Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin And How The Pac-12 Missed Him

Community Projection Review: Joe Randa (and Freddy Sanchez)

With the Pirates' season out of the way, let's review our community projections from before the season.

Here's what we predicted for Joe Randa, the starting third baseman.

Community .275/.325/.399
ZiPS .277/.332/.440
Actual .267/.316/.388
We pretty much nailed this one. The closest prognosticator (by OBP and slugging) was an "Anonymous Hero," who guessed that Randa would hit .254/.313/.386. Bolton also got really close, guessing .265/.320/.395.

No one was really very far off, though, which begs the question - if every single one of us saw this coming, and if Randa's performance this year was bad enough to get him banished to the bench, then what in the world were the Pirates thinking?

Okay, that's not entirely fair. For one thing, nobody saw Freddy Sanchez coming. True, tons of Pirates fans expressed doubts about the signing of Randa, but for the most part, the basis of our objections was that Sanchez was pretty likely to be at least as good as Randa, not that Sanchez was manifestly better, much less NL-batting-champion better. When Randa was signed, I wrote:

My first thought is to wonder what this accomplishes in the grand scheme of things. This money would be better spent elsewhere, on scouting and development, or on the Bucs' 2007 budget. Randa is at best a marginal improvement, and he's a short-term improvement to boot...

Sanchez will be 28 next year. It could go either way, but I'd bet on him outperforming Randa in 2006. In my mind, that makes Randa unnecessary, at least as a starting third baseman.

Of course, Randa did turn out to be unnecessary, but the reason why was that Sanchez turned in one mother of a career year, playing great defense (he would have ranked fourth among all MLB third basemen in zone rating if he'd had enough playing time there to qualify), spraying doubles all over the place, and showing a remarkable ability to adjust and get hits on pitches most batters couldn't even touch.

Assuming Sanchez is still with the Pirates in spring training (a fairly safe assumption, I think), it'll be interesting to see the responses in his 2007 Community Projection here. As much as we all love Freddy, he did just have a fluky year - obviously, it'll be tough for him to hit .343 two years in a row - and he'll almost certainly come back to earth somewhat.

Still, Sanchez should hit more than enough next year to continue to be an asset, especially if he's playing second, and I'll continue to enjoy watching him. He plays with a lot of passion. Sanchez was only one of a handful of players who made the 2006 Bucs worth watching.  

As for Randa, this may have been his last year. If he hadn't agreed to take $4 million to play for the Bucs this year, I'd almost feel sorry for him. He still isn't a terrible player, and he could help a contending club in the right situation - for example, Geoff Blum, a vastly inferior player, will be a starter for the Padres in the playoffs. Randa's greatest sin was having a terrible April - he posted a .589 OPS. Even that might have gone mostly unnoticed if fellow free agent money-barbecue Jeromy Burnitz hadn't burned the Pirates, too. Randa missed most of May and June. When he came back, Sanchez had taken his job, but Randa was a perfectly good role player the rest of the year. Happy trails, Joe.

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Randa
Last offseason, I hated the signing of both Randa and Burnitz. I thought they were both superfluous and that the money should have been put into scouting and development ... just as it should have been for so many schmoes they've signed over the years (Raul Mondesi and Derek Bell being probably the two most notable examples).

Having said all that, I've always liked Joe Randa and rued the day Cam Bonifay let him slip through the expansion draft following the '97 season. Sure, he wasn't necessarily the prototypical third baseman, but he was better than Doug Strange, for cryin' out loud, or anybody else they had until Aramis Ramirez. But that's another story. Not to say that history would have been re-written, but I've always wondered what might've been had they kept The Joker.  Solid player and all-around good guy.  Happy Trails, Joe.

by bern1 on Oct 2, 2006 10:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Burnitz, too
Look, if somebody offers me 8 to 10 times my market value to do my job, I'm not turning it down on principle.  With the exception of one overblown incident, Burnitz did his job to the best of his ability and by all accounts was not a disruptive clubhouse influence, maybe even a positve.  Blaming him for sucking is, at this point in his career, like blaming a rattlensnake for being poisonous.  If you get bit, it's your fault.

by KPatrick on Oct 2, 2006 5:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Pittsburgh Pirates.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Meet & Greet with Joel Hanrahan
Smiling_small
Pedro Alvarez first in at-bats, Josh Harrison second in fWAR
Small
BD Community Top 30 Prospects
Small
Community Prospect #30

Recent FanPosts

Olz8s2gvbdn15zpl08hlumbr_500_small
Kevin Goldstein's Top 101 Prospects (Taking ?'s on Twitter Now)
Smiling_small
Did you know that Bryan Bullington was an All-Start last year?
Small
Point System Rankings
Towell_small
Color me skeptical, the sad story of Oswalt, Burnett and GFJ
Olz8s2gvbdn15zpl08hlumbr_500_small
Keith Law's Top 100 Prospects
Small
Best and Worst Free-Agent Signings In the Infield
Smiling_small
A look at some guys who didn't sign last year.
Small
Hopes for pitching

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Charlie_small Charlie Wilmoth

Editors

18470r_small Vlad

Authors

Davidtodd_small David Todd

Img_1692_small WTM

Mark_profile_pic_small MarkInDallas