Freel and Cota, Take 2
Why wasn't Freel's catch of Humberto Cota's long drive one of ESPN's Web gems? Because Freel didn't catch it.
With evidence mounting, Norris Hopper confessed that he put the baseball in Freel's glove after they collided and Freel was knocked out and taken to a hospital."
Not sure exactly how I feel about this. On the one hand, I'm of the school of thought where it's not cheating in baseball if you aren't caught, and the play does have a nostalgic 1890s vibe to it. On the other hand, it's not like Cota has a lot of hits to spare, and you have to wonder what Freel thinks about the whole thing, where his teammate's initial concern was over the hit rather than the collision.This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of the managing editor (Charlie) or SB Nation. FanPosts are written by Bucs Dugout readers.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Caught?
But then I thought, how different is it from an OF that short hops or traps a ball, like Bay did last night? He half-heartedly tried to sell it as a catch, but it was correctly, ultimately ruled no catch. But you see that sort of stuff all the time. That one was blatant, others aren't. How obliged is a player to admit he didn't catch it? Not at all I think. Often on a diving play, the player may not even be sure if they did catch it in the air.
Still, Hopper's actions were more... willful. He took advantage of the umpire not being in a position to view the ball, where a trap is generally in full view of an umpire to begin with. I find it hard to just wink and nod at what Hopper did.
cheating
But not everywhere. Tennis players have been known to give back points when they no a linesman's call was wrong in their favor. Put me down on that side.
I'm a Homer (not a Simpson's reference)
If it is done by the other team and robs my guy of a hit, I say it is wrong and I feel cheated.
Basically it is like the outfielder pulling a pre-hidden ball out of outfield ivy in Wrigly field. It's just baseball!

by 













