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 47: Cubs @ Pirates
Insetcommodoreperry_small
Guess the Score Game 46: Cubs @ Pirates
Small
A cheerful look at our offseason additions
Small
Pedro's Defensive Contributions
A_red_spider_web_on_a_black_background_0071-0911-1622-1329_smu_small
A couple guys that could help the Buccos offense
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
The Pirates Pitchers Have Adopted Their Own Sign: The FU!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Authors

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas