| Sign Up | Google+

Fanposts

PRESENTED BY
PRESENTED BY

Dickerson and Matt Curry as "fringy" prospects?

In response to my query yesterday, Brian Cartwright described Alex Dickerson and Matt Curry as "fringy" prospects. (He was suggesting that their chances to be starters in the show were not great.) I thought that was an interesting observation given some of the attention paid to them recently. I thought it would be fun to look at their performances thus far in comparison to young players who have had some success in the majors. I used minor league statistics through AA for comparison, as neither Dickerson nor Curry have played above that level.

OBP

ISO

Paul Goldschmidt

0.407

0.303

Ike Davis

0.370

0.195

Matt Curry

0.381

0.193

Matt Rizzo

0.355

0.189

Alex Dickerson

0.369

0.167

Paul Goldschmidt seems to have played at another level, which seems consistent with some of his major league numbers. (Visalia is a launching pad, so his stats are probably inflated a bit.) My take on these numbers is a bit more optimistic than Brian's, but they certainly do not give cause to say he was wrong.

I've seen Dickerson play and think his bat has to carry him. Who can add something about Curry? Who else should be in the comparison?

I've seen Dickerson play and agree

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 9 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5351_tracker