Poll: If you could, what is the lowest acceptable performance you would "Lock" Pedro in to?

Login
Sign Up
Google+

Bucs Dugout, a Pittsburgh Pirates community

FanPost

PRESENTED BY

Poll: If you could, what is the lowest acceptable performance you would "Lock" Pedro in to?

By Justin Mos on Jun 29 2012, 10:18p 9

So, it's not quite halfway into the season and we've seen good Pedro, bad Pedro, etc. Pedro, and etc. etc. pedro. Needless to say to anyone who has been following the team, but his highs and lows have both been of great magnitudes. My question to all the Pirates faithful here, is that if you could in theory "lock in" Pedro's end of year numbers for BOTH THIS YEAR AND NEXT YEAR, would you, and if yes what would be the minimum triple slash that you would accept for him? I'll let arguments begin in the comments, but just to let you know the poll numbers I chose were arbitrarily chosen by me for no reason other the fact I like them for the purpose of this excercise. If you would accept something even lower than the first option, mention it in the comments as well.

Poll

Which is these triple slashes is the MINIMUM it would take to for you to say, "I'd lock in Pedro's numbers for this year and next at this level"?

1% .220/.290/.410 (Just don't give me super bad Pedro) (2 votes)
12% .225/.295/.470 (His season up to this point in the aggregate, maybe with more consistency though) (19 votes)
44% .240/.310/.490 (A power heavy guy who at least gets on base at an over .300 clip is enough for me) (68 votes)
28% .250/.330/.510 (It'd take a borderline top 10 3rd base bat at least to get me to lock him in) (43 votes)
13% Better than that (I believe before the end of next year Pedro will be better than all of those choices) (20 votes)

152 votes total

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Tweet Share 9 Comments